Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
LGD
Sep 25, 2004

Paul Zuvella posted:

Moving away from blocks was the best thing that they have done for draft basically ever. Even now, draft formats are solved in like 5-7 days tops, can you imagine if that was the format for 8-9 entire months?

I mean different sets have different amounts of depth and what being "solved" means varies quite a bit (big difference between "archetype wins if uncontested" and "must/must no be in X color(s)") + adding (theoretically) complementary sets used to shake that up quite a bit (unlikely to get multiples and much broader card pools) so it doesn't inherently mean the format gets too stale, and in fact some of the better designed blocks didn't really

but those blocks were far more exceptions than the rule and not something that could be consistently delivered on, so despite that quibble I'd fully agree that moving away from blocks is about the best thing they've ever done for limited (besides designing sets for it in the first place)

e:

this is extremely funny, especially given his recent comments on Commanders' influence on other formats and also being in relation to a white 5 drop with no etb value in the loving sol ring format

LGD fucked around with this message at 19:50 on Dec 22, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Wittgen
Oct 13, 2012

We have decided to decline your offer of a butt kicking.
I could see where turning off etbs might feel too anti-fun for the format, but come one. If three drop Teferi is legal, you can't use being anti-fun as a reason for banning something.

Framboise
Sep 21, 2014

To make yourself feel better, you make it so you'll never give in to your forevers and live for always.


Lipstick Apathy

Wittgen posted:

I could see where turning off etbs might feel too anti-fun for the format, but come one. If three drop Teferi is legal, you can't use being anti-fun as a reason for banning something.

According to EDHrec, Torpor Orb sees play in 1% of decks. Panharmonicon is in 4% of decks. Sheldon's making GBS threads the bed over what isn't a big deal for pretty much any casual table, ever.

I see the new Norn getting some play in cEDH where ETBs can be pretty devastating (I'm certainly going to try!), but for casual tables, what is the new Elesh Norn going to be ruining? She's 2 cool niche cards stapled onto the most easily removed permanent type.

disaster pastor
May 1, 2007


Wittgen posted:

I could see where turning off etbs might feel too anti-fun for the format, but come one. If three drop Teferi is legal, you can't use being anti-fun as a reason for banning something.

All four of these are EDH-legal. Two of them cost two mana, one costs three. Torpor Orb doesn't even die to creature removal/board wipes!

"But those turn off all ETBs, not just your opponents'." Yes, but that's not actually that much of a difference when you know that you're playing it and can decide when it comes down.

Framboise
Sep 21, 2014

To make yourself feel better, you make it so you'll never give in to your forevers and live for always.


Lipstick Apathy
Hell, Elesh Norn isn't even the most devastating praetor from the new batch of them, especially for casual tables. I feel like the new Sheoldred or Vorinclex are way more scary for casual "interaction? what's that?" tables.

Wittgen
Oct 13, 2012

We have decided to decline your offer of a butt kicking.
Could the concern be the fact that as a legendary creature, she can start every game in your hand? Looking at those cards does make me think she could be a fun death and taxes commander.

I trust the common reaction that this dude's assessment is very bad, to be clear.

LGD
Sep 25, 2004

an effect being (repeatedly) accessible via the command zone is a big thing, but frankly that's an argument for having viable commanders that provide you with proactive interaction with the stuff your opponents are doing

idk, I've enjoyed commander I've played with people irl and at its core it does seem like a great way to do multiplayer mtg, but the way high level commander people seem to actively encourage cultivation of a scrub mentality and apoplexy at the concept of ever having to interact or being interacted with is extremely offputting

disaster pastor
May 1, 2007


Wittgen posted:

Could the concern be the fact that as a legendary creature, she can start every game in your hand? Looking at those cards does make me think she could be a fun death and taxes commander.

I trust the common reaction that this dude's assessment is very bad, to be clear.

Even by that assessment, Sheoldred in particular is way more threatening, as Framboise pointed out. Not to mention that white is generally the worst color in EDH and mono-white decks are notoriously even weaker than that implies.

Framboise
Sep 21, 2014

To make yourself feel better, you make it so you'll never give in to your forevers and live for always.


Lipstick Apathy

Wittgen posted:

Could the concern be the fact that as a legendary creature, she can start every game in your hand? Looking at those cards does make me think she could be a fun death and taxes commander.

I trust the common reaction that this dude's assessment is very bad, to be clear.

I think she'll be a blast to build around! I've always liked Panharmonicon and have wanted a way to abuse it, but needing the extra step to find the card makes it never make the cut for me. So getting a better one that can be in the command zone is really cool!

