|
A5H posted:Nokia are bringing out a phone with a 41 megapixel camera. Lmao. It's an interesting idea, either having legit digital zoom without much loss or lots of pixel binning to downsize to a low noise 5 mp image. Too bad it's in a symbian phone, if it was wp7 or android it would get a lot more attention.
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2012 16:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 02:14 |
|
|
Shmoogy posted:Too bad it's in a symbian phone, if it was wp7 or android it would get a lot more attention. Agreed. Only a matter of time, though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2012 16:52
|
|
|
Seeing as historical colour photography has come up I think it's worth posting these again: http://www.shorpy.com/image/tid/179 Amazing large format Kodachrome images from the second world war.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2012 17:03
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:This picture is incredible  http://www.flickr.com/photos/56090579@N02/5514675020/ "Bitches, please  "
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2012 17:06
|
|
|
Anybody used piRAWnha, or similar RAW editors for iPad? Is there a favorite out there?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2012 17:27
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:Anybody used piRAWnha, or similar RAW editors for iPad? Is there a favorite out there? I tried one or two of them, not sure of the names, but I didn't really find them to be all that useful. The only one I found to be moderately useful was photosmith. It lets me unload my memory card onto ipad and tag photos for lightroom. It can then wifi sync everything back to my laptop when I'm at home, tags included. It's fairly slow and has a few problems, but they have been teasing the 2.0 version for a while so I hope it lives up to expectations. e: To clarify, no editing on it, just tagging with stars/colors/marking for deletion. I didn't find the editors to be all that awesome.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2012 17:31
|
|
|
East Lake posted:On the flip side here's some of the most insane footage I've ever seen in Syria. Are there more videos like these anywhere? This is the most intense and horrifying thing I've ever seen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2012 08:43
|
|
|
I'd be concerned about editing RAWs on a screen I can't calibrate but that's me. Unless the iPad is way ahead of where I think it is.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2012 10:38
|
|
|
XTimmy posted:I'd be concerned about editing RAWs on a screen I can't calibrate but that's me. Unless the iPad is way ahead of where I think it is.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2012 11:30
|
|
|
Ginormous images from Salto Ángel in Venezuela: http://www.airpano.ru/files/Angel-Waterfall-Venezuela/start_e.html
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2012 12:17
|
|
|
a collection of new york times photographs that didn't make the cut. they made a tumblr out of them. http://livelymorgue.tumblr.com/ Here's more info: http://livelymorgue.tumblr.com/about this is why print journalism will always beat the web log/whatever newfangled approach. the sheer history and archives.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2012 16:57
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:This picture is incredible I sort of see a lot in this photo. I'm on a loving iPhone so verbosity is impossible but she really looks like she knows her place in history. Like for example, when Kennedy dies, I'm sure she told everyone to freeze. "remember what you're doing gents, make it sound good. Somebody might want to write an oral history about this." She probably died in the war, I just think she had her poo poo together. This is what a time traveller would look like. Not the guy in a Chaplin film with a mobile phone or the chick with a satnav on a horse in a renaissance painting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2012 06:46
|
|
|
ShadeofBlue posted:Why stop at f0.4? Just take your lens off and take pictures open body. What's the F# on that? Edit : oops just realized I was replying to something a few pages ago.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2012 16:48
|
|
|
ease posted:Just take your lens off and take pictures open body. What's the F# on that? I think that would be like trying to look at something without having any eyes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2012 17:26
|
|
|
RangerScum posted:I think that would be like trying to look at something without having any eyes. Or rather, eyes that see everything all the time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2012 17:37
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Or rather, eyes that see everything all the time. Man I really feel like doing some drugs right now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2012 18:35
|
|
|
A true hipster, spotted in the wild by my gf. Read the underlined text. Who admits these things?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 02:29
|
|
|
someone who carries THREE moleskins
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 02:52
|
|
|
This is why i can't get a lynx for a reaonable price around these parts 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 02:52
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:someone who carries THREE moleskins Moleskine means you're sophisticated and deep, so clearly he's triple sophisticated, duh.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 03:17
|
|
|
Martytoof posted:Moleskine means you're sophisticated and deep, so clearly he's triple sophisticated, duh. 3xMoleskine+1xMac=She's super creative. And in case you don't believe it, the "vintage" camera solidifies it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 03:44
|
|
|
As someone with two (2) Moleskines and two (2) vintage cameras on my desk RIGHT NOW in addition to a Mac, I have to agree. I am a very creative person. Look at my things, they prove it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 03:50
|
|
|
Moleskines are also used heavily by physicists (and probably scientists from all walks) so it could also mean you are a gigantic nerd.  fakeedit - they also use macs
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 03:52
|
|
|
Martytoof posted:As someone with two (2) Moleskines and two (2) vintage cameras on my desk RIGHT NOW in addition to a Mac, I have to agree. I am a very creative person. Look at my things, they prove it. But if you actually use them I'm going to have to dock points, sorry. Thems the rules.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 03:52
|
|
|
It really grinds my gears when people rebuttal my critique. Him: Hey guys give me critique on this photo. Me: Right side looks fantastic, lots of detail, left side looks far too blown out, needs more detail. Him: jokes on you i did that on purpose. The blown out part is suppose to be the sun, so it makes sense. Me:  If it needs an explanation as to "why it looks good", maybe it's not?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 04:07
|
|
|
PREYING MANTITS posted:But if you actually use them I'm going to have to dock points, sorry. Thems the rules. Yea they're just for show. Bonus bonus points if you got them pre-worn/used. Disclaimer: I have 2 moleskines and a few vintage cameras. I guess that makes me a hypocrite. Then again, I use them all. Cyberbob posted:It really grinds my gears when people rebuttal my critique. Were they perhaps looking for a Flickr-type critique? That would explain that. bobmarleysghost fucked around with this message at 04:11 on Mar 1, 2012 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 04:09
|
|
|
It was on the Fstoppers Facebook group, so I kinda expected slightly higher standards of people than your average Flickr group.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 04:20
|
|
|
Moleskines suck. That is all.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 12:40
|
|
|
Is Picassa any good? I haven't used it for a long time (I have LR) - but the family PC has a lot of photos on it and they need organising. Editing will be crop and resizing for email only. should be extremely user-friendly for unkilled users.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 12:47
|
|
|
Mathturbator posted:Moleskines suck. That is all. they definitely jumped the shark with the star wars and lego themed ones.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 12:51
|
|
|
spog posted:Is Picassa any good? The google viewer that comes with it is also excellent.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 13:00
|
|
|
Cyberbob posted:If it needs an explanation as to "why it looks good", maybe it's not? Yup, pretty much. In a print competition, images need to stand on their own. Nobody's there to tell the judges why something is the way it is, or to give the backstory behind the shot. The picture is supposed to do that by itself... that's the challenge. If one side of a picture is intentionally blown out, it's the job of the artist to build up enough context in the rest of the image to make it obvious WHY to the viewer. Just saying "It's supposed to be that way" doesn't give anyone a free pass.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 15:28
|
|
|
Cyberbob posted:It really grinds my gears when people rebuttal my critique. I think you need to link the shot here so we can ALL give the person a hard time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 18:28
|
|
|
Mathturbator posted:Moleskines suck. That is all. My god, it's a notebook. Do you really waste so much energy on having such crazy opinions on notebooks?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 19:12
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:My god, it's a notebook. Do you really waste so much energy on having such crazy opinions on notebooks? With regards to waste of energy, your reply was roughly four times the character count of mine. You decide.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 20:25
|
|
|
I have some moleskins I stole from work. Makes them even better imo. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 20:26
|
|
|
Cyberbob posted:It really grinds my gears when people rebuttal my critique. Look Cyberbob, I'm sorry you just don't get my photography. I'll have you know this selective colour holga print won several Flickr awards and is prominently featured on a number of flickr galleries. So clearly you just don't know what you're talking about.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 20:42
|
|
|
Martytoof posted:Look Cyberbob, I'm sorry you just don't get my photography. Were they glittery gif flickr awards, because anything else does not count.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 20:44
|
|
|
Mathturbator posted:With regards to waste of energy, your reply was roughly four times the character count of mine. You decide. I had anger to burn. It was a net gain for me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 20:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 02:14 |
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:I had anger to burn. It was a net gain for me. Glad I could help 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2012 20:50
|
|