Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
PITT
Sep 21, 2004
MISTER

Blockhouse posted:

If the US wanted to appease Putin I'm almost sure the government wouldn't have led a global initiative to choke the life of the country's' economy.

Led seems like a strong word, I would argue it was in concert with the EU.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Tomn posted:

Yeah, that's important context - but it doesn't change the main point of worry, which is "Hey, nobody in Russia is picking up the phone to discuss strategic deconfliction." Whether that's because Russia is throwing a hissy fit, or because they're currently getting waterboarded by Putin, either way the end result is the worrying same.
Surely there are others in russian command below the aformentioned generals that they can get a hold of at the very least? Working with what they got and all...
I'm pretty sure we'll get through this.

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Tomn posted:


Yeah, that's important context - but it doesn't change the main point of worry, which is "Hey, nobody in Russia is picking up the phone to discuss strategic deconfliction." Whether that's because Russia is throwing a hissy fit, or because they're currently getting waterboarded by Putin, either way the end result is the worrying same.

Putin does seem to be seeking to go full Stalin, next logical step is Commander in Chief. Maybe he'll answer himself after he closes the windows behind his ex-generals.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Have Some Flowers! posted:

The article says that US (and allies) actions signal that they don't want Ukraine to lose, but they're fine with a slow costly (for Ukraine) win because that maximizes the punishment to Russia and Putin.

Are there any reasonable suggestions for the US to help Ukraine speed up a victory more than they already are?

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Tiny Timbs posted:

Are there any reasonable suggestions for the US to help Ukraine speed up a victory more than they already are?

Training Ukrainian pilots to fly F-22s?

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Tiny Timbs posted:

Are there any reasonable suggestions for the US to help Ukraine speed up a victory more than they already are?
I don't see many beyond what we're doing that do not have a greatly increasing risk of escalation. I suppose we could send them more medical supplies.

Glimm
Jul 27, 2005

Time is only gonna pass you by

Tiny Timbs posted:

Are there any reasonable suggestions for the US to help Ukraine speed up a victory more than they already are?

Presumably being fine with a slow costly war means the Biden administration will not pressure Ukraine into accepting lovely terms to end the conflict early.

Sir John Falstaff
Apr 13, 2010

Tomn posted:

Interestingly, the ISW report includes this note:

So both the French report and the ISW agree that Russia controls a lot of the area and has done for a while, and that nothing has really been happening there for a while now. They disagree in whether or not the pocket has actually be closed yet. Neither of them have any comment on how many troops are in that potential pocket.

Yeah, it doesn't seem to be a big focus of anyone's commentary, which may suggest it isn't particularly significant, but idk

The other option:

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
https://twitter.com/BBCYaldaHakim/status/1506753765994647556?s=20&t=GJc6jCNNoD8BEgfHXohb6Q

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Tiny Timbs posted:

Are there any reasonable suggestions for the US to help Ukraine speed up a victory more than they already are?

Supplying of anti aircraft batteries, increase in jets sent to the country, helicopters. they can honestly give Ukraine a loving carrier that probably be sweet. Also they could give Ukraine Texas. Yes I do mean the entire state.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Supplying of anti aircraft batteries, increase in jets sent to the country, helicopters. they can honestly give Ukraine a loving carrier that probably be sweet. Also they could give Ukraine Texas. Yes I do mean the entire state.

Ukraine's got enough poo poo to deal with without saddling them with Texas. :cmon:

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

Charliegrs posted:

CNN interviewed a Ukrainian fighter pilot and a lot of what he said is pretty wild stuff. Like it sounds like there's honest to God dogfights going on over the skies of Ukraine even a month into the war when the Russians have a clear numerical advantage in warplanes.
Inside the race to prevent Russia gaining full control of the skies above Ukraine

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/23/europe/ukraine-pilot-battle-skies-cmd-intl/index.html
From what I'm getting the purpose of the Ukrainian fighter craft isn't so much to shoot down the enemy, it's to exist and force the enemy to take them into account and not be able to fly courses solely optimised for avoiding ground fire. This added variable makes the ground-based missiles more effective, scoring more kills than the aircraft could have done themselves.

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009

gay picnic defence posted:

Training Ukrainian pilots to fly F-22s?

Hastily repainting a retired Nimitz-class carrier blue and yellow and parking it in the Black Sea?

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

The X-man cometh posted:

Hastily repainting a retired Nimitz-class carrier blue and yellow and parking it in the Black Sea?

If I see A Ukrainian tug carrying a Nimitz class across the Black Sea I will lose my poo poo

AHH F/UGH
May 25, 2002

So can someone answer this question for me - Did Zelensky ban "all opposition parties" or just those 11 with pro-Russia ties? And if not all opposition parties were banned, what are some other opposition parties were allowed to stay?

AHH F/UGH fucked around with this message at 03:05 on Mar 24, 2022

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

KitConstantine posted:

Looks like the US did get the fancy e-warfare box shipped over here to get torn apart. I hope the Ukrainians made us pay through the nose
https://twitter.com/wipljw/status/1506673602015473670?t=S-Bg7nmPqUozVsZbvVHA_A&s=19

What information can we get from this? Explain to me like I’m dumb.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Boris Galerkin posted:

What information can we get from this? Explain to me like I’m dumb.

We can see if they're stolen tech in it, we can see where they are getting their parts whether China's making them or not. We can also see if there's IP theft involved in the creation of them to start. I'm sure a computer touch it can explain more about this bullshit but we can probably take software data off of it and you know glorious NSA hackers can see how the vehicle is sending data back. And potentially see if it can access other vehicles sending back data and get their locations which would be super beneficial to the ukrainians.


If any of this is outright wrong please say something I need to know I am not a big intelligence guy in terms of reverse engineering soft and hardware

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Getting some numbers on how wrecked one of the VDV paratrooper regiments is. And this isn't likely to be the final total.
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1506777574084595717?t=Ca6NNBcDxV_JsvNqrVJLjg&s=19
From the article:

quote:

Thus, in less than a month, at least 21 servicemen of the 331st Guards Parachute Assault Regiment of Kostroma, including the commander of the unit, died.

Foreign media report other information about the number of killed Kostroma paratroopers, but the current legislation prohibits us from publishing it.

During the war in Afghanistan, 56 Kostroma residents were killed, in two Chechen wars - 57 and two - in South Ossetia in August 2008.

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010

AHH F/UGH posted:

So can someone answer this question for me - Did Zelensky ban "all opposition parties" or just those 11 with pro-Russia ties? And if not all opposition parties were banned, what are some other opposition parties were allowed to stay?

He banned the activities of 11 opposition parties, those with deep pro-Russian ties, only one of which actually held any seats in the parliament.

EDIT: The party with seats in parliament was the second largest party in parliament. It held 43 seats compared to Tymoshenko's Party (26 seats), Poroshenko's (25) or another pro-Euro party (that held 20 seats but appears to have split into two). Zelensky's own party had 254 seats.

Morrow fucked around with this message at 03:11 on Mar 24, 2022

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Few points on this

1) I think he's overstating 'expected kiev to fall' with planning for the worst wrt security situation for embassies and Zelensky's safety and Russia's ability to get enough people into the capital to cause a ton of chaos. That's not to say that people anywhere were super confident of Ukraine's actual ability to defend beyond being able to slow down and inflict horrific losses on Russia.

2) Natsec blob was pretty on point actually wrt Ukraine's capabilities and to the general facts of the war and Russia basically put into plan the exact plan Ukraine had expected and been preparing for (with substantial American and NATO help) the better part of a decade. Only real early days strategic surprises were, pushing through chernobyl and how small Russia's opening salvos aimed at Ukrainian air defenses were. Ironically it was not just the Russian elite who were unaware of how different Ukrainian armed forces of 2022 are from 2014, it was very much a thing in the US as well.

3) A fairly core planning thing, and only moreso in military planning, is to never make best-case assumptions about a situation so you don't get caught off guard by things you have discounted or failed to account for. That perspective reads as quite pessimistic, but it's distinct from the actual outlook which does not expect literally every possible thing to go wrong. From what I've seen, most assessments of Ukraine's chances were much more grounded in the latter than in some abject pessimism. Two big refrains I heard over and over were 'there's no quick way to conquer the second largest country in Europe and especially not during the spring' and 'a month from now Russian forces will be bogged down while Ukrainians hammer their supply lines.' So I think that the 'this caught everyone off guard' is more of an individual 'i was just caught off guard' acknowledgement in many cases.

4) with that said, a Ukrainian victory (or even strings of successes enough that you start getting significant regional victories) is undeniably something few people outside of Ukraine have given a lot of mental energy to because there were far more pressing existentially relevant concerns. So yeah there's probably a big blind spot here of 'where do we go if Ukraine really is pulling this off?' Additionally it's also way the gently caress too early to start be calling the conflict and there remain a number of huge things that could swing things in either direction (things ranging from Ukraine deciding they're winning and taking their foot off the gas, Russia generally mobilizing, other countries entering the war, and so on). I know there is institutional thought about what a Ukrainian victory would look like, but yeah it's probably not something the administration was expecting or significantly accounting for and if they are in fact seeing the signs of it, yeah there's no doubt a huge scramble to understand it. Personally I remain skeptical because wars very much are not over until they're actually over and converting early successes into an actual victory is as much or more work than achieving the early successes in extremely advantageous circumstances.

Once the mud dries up, which it already is clearly starting to, though it appears it's still going to be a while yet, and if Ukrainian starts mounting offenses as opposed to hit and run attacks or fighting out of defensive positions that maximize their advantages, then it's a whole different kind of war from what they've succeeded at so far.

Herstory Begins Now fucked around with this message at 03:25 on Mar 24, 2022

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Have we ever received confirmation that the iPhone 76s were shot down? Because that's 400 vdv soldiers in one engagement.

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Boris Galerkin posted:

What information can we get from this? Explain to me like I’m dumb.

According to replies this is Russia's most advanced electronic warfare box. It's the peak of their tech. By obtaining it the US government can see exactly how it works and figure out how to counter it with our equipment. Apparently it will put Russia another decade in the hole because they will have to advance even more to beat the advancements and counters the US develops using Russia's equipment as a cheat sheet

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

Not to sound too conspiratorial but this really does look like a green screen.

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?

does anyone have a source for that claim? i probably just missed it, but i don't remember hearing that before.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Rinkles posted:

does anyone have a source for that claim? i probably just missed it, but i don't remember hearing that before.
It was a pretty common projection although it was mostly looking at a map and figuring 'well, the Russian army isn't made of jetpacks, it will take them at least 2-3 days to push into the city.' This was before the intense levels of clown factor were clear.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Boris Galerkin posted:

Not to sound too conspiratorial but this really does look like a green screen.

It absolutely is a green screen it's 2022. Why wouldn't zelensky mask his location?

Also he used this green screen before same guard in the same location and everything. It's loving obvious at this point so obvious that it's intentional. The thread that cannot be named in the sub forum that cannot be named mentioned that these prove that zelensky wasn't actually in Kyiv.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

AHH F/UGH posted:

So can someone answer this question for me - Did Zelensky ban "all opposition parties" or just those 11 with pro-Russia ties? And if not all opposition parties were banned, what are some other opposition parties were allowed to stay?

I haven't found a comprehensive answer for this either. The closest piece I can find is this:

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/3/21/why-did-ukraine-suspend-11-pro-russia-parties

quote:

Most “pro-Russian” parties in Ukraine are first and foremost “pro-themselves” and have autonomous interests and sources of income in Ukraine. They are trying to capitalise on the real grievances of a sizeable minority of Russian-speaking Ukrainian citizens concentrated in the southeastern regions. These parties do command significant public support. For example, three of the recently suspended parties participated in the parliamentary elections in 2019 and combined received about 2.7 million votes (18.3 percent) and in the most recent polls conducted before Russia’s invasion, these parties collectively scored about 16-20 percent of the vote.

Other parties on Zelenskyy’s suspension list were of left-wing orientation. Some of them played an important role in Ukrainian politics in the 1990-2000s, such as the Socialist and Progressive Socialist parties, but by now they are all completely marginalised. Indeed, there is no political party in Ukraine today with “left” or “socialist” in its name that could secure any considerable portion of the general vote now or for the foreseeable future. Ukraine had already suspended in 2015 all of the country’s communist parties under the “decommunisation” law, which was strongly criticised by the Venice Commission. The latest round of suspensions may not be necessarily motivated by the wish to erase the left from Ukraine’s political sphere, but it certainly contributes to such an agenda.

[...]

While it is easy to classify the decision to suspend the “pro-Russian” political parties amid a Russian invasion as a security necessity, the move should be analysed and understood in this wider context. It is also important to point out that the government’s sanctions regime against opposition parties, politicians and media has long attracted widespread criticism within Ukraine. Many in the country believe that the sanctions were designed and implemented by a small group attending Ukraine’s Security and Defence Council meetings, without serious discussion, on dubious legal grounds, to further corrupt interests.

It doesn't seem like a great or necessary move, really, but I'm not Ukrainian.

Reiterpallasch
Nov 3, 2010



Fun Shoe

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:


Early on I guess maybe middle of the conflict we saw the Russians would chop a shitload of trees down and lay them all behind or in front of the tank. I'm sure those things are happening in larger capacities. My theory is that hole Ukrainian trees are going to get chopped down by Russia to sell was bullshit and it was reality seeing forests getting deleted for a firewood and also makeshift Bridges

To be clear, there's no evidence that they are actually doing this, but cutting down trees and using them to corduroy a road is a time honored way for an army to restore mobility in mud; Sherman did it in Georgia during the ACW and the Soviets used to make movements in the Pripyat swamps in WW2.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corduroy_road

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Reiterpallasch posted:

To be clear, there's no evidence that they are actually doing this, but cutting down trees and using them to corduroy a road is a time honored way for an army to restore mobility in mud; Sherman did it in Georgia during the ACW and the Soviets used to make movements in the Pripyat swamps in WW2.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corduroy_road

Thanks for clarifying. I actually had no idea about this concept and just saw a tank hosed up in the mud getting pulled out with logs which made me base an assumption that it as being done in mass.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Boris Galerkin posted:

What information can we get from this? Explain to me like I’m dumb.

Knowing the specific capabilities and quirks of a piece of EW gear makes it possible to do things like immediately identify it's activities and get an approximate range based purely on it's emissions. You can also specifically tailor HARM (anti-radar) missiles to seek it.

Dr. Arbitrary
Mar 15, 2006

Bleak Gremlin

Boris Galerkin posted:

What information can we get from this? Explain to me like I’m dumb.

It might be comparable to the capture of the enigma machine in WW2.
Prior to that, we had a general idea of how it worked, as well as intercepted transmissions.

Decryption was still possible, but it involves a lot of guessing about the underlying mechanism.

After capture, decryption was still challenging, but since we knew the exact process involved, a lot of false trails could be excluded.

In theory, a design mistake could have been discovered and broke it wide open.

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Few points on this

1) I think he's overstating 'expected kiev to fall' with planning for the worst wrt security situation for embassies and Zelensky's safety and Russia's ability to get enough people into the capital to cause a ton of chaos. That's not to say that people anywhere were super confident of Ukraine's actual ability to defend beyond being able to slow down and inflict horrific losses on Russia.

2) Natsec blob was pretty on point actually wrt Ukraine's capabilities and to the general facts of the war and Russia basically put into plan the exact plan Ukraine had expected and been preparing for (with substantial American and NATO help) the better part of a decade. Only real early days strategic surprises were, pushing through chernobyl and how small Russia's opening salvos aimed at Ukrainian air defenses were. Ironically it was not just the Russian elite who were unaware of how different Ukrainian armed forces of 2022 are from 2014, it was very much a thing in the US as well.

3) A fairly core planning thing, and only moreso in military planning, is to never make best-case assumptions about a situation so you don't get caught off guard by things you have discounted or failed to account for. That perspective reads as quite pessimistic, but it's distinct from the actual outlook which does not expect literally every possible thing to go wrong. From what I've seen, most assessments of Ukraine's chances were much more grounded in the latter than in some abject pessimism. Two big refrains I heard over and over were 'there's no quick way to conquer the second largest country in Europe and especially not during the spring' and 'a month from now Russian forces will be bogged down while Ukrainians hammer their supply lines.' So I think that the 'this caught everyone off guard' is more of an individual 'i was just caught off guard' acknowledgement in many cases.

4) with that said, a Ukrainian victory (or even strings of successes enough that you start getting significant regional victories) is undeniably something few people outside of Ukraine have given a lot of mental energy to because there were far more pressing existentially relevant concerns. So yeah there's probably a big blind spot here of 'where do we go if Ukraine really is pulling this off?' Additionally it's also way the gently caress too early to start be calling the conflict and there remain a number of huge things that could swing things in either direction (things ranging from Ukraine deciding they're winning and taking their foot off the gas, Russia generally mobilizing, other countries entering the war, and so on). I know there is institutional thought about what a Ukrainian victory would look like, but yeah it's probably not something the administration was expecting or significantly accounting for and if they are in fact seeing the signs of it, yeah there's no doubt a huge scramble to understand it. Personally I remain skeptical because wars very much are not over until they're actually over and converting early successes into an actual victory is as much or more work than achieving the early successes in extremely advantageous circumstances.

Once the mud dries up, which it already is clearly starting to, though it appears it's still going to be a while yet, and if Ukrainian starts mounting offenses as opposed to hit and run attacks or fighting out of defensive positions that maximize their advantages, then it's a whole different kind of war from what they've succeeded at so far.

Don't forget
5) While we figured Russia's capabilities weren't as advertised, we didn't anticipate them having a poo poo strategy, even more poo poo training, and the absolute bono-level poo poo maintenance and combat readiness of their equipment. It's like seeing a big imposing castle, and only after touching it do you realize it's just an inflatable.

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

Rinkles posted:

does anyone have a source for that claim? i probably just missed it, but i don't remember hearing that before.

“Sources in the intelligence community” was the usual attribution, but I think there’s a lot of mis-remembering going on. The statement wasn’t “Kiev would fall in 24-48 hours”, it was “Kiev could fall within 24-48 hours.” Which is exactly what the poster above described - worst case analysis, not likeliest outcome.

(The linked WSJ story, in case of paywall: “WASHINGTON—The White House warned that Kyiv could fall as Russian forces continue to advance on the city.

“Kyiv falling is a real possibility,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Friday. “Even as we see resistance on the ground, Russia’s military continues to advance toward Kyiv.”

U.S. officials had assessed as recently as Thursday that Kyiv could fall within 24-48 hours. U.S. officials still expect it could fall, but a senior defense official said Friday that Ukrainian resistance was stronger than the U.S. first expected and the Ukrainians had slowed the Russians’ push into the capital.”)

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?
That's more in line with what I remembered

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/tlch9g/the_belarusian_military_contacts_the_ukrainian/

Belarus military has told the Ukrainian army they if they attack they will discuss terms of surrender.


As in their own.

Comstar fucked around with this message at 03:47 on Mar 24, 2022

Marshal Prolapse
Jun 23, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Morrow posted:

He banned the activities of 11 opposition parties, those with deep pro-Russian ties, only one of which actually held any seats in the parliament.

EDIT: The party with seats in parliament was the second largest party in parliament. It held 43 seats compared to Tymoshenko's Party (26 seats), Poroshenko's (25) or another pro-Euro party (that held 20 seats but appears to have split into two). Zelensky's own party had 254 seats.

Yeah, it’s basically like the rolling up of the German American Bund at the start of World War II or Mosley’s group of dorks…British Union of fascists (I think) in the UK.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Once the mud dries up, which it already is clearly starting to, though it appears it's still going to be a while yet, and if Ukrainian starts mounting offenses as opposed to hit and run attacks or fighting out of defensive positions that maximize their advantages, then it's a whole different kind of war from what they've succeeded at so far.

I seem to recall that some mid-early assessments figured that the mud would slow the Russians down, but once the mud ended, watch out, because now the Bear could maneuver freely and shatter the Ukrainians on their poor defensive terrain.

It would be a very strange turnabout if the ending of the mud actually helped the Ukrainians because now the Russians have exhausted their fuel trying to attack through the mud and the Ukrainians are the ones with mobility.

Still, that being said, the mud only really full dries up around the end of April or so, right? That's PROBABLY enough time to stockpile at least some supplies that could keep Russian tanks moving around by then, assuming the Russian bureaucracy unfucks itself. It may not be impossible that the end of the mud season WILL see some Russian offensives.

Thing is, by this point, "assuming the Russian bureaucracy unfucks itself" feels like kind of a big ask. The latest White House press briefing from the 22nd suggests that while the Russians are making plans, they still haven't actually started moving supplies from the rest of the country towards the Ukrainian theater. Given how long it took to assemble the supplies for the initial invasion in the first place, I have to think that if they don't start moving now they'll find it hard to get enough stuff in position a month later to do much.

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.

Comstar posted:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/tlch9g/the_belarusian_military_contacts_the_ukrainian/

Belarus military has told the Ukrainian army they if they attack they will discuss terns of surrender.


As in their own.



I mean, good if true. It'd be one less headache for UA to deal with.

KillHour
Oct 28, 2007


Comstar posted:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/tlch9g/the_belarusian_military_contacts_the_ukrainian/

Belarus military has told the Ukrainian army they if they attack they will discuss terns of surrender.


As in their own.

This has to be just under "Lukashenko fakes his own coup and secretly escapes the country to hide out in a Polish military base until the war ends" on their list of desperate ideas.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gejnor
Mar 14, 2005

Fun Shoe

Comstar posted:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/tlch9g/the_belarusian_military_contacts_the_ukrainian/

Belarus military has told the Ukrainian army they if they attack they will discuss terns of surrender.


As in their own.

While this would be great, this should not be taken with a pinch of salt, or a boulder of salt, this is the entirety of Lake Baskunchak and Bonneville Salt Flats combined in terms of believability right now.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5