But she's still a 5 mana creature who is easily removed, so I really don't understand what the concern could really be. The Torpor Orb effect isn't even that worrisome for the vast majority of cases-- but shutting off stuff like Thassa's Oracle, Dockside Extortionist, Gilded Drake, Imperial Recruiter, Recruiter of the Guard, and commanders that are ETB engines/wincons like Godo or Tatyova or Rocco is pretty cool. But that's much more of a cEDH thing than casual, which is the realm from where Sheldon speaks.

Kashuno
Oct 9, 2012

Where the hell is my SWORD?
Grimey Drawer
I'd rather play against new Elesh Norn than Jin Gitaxias from NEO because that guy is hard to interact with! Elesh Norn just dies

Framboise
Sep 21, 2014

To make yourself feel better, you make it so you'll never give in to your forevers and live for always.


Lipstick Apathy

LGD posted:

idk, I've enjoyed commander I've played with people irl and at its core it does seem like a great way to do multiplayer mtg, but the way high level commander people seem to actively encourage cultivation of a scrub mentality and apoplexy at the concept of ever having to interact or being interacted with is extremely offputting

What are you talking about? Not following you here.

disaster pastor
May 1, 2007


Framboise posted:

What are you talking about? Not following you here.

It reads to me like he's talking about the dedicated but casual Commander players (i.e. not cEDH) who have expensive decks and powerful cards but do not play interaction, expect nobody else to play interaction, and get super upset if anyone interferes with everyone's goldfishing.

LGD
Sep 25, 2004

disaster pastor posted:

It reads to me like he's talking about the dedicated but casual Commander players (i.e. not cEDH) who have expensive decks and powerful cards but do not play interaction, expect nobody else to play interaction, and get super upset if anyone interferes with everyone's goldfishing.

yeah, sorry if the "high level" caused confusion - I wasn't talking about playskill, I was talking about prominence/promotion + extent to which their views are disseminated, actual cEDH is the antithesis of what I meant

and yeah basically that + some of the sentiment towards "stax pieces" which are how you interact effectively in a multiplayer format + some of the associated "dies to doomblade" discourse (i.e. its 'invalidity' as an argument tends to be overstated, if a 1/3 with no protection shuts down your whole gameplan that's on you)

the "scrub mentality" thing is in relation to conflicted attitudes towards winning - not saying everyone needs to play to win at any cost, but a lot of the discourse around "rule 0" and limiting things that offend your sensibilities seems to wrap back around into cultivating self-serving myths about "honorable" and "virtuous" playstyles (in lieu of adaptation/getting better)

Charity Porno
Aug 2, 2021

by Hand Knit
Some people use Commander deckbuilding as an expression of identity and for most of them it's not about not playing removal, it's about seeing goodstuff piles that are just 99 of the best cards in the game with zero thematic link, with a 5 color commander the player will never cast that annoys those people

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012
If you look at sheldon's decks you'll see that for the most part he personally just basically doesn't run any spot removal, yeah. That's the vision of commander that he's talking about Mother of Machines being a "Don't print this card" powerlevel for.

neaden
Nov 4, 2012

A changer of ways
It just comes off as weird that Sheldon got pissy enough to write an article about how much he doesn't like this card even though it's innocuous in standard and meanwhile cards designed for commander had to get mass banned out of pauper and have the highest win rate in Legacy and shaking up Vintage.

teppichporsche
May 11, 2019

Yeah they are making cards for the 80% of the playerbase that hates playing interactive games and I think that’s awesome.

teppichporsche
May 11, 2019

“I get that it’s a main-set card, not in Commander product, and I’ll return to the recognition that not everything has to be designed with Commander in mind. I’ll also point out that it would also be tremendously naïve for a designer/design team to ignore Commander’s existence when designing cards.”

Why? Why don’t people just play commander with whatever lists of cards they find acceptable? Why does card design have to keep commander in mind?

fadam
Apr 23, 2008

Archon of Emeria is on balance a more hosed up card in every way for the Sheldons of the world and he didn’t write an essay about that. I wonder what the point of this article even is?

teppichporsche posted:

“I get that it’s a main-set card, not in Commander product, and I’ll return to the recognition that not everything has to be designed with Commander in mind. I’ll also point out that it would also be tremendously naïve for a designer/design team to ignore Commander’s existence when designing cards.”

Why? Why don’t people just play commander with whatever lists of cards they find acceptable? Why does card design have to keep commander in mind?

It’s the most popular format and designing for it usually comes at zero cost to any 60-card formats. That being said they print cards that don’t work/do anything in commander all the time (wishes, any aggressive attacking creature). Most of the cards that are pillars of Pioneer are really bad in Commander.

