|
surebet posted:i had to look that up and text editor posted:last time i bought modafinil on the internet it was from someone in tcc that sold nootropics out of the uk yeah that dude has a website where he sells hydrafinil, but he's out atm
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 16:12 |
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:modafinil is the drug described to me as: shows great promise treating x, y, z, but in rare instances causes life-threatening skin lesions do it, you pussy
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:yeah that dude has a website where he sells hydrafinil, but he's out atm yeah thats the guy iirc, wasn't hydrafinil, it was
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
a mint for my bath
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:20
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:modafinil is the drug described to me as: shows great promise treating x, y, z, but in rare instances causes life-threatening skin lesions even loving ibuprofen can cause Stevens Johnson, it's a boogeyman for the most part. unless it's contaminated, modafinil and its constituents are nontoxic
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:20
|
|
|
text editor posted:yeah thats the guy iirc, wasn't hydrafinil, it was yeah he doesn't sell the "real" stuff anymore
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:modafinil is the drug described to me as: shows great promise treating x, y, z, but in rare instances causes life-threatening skin lesions tbh if youre in the weird genetic category where provigil gives you skin lesions, something inncuous was gonna kill you sooner or later
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:22
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:modafinil is the drug described to me as: shows great promise treating x, y, z, but in rare instances causes life-threatening skin lesions tbf i have noticed my skin has taken a hit overall (nothing near sjs though) and it's been the case for the two other people i know who've taken it that and my piss is now a solid stream of sulphur, but i'm running between 600 & 800mg per day so theflyingexecutive posted:yeah that dude has a website where he sells hydrafinil, but he's out atm you could buy that right off of sigma aldrich but yeah i'm not putting a thing that has had insecticide/pesticide use for decades while having literally no human trials and almost no mentions on pubmed in my body surebet fucked around with this message at 04:58 on Jul 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
surebet posted:that and my piss is now a solid stream of sulphur, but i'm running between 600 & 800mg per day so jesus christ get some prescription amphetamines instead 800mg cant be healthy
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
nice drug stories
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:06
|
|
|
BiTCCoin: Arm and leg reduction nah, too much of a stretch; need to either get some sleep or amphetamines
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
yes, we get it, you guys love your drugs. may i suggest you buy them with butts?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
surebet posted:that and my piss is now a solid stream of sulphur, but i'm running between 600 & 800mg per day so holy gently caress i was happy with 50-200mg a day
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
surebet posted:
it knocks out the fiat
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:it knocks out the fiat it takes a bite out of banksters
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
text editor posted:jesus christ get some prescription amphetamines instead 800mg cant be healthy uh, yeah, those are in there as well, albeit in a very modest amount proportionally the tl;dr of several thousand pages of medical file is that my liver is poo poo, which both caused the initial problem and complicated a bunch of others, and that after playing medical russian roulette with p much every goddamn stimulant out there i stumbled on modafinil, 400mg is my minimum req for functional, 600 is productive and 800 is only for special cases because i'd rather not go about life with atlas inspired sleep schedules good news is after 5 year some of my issues are finally fading away so i'm hoping to spin everything down a bit
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:it knocks out the fiat
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:32
|
|
|
guys i just happened to find $25k around, what do i do?quote:Q: How to deposit [$25000] found money? A: Buy Bitcoin with cash! (self.Bitcoin) wow, this is one smart individual quote:If depositing slightly below $10'000 is considered suspicious and may lead to confiscation (civil forfeiture), does depositing always above $10'000 considered also suspicious?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:42
|
|
|
trucutru posted:guys i just happened to find $25k around, what do i do? its not like its a million dollars, just take your spending money from the pile instead of the atm for a few years and dont bother with all that poo poo. adding bitcoin just makes things needlessly complicated and risky for zero benefit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:48
|
|
|
in not me related news, this thing: http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/nasdaq-and-chain-to-partner-on-blockchain-technology-initiative-20150624-00446 someone sold nasdaq colored coins as a way to move securities as tokens tbf it's probably one of the least dumb bitcoin apps i can think of, and since nerds worldwide are footing the bill to run your infrastructure, heh, might even make financial sense too ofc since all you need to actually emit on the network is the minimum tx size + minimum fee if this picks up the blockchain will just end up being spammed to high hell with worthless transactions, which is good for bitcoin because
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 05:49
|
|
|
sorry for starting a drug derail guys, i was as dumb as a bitcoiner (but without bitcoin) when's the next laugh bubble due anyway, i feel like i'm coming down off the stress test/network fork/protocol collapse now. i remember when a phone falling off a chair was enough to make me laugh at butts, now it seems like nothing less than a full blown libertarian seasteading expedition and ensuing lost city of atlantis style disaster will do it for me
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 07:06
|
|
|
actually I retract my previous post, surebet is clearly a drug seeking moron, don't listen to them
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 07:13
|
|
|
surebet posted:http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/nasdaq-and-chain-to-partner-on-blockchain-technology-initiative-20150624-00446 quote:"We are excited about the potential impact of this new endeavor with Chain on the transaction process," said Bob Greifeld, CEO, Nasdaq. "This Nasdaq Private Market project aims to simplify the overwhelming challenges private companies face with manual ledger record-keeping. As blockchain technology continues to redefine not only how the exchange sector operates, but the global financial economy as a whole, Nasdaq aims to be at the center of this watershed development." what the christ, the ceo of nasdaq drank the koolade
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 07:58
|
|
|
that press release basically says "this company that does blockchain stuff is going to be the first to use blockchain stuff in this part of nasdaq over here that's used for privately-owned companies for their internal equity and isn't really part of nasdaq at all" "blockchain technology" is a meaningless term (right up there with "disruptive") and this has nothing at all to do with bitcoin (which you'll note isn't mentioned anywhere in the press release), they could be providing any sort of distributed data management software and slapping the "blockchain" label on it in order to grab cash from dumb venture capitalists
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 09:05
|
|
|
you're right about them not mentioning bitcoin, i thought that was conspicuous too, but they do mention the open assets protocol, which is apparently some sort of colored coin implimentation for bitcoin, and chain, the company in the article, wrote a big ol' post on medium about how they use bitcoin, and they speficially handwave the idea of anyone using a non bitcoin blockchain. i mean, if it mentions blockchain, it's got to be either a scammer or a fanatic, i just suspect this is the latter.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 10:07
|
|
|
The bitcoin "enthusiasts" have been banging on about getting the prostitutes on backpage.com to accept bitcoin recently. http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3du0qc/i_can_confirm_the_backpage_effect/ Then I noticed this in the washington post Woman who shot alleged attacker may have slain a serial killer, police say quote:Neal Falls showed up at the woman’s home on July 18 after answering an escort ad she had placed on Backpage.com, according to police. He showed up with a “kill list,” multiple pairs of handcuffs and a Subaru full of weapons and tools, including a shovel, knives, a bulletproof vest, a machete, bleach, trash bags, sledgehammers and axes, according to Fox affiliate KPTV. quote:“He made a deal with the victim to exchange money for her services as an escort,” Cooper said. “He brought no money with him. What he brought with him was a firearm, four sets of handcuffs, and all of the items you have photos of from the trunk of his car. So … clearly his intentions were dark.” Backpage.com, no money, could he be a bitcoiner? One of those rare outdoors bitcoiners?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 10:56
|
|
|
surebet posted:someone sold nasdaq colored coins as a way to move securities as tokens how. how will it make sense, financial or otherwise, to use bitcoin instead of a distributed database of trusted and known peers? the technology cost is negligible anyway compared to the employee costs, and with a dd you actually have good, predictable availability, instant confirmations instead of having to wait for hours, and your ownership records aren't at the mercy of unpredictable Chinese mining cabals.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 11:41
|
|
|
i like
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 11:47
|
|
|
j'aime comment
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 12:05
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:it knocks out the fiat did not get enough love
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 12:11
|
|
|
looking over chain's website it's obvious they work with bitcoin and bitcoin-based implementations, but since the press release so carefully avoids any mention of bitcoin i'm wondering if they're not thinking of using a private, internal deployment of a bitcoin like thing i'm not enough of a database and infrastructure nerd to answer this, how would a bitcoin-like ledger compare to a traditional data store if - all of your participants are known, albeit everyone has a financial motivation to distrust everyone else to some extent - every participant has to provide a specific and fixed amount of hashing power - block rewards and tx fees are removed entirely, providing miners is part of the participation obligation - nasdaq still acts as the central authority in the network, holds all the unused tokens who haven't been assigned to represent a security or stock basically, what if you remove the entire notion of tokens as valuable by themselves, provision a kickout clause if any participant positions themselves above their expected hashpower and only use the redundant database features of bitcoin. how does that compare to current options?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 13:07
|
|
|
trucutru posted:guys i just happened to find $25k around, what do i do? Wait sorry I meant he should launder it through a fake money system that is referred to by various three letter agencies as "prosecution futures". My mistake.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 13:56
|
|
|
Splicer posted:Claim it as abandoned money, pay some taxes, enjoy. Or put it back in the roof and make a withdrawal every week or so for your walking around money.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 14:00
|
|
|
surebet posted:looking over chain's website it's obvious they work with bitcoin and bitcoin-based implementations, but since the press release so carefully avoids any mention of bitcoin i'm wondering if they're not thinking of using a private, internal deployment of a bitcoin like thing By "redundant database" you mean "everyone has a copy of the database", right? (Because that's how it works in bitcoinland...) If everyone has a full copy of the database anyway, then there are definitely better mechanisms you can use. For example, you could just use Paxos with transactions signed by the originator using a well-known key. No need for participants to spend a bunch of computer time brute-forcing hashes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 15:42
|
|
|
surebet posted:basically, what if you remove the entire notion of tokens as valuable by themselves, provision a kickout clause if any participant positions themselves above their expected hashpower and only use the redundant database features of bitcoin. how does that compare to current options? poorly. butts are one of the worst "database" systems known to man.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 15:59
|
|
|
trucutru posted:guys i just happened to find $25k around, what do i do? i don't understand the obsessive need these people have to structure their money when all they have to do is just deposit it into a loving bank
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 16:24
|
|
|
bitcoin as a database makes absolutely zero loving sense
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:i don't understand the obsessive need these people have to structure their money when all they have to do is just deposit it into a loving bank tax evasion is implied
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 16:38
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:bitcoin makes absolutely zero loving sense
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 16:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 16:12 |
|
|
25k isn't enough money to have to put it into a bank. wtf. just buy all your poo poo cash for a year or two
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 19:27
|
|
