|
The linked AP report is just a status update on the Hilary shoe thrower. There's no mention of Iraq let alone any foreign entity at all. At least reference something that states this perceived popular opinion.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 12:06 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 17:49 |
|
I was curious to see how this fit soquote:The CEO has cut benefits for employees by over 50% since he has been in charge. This is the story of one worker's struggles:
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 12:30 |
|
Buzkashi posted:I was curious to see how this fit so
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 13:19 |
|
wolffenstein posted:
When the hell was the Bush shoe-thrower called a hero and how the gently caress is throwing a shoe protected by the first amendment?
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 13:22 |
|
wolffenstein posted:
Man throws a shoe at a Republican - 1 year in jail. Woman throws shoe at Democrat - no charges pressed, given a warnin for disorderl conduct. Who, exactly, are the tyrants here?
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 13:39 |
|
LunarShadow posted:So this is a thing I came across while looking for a painting of the Assassination of Alexander II.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 13:39 |
|
Defenestration posted:Who the hell is angry about the killing of a 19th century tsar? This is like someone being mad that that jew Brutus killed Caesar It may surprise you that there are a lot of people mad at the Jews for things they didn't do.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 13:45 |
|
GAYMIEN SANDOW posted:Army had a half day. Hmm, you must be an excellent marksman and skilled in sandracing. Got to hand it to you, I'm a little jealous.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 13:53 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Woman throws shoe at Democrat - no charges pressed, given a warnin for disorderl conduct.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 14:23 |
|
wolffenstein posted:
I think that's the extent to which anyone compares the two events, unless they're a Republican who wants to obsess over it.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 14:56 |
|
wolffenstein posted:
That's a reference to this guy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muntadhar_al-Zaidi He WAS a hero in the Arab world; and IIRC plenty of people were supportive in the US, too. Consider the context, though; he was getting in the face of one of the men most responsible for wrecking the gently caress out of his country and killing hundreds of thousands of his people. Anything imaginable he might have done to Bush would have been justified. What was the lady who threw a shoe at Hilary on about? Even if it isn't utter conservative horseshit it won't be on nearly the same level.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 15:00 |
|
Buzkashi posted:I was curious to see how this fit so You're a god damned hero.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 15:03 |
|
Some of those posts seem like a bizarro-world Jeff Foxworthy bit. "IF YEW PUT TEN TIMES AS MUCH ENERGY INTO DEFRAUDING THE GOVERNMENT AS GETTING AN HONEST JOB... YEW JUST MIGHT BE A MOOCHER!!!"
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 15:10 |
|
Ya it's a nerve!!!!
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 16:21 |
|
My cousin is on a roll today. First up: "LOL at people I don't agree with being killed!" Also, loving "mooselimb terrorist!" is a new one for me. A mostly false story about his FAVORITE PRESIDENT OF ALL TIME!! (sidenote: during the 2012 elections every single one of his posts were in all caps and praising the virtues of DR RON PAUL 2012!!!) This last one strikes me as odd since he is currently serving in the Army, but maybe it's just me.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 22:30 |
|
I know a ton of public workers/guys in the military who bitch endlessly about the government while cashing their government signed paychecks. So it's definitely a thing.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 22:35 |
|
Redo this one with the picture of the "New Black Panthers" and see what they say.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 22:42 |
|
Huh, I had read that there were no charges filed. Okay, never mind.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 22:46 |
|
That photo of a 13-Star flag carried by a man with modern weaponry is obviously a call to return the Northwest territories and all other tyrannical conquests to the Native Americans.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 22:51 |
|
VitalSigns posted:That photo of a 13-Star flag carried by a man with modern weaponry is obviously a call to return the Northwest territories and all other tyrannical conquests to the Native Americans. This is literally the only interpretation that makes sense. We should let all of those states fend for themselves without Federal assistance.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2014 22:53 |
|
This minuteman is dead or at the least badly wounded the first time shrapnel comes anywhere near his head. There's a reason we don't wear fancy cloth hats in to battle any more, chucklefuck.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 03:53 |
|
BBJoey posted:This minuteman is dead or at the least badly wounded the first time shrapnel comes anywhere near his head. There's a reason we don't wear fancy cloth hats in to battle any more, chucklefuck. He's Chase Sanderson, idiot time traveler from 2014
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 04:10 |
|
Who could read this and take it seriously? What the gently caress does 'anti-American slogan' even mean? Why did they only have a burned flag on their car when they could have been actively burning them? Why didn't they roll up in a steam driven vehicle burning a continuous stream of American flags inside a glass boiler chamber for all to see? Why only beards, and no turbans? Who the gently caress doesn't get the foundation of bullshit that this is built upon? The gently caress.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 04:14 |
|
Except for, you know, the militia groups that are hosed up extremists and potentially very dangerous to innocent people who happen to not share their beliefs/skin color/etc.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 04:43 |
|
Wulfolme posted:Who could read this and take it seriously? What the gently caress does 'anti-American slogan' even mean? Why did they only have a burned flag on their car when they could have been actively burning them? Why didn't they roll up in a steam driven vehicle burning a continuous stream of American flags inside a glass boiler chamber for all to see? Why only beards, and no turbans? Who the gently caress doesn't get the foundation of bullshit that this is built upon? Um, it's a joke and not meant to be taken seriously?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 04:45 |
