Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Morningwoodpecker
Jan 17, 2016

I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO BE THIS STUPID

BUT HERE YOU ARE

Tetraptous posted:

Yeah, turbines are pretty forgiving. Aircraft often use special fuel formulations for safety more than anything. The US Army runs everything on JP-8 to simplify logistics, but other operators like Australia just run on regular diesel because that’s what their other ground vehicles use. I’m sure there are some differences in overhaul cycles and whatnot, but the kind of fuel would not be Ukraine’s problem. The amount of fuel might be!

Like a lot of these weapon systems, technical knowledge for maintenance and training is probably the biggest barrier. The US might have the will to ship over Patriot, but not to have US advisors in the country to train and maintain the equipment. Maybe this stuff would have been useful if it had been shipped out last year, but there was an understandable concern about escalating the situation.

Another barrier is the difference between organising a delivery of kit you'd never use yourself and hanging onto the things you might desperately need yourself if things expand.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

d64
Jan 15, 2003

gay picnic defence posted:

acidx posted:

I think there is a degree of this as there are some lefties who romanticize the USSR, but I think the bulk of it is just a simplified framing of the world where the US is the worst actor in the world in every situation. In that situation, Russia is just the de facto beneficiary of people who are siding against whatever they perceive the US to be doing. All Russia needs to do is make some vague statements about the West forcing their hand and opposing imperialism, and they'll get the support of this group. The irony of course is that it's in the west where these people are free to feel this way about their governments. Go try and proclaim that the Russian government is the source of all the worlds evils in Moscow and see what happens.
I think that’s laid the groundwork for a lot of the pro Russia tankie poo poo we’re seeing. There’s been plenty of examples of Russia backing the victims of unjustified US/western fuckery and it’s gradually morphed into a US bad/Russia good dichotomy in some left wing circles. That’s made them far more susceptible to Russian propaganda regarding Ukraine and its nazis because they’ve already been primed to assume that Russia is the good guy and whoever the US is backing must be the bad guy.

It’s a shame because a strength of the left is it’s propensity to actually analyse complex situations but instead some of the most committed leftists have sunk to the same goodies and baddies poo poo I expect from chuds.
I think that to many older communists, "imperialism" is a loaded word that always implicates western powers. Just as an example, Kim Il Sung in his speeches and writings hardly mentioned "Americans" as such, always "American imperialists". He had a lot to say of those. "Peace" was another word Soviets tried to claim for their own purposes and at times succeeded. At some point student demonstrators in Helsinki chanted "Soviet missile! Missile of peace!" - enemies of the Soviet union were a destructive force in the world and "peace" meant them being kept in check.

In the US many tankies seem to be younger people but in Finland, most of the hardcore putinists are older people. Many of them used to be communists, but I don't see much of an ideology behind it anymore. It's just whatever Russia does is good and what EU and US does it bad. Already some years ago I started to suspect that to most of these people the good and constructive messages of socialism and communism probably didn't mean much, they just were elated to be on the winning team with big and strong USSR against imperialist bogeymen.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Risky Bisquick posted:

I remember hearing about the poisoned baked goods, but spiking the alcohol seems new. Anyways that is a lot of troops to be out of combat at once


Where is this news from?

Adenoid Dan
Mar 8, 2012

The Hobo Serenader
Lipstick Apathy
I don't object to them using any means like poisoning to defend themselves but man I do really worry about reprisal attacks.

(Which, obviously, have already been happening)

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Morningwoodpecker posted:

Another barrier is the difference between organising a delivery of kit you'd never use yourself and hanging onto the things you might desperately need yourself if things expand.
I do not think rusted-out IFVs are going to make a difference to the defense of Germany from the Russian army. There are two large countries between Germany and Russia, one of which is currently, it would seem, winning against Russia's actual army, and killing a lot of them. Yes, I would say probably nobody other than Ukraine has a lot to fear for the next few months from the Russian army.

fnox
May 19, 2013



https://twitter.com/jmscaronte/status/1510608437994049544

Oh, yeah, btw there's Russian Nazis. You don't even to squint that hard to see the black sun patch.

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011

Nessus posted:

I do not think rusted-out IFVs are going to make a difference to the defense of Germany from the Russian army. There are two large countries between Germany and Russia, one of which is currently, it would seem, winning against Russia's actual army, and killing a lot of them. Yes, I would say probably nobody other than Ukraine has a lot to fear for the next few months from the Russian army.

I mean the real reason the Germans are holding onto those IFVs as they are is probably because they are inoperable and rusted out hulks for lack of use and maintenance and they are too ashamed to let others know this.

GaussianCopula
Jun 5, 2011
Jews fleeing the Holocaust are not in any way comparable to North Africans, who don't flee genocide but want to enjoy the social welfare systems of Northern Europe.

fnox posted:

https://twitter.com/jmscaronte/status/1510608437994049544

Oh, yeah, btw there's Russian Nazis. You don't even to squint that hard to see the black sun patch.

What differentiates Russian Nazis from regular Russian soldiers?
Are they raping, murdering and looting in a more evil way?

Nessus posted:

I do not think rusted-out IFVs are going to make a difference to the defense of Germany from the Russian army. There are two large countries between Germany and Russia, one of which is currently, it would seem, winning against Russia's actual army, and killing a lot of them. Yes, I would say probably nobody other than Ukraine has a lot to fear for the next few months from the Russian army.


Germany is not giving away stuff the Bundeswehr actually needs because then they would have to replace those and that might mean that some goodie in the coalition treaty can not be paid for, which in turn would make the peace activist wings of the Greens/SPD very mad. Additionally Germany still only allows the export of "defensive weapons", which is a term not well defined but as far as I know rules out tanks for example.

GaussianCopula fucked around with this message at 08:35 on Apr 4, 2022

Morningwoodpecker
Jan 17, 2016

I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO BE THIS STUPID

BUT HERE YOU ARE

Nessus posted:

I do not think rusted-out IFVs are going to make a difference to the defense of Germany from the Russian army. There are two large countries between Germany and Russia, one of which is currently, it would seem, winning against Russia's actual army, and killing a lot of them. Yes, I would say probably nobody other than Ukraine has a lot to fear for the next few months from the Russian army.

Tanks have a far longer shelf life than a few months. We've just lurched 30 years backwards in terms of the situation, anybody who claims to know how this will pan out is lying.

So you hope for the best and prepare for the worst. Keeping a stockpile of replacements for yourself is prudent right now.

Adenoid Dan
Mar 8, 2012

The Hobo Serenader
Lipstick Apathy

fnox posted:

https://twitter.com/jmscaronte/status/1510608437994049544

Oh, yeah, btw there's Russian Nazis. You don't even to squint that hard to see the black sun patch.

Their watermark is also a white supremacist symbol (not always, but certainly in these circumstances) and also SS.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

GaussianCopula posted:

What differentiates Russian Nazis from regular Russian soldiers?
Are they raping, murdering and looting in a more evil way?

More interested in world ice theory

ShadowHawk
Jun 25, 2000

CERTIFIED PRE OWNED TESLA OWNER

Morningwoodpecker posted:

Tanks have a far longer shelf life than a few months. We've just lurched 30 years backwards in terms of the situation, anybody who claims to know how this will pan out is lying.

So you hope for the best and prepare for the worst. Keeping a stockpile of replacements for yourself is prudent right now.
I don't really understand this. Who do they have to even hypothetically use the tanks against if not Russia? And even then if they were at literal war with Russia right now, wouldn't sending those tanks to the frontline in Ukraine be the best place for them anyway?

fnox
May 19, 2013



GaussianCopula posted:

What differentiates Russian Nazis from regular Russian soldiers?
Are they raping, murdering and looting in a more evil way?

Nothing at all, just reminded me of how those black sun patches Azov uses were used to justify calling the entirety of Ukraine's military Nazis.

Adenoid Dan posted:

Their watermark is also a white supremacist symbol (not always, but certainly in these circumstances) and also SS.

Yup, I believe they're Wagner group adjacent. So these are guys pretty much operating under Putin's beck and call.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

GaussianCopula posted:

What differentiates Russian Nazis from regular Russian soldiers?
Are they raping, murdering and looting in a more evil way?

They are probably worse than average, yes

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

The wreckage that could possibly be the IL-76. Same as posted before, little to go on. No gore in this tweet, but the thread has plenty. :nms:

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheDeadDistrict/status/1510879875405684738

It looks like a low bypass jet engine, you can see a wheel rim that kind of fits the ones an IL-76 has (many/small instead of few/big). The airfoil structure in the foreground is far too thin to be a wing, but could perhaps be part of the flap structure. All three pieces would come from the same area.



Definitely not close to confirmation, but I'd say you couldn't rule it out as an IL-76.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

Concerned Citizen posted:

ISW has really become too reliant on the UA General Staff for its updates in general. It's not super useful to just recycle their updates in a new format rather than incorporating the ample OSINT stuff out there.

I do have to agree that a fair bit of what the UA General Staff has to say seems pretty out there and questionably sourced. I mean, it makes sense that a military organization isn't exactly going to be revealing where they got their intel from but a lot of their claims involve claiming knowledge of the intimate on-goings of Russian decision-making and what goes on behind Russian lines and I'm forced to ask: Can their HUMINT really be THAT good? I'm not ruling it out entirely since between corruption, poor morale, and some skeevy ideological justifications for the war I can see there being Russians willing to talk to Ukrainian agents about what's going on but Occam's Razor does suggest that sometimes they're just saying more than they can really support, albeit for perfectly understandable reasons.

Morningwoodpecker
Jan 17, 2016

I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO BE THIS STUPID

BUT HERE YOU ARE

ShadowHawk posted:

I don't really understand this. Who do they have to even hypothetically use the tanks against if not Russia? And even then if they were at literal war with Russia right now, wouldn't sending those tanks to the frontline in Ukraine be the best place for them anyway?

The world today is vastly different to the world six months ago. The next six months could see similar or larger changes.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Morningwoodpecker posted:

The world today is vastly different to the world six months ago. The next six months could see similar or larger changes.

There just isn't any other country posing a credible threat in the vicinity of Europe other than Russia. Unless China is going to invade Europe with its navy? A threat can't just materialize overnight, especially one requiring tanks. It's true that world is changing, but that doesn't mean the scope and pace of change isn't limited by some parameters - we wouldn't be in a proxy war with Russia hadn't Russia spent two decades arming itself and creating a justification for it, for instance.

Owling Howl
Jul 17, 2019

Tomn posted:

I do have to agree that a fair bit of what the UA General Staff has to say seems pretty out there and questionably sourced.

I'm sure there's propaganda and wishful thinking but the Russian army does to an extent communicate over cell phones and un-encrypted radios which should provide a lot more intel than one would normally expect.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

steinrokkan posted:

There just isn't any other country posing a credible threat in the vicinity of Europe other than Russia. Unless China is going to invade Europe with its navy? A threat can't just materialize overnight, especially one requiring tanks. It's true that world is changing, but that doesn't mean the scope and pace of change isn't limited by some parameters - we wouldn't be in a proxy war with Russia hadn't Russia spent two decades arming itself and creating a justification for it, for instance.

Also, ensuring that russia loses this is a good way to discourage anyone from trying to pull any poo poo in the near future. If Europe can't defend its neighbor that sends a very bad message about its abilities and will.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

steinrokkan posted:

There just isn't any other country posing a credible threat in the vicinity of Europe other than Russia. Unless China is going to invade Europe with its navy? A threat can't just materialize overnight, especially one requiring tanks. It's true that world is changing, but that doesn't mean the scope and pace of change isn't limited by some parameters - we wouldn't be in a proxy war with Russia hadn't Russia spent two decades arming itself and creating a justification for it, for instance.

China could really make us hurt if it wanted to however via economic means.

