|
Mister Chief posted:There have been three Punisher movies which all bombed. They're not going to make another one for a long while. As for Spawn, I doubt you will ever see another Spawn movie with any sort of real money behind it. That IP is just too 90s I think. People always say that, but we can't be stuck in this stupid '80s time warp forever (at least I sincerely hope not), they're gonna have to start ripping off the '90s eventually if they wanna keep up the trend of total creative stagnation. I hope it's soon because it can't be worse than the '80s, I hate the loving '80s. e: not that I like Spawn or anything, it's just inevitable. Lizard Combatant fucked around with this message at 01:35 on Jan 28, 2012 |
# ? Jan 28, 2012 01:33 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 09:25 |
|
I always thought Henry Rollins should have been cast as the Punisher. He's too old now though. Anyway, Spawn is only a "Will Smith is interested" away from getting greenlit. Spawn is horrible by the way and any film would be horrible. I'm just saying.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 01:41 |
|
NINbuntu 64 posted:Seeing as this is another origin movie, from what I've heard? It isn't in any way. You must've heard wrong. The film is supposed to involve Peter's parents in some way, and they were barely mentioned in the Raimi films.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 01:42 |
|
kiimo posted:I always thought Henry Rollins should have been cast as the Punisher. He's too old now though. Jesus, that would've been perfect. What the hell, '90s Hollywood.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 01:57 |
|
Prof. Spaceman posted:Jesus, that would've been perfect. What the hell, '90s Hollywood. And just imagine a Cape Fear-era DeNiro as Wolverine...
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 02:02 |
|
Dillbag posted:And just imagine a Cape Fear-era DeNiro as Wolverine...
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 02:44 |
|
Codependent Poster posted:You must've heard wrong. The film is supposed to involve Peter's parents in some way, and they were barely mentioned in the Raimi films. Don't Peter's parents have some ridiculously convoluted backstory in the comics or was that just the Green Goblin messing with Spidey?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 02:47 |
|
Got this in today, the artwork is ok, nothing terrible or good although it looks like Ewans left eye is about to pop out. I had never heard of it before so I decided to look it up and found this poster that just messes with my head. Then I found this awful poster which looks like the cover to a trashy romance novel.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 03:00 |
|
Irish Joe posted:Don't Peter's parents have some ridiculously convoluted backstory in the comics or was that just the Green Goblin messing with Spidey? Yeah, it's something ridiculous that Stan Lee wrote. They were CIA agents that were killed by the Red Skull while they were on a secret mission to Algeria, leaving Peter to be raised by Uncle Ben and Aunt May from a very young age.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 03:40 |
|
Slasherfan posted:Got this in today, the artwork is ok, nothing terrible or good although it looks like Ewans left eye is about to pop out. "A chef and a scientist fall in love as an epidemic begins to rob people of their sensory perceptions." I kinda get this with the composition of the second poster but none of the others.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 03:46 |
|
Jedit posted:In case you didn't know, Sin City is a comic book and the whole movie was designed to look like it was a comic. For it to use Comic Sans in boxouts is not only acceptable, it's the best possible representation of the movie. I don't think Comic Sans looks very good as a proper comic book font. I mean, I don't wanna sound spergy but the original Sin City font isn't that bolded and ugly. Comic Sans just automatically makes me think about googly eyes and ms paint colors.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 04:21 |
|
Dillbag posted:And just imagine a Cape Fear-era DeNiro as Wolverine... Man, even though it's chronologically impossible, in the X-Men movie that exists in my head Charles Bronson plays Wolverine. While I was watching the new ones I kept thinking... well, I kept thinking holy poo poo this movie is awful through the third one, but I also kept thinking "man, Hugh Jackman's good, but can't we get a time machine and steal Charles Bronson from the 70's?"
