Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008

Mr.Chill posted:

My partner is a massive Malazan fan and wants me to read them. I made it through Gardens of the Moon and a third through Deadhouse Gates and... I just can't do it. I have a degree in literature and the Malazan books are among the hardest I've come across.

I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out why i can strain to read ten pages and then realize I've retained nothing, and I'm at a loss other than "I have no idea why this scene happened". You have to trust that the story is going somewhere because Erikson certainly isn't going to suggest that this random event served a purpose until 80 pages later.

Someone like, say, the structured Iain Banks or experimental Kathe Koja, will start a book with letting you know what the stakes are, what the conflict is, and every scene somehow applies to either confirming the stakes or moving forward with the conflict. Erikson doesn't do that - here's a scene of a character wandering off for the fifth time and he does a thing that doesn't seem related to anything, but MAYBE it will be later. Next scene. It's bizarre and I've never seen anyone else do this, at least not on purpose.

I've read all the Bauchelain and Korbal novellas and enjoyed them, mainly because A. They're short and B. The stakes are clearly set immediately - 'We need to kill this guy', or
'We need to reach this place without dying' and the rest of the story is all heading to the goal. Most detours are for setting and also entertaining (Lees of Laughter's End was a trip and a half).

I'm not saying this is bad, it's just surprising to me how much scene direction matters in order to retain any of it.

Has anyone else noticed this?

There's a not-insignificant part of me that feels I should tell you that you're absolutely at the sharp end of the stick right now; that understanding is right around the corner and things will - slowly - fall into place.



But there's the other part of me that feels I should suggest that you're maybe not that bright. And that's cool! Like, 25% of people are pretty stupid, so you're in - if not good - then, plentiful company. And sure, not everyone can realise that their degree in literature is worth less than the used post-it notes the university recycled to make the degree certificates, but it's the enthusiasm they completed their 'degree' with that counts, right?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

pile of brown
Dec 31, 2004

kingturnip posted:



But there's the other part of me that feels I should suggest that you're maybe not that bright. And that's cool! Like, 25% of people are pretty stupid, so you're in - if not good - then, plentiful company. And sure, not everyone can realise that their degree in literature is worth less than the used post-it notes the university recycled to make the degree certificates, but it's the enthusiasm they completed their 'degree' with that counts, right?

You sound like you're really upset about the peer critiques you got in your 300 level creative writing class

dishwasherlove
Nov 26, 2007

The ultimate fusion of man and machine.

What is it about this series that attracts brain lords.

Barreft
Jul 21, 2014

kingturnip posted:

There's a not-insignificant part of me that feels I should tell you that you're absolutely at the sharp end of the stick right now; that understanding is right around the corner and things will - slowly - fall into place.



But there's the other part of me that feels I should suggest that you're maybe not that bright. And that's cool! Like, 25% of people are pretty stupid, so you're in - if not good - then, plentiful company. And sure, not everyone can realise that their degree in literature is worth less than the used post-it notes the university recycled to make the degree certificates, but it's the enthusiasm they completed their 'degree' with that counts, right?

You're the reason everyone hates liberals.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Infinite Karma
Oct 23, 2004
Good as dead





kingturnip posted:

There's a not-insignificant part of me that feels I should tell you that you're absolutely at the sharp end of the stick right now; that understanding is right around the corner and things will - slowly - fall into place.



But there's the other part of me that feels I should suggest that you're maybe not that bright. And that's cool! Like, 25% of people are pretty stupid, so you're in - if not good - then, plentiful company. And sure, not everyone can realise that their degree in literature is worth less than the used post-it notes the university recycled to make the degree certificates, but it's the enthusiasm they completed their 'degree' with that counts, right?
What the gently caress is wrong with you? I like these books and find the writing style rewarding, but I'd rather leave thread than be on your side.

TGG
Aug 8, 2003

"I Dare."
Calm down people.