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011

His Divine Shadow posted:

China could really make us hurt if it wanted to however via economic means.

As far as I'm aware, China is very much dependent on trade with the US.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Randarkman posted:

As far as I'm aware, China is very much dependent on trade with the US.
It's not exactly all peaches and cream in China right now either, so I doubt they would want to have a giant trade war (and resulting local unemployment) with the US right now. Or in the next six months, even.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Randarkman posted:

As far as I'm aware, China is very much dependent on trade with the US.

It goes both ways, sure they couldn't hurt us without hurting themselves, but it's not like it cannot happen.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Randarkman posted:

As far as I'm aware, China is very much dependent on trade with the US.

I think I've already heard this somewhere like a month ago

GaussianCopula
Jun 5, 2011
Jews fleeing the Holocaust are not in any way comparable to North Africans, who don't flee genocide but want to enjoy the social welfare systems of Northern Europe.

mobby_6kl posted:

I think I've already heard this somewhere like a month ago

And it's still true. The Russian economy is turbofucked, the issue is just that a turbofucked economy does not disable the military from day 1 - even more so for countries that are not dependent on oil/energy imports.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

GaussianCopula posted:

And it's still true. The Russian economy is turbofucked, the issue is just that a turbofucked economy does not disable the military from day 1 - even more so for countries that are not dependent on oil/energy imports.
Well yeah exactly, what good is it if they can level your cities and kill thousands in the meantime?

But actually reading those posts again that's not really applicable to China since they won't invade continental EU so it would be purely a sanctions showdown.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Insane stuff here

https://twitter.com/TadeuszGiczan/status/1510908231077531648
https://twitter.com/TadeuszGiczan/status/1510908238677614598
https://twitter.com/TadeuszGiczan/status/1510908245568856067

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

:stare:

I'm starting to think that maybe the people rooting for the invaders aren't going to end up on the right side of history.

Is that for domestic consumption? Can someone familiar with the Russian media landscape tell if this is preparing the Russian population for the warcrime allegations or some poo poo like that?

Terminally Bored
Oct 31, 2011

Twenty-five dollars and a six pack to my name

gay picnic defence posted:

:stare:

I'm starting to think that maybe the people rooting for the invaders aren't going to end up on the right side of history.

Is that for domestic consumption? Can someone familiar with the Russian media landscape tell if this is preparing the Russian population for the warcrime allegations or some poo poo like that?

Ukrainians have been treated like subhumans by Ryssians for a long time. This is just saying the silent part out loud.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011


Generalplan West coming along nicely

Feliday Melody
May 8, 2021

https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1510699728102592512?s=20&t=jYf2VCMeCUgkmYJ6dxKHlA

Retweeted by "I swear I'm not a Russian government mouthpiece" Caleb T. Maupin.

with a rebel yell she QQd
Jan 18, 2007

Villain


Pizdec posted:

Zelenskyy? :wtc: Is there a source?

Last weeks of the campaign the government was pushing "Ukrainians are attacking US now" "Zelensky is attacking US" "The opposition is in league with Ukraine" so it's not that big of a change in rhetoric.

Ashenai posted:

I'm Hungarian, I can confirm it. Orbán said it in his victory speech. All over Hungarian news.

Direkt kerültem a beszédet. Szégyen. :(

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Feliday Melody posted:

https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1510699728102592512?s=20&t=jYf2VCMeCUgkmYJ6dxKHlA

Retweeted by "I swear I'm not a Russian government mouthpiece" Caleb T. Maupin.

To be fair Russia would have to have captured a major city first before Ukraine could recapture it.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

fnox posted:

https://twitter.com/jmscaronte/status/1510608437994049544

Oh, yeah, btw there's Russian Nazis. You don't even to squint that hard to see the black sun patch.

It's a new logo. They still have their old one on their VK page.

freebooter
Jul 7, 2009

Ashenai posted:

I'm Hungarian, I can confirm it. Orbán said it in his victory speech. All over Hungarian news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2lCKstcXq8&t=441s

Starting from 7:21, my transcription:

"Ez a győzelem azért is marad majd emlékezetes talán életünk végéig, mert most kellett a legnagyobb túlerővel megküzdeni. A baloldal itthon, a nemzetközi baloldal körös-körül, a brüsszeli bürokraták, a Soros-birodalom minden pénze és szervezete, a nemzetközi fősodratú média és a végén még az ukrán elnök is. Ennyi ellenfelünk egyszerre még sosem volt."

My translation:

"Perhaps another reason why we should remember this victory for as long as we live: now is when the forces against us were at their most overwhelming. The political left at home, the international left all around us, the bureaucrats in Brussels, all the money and all the organizations of the Soros empire, the international mainstream media, and by the end, even the Ukrainian president. We have never had so many opponents, all at once."

Obviously this sucks but it also sounds basically identical to the poo poo coming out of the last US president's mouth, every country in the world has a pretty big element of this in its voter base

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011


Morningwoodpecker
Jan 17, 2016

I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO BE THIS STUPID

BUT HERE YOU ARE

mobby_6kl posted:

Also, ensuring that russia loses this is a good way to discourage anyone from trying to pull any poo poo in the near future. If Europe can't defend its neighbor that sends a very bad message about its abilities and will.

Russia has had their arses handed to them in the north around Kyiv (not so much in the south/east). They've been hit with massive sanctions. Poland have just announced their willingness to host nukes. The EU is rearming.

Russia feel far more insecure than they did before. That's fantastic if they back off, but it's an if.

Gejnor
Mar 14, 2005

Fun Shoe

freebooter posted:

Obviously this sucks but it also sounds basically identical to the poo poo coming out of the last US president's mouth, every country in the world has a pretty big element of this in its voter base

From a Hungarian youtuber:

quote:

Viktor Orban won the elections in Hungary. Not only that, but with a two-thirds majority. That is of course rather concerning.

Orban is a pro-Putin far right ethno-nationalist, whose publicly declared enemies include the Left, Brussels, communists, Soros, and now officially Zelensky, the president of Ukraine.

While the war in Ukraine has been a disaster for almost every European far right party (they're very pro-Putin), it actually worked in Orban's favor. And why is that?

The elections in Hungary are free, but not fair.

Orban controls most of Hungary's media, and turned public service TV channels, newspapers etc. into his 24/7 campaign and propaganda machine. Apart from that, Orban took over Hungary's second-biggest commercial TV channel, and two of its most popular news sites among others, and turned them into similar propaganda outlets. Opposition radio did not get a single frequency for years now. In the countryside if you don't have access to the internet, you don't have access to any news besides Orban's.

Otherwise voting from Western Europe, where there are large Hungarian diasporas, is needlessly overcomplicated, lots of hoops to jump through.
Voting in Slovakia and Transylvania however, in the ethnic Hungarian areas, couldn't be any easier. They'll even show up to your house with your voting sheet if you ask them to. These ethnic Hungarian communities have been financed by Orban for years now: new sports halls, churches, etc. Those folks will be more than happy to vote for Orban.

On public media, following 4 years of pro-Orban propaganda, the opposition got 5 minutes of airtime. Between two news segments detailing how the opposition would drag Hungary into the war, and how they want to hurt children with their trans ideology, etc.

So yeah, free but not fair.

The problem is, Orban isolated himself diplomatically, not even Poland will talk to him. That, and there is a huge hole in the budget that needs to be plugged somehow. Not with EU money, since there won't be any.

Speaking of which, a positive of this whole debacle is that the EU might just get serious about its anti-autocracy measures. They'll withhold funds, launch investigations, etc. Time will tell!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Threadkiller Dog
Jun 9, 2010
What's happening in Hungary is sad but at some point they will have to relent and normalize with the rest of the EU.

I was gonna say it's like if New Jersey or North Carolina turned into weirdo pseudo autocracies for a couple of decades but then I realized you americans are proably more used to weird federal tinpot governors than we are. :(

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5