What makes all this discourse even more bizarre is this Elesh Norn is obviously a commander card top-to-bottom lol.

fadam fucked around with this message at 00:37 on Dec 23, 2022

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007

teppichporsche posted:

“I get that it’s a main-set card, not in Commander product, and I’ll return to the recognition that not everything has to be designed with Commander in mind. I’ll also point out that it would also be tremendously naïve for a designer/design team to ignore Commander’s existence when designing cards.”

Why? Why don’t people just play commander with whatever lists of cards they find acceptable? Why does card design have to keep commander in mind?

They sell commander products, it's a real format people play kinda the main way to find another person to play with on paper, and they seem to generally design cards considering how it might be in things it can be played in? I would assume the card designers did consider commander when designing this card and themselves like everyone has pointed out, figured it's fine in commander.

Abhorrence
Feb 5, 2010

A love that crushes like a mace.

reignonyourparade posted:

If you look at sheldon's decks you'll see that for the most part he personally just basically doesn't run any spot removal, yeah. That's the vision of commander that he's talking about Mother of Machines being a "Don't print this card" powerlevel for.

In Sheldon's meager defense, 1 for 1 spot removal is fairly bad in 4 player games, as it puts you and your target down a card vs. The other two players.

It's still a nessicary evil, however, for when poo poo like Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines hits the table.

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

Abhorrence posted:

In Sheldon's meager defense, 1 for 1 spot removal is fairly bad in 4 player games, as it puts you and your target down a card vs. The other two players.

It's still a nessicary evil, however, for when poo poo like Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines hits the table.

People just aren't willing to Eat Their Veggies

fadam
Apr 23, 2008

Abhorrence posted:

In Sheldon's meager defense, 1 for 1 spot removal is fairly bad in 4 player games, as it puts you and your target down a card vs. The other two players.

It's still a nessicary evil, however, for when poo poo like Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines hits the table.

Idk about that, most of the tournament winning CEDH lists run tons of removal spells. I don’t care if two people at the table are technically up a card if I’m clearing a RoL to breach win.

I think it’s as important and good as it is in 60 card.

Toshimo
Aug 23, 2012

He's outta line...

But he's right!

Abhorrence posted:

In Sheldon's meager defense, 1 for 1 spot removal is fairly bad in 4 player games, as it puts you and your target down a card vs. The other two players.

It's still a nessicary evil, however, for when poo poo like Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines hits the table.

poo poo, Force of Will is still 1 for 2 and absolutely great in EDH. Yeah, you can't spot removal EVERYTHING like you try and do in Standard, but when push comes to shove, every good deck is packing 10 pieces or so because it's better than losing.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Yeah I only started getting into Commander like 8 months ago and I learned pretty quickly that you need as much spot removal as you can get. Cards like Swords and Path are auto-includes in any deck I run that has white because they're so drat useful. Same goes for Assassin's Trophy in Golgari decks and Deadly Rollick/Go For the Throat in black. If you're not running enough spot removal, someone else will run away with the game. In that context, the new Elesh Norn looks powerful because she turns off Dockside and Thoracle, but really she's just a speed bump to those players.

Charity Porno
Aug 2, 2021

by Hand Knit

fadam posted:

Idk about that, most of the tournament winning CEDH lists run tons of removal spells.

Isn't CEDH 2 player games?

fadam
Apr 23, 2008

Charity Porno posted:

Isn't CEDH 2 player games?

I think there’s a 2 player commander format that’s big in Paris or something but CEDH is just regular EDH where everyone is playing to win. It’s had a bit of a boom recently with a bunch of tournaments (paper and online) with big turn outs happening in 2022 and a lot of content creators from 60-card formats checking it out. Brian Coval (big legacy content creator and tournament grinder) won a huge tournament a few weeks with a deck running lots of stack and board interaction.

fadam fucked around with this message at 00:52 on Dec 23, 2022

flatluigi
Apr 23, 2008

here come the planes
tbh i think the article is more 'it's dumb to print cards that are good enough to be auto-includes in any commander deck that could run it' and that sentiment i pretty much agree with? i'd much rather have more cards you need to think about putting in instead of cards you'd need a real good excuse to not run (hi, sol ring). he draws a comparison to tatyova benthic druid in which you're rewarded for just doing the things you'd be doing regularly, and the new sheoldred i think is also a good example. the fact that the new elesh norn is extremely easy to splash at 4W is also a big deal -- make her 3WW or even 2WWW and now you need to think about manabases at the very least

Papa Was A Video Toaster
Jan 9, 2011





fadam posted:

I think there’s a 2 player commander format that’s big in Paris or something but CEDH is just regular EDH where everyone is playing to win. It’s had a bit of a boom recently with a bunch of tournaments (paper and online) with big turn outs happening in 2022 and a lot of content creators from 60-card formats checking it out. Brian Coval (big legacy content creator and tournament grinder) won a huge tournament a few weeks with a deck running lots of stack and board interaction.