I've always viewed the series as a narrative that you just see bit by bit. However it works, I always view each chapter as just a new random highlight from something I might remember and I just roll with it like that. When it ends up coming together and you start seeing how it's all set up it becomes an entirely different affair. It's like the average fantasy setup and no one cares or should care and it doesn't matter but oh poo poo the lore is weird and wait does he build the houses or wait what's a god in this and oh poo poo that was that tree and drat that's why that dude was there and oh gently caress THATS the ship and gently caress he's that guy|? so wait if he was there that means the she set that up so that he'd be there so gently caress was she the one who made sure that..............

It can be a bit tedious.

I love it.

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

Mr.Chill posted:


I'm not saying this is bad, it's just surprising to me how much scene direction matters in order to retain any of it.

Has anyone else noticed this?

Erikson does this a lot, but I feel like he gets a better handle on it from book 4 onwards. You still those little side-moments, but they feel like little vignettes or short-stories, instead of being quite so fragmented. I really struggled with DG and MOI because there are so many moments where I felt "what is even happening and why do I care?"

Wibla
Feb 16, 2011

I had to take breaks reading those books :v:

Aranan
May 21, 2007

Release the Kraken
From a fellow literature major: These books rank among my favorite I've read, but I bounced off GotM twice before being able to finish it. When reading the main series, I was taking a break after every book to read something else to give my brain a break. They're really loving dense and sufficiently draining in a few ways (structure, vocabulary, plethora of characters, content) that I needed a palette cleanser of something light and fluffy or I don't know if I would have made it through them. That said, I've read the series three times now.

Also, it's totally okay if you don't enjoy the books. It certainly doesn't mean you're lumped in with people like kingturnip -- there are different flavors of ice cream for a reason. Read it if you enjoy it, and if not just share your partner's enthusiasm and let them babble on about the cool parts of the books. That's the arrangement my wife and I have made. :)

snoremac
Jul 27, 2012

I LOVE SEEING DEAD BABIES ON 𝕏, THE EVERYTHING APP. IT'S WORTH IT FOR THE FOLLOWING TAB.
I remember almost quitting the series after Memories of Ice, a beloved book that simply didn't hit me, before reading the start of House of Chains and being so stunned by its audacity in the change of tone, which it repeats again in later books, that I knew I had to see it through. And I think the end of Deadhouse is an emotional peak of the series worth reaching. I have a literature degree.

latinotwink1997
Jan 2, 2008

Taste my Ball of Hope, foul dragon!


kingturnip posted:

There's a not-insignificant part of me that feels I should tell you that you're absolutely at the sharp end of the stick right now; that understanding is right around the corner and things will - slowly - fall into place.



But there's the other part of me that feels I should suggest that you're maybe not that bright. And that's cool! Like, 25% of people are pretty stupid, so you're in - if not good - then, plentiful company. And sure, not everyone can realise that their degree in literature is worth less than the used post-it notes the university recycled to make the degree certificates, but it's the enthusiasm they completed their 'degree' with that counts, right?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Well that escalated quickly. Admittedly it did have me laughing though because of how absurd it is while trying to present it so seriously.

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




Aranan posted:

That said, I've read the series three times now.


I honestly can't imagine being able to do that. Ten books, well over 1000 pages per book. Just reading the last five books took me six months.

Aranan
May 21, 2007

Release the Kraken
It's been spread out over years. They're not something I crack open on a regular basis or anything. The first time coincided with reading TCG when it released, so that was about 10 years ago. I did it again maybe 7 years ago and it was interesting seeing what a different perspective I had on things just from 3 years of life experience. Then again a couple of years ago I worked through them.

I've only read a few of ICE's stuff and I can't stomach the Forge of Darkness trilogy. I haven't picked up TGinW but I plan to soonish. It's just something about the core 10 books that really jives with me.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Mr.Chill posted:

My partner is a massive Malazan fan and wants me to read them. I made it through Gardens of the Moon and a third through Deadhouse Gates and... I just can't do it. I have a degree in literature and the Malazan books are among the hardest I've come across.

I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out why i can strain to read ten pages and then realize I've retained nothing, and I'm at a loss other than "I have no idea why this scene happened". You have to trust that the story is going somewhere because Erikson certainly isn't going to suggest that this random event served a purpose until 80 pages later.

