|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:give gitmo back to cuba and then send them to gitmo why do you want them to have better healthcare?
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 09:15 |
|
|
Yeah it seems like Thomas is gearing up to take on substantive due process directly, it wouldn’t be just limited to those three cases either. Everything would be on the table.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:24
|
|
|
is there a good rundown of substantive due process thats not law school drivel?
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:29
|
|
|
Antonymous posted:Here's an insane list of hundreds of times a newer supreme court decided an older supreme court was wrong 
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:39
|
|
|
Ardennes posted:Yeah it seems like Thomas is gearing up to take on substantive due process directly, it wouldn’t be just limited to those three cases either. Everything would be on the table. But first he's gonna make weed legal for everyone like in his dissent from 20 years ago in Raich
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:42
|
|
|
i know they are pointless, but are there even any protests anywhere? it feels like everyone is just depressed and dejected and has given up entirely
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:55
|
|
|
Ardennes posted:Yeah it seems like Thomas is gearing up to take on substantive due process directly, it wouldn’t be just limited to those three cases either. Everything would be on the table. It would be cool if the Supreme Court just overturned literally everything in the name of the Republican ideal of "a government small enough you could drown it in a bathtub"
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:55
|
|
|
Kit Walker posted:It would be cool if the Supreme Court just overturned literally everything in the name of the Republican ideal of "a government small enough you could drown it in a bathtub" Supreme Court overturns the Bill of Rights because it wasn't originally part of the Constitution (except the Second Amendment which was handed down on stone tablets by God)
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:58
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:i know they are pointless, but are there even any protests anywhere? it feels like everyone is just depressed and dejected and has given up entirely I went to one and they dismissed promptly at like 7:00PM
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 01:58
|
|
|
I imagine there were impromptu protests in most major cities and there will be more over the weekend. But since there will be no [REDACTED], they'll accomplish nothing, the news cycle will move on, and in two months blue checks will be smugly posting at teenagers in red states that their parents should have voted for Hilary.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:01
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:i know they are pointless, but are there even any protests anywhere? it feels like everyone is just depressed and dejected and has given up entirely https://twitter.com/lyzl/status/1540495065386303488 https://twitter.com/PplsCityCouncil/status/1540496562396094465 https://twitter.com/colpeoplespress/status/1540495795002163200
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:01
|
|
|
Kit Walker posted:It would be cool if the Supreme Court just overturned literally everything in the name of the Republican ideal of "a government small enough you could drown it in a bathtub" you could probably get me to support this as long as we actually got to drown them in the bathtub at the end
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:02
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:i know they are pointless, but are there even any protests anywhere? it feels like everyone is just depressed and dejected and has given up entirely https://twitter.com/CourtyardBrew/status/1540481350322503683
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:07
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:i know they are pointless, but are there even any protests anywhere? it feels like everyone is just depressed and dejected and has given up entirely it is gonna be all the same people that were at the various womens marches from the last 6 years and accomplished nothing. they will continue doing all of that
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:09
|
|
|
I have a coworker that’s out at a protest in the Bay Area and I feel bad for her because I’m sure she’s got to realize at this point that it won’t make a bit of difference but there’s also nothing else she can do.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:09
|
|
|
so is facebook still the main platform for tracking upcoming protests, because fuuuck I do not want to ever open facebook again
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:09
|
|
|
    order in the court thread lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:10
|
|
|
fosborb posted:why do you want them to have better healthcare?