:smith: They'll come to Canadian Highlander eventually, right?

fadam
Apr 23, 2008

flatluigi posted:

tbh i think the article is more 'it's dumb to print cards that are good enough to be auto-includes in any commander deck that could run it' and that sentiment i pretty much agree with? i'd much rather have more cards you need to think about putting in instead of cards you'd need a real good excuse to not run (hi, sol ring). he draws a comparison to tatyova benthic druid in which you're rewarded for just doing the things you'd be doing regularly, and the new sheoldred i think is also a good example. the fact that the new elesh norn is extremely easy to splash at 4W is also a big deal -- make her 3WW or even 2WWW and now you need to think about manabases at the very least

Does this Elesh belong in any deck that can run it? It's a 5CMC card that doesn't win the game on its own. I don't think it's any more powerful than a ton of expensive, low impact cards they print all the time. You might be right about the mana cost, but I don't think this card is particularly problematic.

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

What did you say the strategy was?

fadam posted:

I think there’s a 2 player commander format that’s big in Paris or something but CEDH is just regular EDH where everyone is playing to win. It’s had a bit of a boom recently with a bunch of tournaments (paper and online) with big turn outs happening in 2022 and a lot of content creators from 60-card formats checking it out. Brian Coval (big legacy content creator and tournament grinder) won a huge tournament a few weeks with a deck running lots of stack and board interaction.

France loves duel commander

JawnV6
Jul 4, 2004

So hot ...
I haven't played Commander yet, but I'm getting a precon deck with a friend and we'll be checking it out next year. I look forward to having opinions!

serefin99
Apr 15, 2016

Mikoooon~
Your lovely shrine maiden fox wife, Tamamo no Mae, is here to help!

flatluigi posted:

tbh i think the article is more 'it's dumb to print cards that are good enough to be auto-includes in any commander deck that could run it' and that sentiment i pretty much agree with? i'd much rather have more cards you need to think about putting in instead of cards you'd need a real good excuse to not run (hi, sol ring). he draws a comparison to tatyova benthic druid in which you're rewarded for just doing the things you'd be doing regularly, and the new sheoldred i think is also a good example. the fact that the new elesh norn is extremely easy to splash at 4W is also a big deal -- make her 3WW or even 2WWW and now you need to think about manabases at the very least

Except it's not even an auto-include every deck? Unless your deck is specifically themed around ETB or Landfall or something, you're really only gonna get incidental value out of her, and for 5 mana you can do a lot more than 'incidental value'.

Serf
May 5, 2011


I would only run her in my white decks because we have one guy who always goes for Thoracle or Dockside loops no matter what power level we're playing in. I don't think I have anything that plays off the ETB doubling, so really she'd just be to stop those combos and also be a nice body on the field. But right now I run old Elesh because she acts as a pseudo-finisher in a lot of ways because I love creature decks and combat damage to win.

whydirt
Apr 18, 2001


Gaz Posting Brigade :c00lbert:
“Every deck will have to run it” is a bad defense in a format where Sol Ring is legal

TotalHell
Feb 22, 2005

Roman Reigns fights CM Punk in fantasy warld. Lotsa violins, so littl kids cant red it.


Papa Was A Video Toaster posted:

:smith: They'll come to Canadian Highlander eventually, right?

I hope so, Canlander seems like a pretty rad format.

Charity Porno
Aug 2, 2021

by Hand Knit

whydirt posted:

“Every deck will have to run it” is a bad defense in a format where Sol Ring is legal

I mean imo every 0 and 1 mana rock that makes 2 or more should be banned but since they've crammed Sol Ring in every Commander product since 2012 that ship seems to have sailed

Arivia
Mar 17, 2011

JawnV6 posted:

I haven't played Commander yet, but I'm getting a precon deck with a friend and we'll be checking it out next year. I look forward to having opinions!

It’s like processor real mode for magic the gathering I’m sorry to say.

Paul Zuvella
Dec 7, 2011

SCG deleted the article lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Papa Was A Video Toaster
Jan 9, 2011





Paul Zuvella posted:

SCG deleted the article lol

Naw I think their CDN is just having a moment.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply