|
McVay has a full-on murder face
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:37 |
|
|
MoaM posted:Ahahahaaha, McVay's face. Need a gif of that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:20
|
|
|
Chinatown posted:Need a gif of that. it was the VERY first one they showed, lmfao....right after the 3 and 16 catch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:21
|
|
|
SirPablo posted:I know how this goes, Vikings not making the playoffs. I was wrong! Woooo!
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:21
|
|
|
So Rams eliminated, 49ers still alive for the #1 seed? And 49ers still alive for the #5 seed of course. What happens if Seattle drops a game to Arizona? I'm assuming nothing important.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:21
|
|
|
How do the 49ers still have control of their destiny with #1 seed? I thought they were last in tiebreakers
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
Yes!!!! gently caress the Rams! Yes!
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
two first round draft picks
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
womp womp
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
I enjoyed seeing Mcvay's face as he realized he wasn't going to the postseason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
Reche Caldwell feels a sense of relief and he doesn't know why
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
drat the other side of this feels good
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:22
|
|
|
Hope Seahawks/49ers is as good as the last moments of this 4th quarter.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:23
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:How do the 49ers still have control of their destiny with #1 seed? I thought they were last in tiebreakers We've beaten both the Saints and the Packers head-to-head, so no, we have all of the tiebreakers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:23
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPDcrc3Srzw
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:23
|
|
|
Yikes. Good thing the Bears don’t have a kicker like that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:23
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:We've beaten both the Saints and the Packers head-to-head. I thought 3 way ties went to division records?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:24
|
|
|
pretty sure I've seen this in every Rams GDT since Sbl 52
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SBNation/status/1208603401740664834?s=19
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:25
|
|
|
Doesn't that happen a lot to Super Bowl losers?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:27
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:I thought 3 way ties went to division records? If there are shared games head to head is the first tiebreaker in a 3 way tie, then it goes to division. Did the Saints and Packers play each other this year?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:27
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:If there are shared games head to head is the first tiebreaker in a 3 way tie, then it goes to division. No. Also there's no way this is true, because seahawks-packers-saints leaves the saints with the 3rd seed despite trumping the hawks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:28
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:If there are shared games head to head is the first tiebreaker in a 3 way tie, then it goes to division. No
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:28
|
|
|
that was a cool and fun game
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:29
|
|
|
really queer Christmas posted:No. Also there's no way this is true, because seahawks-packers-saints leaves the saints with the 3rd seed despite trumping the hawks. Well it would decide the top team, then it would go to a two way tiebreaker for the others as I understand it. Looking at this. Not that it matters here of course if the Saints and Packers didn't play.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:34
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:I thought 3 way ties went to division records? https://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures posted:To determine home-field priority among division-titlists, apply Wild Card tie-breakers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:36
|
|
|
gently caress the cheating dirty Pats and gently caress the Rams for almost giving me a heart attack.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:40
|
|
|
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh you know what we're gonna lose to the Titans anyway so I don't need to figure this out
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:44
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Well it would decide the top team, then it would go to a two way tiebreaker for the others as I understand it. Oh poo poo I'm dumb and was reading tiebreakers within a division, where h2h makes more sense. If I'm reading it right if one team has beaten the other two then they have the tiebreaker, if not it goes to conference record. After that common games. e:fb
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:44
|
|
|
This was so not on Ramsey. https://twitter.com/billbarnwell/status/1208605628404555777 He's got outside trail and expecting safety help and the safety just...wanders off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 05:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:37 |
|
|
Basically: if one of the teams has beaten (lost to) all of the other teams in the tie, it wins (loses) the tiebreaker; otherwise it goes to conference record; otherwise it goes to record in games against common opponents, if there are at least four of them; otherwise it goes into pretty arcane stuff like "strength of victory". Seahawks-Packers-Saints doesn't resolve on the first, despite the Saints beating the Seahawks, because they didn't also play the Packers. The first condition requires a total sweep; it's not, like, winning percentage in games between the teams. And that makes sense: it's fine to put the Saints over the Seahawks because of that win, but it'd be dumb to also put the Saints over the Packers because of that win. I assume the Saints lose in conference record for some reason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2019 06:02
|
|