Someone like, say, the structured Iain Banks or experimental Kathe Koja, will start a book with letting you know what the stakes are, what the conflict is, and every scene somehow applies to either confirming the stakes or moving forward with the conflict. Erikson doesn't do that - here's a scene of a character wandering off for the fifth time and he does a thing that doesn't seem related to anything, but MAYBE it will be later. Next scene. It's bizarre and I've never seen anyone else do this, at least not on purpose.

I've read all the Bauchelain and Korbal novellas and enjoyed them, mainly because A. They're short and B. The stakes are clearly set immediately - 'We need to kill this guy', or
'We need to reach this place without dying' and the rest of the story is all heading to the goal. Most detours are for setting and also entertaining (Lees of Laughter's End was a trip and a half).

I'm not saying this is bad, it's just surprising to me how much scene direction matters in order to retain any of it.

Has anyone else noticed this?

I feel this way with portions of each of the books that i've read. There are some characters and story arcs where my eyes glaze over and I don't retain anything I read.

Books 2 and 3 really sold the series to me.

Eediot Jedi
Dec 25, 2007

This is where I begin to speculate what being a
man of my word costs me

The first time I spotted historical characters with new names hiding in the wild sold me on the meandering storytelling.

Also isn't the "you might just not be smart" thing a quote or reference to something? Feels familiar.

cptn_dr
Sep 7, 2011

Seven for beauty that blossoms and dies


Eediot Jedi posted:

The first time I spotted historical characters with new names hiding in the wild sold me on the meandering storytelling.

Also isn't the "you might just not be smart" thing a quote or reference to something? Feels familiar.

To be fair you have to have a very high IQ to understand the Malazan Book of the Fallen. The worldbuilding is extremely subtle and

Jan
Feb 27, 2008

The disruptive powers of excessive national fecundity may have played a greater part in bursting the bonds of convention than either the power of ideas or the errors of autocracy.

Mr.Chill posted:

My partner is a massive Malazan fan and wants me to read them. I made it through Gardens of the Moon and a third through Deadhouse Gates and... I just can't do it. I have a degree in literature and the Malazan books are among the hardest I've come across.

I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out why i can strain to read ten pages and then realize I've retained nothing, and I'm at a loss other than "I have no idea why this scene happened". You have to trust that the story is going somewhere because Erikson certainly isn't going to suggest that this random event served a purpose until 80 pages later.

There's something peculiar about the way Erikson writes, yeah. He leaves key details vague on purpose and then in interviews will handwave it away saying how history and archaeology are imprecise. This characteristic also makes the whole concept of power and ascendants more muddled than it would in some power fantasy like Wheel of Time. I found it off putting at first, but then I realised that without this vagueness, the concept of these ascendants and gods meddling with the world would instead read like Dragonball Z (even more than it sometimes does).

"What does the scouter say about Icarium's power level!?"

One thing to bear in mind is that each book has seemingly disparate storylines and side characters, but those tend to converge towards the end of each book. To the point that it's actually a little contrived sometimes how those random characters all turn up at the same location. This is what's alluded to in the books as "convergence", a concept which, beyond its justification for why all these ascendant powers end up vying against each other, also serves as a convenient literary device for wrapping up each book.

^burtle
Jul 17, 2001

God of Boomin'



Finally hit the last section of Reaper’s Gale… please tell me things happen.

imagine dungeons
Jan 24, 2008

Like an arrow, I was only passing through.

^burtle posted:

Finally hit the last section of Reaper’s Gale… please tell me things happen.

Many things happen.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

^burtle posted:

Finally hit the last section of Reaper’s Gale… please tell me things happen.

If you're that deep in the series, you know a bunch of poo poo happens at the end of every book.

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

Jaxyon posted:

If you're that deep in the series, you know a bunch of poo poo happens at the end of every book.

I think this is the stage where as much poo poo goes down in each book as many other authors manage in a series.

OneSizeFitsAll
Sep 13, 2010

Du bist mein Sofa
Anyone found that Malazan has spoiled other fantasy series at all? I was reading some discussions about this series vs Wheel of Time online and most people recommended if one was to read both then to read WoT first, as enjoyment of it will be diminished after reading Malazan. I can sort of see it theoretically, given the overall quality of MBotF and the way it offers such a non-spoon-fed, postmodern take. And WoT is such a huge commitment, even if it's purportedly a lighter read. But I feel tempted after watching the 1st few eps of the adaptation.

Basically this is a not-very-well-disguised "shall I read WoT" post in the Malazan thread, as I'm behind on the TV show and don't want to go into the thread, and obviously don't want to go into the book spoilers thread. But I am interested in general answers to the question in my first sentence too.

I'm currently reading the Gormenghast series, which is such a different beast I don't think having read Malazan has any effect at all, and I'm keen to re-read LotR for the first time in ages soon, which like WoT is of course a quintessential good vs evil type tale. So maybe I've answered my own question, but curious about others' experiences.

The Ninth Layer
Jun 20, 2007

I felt that way for a while after finishing the series, and imo nothing in the genre matches Erikson, but different authors have different strengths and their stories have different appeals. I read WoT after Malazan and mostly enjoyed it for being a more straightforward high fantasy story of good vs evil, with characters who are much more personable and relatable than Malazan's ten thousand year old assassin mage skeleton lizards or what have you.

The only series I've read that I felt came close to the scale and tone of Malazan was R. Scott Bakker's Second Apocalypse books, which were inspired in part by Erikson's work and are basically "epic grimdark" fantasy cranked up to 11. That's what I'd recommend if you really want more like Erikson. I especially recommend the first few as audiobooks which imo make the setting's many fantasy names a lot easier to follow. Just be warned, they're very dark books and definitely not for everyone.

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

Putting questions of quality aside, Malazan is about the only epic-fantasy series I can think of where each book manages to be self-contained story. So going from that to Prince of the Elder Dragon Chronicles: Knight of Prophecy: Book 1 of 18 is a massive struggle. I've just been reading The Blacktongue Thief, and it's a lightweight but fun pulpy adventure. But it clearly exists just to set up the next book, and even though I enjoyed it I still feel unfulfilled.

Regarding WoT - there's a very fun and clever take on the Chosen One and stuff in there. But it's incredibly padded and stretched out. 4.4 million words, compared BotF 3.3. There's a stretch of multiple books that are just moving stuff around for the next climax, and it's infuriating. The central journey of the main characters is pretty good, but it takes thousands of pages, and the characters stubbornly refuse to do stuff.

BigHead
Jul 25, 2003
Huh?


Nap Ghost

OneSizeFitsAll posted:

Anyone found that Malazan has spoiled other fantasy series at all? I was reading some discussions about this series vs Wheel of Time online and most people recommended if one was to read both then to read WoT first, as enjoyment of it will be diminished after reading Malazan. I can sort of see it theoretically, given the overall quality of MBotF and the way it offers such a non-spoon-fed, postmodern take. And WoT is such a huge commitment, even if it's purportedly a lighter read. But I feel tempted after watching the 1st few eps of the adaptation.

Basically this is a not-very-well-disguised "shall I read WoT" post in the Malazan thread, as I'm behind on the TV show and don't want to go into the thread, and obviously don't want to go into the book spoilers thread. But I am interested in general answers to the question in my first sentence too.

I'm currently reading the Gormenghast series, which is such a different beast I don't think having read Malazan has any effect at all, and I'm keen to re-read LotR for the first time in ages soon, which like WoT is of course a quintessential good vs evil type tale. So maybe I've answered my own question, but curious about others' experiences.

I have not found that Malazan has spoiled anything, except perhaps appreciating in-depth world building so much that single short volume stories are a bit harder for me to read.

I have read both Malazan and WOT. Malazan twice and WOT three times. I have not found Malazan to have ruined WOT at all. If anything you appreciate the gargantuan world building Jordan undertook with WOT. Plus the story was generally charted out from the beginning, so the series is as cohesive as something that long can be.

