Gonz posted:I cannot fathom the Lions trading up for Anthony Richardson. Yeah that alone has me writing off the mock entirely. Goff had a very good season and will be only 29 years old. There's no reason at all for the Lions to vastly overpay and trade up to massively reach for an ultraraw prospect. They're in a good spot, they can be patient and wait for their perfect fit.
|
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 01:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 03:15 |
|
If the Colts trade up for anybody it would be either Stroud or Levis, not Young. Ballard is all about traits, no way he gives up his precious draft capital for a QB with Young's body type.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 01:24 |
|
Is...the Commanders drafting Richardson really that much of a danger to the Lions' apparently pressing need to get him, or is Brad Holmes just mercilessly addicted to in-division trading now and he needs another hit of that good poo poo? I'm just trying to figure out the story, here. Like, if Holmes thinks Richardson is the guy and that they can develop him, I can talk myself into him at 18, but trading up three spots for him seems so...unnesecary.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 01:34 |
|
Lions podcast at athletic was defending the trade up as not far-fetched and I just can't imagine giving up potentially two starters (18 and 48) to have a QB sit on the bench for a year. When your defence is bottom-rung. That just doesn't feel good. I'm not sure I like a CB at 6 either, but i'm not gonna lose sleep over it.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 01:57 |
|
I'm mostly seeing mocks say the Lions go CB at 6, but, Witherspoon.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 02:03 |
|
Witherspoon would be a drat steal at 18, since he’s pretty much in the top 2 or 3 in every defensive/DB metric in the nation last season, but I doubt the Lions are gonna draft another corner in the top 10. Especially when they need interior D-line help so much.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 02:13 |
|
CBs are hard to peg before the combine. I think right now it's Gonzalez - Witherspoon - Cam Smith all solidly mixed for the #1 talk and then JPJ/Ringo/Branch/Forbes/Ricks/Williams/Jones on the edges. Solid class throughout, lots of big guys and variety of man/zone. Kind of like Cam the best at the moment. Had to do a lot with nothing around him. Constantly asked to blanket #1s and looked way more athletic than them all. Either way I'm afraid because most of the WRs sucked this year and I'm not sure how well any of these guys were tested.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 02:27 |
|
EmbryoSteve posted:If stroud is at 5 and the hawks don't take him then just... uh.. Jesus christ This mfer said Hawks lol
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 03:14 |
|
Anyway the Seahawks do NOT need another Jesus freak weirdo as QB.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 03:18 |
|
Danny LaFever posted:Lions podcast at athletic was defending the trade up as not far-fetched and I just can't imagine giving up potentially two starters (18 and 48) to have a QB sit on the bench for a year. When your defence is bottom-rung. Yeah, I understood the reasoning behind the argument (The team is clearly scouting Richardson, he's got immense physical tools, Holmes has a track record of trading up to get the player he wants), but I think it would be a gargantuan mistake. I'm not opposed to taking a QB, as my feelings on Goff are well-known, but the defense is in such a dire situation that they need a ton of talent and depth to turn that unit around. And while Richardson has all the physical ability in the world from what I've heard, I'm not sure the Lions really have the staff or capability to develop that ability into a functional QB—since while they did help Goff turn his career around, he was already a developed QB and just needed to rebuild his confidence/be placed into a system that maximized his abilities. If he falls into our lap, sure, I guess, but trading up (especially the one proposed in that mock) is... boy, I don't like it.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 04:29 |
I think the Lions should wait. I'm not at all sold on this year's QB class (much less this year's draft class as a whole) and the Lions have way bigger needs. Goff is good enough for the moment. The biggest thing the Lions need more than anything is to build a culture of winning, and trying to take a home-run swing on a QB when you don't have the pieces around him doesn't lead to that -- even if the QB is actually decent. Look at Arizona with Murray. Hell, look at the Stafford Lions.
|
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 05:13 |
|
SKULL.GIF posted:I think the Lions should wait. I'm not at all sold on this year's QB class (much less this year's draft class as a whole) and the Lions have way bigger needs. Goff is good enough for the moment. I agree with you but I do think the Lions actually have one of the best situations for a young QB to come into. If the season had continued on its trajectory at 1-6 or even if they just finished with like, 5 wins, I would've welcomed the top prospects--rarely do top QB picks get to join a team with a good offensive line and a safety valve as good as St. Brown! But Richardson is way too much of a project.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 05:23 |
|
SKULL.GIF posted:I think the Lions should wait. I'm not at all sold on this year's QB class (much less this year's draft class as a whole) and the Lions have way bigger needs. Goff is good enough for the moment. The main thing that helps build a “culture of winning” is winning and having a top tier QB helps a lot with winning. The Bengals didn’t exactly have a “culture of winning” until they drafted a QB and started winning a bunch. Ditto the Bills. Or the Saints getting Brees in FA. For the most part teams that are consistently good are consistently good because they have a really good quarterback. If you’re really good at drafting and development you can still be consistently competitive but that gets harder when your draft picks are coming at the end of the first instead of the beginning and you actually have players you want to sign to second contracts.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 05:29 |
|
It's still very enticing, given that: - the Lions have zero investment in the QB position beyond Goff - Brad Holmes has found more starting-caliber talent outside of the first two rounds in two drafts than some organizations have in a decade - this is the most draft capital they're gonna have for a while, especially if they are going to shed the Same Old Lions tag and be as good as people think They have picks #49 and #56 in the second round, if they ended up with Richardson at one of those spots and a DT, a corner, and another defender with 6, 18, and the other 2nd, I wouldn't complain.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 05:41 |
|
ShakeZula posted:If the Colts trade up for anybody it would be either Stroud or Levis, not Young. Ballard is all about traits, no way he gives up his precious draft capital for a QB with Young's body type. Levis just screams Colts to me.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 07:42 |
|
SKULL.GIF posted:I think the Lions should wait. I'm not at all sold on this year's QB class (much less this year's draft class as a whole) and the Lions have way bigger needs. Goff is good enough for the moment. If you’re not sold on this draft class generally then you should be more willing to trade picks in it. Goff may be good enough for the moment, but that’s the point. Goff can play one more year and Richardson gets to develop before taking over. I think Richardson is more likely to bust than not, but he has huge upside and Goff isn’t the long term answer. Further, I think if Detroit does want to grab Richardson then it seems likely that they will have to hop over the commanders. The lions aren’t a perfect roster but they are a good team with good coaching. They aren’t going to be near the top of the draft again for a long time. If they do want a top qb next year they will probably have to trade 3 first round picks (and then some) to go get that prospect. Would you prefer that big of a trade or doing a modest trade this year for Richardson? In my opinion.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 08:51 |
|
Can Goff build off his incredible 2022 second half and continue playing like that into 2023? Hard to tell. But even with his inconsistencies over the first half of the season, the Lions finished with a top 5 offense regardless. I would like to have a QB who can fling the ball 50 yards without even trying, into the waiting arms of Jameson Williams, who has several feet of separation between himself and whomever is covering him. Goff probably isn’t ever gonna be that guy. But as other have said, the Lions defense was the worst in the league this past year, despite their improvement in the last ten games. They have so many needs on defense. If they had a 15th-20th ranked defense in 2022, they might’ve won 11 or 12 games. That’s how close they were in a lot of instances in which the defense just got gassed and poo poo the bed when all they needed was a minor stop or two to hold on for a win. When they lost to Seattle early in the season, Seattle didn’t punt once, and that’s why they won. If the Lions win that shootout and force a singular Seattle punt, the Lions have the 6 seed and the Giants have the 7 seed after Week 17. Drafting a QB who isn’t a sure thing (ala how Andrew Luck or Joe Burrow were overwhelmingly considered) and could potentially be a bust, it wouldn’t exactly put them in a position where they could take advantage of the fact that the Vikings and Packers have questionable rosters. With 1-2 more good drafts and some good Holmes signings in free agency, the potential exists for them to win the division NOW. Or at least compete for the division NOW. With a seemingly okay (but not spectacular) Goff, and an improved defense, and a lot of rookies and 3rd year players taking the next step in their development, they can win NOW. But the big question mark in all of this is “Does Goff turn back into Post-Super Bowl Shook Goff or does he have another great year?”. I trust Holmes and MuscleCoach to make the right choices, though. Their last two drafts have been phenominal. It’s the first time in my whole life the Lions have a front office that doesn’t consist of a recording of Yakety Sax on a perpetual loop.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 09:39 |
|
FizFashizzle posted:CJ Stroud for a swap, 3rd and a future first seems....appropriate? Would be a dream scenario so long as we have an OC who can use him right but even trading with Seattle just makes sense.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 09:57 |
|
maybe you trade up for richardson if you think he's some kind of Super Taysom
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 10:17 |
|
https://twitter.com/MelKiperESPN/status/1618240736264355840quote:1. Chicago Bears
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 14:51 |
I like Mayer a lot for the Packers at 15, it's both a fit and a need. I wouldn't be against Kincaid or Washington in the 2nd though, if we take Quinton Johnston instead. BTW, ignore any mocks that have the Packers taking Jordan Addison. He's so far outside the size requirements the Packers have been sticking to for years now.
|
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 16:55 |
|
Sataere posted:Levis just screams Colts to me. Correct, op
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 17:13 |
|
Yeah I don't see the Colts taking Young. I think it's either Stroud or Levis. They'll probably take a swing at Levis and if he doesn't work out, go in the tank and all in for Arch Manning.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 17:24 |
|
SKULL.GIF posted:I like Mayer a lot for the Packers at 15, it's both a fit and a need. I wouldn't be against Kincaid or Washington in the 2nd though, if we take Quinton Johnston instead. Earlier in this thread, I scouted Hyatt and noted he was smol and fast. Somehow Addison is even more smol.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 17:26 |
|
Extremely into the Titans drafting LT and then Hyatt
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 17:39 |
|
I just do not see this year's QB class containing 4 top 10 players.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 18:25 |
|
Get classes!!!! Rekt (You’re probably right but Stroud will be flawless)
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 20:12 |
|
I still highly doubt the panthers take a look at Richardson and think he's their guy. I know someone is going to fall in love with his measurables but after the recent issues with Qb I just don't see it. All of this is kind of for poo poo anyway until Jimmy G, Carr, Geno, Brady and Rodgers situations become a lot more clear. I could easily see a situation where Jimmy or Carr goes to the Colts, Geno re-signs for 3 years in Seattle and we have a very different looking top 10.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 22:01 |
|
BlindSite posted:I still highly doubt the panthers take a look at Richardson and think he's their guy. I know someone is going to fall in love with his measurables but after the recent issues with Qb I just don't see it. There's no way the Panthers draft a project. They have been burned frequently and Richardson is a humongous risk. I'd love the Cardinals to take the pass rusher. I suspect a trade.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 22:20 |
|
BlindSite posted:I still highly doubt the panthers take a look at Richardson and think he's their guy. I know someone is going to fall in love with his measurables but after the recent issues with Qb I just don't see it. Colts will be paying Matt Ryan a minimum of $17mil this year whether he's on the team or not, I don't see them dipping into the top of the FA QB class. They'll draft someone for sure and maybe pick up a journeyman vet to be the backup.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 22:24 |
|
ShakeZula posted:Colts will be paying Matt Ryan a minimum of $17mil this year whether he's on the team or not, I don't see them dipping into the top of the FA QB class. They'll draft someone for sure and maybe pick up a journeyman vet to be the backup. You're probably right. It wouldn't surprise me either way, but a lot of it will hinge on what they do in the coaching staff. I get that mock drafts are just content but this time a year ago we were looking at Malik Willis as potentially a top 10 pick in a lot of mock drafts and he ended up as a third rounder. I still think the top three QBs remain the same and I'd still bet the house they go in the top 15 but the landscape will change so much closer to the draft. Even someone like the Jets trading for Rodgers changes things in terms of trade possibilities etc. Again it's all just speculation but there are a couple guys whos contracts are up who could hit the market and a couple more who could be trade candidates/. ShakeZula posted:Colts will be paying Matt Ryan a minimum of $17mil this year whether he's on the team or not, I don't see them dipping into the top of the FA QB class. They'll draft someone for sure and maybe pick up a journeyman vet to be the backup. Yeah, even a cut costs them 18 mill, only a trade would save them 12/11 million depending on which way they go and while I can't discount someone taking him on I don't see it happening. Unless someone in crazy cap shape like the Bears does something like Ryan and a 3rd for a 7th just for them to dump salary like the Browns (I think IIRC) did with Osweiler. Colts aren't in too terrible of a situation cap wise anyway and GMs get pretty creative kicking the can down the road. I dunno - its interesting is all. I know its very unlikely most of this happens but just a glance at the QBs in the league who could land a starting gig we could see Lamar Jimmy Carr Brady Rodgers / Love Lance Tua Geno All end up not on the same team they started this year. I think it's likely, Lamar, Tua, Geno, Lance, Rodgers, Love all end up right where they are now, but the market could swing pretty dramatically and it'll be fun to see it unfold.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 22:58 |