|
ledge posted:Um, it's a joke and not meant to be taken seriously? Careful, last time I pointed that out to someone freaking out about logical inconsistencies in a story not presented as literal fact I got my head bit off.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 05:11 |
|
Looking for help assembling a good response. I'm Tom (hello, world), Dan is my older brother, and Ram is a friend of Dan's that, as far as I can tell, a FYGM rich Republican who grew up well-off and doesn't generally seem to give a poo poo (as seen here) that some people get the loving short end of the stick horribly in socio-economic background. I don't know him super well, but a lot of my brother's friends are FYGM yuppies. Initial reaction was basically "America, the land of freedom, with the highest per capita incarceration rate in the West. America, the land of opportunity, with a skyrocketing income gap between the rich and the poor and declining social mobility." But I could use help on the "find a government that isn't really an oligarchy " handwaving poo poo, because, honestly, I have a simpleton's grasp of US politics and none of world politics or history outside of really, really basic poo poo.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 10:04 |
|
Magres posted:Initial reaction was basically "America, the land of freedom, with the highest per capita incarceration rate in the West. America, the land of opportunity, with a skyrocketing income gap between the rich and the poor and declining social mobility." But I could use help on the "find a government that isn't really an oligarchy " handwaving poo poo, because, honestly, I have a simpleton's grasp of US politics and none of world politics or history outside of really, really basic poo poo. Many oligarchies take better care of their have-nots. I think spamming a bunch of human development, inequality, education, health, etc. ranking tables and heat maps should prove that point. Hmmm...maybe I'll take that on as a project: cycle through a bunch of data sets on the same map in a gif, americanexceptionalism.gif
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 10:22 |
|
Lady Naga posted:Careful, last time I pointed that out to someone freaking out about logical inconsistencies in a story not presented as literal fact I got my head bit off. Uh, if you've got your head bit off, how the hell is this post possible then? Wouldn't you be dead
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 10:33 |
|
Magres posted:
This guy's argument basically boils down to two things: 1) the world isn't perfect, so there's no point in trying to fix any problems; 2) a bunch of buzzwords that suggest America is great but actually don't loving mean anything. What does it mean for "opportunity" to be "abundant"? Abundant relative to what? What does it mean to be "free" to "pursue your dreams"? Also, this guy must think that the rich are either incredibly stupid or benevolent. They control the entire political process but they don't use that power to cement their positions and keep others from taking their power? Maybe you should ask this guy for an example from history where power was concentrated in the hands of a small group of elites and they didn't do everything they could to hold on to it.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 10:52 |
|
Mornacale posted:This guy's argument basically boils down to two things: 1) the world isn't perfect, so there's no point in trying to fix any problems; 2) a bunch of buzzwords that suggest America is great but actually don't loving mean anything. What does it mean for "opportunity" to be "abundant"? Abundant relative to what? What does it mean to be "free" to "pursue your dreams"? It's also pretty Unamerican from the basis of it. "All men are created equal" is pretty much the cornerstone of our society, though it's refreshing to see a rich guy actually say in public what we've known was beneath the surface for awhile.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 11:35 |
|
Mornacale posted:This guy's argument basically boils down to two things: 1) the world isn't perfect, so there's no point in trying to fix any problems; 2) a bunch of buzzwords that suggest America is great but actually don't loving mean anything. What does it mean for "opportunity" to be "abundant"? Abundant relative to what? What does it mean to be "free" to "pursue your dreams"? He's more saying that we just need to accept it and let the job creators have their way with us, imo. It's not that they're benevolent, more FYGM because he's rich and the poors should be happy to lick his boots. Magres fucked around with this message at 12:18 on Apr 17, 2014 |
# ? Apr 17, 2014 12:06 |
|
OAquinas posted:Redo this one with the picture of the "New Black Panthers" and see what they say. I've put this as a response to a friend on facebook already. Edit- now it just needs an Afghan militia to really stir the pot. Mike the TV fucked around with this message at 16:27 on Apr 17, 2014 |
# ? Apr 17, 2014 16:21 |
|
Mike the TV posted:
I unironically agree with this image and the mission of the Black Panthers in general.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 16:25 |
Mike the TV posted:
Was there a response?
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 16:27 |
Magres posted:
All of this said, the article being linked is absolutely terrible. The method is reprehensibly bad- the authors are practically apologizing for the measurement validity threats from page one, not that it stopped them from submitting that pile of headline bait.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 16:36 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCW-8TmdoSU
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 20:14 |
|
That's a lot of video to just brag that you went to an Ivy League college.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 20:19 |
|
Pfirti86 posted:That's a lot of video to just brag that you went to an Ivy League college. It's hard to take anyone seriously that compares themselves to Geraldo opening "Al Capone's vault".
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 22:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 17:49 |
|
Magres posted:He's more saying that we just need to accept it and let the job creators have their way with us, imo. It's not that they're benevolent, more FYGM because he's rich and the poors should be happy to lick his boots. But he's not just saying that, he's also trying to claim that there's a ton of opportunity to improve your life and become an oligarch. Which means that he either thinks money/power are positive-sum (in which case why don't we just find a way to make everyone an oligarch!) or he thinks that the existing holders of money/power are for some reason failing to use their station to hold down the poors. I'm saying you get to say either "yeah, life's not fair, lick my boot you poors" OR "land of freedom and opportunity," not both.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2014 23:18 |