I would highly recommend jumping into WOT. If you can slog through Malazan, then WOT is a breeze. It's much more approachable. The first book is written for tweens and is 100% a LOTR knockoff (after that the series becomes dramatically better). The bad guy is literal Satan. His minions are obviously and clearly Evil and do evil things. The good guys have slightly different flavors of the motivation of "fight literal Satan." On my last re-read, which I did because my 9 year old book worm nephew picked up the first book, took me all of like four months to finish. It's not like Malazan where you need to chart out multiple simultaneous D&D campaigns with nine different alignment charts to figure out what the hell is going on, and everyone communicates in grandiose innuendo and raised eyebrows.

In short, both are good and good for different reasons. Definitely pick up WOT and enjoy the wild ride.

If you do pick it up, look up the podcast Wheel Takes, which is a new read through podcast where they discuss the books in order chapter by chapter. You can't google anything without being completely spoiled, and you don't want to be completely spoiled, so that podcast is the most safe avenue for having a secondary resource.

OneSizeFitsAll
Sep 13, 2010

Du bist mein Sofa
Thanks for the commments. Yeah the length gives me pause also, even though it's meant to be an easier read than Malazan. I'm pretty patient, but also have kids, a pretty demanding job, various hobbies etc, and sometimes like to have a cheeky joint in the evening. Consequently it took me loving ages to get through Malazan. But given I love the genre and WoT is generally pretty well loved and sounds ultimately quite satisfying, and having been drawn in a bit by the adaptation, I think I might just bite the bullet and do it, even though I have The Dark Tower series sitting unread on my shelf, along with various other genre and non-genre stuff.

CaptainJuan
Oct 15, 2008

Thick. Juicy. Tender.

Imagine cutting into a Barry White Song.
WOT is also much faster to read. less dense and less ambiguity.

imagine dungeons
Jan 24, 2008

Like an arrow, I was only passing through.
Just to jump on the WoT talk, the audiobooks for WoT are fantastic and have two narrators. One for chapters from a male perspective and one for chapters from a female perspective and they’re both spectacular.

secular woods sex
Aug 1, 2000
I dispense wisdom by the gallon.
In my experience, reading WoT diminished my enjoyment of WoT. I don’t think I ever finished book 10.

I’ve read Malazan multiple times.

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

OneSizeFitsAll posted:

I think I might just bite the bullet and do it, even though I have The Dark Tower series sitting unread on my shelf, along with various other genre and non-genre stuff.

The Dark Tower is quite a journey. Stephen King wrote it over like 30 years, and it really shows. Just wild changes in tone and plot as he makes the entire thing up as he goes along. Not many people would agree he sticks the landing (he's Stephen King after all). But even when its dumb, its loving wild.

Shockeh
Feb 24, 2009

Now be a dear and
fuck the fuck off.
Not much chatter on The God Is Not Willing…

I… went up and down on this one. Starting out, I was excited as the world has visibly moved on, which was excellent. Then the whole middle section seemed to founder a little, with multiple scenes that only occurred to have a scene, like Erikson was writing almost the Malazan version of SNL sketches.

Then the final third kicks back into gear, and we get some truly memorable scenes up there with Chain of Dogs, and I’m roaring along, turning pages as fast as I can devour them, with a final few that are very… ‘but this was just the beginning’ setups.

I don’t think it’s going to be remembered as his best novel, but it’s doing new things, and that, I really appreciated it for. I definitely found it more pleasurable than the Kharkanas books.

Ethiser
Dec 31, 2011

Shockeh posted:

Not much chatter on The God Is Not Willing…

I think most people probably read it when it was released outside the US a few months ago.

I was talking about it with a friend a few weeks ago and while I’m super excited to see what the characters get up to next if Erikson just wrote a one off novel every now and then staring tertiary characters from the main series going about their lives I wouldn’t complain in the least.

OneSizeFitsAll
Sep 13, 2010

Du bist mein Sofa

Strom Cuzewon posted:

The Dark Tower is quite a journey. Stephen King wrote it over like 30 years, and it really shows. Just wild changes in tone and plot as he makes the entire thing up as he goes along. Not many people would agree he sticks the landing (he's Stephen King after all). But even when its dumb, its loving wild.