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 04:48 |
|
Cacator posted:Well not quite, it's been 10 years since the first Spider-man movie, gently caress me, where's the time gone.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 09:43 |
kiimo posted:Here's what it is, when you stop making profitable and quality sequels you reboot. That's the new blueprint. X-Men hasn't had a reboot. First Class contradicts a couple of things from the other films, but it's pretty obvious it's meant to be in the same series, right down to Jackman as Wolverine and Stamos as Mystique. And they're talking about doing X-Men 4, which will hopefully ignore X3.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 10:16 |
|
Wolverine was a reboot of sorts and first class was a reboot since Wolverine disappointed. I mean I liked it. But yeah X Men 3 (read: Brett Ratner) caused that. I didn't see X Men 3 and I didn't see Spiderman 3 which I felt was in my best interest. I saw Superman Returns but I guess he didn't Superman Return. I have this amazing plan I just made up to reboot Crow. It stars Adam Levine as the Crow and Christina Aguilera plays herself as the villain. They both do Joy Division covers involving dubstep. Katie Perry plays an extra terrestrial with a heart of gold but Russel Brand's part ends up on the cutting room floor based on focus group approval rating of 13%. Somebody kill me I'm through the looking glass.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 12:09 |
|
I looked at your concept and I think it can be slightly improved. Adam Lambert is the Crow. He is killed in the middle of being absolutely fabulous, and is empowered with the powers of being the Crow, whatever that means, so he's undead and has the power to rock or something. His mentor is Lou Reed, but Adam Lambert rejects that, because Lou Reed is way too dreary and sees everything in black and white. Lambert thinks undeath needs more colour and being gorgeous. Lou Reed sulks away and Lambert finds a better mentor, Rupaul, who teaches him the powers of Charm, Uniqueness, Nerve and Talent. Lady Gaga and Katy Perry are Lambert's rivals, and they act as recurring feuding partners with Lambert in making the world absolutely fantastic and amazing and delightful in their own special ways. Everyone is always much happier when the three of them appear together. The second act has them joining forces to defeat something terrible and poo poo, like I dunno Creed or Nickelback. Gaga and Perry are respectively nearly killed by the assistant of a mysterious villain (the assistant being a zombified Johnny Cash), but are afflicted with some dumbass dark disease so Lambert must confront the dull villain to save them. Rupaul reveals a whole new power to Lambert which he harnesses to fly across a rainbow stream to another part of the undead world. He ends up in a cemetry. Holy poo poo, Lou Reed is the mastermind after all! Lou Reed reveals he was trying to groom Lambert to be the harbinger of doom and gloom and make the world darker etc etc etc and too bad Lambert was too darling to be into that kind of poo poo. Lambert is like, "bitch, please" and with a flick of his little finger destroys Lou Reed's negativity and dresses him up in an Alexander McQueen and some beautiful Jimmy Choos. Lou Reed cries and learns to move on from being so boring. The movie ends with a gigantic Glee party with Lambert singing alongside Gaga, Perry, and Henry Rollins too, because why not. The Saddest Rhino fucked around with this message at 12:51 on Jan 28, 2012 |
# ? Jan 28, 2012 12:44 |
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:I looked at your concept and I think it can be slightly improved. Even as a joke this is such an offensively bad idea for a movie in every single way that it hurts my head to imagine it existing.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 13:45 |
|
Ez posted:Oooh ya got me. Except I wasn't talking about sperging in this thread, I was speaking about goons in general. Typography is hugey, hugely important. It's an art. A lot of 'goons' have taken to recognising one or two standard fonts and ranting about them, much in the same way that many of them in CD cling to the "praaaaaactical effeeects" bandwagon because it's the fast-track way to looking like a Film Connoisseur. However, rather that than the other instance on here were someone was raging "why does it even matter" that Papyrus was on the Avatar poster, and that it wasn't important. This why we have such terrible posters now, because execs know that people will swallow any old poo poo and that the details don't matter. It was mind blowing to see someone post 'lol u care about something' when discussing art - albeit commercial art. Desperado Bones posted:But then we have this: I like this. Immediately evocative of the TV movie, and actually quite chilling. I really like Radcliffe and I'm excited to see him in this. The posters showing him beardy and sleep-deprived is a GREAT way to break him out of Potterdom. echoplex fucked around with this message at 14:20 on Jan 28, 2012 |
# ? Jan 28, 2012 13:56 |
|
scary ghost dog posted:Even as a joke this is such an offensively bad idea for a movie in every single way that it hurts my head to imagine it existing. Soundtrack by 'Loutellica'.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 14:04 |
|
echoplex posted:Typography is hugey, hugely important. It's an art. A lot of 'goons' have taken to recognising one or two standard fonts and ranting about them, much in the same way that many of them in CD cling to the "praaaaaactical effeeects" bandwagon because it's the fast-track way to looking like a Film Connoisseur.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 19:14 |
|
bobkatt013 posted:Also showing his dick on stage Forgot about that. Also I just watched the trailer and it looks really naff, so balls to it all.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 19:18 |
|
echoplex posted:Forgot about that. Also I just watched the trailer and it looks really naff, so balls to it all. Naff? Please translate yourself, Englishman.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 19:21 |
