|
Guavanaut posted:What are their pronouns if they're identifying as an attack helicopter, thwup/thwup/thwup/thwup/thwup? idiot/idiot
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 20:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 08:11 |
|
|
Just start treating them as an inanimate tool for use by actual human beings.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 20:08
|
|
|
Soylent Pudding posted:Of someone pulls the "I identify as an attack helicopter" bullshit is it acceptable to tell mutual acquaintances that they've transitioned and don't want to be addressed by their previous pronouns and the like? Tell them they should identify as funny and come up with jokes other than the attack helicopter one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 20:09
|
|
|
I too am a 120 year old man.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 20:34
|
|
|
Soylent Pudding posted:Of someone pulls the "I identify as an attack helicopter" bullshit is it acceptable to tell mutual acquaintances that they've transitioned and don't want to be addressed by their previous pronouns and the like? It's rude to out someone to their acquaintances unless you have their consent, but for interactions with the person themselves you can start here: https://twitter.com/vexwerewolf/status/1152372555245858816
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 20:50
|
|
|
Soylent Pudding posted:Of someone pulls the "I identify as an attack helicopter" bullshit is it acceptable to tell mutual acquaintances that they've transitioned and don't want to be addressed by their previous pronouns and the like? The correct response to any lovely bigoted joke is to ask them to explain it. Bigots don't like having to explain "its funny because I am a bad person".
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 21:44
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:What are their pronouns if they're identifying as an attack helicopter, thwup/thwup/thwup/thwup/thwup? Apache/apacher
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 22:21
|
|
|
CuddleCryptid posted:The correct response to any lovely bigoted joke is to ask them to explain it. Bigots don't like having to explain "its funny because I am a bad person". This, but also accede to their wishes and refer to them from that moment on only as "attack helicopter".
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 22:41
|
|
|
I wish I was smart enough to come up with those sick burns cause godamn.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 22:45
|
|
|
PeterCat posted:Imagine you were born in 1900. Love how this basically skips the 80s, 90s, 9/11, Enron, both Recessions and the general trickle-down fuckery they are responsible for. Boomer needs to be put in the DSV.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 00:37
|
|
|
Imagine you were born in 1900 You’re the second oldest person who ever lived. High-five dude!!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 02:33
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:Did you search the forums for the word "veteran" just to find something to reply to, like the OP from three weeks ago? No, ya weirdo, I was just on my usual round of meandering around my bookmarks and decided to get Mad Online for a second
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 02:39
|
|
|
Lib and let die posted:Not on your loving life. They're full of PTSD and the VA doesn't care to help them. Ticking time bombs. True. Also they would probably just find a way to claim the damage as additional disability so your (well and their) tax dollars would just go to them. That'd be my plan anyway
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 02:40
|
|
|
wizzardstaff posted:It's rude to out someone to their acquaintances unless you have their consent, but for interactions with the person themselves you can start here: This is wrong, the robot would cost more I mean the rest of it is right I just didn't want anyone to get too excited thinking there had been some advance in robotics or something
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 02:42
|
|
|
Slippery posted:This is wrong, the robot would cost more The robot's also not autonomous.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 03:14
|
|
|
PeterCat posted:The robot's also not autonomous. Well then it's a drone 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 03:19
|
|
|
Slippery posted:Well then it's a drone Thanks Obama
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 03:59
|
|
|
Slippery posted:No, ya weirdo, I was just on my usual round of meandering around my bookmarks and decided to get Mad Online for a second [img-timeline]
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 05:53
|
|
|
AFewBricksShy posted:A boy born in 1985 would have grandparents born around 1930, unless you had 2 generations in a row that didn't have kids until their 40's. sup?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 06:04
|
|
|
quote:Contested Election Incoming! Original lack of paragraph spacing preserved. I looked up what the actual protocol for January 6th is, and I'll paste it here, because it's interesting the pomp behind it: quote:§ 15. Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the tate of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Bobulus fucked around with this message at 17:04 on Dec 15, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 16:55
|
|
|
Accused of proven crimes
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 17:54
|
|
|
Ensuring a fair political process by executing everyone who doesn't vote for you.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 18:24
|
|
|
It will be for not
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 18:29
|
|
|
