|
Was it here that someone posted some story about an idiot implanting some sub-dermal flash drive that got insanely infected and almost cost them their arm? Edit: lol just read the plan to not need an MRI! Problem solved! Grip it and rip it fucked around with this message at 18:50 on Jul 10, 2021 |
# ? Jul 10, 2021 18:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 15:44 |
|
That Cyberpunk mission where you have to drive a dude with a malfunctioning refurbished cyberdick to the doctor was extremely on-point
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 19:30 |
|
gently caress, I've been joking for years that the only body mod I'd seriously consider is a giant ring through my arm that I can clip my keys to and now an implantable keyfob can provide better functionality and someone's gonna call my bluff
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 19:43 |
|
*checks thread title* *checks own hands for magnets* *continues on*
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 19:49 |
|
Vengarr posted:That Cyberpunk mission where you have to drive a dude with a malfunctioning refurbished cyberdick to the doctor was extremely on-point Yup, although ironically it was faulty and out of warranty and defective rather than being hacked. If you do the Corpo play through they show a team that sabotages a bunch of connected diplomats by burning out their cyberware/brains
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 19:55 |
CommieGIR posted:Yup, although ironically it was faulty and out of warranty and defective rather than being hacked. That’s just called getting older
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 20:09 |
|
Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 20:12 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. Because it's cool.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 20:19 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. Yeah the story is missing that fortnight 2077 requires cyberware to play
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 20:40 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. That's why people get digital dicks. Also username post combo
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 21:26 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. Because we do the same loving thing now, just not with eyeballs. Power plants, water companies, livestock management, hospitals...
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 21:39 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. I got additional lenses put into my eyes as well (lol fuckin eyes too dog poo poo for just the lasik) and if they could've offered cybereyes I'd have to think long and hard about how much I want cyber eyes versus knowing that they would be super vulnerable.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 21:58 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. One of the conceits of the setting is that the corps have made it pretty much required in order to participate in the society there.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 22:11 |
|
shame on an IGA posted:gently caress, I've been joking for years that the only body mod I'd seriously consider is a giant ring through my arm that I can clip my keys to and now an implantable keyfob can provide better functionality and someone's gonna call my bluff Just get a Prince Albert.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 22:13 |
|
CainFortea posted:Are there even IoT things you can implant? Implant, insert, it's all in how much you want it. Flared bases not required.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 22:40 |
|
St_Ides posted:Just get a Prince Albert. Only if it's bluetooth enabled.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 22:50 |
|
I’m just gonna leave this here https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/02/06/chastity-belt-ransomware-how-hackers-held-peoples-genitals-hostage/amp/
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 22:52 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Just got the game this week and I can't stop wondering in this future why EVERYONE chooses to be a cyborg instead of just have regular eyeballs or whatever given how easy (realistic!) it is to gently caress with cyberware remotely. Some of the side missions go into how its necessary if you want to compete in the hell-capitalism of the dark future. There are people who refuse (like Jackie’s girlfriend) but they are usually luddites, weirdos, poors, or buddhists.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2021 22:54 |
|
Guest2553 posted:Only if it's bluetooth enabled. Nah...app-controlled vibrator.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 00:03 |
|
goatsestretchgoals posted:E: re neodymium: how many debit cards do you go through in an average week? Nobody uses the magstripe any more.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 00:17 |
|
The Lone Badger posted:Nobody uses the magstripe any more. I just used mine when the chip reader balked.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 01:10 |
|
Wrr posted:I got additional lenses put into my eyes as well (lol fuckin eyes too dog poo poo for just the lasik) and if they could've offered cybereyes I'd have to think long and hard about how much I want cyber eyes versus knowing that they would be super vulnerable. They do cybereyes but only for people whose eyes aren't working, because they're still inferior to normal eyes. Same with cyberears.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 03:13 |
|
CainFortea posted:Are there even IoT things you can implant? no, the closest you can get right now is a modern pacemaker. doctors can connect to them wirelessly, but they don't talk to the internet at all. as to how robust the security is for that connection may be a matter of concern, but probably not a realistic one for the average person.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 05:01 |
|
There was this thing from a while back where security researchers figured out how to take remote control of some implanted insulin pumps and do things like have it murder the user by dumping the entire reservoir at once https://www.theregister.com/2011/10/27/fatal_insulin_pump_attack/. They were eventually recalled by the FDA https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...oncerns-certain. e: you have to be within fairly short range for the attack to work, but it does demonstrate the dangers of rf-enabled medical devices. That Dang Lizard fucked around with this message at 05:28 on Jul 11, 2021 |
# ? Jul 11, 2021 05:25 |
|
`Nemesis posted:no, the closest you can get right now is a modern pacemaker. doctors can connect to them wirelessly, but they don't talk to the internet at all. as to how robust the security is for that connection may be a matter of concern, but probably not a realistic one for the average person. IIRC Dick Cheney's doctors / security experts deliberately disabled the wifi on his pacemaker.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 06:18 |
|
Lead out in cuffs posted:IIRC Dick Cheney's doctors / security experts deliberately disabled the wifi on his pacemaker. that's a shame
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 06:21 |
|
That Dang Lizard posted:There was this thing from a while back where security researchers figured out how to take remote control of some implanted insulin pumps and do things like have it murder the user by dumping the entire reservoir at once https://www.theregister.com/2011/10/27/fatal_insulin_pump_attack/. You don’t even have to be connected to anything for technology to try to kill you. The programmers of non-connected life support equipment will very happily do it for you. And then the manufacturers will form an industry organization that lobby’s for less oversight.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 15:48 |
|
MrYenko posted:You don’t even have to be connected to anything for technology to try to kill you. The programmers of non-connected life support equipment will very happily do it for you. And then the manufacturers will form an industry organization that lobby’s for less oversight. There's a news report in CP2077 where implant manufacturers disolve the safety regulator because they claim to self-regulate. Made me laugh
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 16:13 |
|
My favorite for software trying to kill you https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therac-25
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 19:22 |
|
`Nemesis posted:no, the closest you can get right now is a modern pacemaker. doctors can connect to them wirelessly, but they don't talk to the internet at all. as to how robust the security is for that connection may be a matter of concern, but probably not a realistic one for the average person. I remember learning about this from the first Watch Dogs; makes sense in a way because how do you push new firmware or making setting changes or get info from it without it? Surgery? gently caress watch dogs tho.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 20:06 |
|
Wrr posted:I remember learning about this from the first Watch Dogs; makes sense in a way because how do you push new firmware or making setting changes or get info from it without it? Surgery? What's wrong with Watch Dogs? I never played the first one but the second was fine, albeit very much an Ubisoft game.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 22:54 |
|
Shooting Blanks posted:What's wrong with Watch Dogs? I never played the first one but the second was fine, albeit very much an Ubisoft game. okay so you know how assassin's creed 1 was pretty bad, but there were some interesting ideas there, and then assassin's creed 2 was a huuuuuuuuuge step forward? watch_dogs is like that but also the first game is really braindead, and pretty racist at parts, and just a huge mess
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 00:25 |
|
A racist Ubisoft game? Well, I never...
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 00:37 |
|
Shooting Blanks posted:What's wrong with Watch Dogs? I never played the first one but the second was fine, albeit very much an Ubisoft game. Bland game with the usual awful Ubisoft writing, entire mission arc in the middle that leads to nothing and kills pacing, unlikable scumbag protagonist who is both the source of all his own problems in the game and yet utterly convinced he is the victim, weird ableism around a dude putting an evil master villain cause his one leg got busted and now he needs a leg brace, general aura of racism, weird sex-trafficking plot that goes nowhere and becomes just another collectable, privacy invasion mission that just reveals everyone in the city is a monster and consistently has at least one foot in Dark and Edgy poo poo Man, main character very clearly used to be an estranged husband instead of a brother leading to weird poo poo with his son-nephew, uuuuuuuh bland gameplay whose hacking is just a general fancy use button, etc. Chip Cheezum has an excellent LP of the first game if you're curious.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 18:51 |
Watch Dogs was cool for the opening mission and then it’s very generic. How do you make the ability to hack every electronic in a city that boring?
|
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 18:54 |
|
Ubisoft really seems to struggle with writing and getting ideas to be interesting in games.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 19:01 |
|
Wrr posted:Bland game with the usual awful Ubisoft writing, entire mission arc in the middle that leads to nothing and kills pacing, unlikable scumbag protagonist who is both the source of all his own problems in the game and yet utterly convinced he is the victim, weird ableism around a dude putting an evil master villain cause his one leg got busted and now he needs a leg brace, general aura of racism, weird sex-trafficking plot that goes nowhere and becomes just another collectable, privacy invasion mission that just reveals everyone in the city is a monster and consistently has at least one foot in Dark and Edgy poo poo Man, main character very clearly used to be an estranged husband instead of a brother leading to weird poo poo with his son-nephew, uuuuuuuh bland gameplay whose hacking is just a general fancy use button, etc. lol and they were so convinced that this guy was going to be the new tentpole of a franchise they were selling his "iconic" hat and jacket on their website for like a thousand bucks before the game released.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 19:13 |
|
Watchdogs 2 was such a good game by virtue of not being watchdogs 1.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 19:30 |
|
Moon Slayer posted:lol and they were so convinced that this guy was going to be the new tentpole of a franchise they were selling his "iconic" hat and jacket on their website for like a thousand bucks before the game released. The ANSI art skull t shirt was pretty great, I picked one of those up.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 19:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 15:44 |
|
Watch Dogs 3 is straight garbage.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2021 19:42 |