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:Naff? Please translate yourself, Englishman. I figure this is the best place to ask; I've been toying with the idea of sprucing up this house here with some of my favourite movie posters. The best resource appears to be http://www.allposters.co.uk/ I am curious to know whether anyone has bought anything from this website before and if you have, is the quality actual poster quality or something not worth a tenner? The Saddest Rhino posted:Adam Lambert as Crow
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 19:39 |
|
Having actually worked for Todd McFarlane in recent years, at his offices in Phoenix, I can assure you he is still trying to get a Spawn movie going again, admist his other projects. I can also tell you that Todd is cool as poo poo and I can't knock on him for living every kid's dream. I mean, toys, comics, videogames, baseball... he really is a kinda inspirational figure even if you don't like the majority of his work.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2012 19:48 |
|
iTrust posted:It means bad. If you've got money to burn then you could pick up some screen printed posters. Check out [url=http://www.reelizer.com/]this site[url] and see if there is anything you like.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 01:20 |
|
Oh man, I miss being near a good poster shop. There was a an amazing place in Toronto I would go to all the time. They had tons of rare stuff, good prices on it too. Back when I was supervising an animation studio there, me and a few others went to that shop and loaded up on classic posters to decorate our offices. I think my favourite was this Temple of Doom variant poster:
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 02:44 |
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Oh man, I miss being near a good poster shop. There was a an amazing place in Toronto I would go to all the time. They had tons of rare stuff, good prices on it too. Back when I was supervising an animation studio there, me and a few others went to that shop and loaded up on classic posters to decorate our offices. There is nothing wrong with this poster. Every constituent just says "Guys, we're gonna have an adventure."
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 02:57 |
|
Nilbop posted:There is nothing wrong with this poster. Every constituent just says
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 05:00 |
|
fenix down posted:If he didn't have the machete, it could be the start of a very romantic interlude. You're just dating the wrong women and/or men.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 05:10 |
|
westborn posted:This poster literally made me hate Jack Black for ever and ever. I saw it, and I was like "I will never enjoy any movie this man has been in or will ever be in." I'm not even exaggerating. Before that poster, I had no opinion. Everything about it just makes me so mad.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 05:46 |
|
Rubber Slug posted:This poster literally made me hate Jack Black for ever and ever. I saw it, and I was like "I will never enjoy any movie this man has been in or will ever be in." I'm not even exaggerating. Before that poster, I had no opinion. Everything about it just makes me so mad. Why Jack Black? He didn't make the damned thing.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 05:54 |
|
Rubber Slug posted:This poster literally made me hate Jack Black for ever and ever. I saw it, and I was like "I will never enjoy any movie this man has been in or will ever be in." I'm not even exaggerating. Before that poster, I had no opinion. Everything about it just makes me so mad. Then you must have missed out on the new Muppet movie, and this makes me sad for you.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 06:12 |
|
Nate Breakman posted:Why Jack Black? He didn't make the damned thing. I know he didn't, it's just that I'll think of that poster whenever I see/hear him, which in turn makes me think of terrible comedies, which makes me unable to enjoy whatever he's in. :/
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 06:18 |
|
Jack Black is one of those guys who can either be surprisingly great or just intolerable depending on the material. Loved him in some things, hated his guts in others. Maybe I'm bipolar for him or something.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 06:20 |
|
Rubber Slug posted:I know he didn't, it's just that I'll think of that poster whenever I see/hear him, which in turn makes me think of terrible comedies, which makes me unable to enjoy whatever he's in. :/ He is very good in High Fidelity.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 06:53 |
|
He's very good with the right script (High Fidelity, School of Rock, Orange County) but horrible in too many things. He seems to mostly be after easy paycheques these days what with all the animated work he's done.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 07:12 |
|
kiimo posted:I always thought Henry Rollins should have been cast as the Punisher. He's too old now though.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 09:48 |
|
Jack Black is great in The Muppets and the Kung Fu Panda movies and that Community episode and all sorts of things. Jack Blacklash is the worst thing, he's a treasure.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 10:32 |
|
Mister Chief posted:There have been three Punisher movies which all bombed. They're not going to make another one for a long while. As for Spawn, I doubt you will ever see another Spawn movie with any sort of real money behind it. That IP is just too 90s I think.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 10:45 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 09:25 |
FlamingLiberal posted:Disney/Marvel bought the Punisher license back recently from whatever studio had the rights. Supposedly they're considering making a TV series or miniseries or something out of it, rather than another movie. The rumor is TV Series on FOX, and the idea sounds loving awful. Imagine Dexter, but with a skull t-shirt.
|
|
# ? Jan 29, 2012 11:03 |