I will get to them, at some point (he says hopefully without dramatic irony).

One thing I'm glad I read before Malazan actually is The Chronicles of The Black Company series. I mean they were really enjoyable, and obviously influential, so it's neat to subsequently see one of the authors Cook influenced write something in a similar tradition so steroided up and ambitious (and largely successfully I think).

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

OneSizeFitsAll posted:

Anyone found that Malazan has spoiled other fantasy series at all? I was reading some discussions about this series vs Wheel of Time online and most people recommended if one was to read both then to read WoT first, as enjoyment of it will be diminished after reading Malazan. I can sort of see it theoretically, given the overall quality of MBotF and the way it offers such a non-spoon-fed, postmodern take. And WoT is such a huge commitment, even if it's purportedly a lighter read. But I feel tempted after watching the 1st few eps of the adaptation.

Basically this is a not-very-well-disguised "shall I read WoT" post in the Malazan thread, as I'm behind on the TV show and don't want to go into the thread, and obviously don't want to go into the book spoilers thread. But I am interested in general answers to the question in my first sentence too.

I'm currently reading the Gormenghast series, which is such a different beast I don't think having read Malazan has any effect at all, and I'm keen to re-read LotR for the first time in ages soon, which like WoT is of course a quintessential good vs evil type tale. So maybe I've answered my own question, but curious about others' experiences.

I've read both WoT and Malazan a bunch of times, and liking one thing doesn't ruin my liking of another.

I'm currently doing a re-read of WoT and I'd say it's good. It's not as amazing as when I was a kid, but that's more about how I've changed than the books being "spoiled" by reading anything else.

They're hard to compare.

I will say that WoT reads way easier than Malazan, but also has more fluff that I will skim over.

Fuzzy Mammal
Aug 15, 2001

Lipstick Apathy
I will say, when I read stories now and the villain is a rapist, or sadist, or child abuser or whatever for no reason but just to set them up as the bad guy in the book I find it super lazy and offputting.

imagine dungeons
Jan 24, 2008

Like an arrow, I was only passing through.

Fuzzy Mammal posted:

I will say, when I read stories now and the villain is a rapist, or sadist, or child abuser or whatever for no reason but just to set them up as the bad guy in the book I find it super lazy and offputting.

Just make them the good guys and you have MBotF

Cryptozoology
Jul 12, 2010
I've bounced off of Wheel of Time my whole life. I keep trying to get into it, but it's so heavily gendered? If anyone knows what I mean? Like I can't bring myself to care this much about mans vs womens. It's uncomfortable to read, it just feels Straight As gently caress

Am I reading it wrong? Is there something I'm missing here?

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

imagine dungeons posted:

Just make them the good guys and you have MBotF

You might want to read the series before making hot takes, but you do you

Cryptozoology posted:

I've bounced off of Wheel of Time my whole life. I keep trying to get into it, but it's so heavily gendered? If anyone knows what I mean? Like I can't bring myself to care this much about mans vs womens. It's uncomfortable to read, it just feels Straight As gently caress

Am I reading it wrong? Is there something I'm missing here?

Nah you got it.

It's "Progressive For The 1990's In Epic Fantasy", which means the author actually gave women major roles and speaking parts, and didn't make everyone white.

It's still got a gender/sex binary in the magic system and "men are like this, women are like this" in the characterization, and the author has quite a breast fetish while still being somehow less creepy than many male fantasy authors of the era.

Malazan's a lot more modern in it's gender take in terms of just basically ignoring it most of the time, but it's still got issues.

Jaxyon fucked around with this message at 01:23 on Dec 11, 2021

imagine dungeons
Jan 24, 2008

Like an arrow, I was only passing through.
Just a joke, my friend.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Barreft
Jul 21, 2014

lol

someone can't read a series cause it's "gendered"? Open your mind and just read it baby. By book 2 you see it's all bullshit, that's the whole point Jordan was making.

I'm not online enough so I dunno what "Straight As gently caress" means as a category for books especially since there's a whole bunch of same sex attraction, but like who cares who is horny for who if the story is good?

Barreft fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Dec 11, 2021

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply