|
devmd01 posted:But you could have! He might not like that particular type of tip, though
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 12:50 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:47 |
|
Could have ended up getting shafted
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 14:01 |
|
Ahhhh, the puns are cumming along, nicely.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 14:40 |
|
This really should include "2,147,483,648" somewhere in the setup though?
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 14:42 |
|
Schadenboner posted:This really should include "2,147,483,648" somewhere in the setup though? Wouldn't the 99,999,999,999 test cover that case?
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 15:13 |
|
PremiumSupport posted:Wouldn't the 99,999,999,999 test cover that case? Maybe, maybe not. I'm thinking of the crash bug in Dreamweaver when a file was an exact multiple of 8k.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 15:39 |
|
chin up everything sucks posted:A third one was blind and lonely and kept calling in to try and reach a female tech (we only had a few) to get help setting up his online dating profile. We actually had to eventually ban this person from calling it. Yeah, that is really sad when it happens. One former job I had was the customer support line for a commercial TV company who provided pay channels to antenna TV. There was this one old guy who would call, hang up on hearing a male voice and asking any female-sounding person "do you want to be my friend?". Sometimes he would not call for a week and then he would call 10 times in a night.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 07:34 |
|
Somewhere in DC, a ticket probably just came in: https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1176890146567983104
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 18:46 |
|
Whenever I see a recalled e-mail in my inbox, it just makes me more interested in it.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 18:54 |
|
Renegret posted:Whenever I see a recalled e-mail in my inbox, it just makes me more interested in it. That is all its for at this point. IT has so little actual use. Its like setting something as low priority, it stands out way more.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:06 |
|
Renegret posted:Whenever I see a recalled e-mail in my inbox, it just makes me more interested in it. Agreed. The first thing I did when setting up my email box was to turn off the auto-processing of recall requests.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:16 |
|
Nemo2342 posted:Agreed. The first thing I did when setting up my email box was to turn off the auto-processing of recall requests. I also auto-reject sending read receipts. gently caress you, you don't get to see that I looked at your e-mail. No way in hell you're going to use that against me when I choose to ignore you.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:21 |
|
The single way to guarantee your email is read by the majority of people,, us to issue a recall notice after sending I wouldn't read it otherwise, but now you DONT want me to read it? I'm memorizing it.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 23:26 |
|
Sickening posted:That is all its for at this point. IT has so little actual use. Its like setting something as low priority, it stands out way more. Exactly. Just like setting something high priority makes me less likely to respond in a timely manner. The email debacle from the WH today has been endlessly entertaining in many of the various Slacks I'm in. It needed a "Remove me from this list" reply all to really push me over the edge, though. Roundboy posted:The single way to guarantee your email is read by the majority of people,, us to issue a recall notice after sending Friend of mine had the exact same name, different email address, as one of his co-workers at an old job. Someone WAY up in the company sent an email to him with shittons of confidential information (executive salaries, etc), and then tried to recall it. "You better believe I read the gently caress out of everything in that message". AlexDeGruven fucked around with this message at 02:11 on Sep 26, 2019 |
# ? Sep 26, 2019 02:08 |
|
Sickening posted:IT has so little actual use. Renegret posted:I also auto-reject sending read receipts.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 05:37 |
|
Read receipts are never not used for some petty reason. I have a coworker who sets it on for every e-mail. Auto-deny read receipt is the only way to function.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 06:16 |
|
AlexDeGruven posted:Friend of mine had the exact same name, different email address, as one of his co-workers at an old job. Someone WAY up in the company sent an email to him with shittons of confidential information (executive salaries, etc), and then tried to recall it. "You better believe I read the gently caress out of everything in that message". Definitely been there. I've got the same first name, first initial of my last name as one of the high high up finance guys. Every now and then someone wouldn't pay attention to their autocomplete and send me things like plans for capital projects. The best part was that this was before we were on Outlook so they couldn't even recall the emails, just politely ask me to please delete everything and not read it.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 09:16 |
|
It's one thing that people miss about GroupWise. You could recall and it would actually delete it from the other persons mail box.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 12:45 |
|
Ghostlight posted:I left that on but turned off automatically-mark-as-read. Clever, but I don't know if it works in Exchange/O365. I've noticed that when I pull down my messages with Thunderbird and keep them marked unread but then subsequently log into the O365 webclient (or visa versa), those emails won't prompt a read receipt request on the second platform. I imagine Exchange tracks "low-key: we know that this message has been accessed" in addition to "marked read or unread by arbitrary user decisions." I'm wondering how it interacts with exchange policies that silently force automatic read receipts on intradomain emails. I suspect one of our executives has such a policy running for their benefit, because I don't get send-receipt prompts on any messages from them in O365, but the disposition-notice request is always in the headers and I see the prompts in Thunderbird. Also, they sent a reply email quoting a receipt from me, one time, and I'm drat skippy I didn't deliberately send one to them. Question is: do they get the receipts when an IMAP client pulls the message, or only when I actually mark it as read or O365 certifies that the email has indeed been displayed in it's environment?
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 12:54 |
|
I don't know if it still does this, but at least a few years ago, the native iOS mail client would automatically (and silently) send read receipts if they were requested. There was no way to disable that "feature."
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 15:07 |
|
Sickening posted:That is all its for at this point. IT has so little actual use. Its like setting something as low priority, it stands out way more.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 16:17 |
|
The Macaroni posted:It's a handy paper trail though. That way when Captain Dumbass makes a decision based on the email you recalled, you get to say, "I recalled the incorrect information, and my later update also said to disregard the previous information." I don't think that is the proper way to go about it. If an email went out that needs to go away, you delete the email on the exchange level by the folks who know how to do that. If you feel you need to follow up with communication to the affected parties for transparency, great. Recall is completely useless.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 16:25 |
|
Eikre posted:Clever, but I don't know if it works in Exchange/O365. I've noticed that when I pull down my messages with Thunderbird and keep them marked unread but then subsequently log into the O365 webclient (or visa versa), those emails won't prompt a read receipt request on the second platform.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 22:56 |
|
When Gmail didn't have read receipts, my company wrote an extension to add them Gmail: We say it's Enterprise Ready! What that means is up to you!
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 23:03 |
|
Dirt Road Junglist posted:When Gmail didn't have read receipts, my company wrote an extension to add them Google is 100% Enterprise Ready! Only if your enterprise is actually google.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 00:00 |
|
Sickening posted:That is all its for at this point. IT has so little actual use. Its like setting something as low priority, it stands out way more. I set up an auto-reply to all high-priority emails, just to force the people who send me that poo poo to read it.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 00:13 |
|
Got report that a machine was crashing with random BSODs, always a different error. This normally means something with memory, but it passed memory tests. Event Viewer full of disk errors. Re-seated everything. Swapped SSD, problems still there. Couldn't run BurnItTest for more than 2 minutes. On a whim, took a pencil eraser to contacts on the RAM stick to make them super shiny... Problem solved! Machine has been running BurnInTest for over an hour now without a single error. WTF
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 17:11 |
|
Someone spilled something and won't tell you.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 17:12 |
|
What is up with HP (and it's only HP) printer software installers? Why do they always take like 20 minutes to install a printer driver? What are they doing in there? I've experienced this for years, every place I've worked, around eight in ten installations will sit there on the setup screen forever. I'm surprised I don't hear more people talk about this. Less surprised that it hasn't been fixed.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 17:44 |
|
Enola Gay-For-Pay posted:What is up with HP (and it's only HP) printer software installers? Why do they always take like 20 minutes to install a printer driver? What are they doing in there? I've experienced this for years, every place I've worked, around eight in ten installations will sit there on the setup screen forever. I'm surprised I don't hear more people talk about this. Less surprised that it hasn't been fixed. I manage all the HP printers here (40 or so printers) and I don't install the software. The drivers get installed automatically from the print server. It takes less than 10 seconds. If I'm installing a local HP printer, I just choose the inf file.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 17:47 |
|
Enola Gay-For-Pay posted:What is up with HP (and it's only HP) printer software installers? Why do they always take like 20 minutes to install a printer driver? What are they doing in there? I've experienced this for years, every place I've worked, around eight in ten installations will sit there on the setup screen forever. I'm surprised I don't hear more people talk about this. Less surprised that it hasn't been fixed. To be fair, the average printer driver bundle is now 2TB in size.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 17:54 |
Shut up Meg posted:To be fair, the average printer driver bundle is now 2TB in size. Love to download gigs of data to go fish for the couple kb file that I actually wanted.
|
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 18:10 |
|
Enola Gay-For-Pay posted:What is up with HP (and it's only HP) printer software installers? It's installing a lot of backend stuff to ensure you only use HP cartridges, shame you if you don't, and pop up helpful reminders to buy new HP ink from the HP store when your ink levels hit about 65%. It also installs a photo manager and Scan-To-Computer funtionality (that doesnt work great) for any model with a scanner. Go get the Basic Driver Package off their website and never install another full HP package again.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 18:14 |
|
Guess the eraser wasn't the magic fix... Machine started showing disk errors again, with a brand new SSD. Giving up on it.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 18:53 |
|
stevewm posted:Guess the eraser wasn't the magic fix... Machine started showing disk errors again, with a brand new SSD. Tried swapping the RAM sticks?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 18:59 |
|
TRIGGER WARNING, dumb jokes by goons: Also reminder about the goon that found it funny to swap out the SATA cable with a known faulty one. Do you work with any goons? Dunno-Lars fucked around with this message at 19:30 on Sep 27, 2019 |
# ? Sep 27, 2019 19:25 |
|
stevewm posted:Guess the eraser wasn't the magic fix... Machine started showing disk errors again, with a brand new SSD. Sun spots.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 19:30 |
|
PremiumSupport posted:Tried swapping the RAM sticks? Yea, no good. Shitload of disk errors, no matter what disk is used. Takes multiple attempts to boot the Windows installer.. Its a Lenovo Tiny system and they use a proprietary SATA cable. Tried stealing one out of another system; no dice. I'm calling it ded.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 20:03 |
|
stevewm posted:Yea, no good. Yeah, sounds like it's the mainboard then. Not worth pursuing much further.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2019 20:09 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:47 |
|
stevewm posted:On a whim, took a pencil eraser to contacts on the RAM stick to make them super shiny... I have never heard of this solution. What does it solve? Does it work?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2019 13:18 |