quote:@BernardKerik: HISTORIC AND UNPARALLELED - PA, GA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and NM all had GOP electors cast votes for @realDonaldTrump. That preserves @POTUS’ right to remedy fraud with his own electors. Obviously all that is bullshit but while this is true that these states had GOP electors cast votes, they mean nothing. None of them are certified by the state governments and so will not be accepted since they're not official electors. It's all just a show to look like they're on Trump's side so their constituents won't turn on them for being "RINO traitors." That said it is very concerning that these people are willing to be seditious just because of Trump's cult of personality.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 18:46
|
|
|
Q needs to spread the word that the GOP electors didn't actually vote.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 18:58
|
|
|
Bobulus posted:Original lack of paragraph spacing preserved. So I wonder what happens if the Vice President just makes something up? "Uhhhhh 10,000 electoral votes for President Mike Pence, 306 electoral votes for Vice President Donald Trump"
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 19:24
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 19:24
|
|
|
if only she was that badass. too bad she's just as happy to just let pelosi take speakership again and not fight for poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 19:27
|
|
|
Putting aside the physical impossibility of buying a freestanding house in New York City, this is another one of the examples of that phenomenon people have been talking about, that a lot of adults are treated as children by boomers because this laundry list of signifiers of "adulthood" are financially out of reach of them, and their ethical decision to not have kids til they can afford them goes against the idea of just having tons of kids and then if they go hungry they go hungry
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 19:33
|
|
|
These are the same people who complain about washington insiders and coastal elites. It doesn't matter what the gatekeeping standard is. It only matters that they are on the right side and the people they don't like arent.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 19:38
|
|
|
Soylent Pudding posted:These are the same people who complain about washington insiders and coastal elites. It doesn't matter what the gatekeeping standard is. It only matters that they are on the right side and the people they don't like arent. Right. It didn't matter what AOC did for a living or where she lived, because it would just get used to attack her one way or another.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 19:45
|
|
|
Minus the completely arbitrary points on this list like child bearing, homeownership and marriage, I'm pretty sure that running a successful campaign for the House of Representatives and winning the seat just about cancels out the rest. And I've known plenty of people who could check off most of those things and the last place I'd want them is anywhere near government.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 20:10
|
|
|
It's funny how, for example, having a kid isn't a requirement for a man to serve in congress. Also if she bought three houses they'd attack her for that too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 20:14
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:So I wonder what happens if the Vice President just makes something up? From what I vaguely recall mentioned in another thread, there's six official documents of how the electors voted sent out to various agencies and people. So if Pence just made something up they'd stop the count and go get one of the official copies, and ignore what Pence said. Hey guess what, Trump also ran for president in 2000 and failed, and you expect me to believe he got more votes than any other candidate in history? Sounds like a scam to me!
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 20:33
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:It's funny how, for example, having a kid isn't a requirement for a man to serve in congress. Hell, Democrats hit Bernie for a having the audacity to own two. They'd straight up censure AOC for owning 3. Oh, sorry, forgot we were talking about Repubs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 21:33
|
|
|
Twelve by Pies posted:Hey guess what, Trump also ran for president in 2000 and failed, and you expect me to believe he got more votes than any other candidate in history? Sounds like a scam to me! He never even got more votes than any other candidate in the same election
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 21:34
|
|
|
Twelve by Pies posted:From what I vaguely recall mentioned in another thread, there's six official documents of how the electors voted sent out to various agencies and people. So if Pence just made something up they'd stop the count and go get one of the official copies, and ignore what Pence said. Man, I just had a brief vision of Trump winning and being president during 9/11.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 21:51
|
|
|
yikes! posted:He never even got more votes than any other candidate in the same election I was gonna say, Trump has literally never broken an election record. Well, other than the one about winning the electoral college despite a historic popular vote loss.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 22:18
|
|
|
Thump! posted:I was gonna say, Trump has literally never broken an election record. Hey he's the first candidate to lose the popular vote twice, serve one term AND be impeached!
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 22:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 08:11 |
|
|
Thump! posted:I was gonna say, Trump has literally never broken an election record. Nah, he broke the record for the most votes for a losing candidate. And the record for the greatest negative vote margin by a winning candidate.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 23:22
|
|