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/demisatyr/status/1540352708523196416
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:19
|
|
|
Venomous posted:the US was a mistake Shear Modulus posted:the natives should have let the plymouth colonists starve to death
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:20
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6ycEW-PLPs
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:21
|
|
|
skooma512 posted:*you literally trying to get people to vote hillary clinton got more votes than trump which means she is the real president but also not enough people voted for her and it's their fault
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:30
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:it feels like everyone is just depressed and dejected and has given up entirely 
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:31
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:I have a coworker that’s out at a protest in the Bay Area and I feel bad for her because I’m sure she’s got to realize at this point that it won’t make a bit of difference but there’s also nothing else she can do. I've been having my poo poo kicked in since OWS and despite failing time after time, direct action is still doing better than nothing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:35
|
|
|
as a note there is nothing in this decision that stops a federal ban from being enacted. there are also lots of state extradition agreements that are about to be pretty troublesome and i wonder what will happen to some of these big companies who are saying they will openly flaunt the laws of the state they operate in.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:41
|
|
|
Lacrosse posted:I've been having my poo poo kicked in since OWS and despite failing time after time, direct action is still doing better than nothing. standing around holding a sign and singing songs isn't direct action lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:42
|
|
|
if the first rule of your direct action isn't "don't get caught" you're doing it wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:53
|
|
|
Morbus posted:it's Morbin' time
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 02:55
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:as a note there is nothing in this decision that stops a federal ban from being enacted. there are also lots of state extradition agreements that are about to be pretty troublesome and i wonder what will happen to some of these big companies who are saying they will openly flaunt the laws of the state they operate in. they'll say that they will pay for peoples' travel to the extent compliant with applicable law
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 03:03
|
|
|
ANIME AKBAR posted:so is facebook still the main platform for tracking upcoming protests, because fuuuck I do not want to ever open facebook again Twitter if that’s any less offensive to you
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 03:09
|
|
|
at least the ayatollahs claim to be in communication w/ the Occluded twelfth imam or something, thats way cooler than having seances with Thomases Jeffersons Ghost
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 03:44
|
|
|
I don't understand what possible things the court thinks the 14th amendment refers to? "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." it's just vague to the point of meaninglessness. It's been used to ensure that people can freely travel between states, and no one has to worry that they'll get arrested for something that is legal in their state and legal nationally, but illegal in a specific state. According to this ruling if Florida decided that they could detain any pregnant women and prevent them from leaving the state, under the pretense that they are preventing an illegal abortion from happening, there is nothing any other state can do to get their resident back short of invading Florida, which would be a civil war. The 14th amendment was written directly after the civil war because it prevented this exact type of thing, where states became so dissimilar in their laws that a resident of New York could be arrested in Alabama for something legal in New York, functionally preventing entry. Could Utah just make a law against and arrest people with tattoos? Is getting a tattoo or any sort of body modification a "fundamental right spelled out in the constitution?" With this ruling the 14th amendment is effectively dead and I see no reason why we don't rapidly lose the ability to legally travel to a bunch of states without fear of imprisonment or even death, and that's sort of how civil wars start.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:32
|
|
|
lol remember when obama + dems had a super majority and said they were sort of ok with gay marriage but its up to states rights and refused to legalize it and it took loving a dumb republican chudge to go "eh i guess its ok for the gays to get married idk" and libs suddenly took credit for that years afterwards pretending to be the party who legalized gay marriage obergefell is dead very soon thanks dems
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:33
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:as a note there is nothing in this decision that stops a federal ban from being enacted. there are also lots of state extradition agreements that are about to be pretty troublesome and i wonder what will happen to some of these big companies who are saying they will openly flaunt the laws of the state they operate in. I expect that companies that moved HQs to red states for tax incentives are going to have to reconsider whether that's still financially viable if their employees don't want to live there anymore
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:41
|
|
|
speng31b posted:I expect that companies that moved HQs to red states for tax incentives are going to have to reconsider whether that's still financially viable if their employees don't want to live there anymore won't be a problem when it is banned nationally next year
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:42
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:won't be a problem when it is banned nationally next year yeah
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:48
|
|
|
speng31b posted:I expect that companies that moved HQs to red states for tax incentives are going to have to reconsider whether that's still financially viable if their employees don't want to live there anymore Why would they care?  They bankroll most of the GOP (and Democratic) ghouls that are cool with it and pinkwash, etc. to give themselves a PR veneer of being 'inclusive' and 'giving a poo poo' about anything but the accumulation of more wealth/capital.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:50
|
|
|
speng31b posted:I expect that companies that moved HQs to red states for tax incentives are going to have to reconsider whether that's still financially viable if their employees don't want to live there anymore this country is up on cinderblocks, no one gives a poo poo about any of this anymore
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 09:15 |
|
|
Horseshoe theory posted:Why would they care? They'll care only if it impacts their bottom line, which it might in some cases. Mostly thinking about the big tech shits migrating from Cali to Texas, silicon hills bullshit
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2022 04:53
|
|