|
I haven't seen this movie in 48fps but I've seen plenty of stuff at or above that speed. It's perfectly great for documenting things but the first thing that will pop out at you while watching anything at that speed is that it "feels" like a home video. Normal films move at 24 frames per second which blurs movement just a bit and gives movies a certain something that you don't get when you're shoving more frames in.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2012 01:35 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 20:21 |
|
More FPS in tv/movies gives them this very unsettlingly real look. It's hard to describe it but once you see it it's very obvious. It kind of looks too crisp and clear, and when you're watching something that is at its core fake, that can be a bad thing. I don't know. I'll see it eventually, but that seems like a strange decision.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2012 01:48 |
|
In a way it's kind of brilliant because now I kind of want to see it just to see how weird it feels whereas before I had negative amounts of interest.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2012 03:10 |
|
Apparently it makes some landscapes look real enough to step into, while at the same time making the dwarves and the various props look like something out of a high school play. That piques my interest at least. And my Chapter 12 should be arriving at the end of the week or so. Its a combination of too much work/shame at what I plan on doing. And not even the good kind of shame.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2012 04:48 |
|
Need to see some 48fps gape porn.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2012 05:28 |
|
I dont really like that whole increased fps stuff but you put that Gape Action in 48 fps its like a Real Time Double Colonoscopy! Ah, the wonders of science meet the the innovation of the double goatse protocol. Heh Mission Impossible: Goatse Protocol featuring Thom Crews, cumming to an "art haus theatre" near you! bigmcgaffney fucked around with this message at 06:04 on Dec 13, 2012 |
# ? Dec 13, 2012 06:02 |
|
You gotta up the frame rate or all the CoD chucklefucks won't go see it. 24 fps? gently caress, my Casio wristwatch does better than that.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2012 06:05 |
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:"This bozo took the basic tenets of fantasy and made it all about rape, incest, and disturbingly long scenes of pedophilia and dwarf/prostitute sex. http://www.mtv.com/videos/movies/865275/an-unexpected-erotic-journey-with-the-cast-of-the-hobbit.jhtml#id=1644133 Veni.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 02:00 |
|
I think I prefer 24 frames because your eyes do have motion blur while "panning" and whatnot. 48fps isn't closer to reality in every aspect
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 02:12 |
|
Okay, just saw The Hobbit. Gandalf and Galadriel didn't fist each other in it, what gives? Also, I apparently didn't see the version that had 48 FPS in it because I didn't feel nauseous the entire time.
Contra Calculus fucked around with this message at 17:03 on Dec 14, 2012 |
# ? Dec 14, 2012 17:01 |
|
The White Council scene would benefit from a gangbang, I think.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 17:04 |
|
Contra Calculus posted:Okay, just saw The Hobbit. Gandalf and Galadriel didn't fist each other in it, what gives? Also, I apparently didn't see the version that had 48 FPS in it because I didn't feel nauseous the entire time. After all the negative press Warner (or is it universal?) pulled the plug and said they're not doing the 48fps thing nationwide. And only internet nerds will know. Imagine if they nauseated the millions of unsuspecting not-dorks with their poo poo gimmick.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 17:43 |
|
The Unnamed One posted:The White Council scene would benefit from a gangbang, I think. Really, what wouldn't?
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 17:48 |
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:After all the negative press Warner (or is it universal?) pulled the plug and said they're not doing the 48fps thing nationwide. The fact that it even got that far is clear evidence that Peter Jackson has entered the George Lucas level of getting everything he wants and having his rear end kissed everywhere he goes. Y'know if turning the hobbit into a 3 part epic wasn't clear enough.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 18:22 |
|
IRQ posted:Really, what wouldn't? GRRM's wedding. Intel&Sebastian posted:Y'know if turning the hobbit into a 3 part epic wasn't clear enough. I don't think "And this way I can make another billion dollars!" is a sign that Peter Jackson's artistic sensibilities have been blinded by universal adoration.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 18:26 |
|
I think it's a sign that his head's up his rear end.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 18:43 |
|
whowhatwhere posted:I don't think "And this way I can make another billion dollars!" is a sign that Peter Jackson's artistic sensibilities have been blinded by universal adoration. No but the fact that he's allowed to do it is.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 18:53 |
|
"All my sets are going to look plastic and cheap, and everything will be overly cartoony and have a shockingly different tone and look and feel from LOTR and the dwarves will be more like the Disney Seven Dwarves, or really, more like Smurfs. Then I'm going to shoot the whole thing in some crazy format because James Cameron and Chris Nolan already one upped everything I could do technologically. Then I'm going to take a 400 page book and pad it out to 9 hours so I can make 3 movies and therefore make more billions!" -a director who clearly hasn't gone insane
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:03 |
|
I mean, I enjoyed the movie (which doesn't mean anything since I've got pretty lovely taste as evidenced by the fact that this is my most posted-in topic), but holy poo poo the pacing was awful. What loving moron thought "It'd be a good idea to split the Hobbit into 3 movies when it merits 2 at absolute maximum"A GLISTENING HODOR posted:"All my sets are going to look plastic and cheap, and everything will be overly cartoony and have a shockingly different tone and look and feel from LOTR and the dwarves will be more like the Disney Seven Dwarves, or really, more like Smurfs. Oh, that explains it.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:14 |
|
Intel&Sebastian posted:No but the fact that he's allowed to do it is. It's a sign that he's surrounded by businessmen instead of artists. Really, though, I don't see how anybody could have watched the previews and thought this movie could have been anything but complete and utter rear end. Also, Tumblr's got some good ideas for the Game of Bones cover: Teim posted:Found these on Tumblr, I can't not hate them..
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:15 |
|
Wait Brandon and Lyanna? As in, Ned's ten year old son? I think that's the new Gurmiest relationship possible. Edit: oh right. Ned's brother. The fact my mind immediately went to pedo-incest instead of just incest might be a sign I have been on the Internet for too long. Contra Calculus fucked around with this message at 20:41 on Dec 14, 2012 |
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:39 |
|
Brandon the Builder and Lyanna Stark? Bitch likes her dick aged.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:42 |
|
Yeah, Unexpected Journey is fine, even if the pacing is loving garbage (No, I don't give a poo poo about Radagast, even if he is played by Sylvester McCoy. This is why Jackson's best decision in the original movies was axing Tom loving Bombadil), but far more interesting is if crazy Pete will poo poo the bed by spreading everything to far (Right now survey says "Probably").Contra Calculus posted:Wait Brandon and Lyanna? As in, Ned's ten year old son? I think that's the new Gurmiest relationship possible. It's the touch of the gurm. Soon the captain's hat will sprout from your head, and everything will taste of lemoncakes.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:43 |
|
That blue rose one actually looks kind of enticing (minus the subtitle), like the sexy winter escapades of Sarah MacLachlin or something.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 20:52 |
|
Oh, also, w/r/t The Hobbit: The guy who played Bilbo did an excellent job. Like infinitely better than Elijah Wood as "I'm-acting-like-a-ten-year-old-even-though-I'm-supposed-to-be-30" Frodo in the first trilogy. Also, Thorin was awesome in this adaptation. The Gollum riddle scene was good. Oh and Sauron's in it. Anyone who is a Tolkien ultra-goon spergelord will know who he is when they see/hear of him.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 21:06 |
|
I heard Peter Jackson added some female roles so it wouldn't be one big sausage party for 9 hours (like this thread), how did that work out?
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 22:28 |
|
IRQ posted:I heard Peter Jackson added some female roles so it wouldn't be one big sausage party for 9 hours (like this thread), how did that work out? The Bad Thread: where even the girls are GRRMs.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 22:43 |
|
There's just Galadriel and a lyre playing elf chick (... I think) with no lines. The rest of the females show up in like, a fraction of a second. I think the next one has a female character invented for the movies, or something.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 22:45 |
|
whowhatwhere posted:The Bad Thread: where even the girls are GRRMs. There's no girls on the internet.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 22:53 |
|
The Unnamed One posted:I think the next one has a female character invented for the movies, or something.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:11 |
|
I hope they bork Smaug spectacularly. Like getting Andy Serkis to play him kind of bad.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:12 |
|
He's played by Benedict Cumberbatch.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:17 |
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:I hope they bork Smaug spectacularly. Like getting Andy Serkis to play him kind of bad. It has to be Gilbert Gottfried.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:18 |
|
Joramun posted:He's played by Benedict Cumberbatch. This is the most British loving name I've ever heard.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:22 |
|
Contra Calculus posted:This is the most British loving name I've ever heard. He's british as gently caress. Watch Sherlock.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:23 |
|
Yeah, I can definetly see "rear end in a top hat dragon" coming from him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Cca7Nq2Zs
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:27 |
|
Joramun posted:He's played by Benedict Cumberbatch. That's a funny way to spell Robert April.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2012 23:33 |
|
IRQ posted:He's british as gently caress. He has the most British face in the world after Prince Charles. But yes, Sherlock owns.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2012 00:08 |
|
Hobbit movie money movie. Nothing with a red line. Impressive. Stretched out over three movies. Not blatant, I swear.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2012 02:05 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 20:21 |
|
I assume the fucker still ain't writing.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2012 21:59 |