|
BlindSite posted:You're probably right. It wouldn't surprise me either way, but a lot of it will hinge on what they do in the coaching staff. I get that mock drafts are just content but this time a year ago we were looking at Malik Willis as potentially a top 10 pick in a lot of mock drafts and he ended up as a third rounder. I still think the top three QBs remain the same and I'd still bet the house they go in the top 15 but the landscape will change so much closer to the draft. Even someone like the Jets trading for Rodgers changes things in terms of trade possibilities etc. I think comparing last year to this year is a mistake for quarterbacks. While Malik Willis was talked about, everyone in mocks basically said the only reason they were putting those quarterbacks in the first was because they assumed teams would be stupid about quarterbacks. quote:Yeah, even a cut costs them 18 mill, only a trade would save them 12/11 million depending on which way they go and while I can't discount someone taking him on I don't see it happening. Unless someone in crazy cap shape like the Bears does something like Ryan and a 3rd for a 7th just for them to dump salary like the Browns (I think IIRC) did with Osweiler. Colts aren't in too terrible of a situation cap wise anyway and GMs get pretty creative kicking the can down the road. Lamar, Lance, Geno, and Tua will all stay on the same team. Baltimore is almost assuredly going to exclusively franchise tag him. Tua and Lance are still on rookie contracts. There's no real value to moving them. I think Seattle already said they're signing Geno. One of Rodgers/Love will be gone. If it is Rodgers, Love stays with the Pack as the starter. If it is Love that is traded, I don't think it precludes the team that traded for him from drafting someone. Really, it is Jimmy G, Carr, and Brady that will impact how the market will bear out. Even with all that, the following teams could be looking at quarterback upgrades. Houston Indy Seattle Las Vegas Detroit New Orleans Tampa Bay Carolina New York Jets Honestly, Tennesse, Washington, Atlanta, Giants, Rams, and New England wouldn't surprise me either. Basically, there are more teams that need upgrades at quarterback than quarterbacks are available. I think last years class being so bad only increases the urgency for a lot of teams this year.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 23:26 |
|
Yeah the Colts aren't in bad shape cap-wise even with the Ryan contract, but I think it's fair to say that Ballard's days of being able to hoard all of his money in FA and rely on Day 3 picks to plug roster holes without Irsay knocking on his door are pretty much over, so having $40mil tied up in a non-superstar QB room is probably untenable.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 23:35 |
|
Sataere posted:I think comparing last year to this year is a mistake for quarterbacks. While Malik Willis was talked about, everyone in mocks basically said the only reason they were putting those quarterbacks in the first was because they assumed teams would be stupid about quarterbacks. I think it might also take some teams out of the market though. I think if you have a known quantity like Geno or Goff at this point you might be better off sticking rather than changing horses mid regime and hoping you hit the next superstar. I think if Muscle coach or Carrol were fired or retired they might be on the list, but as much as poo poo talent coming through makes some teams more desperate it undoubtedly would make some more conservative.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 23:38 |
|
Just off my intuition but i’m not super sold on Stroud and Bryce being that good in the NFL. Two typical college teams that are used to steamrolling most teams with their top 4 and 5 star recruits. The NFL is just a different game altogether.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2023 23:44 |
|
infraboy posted:Just off my intuition but i’m not super sold on Stroud and Bryce being that good in the NFL. Two typical college teams that are used to steamrolling most teams with their top 4 and 5 star recruits. The NFL is just a different game altogether. I think everybody knows the NFL is a different game altogether which is why Stetson Bennett isn’t getting hyped as a first rounder. Some of the things Stroud and Young do well translate very well to the NFL.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2023 00:15 |
|
Stroud and Young also come from the same programs that produced 3 current starters who similarly beat the gently caress out of their college competition. Theyre also arguably better prospects than any of those 3 coming out.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2023 00:18 |
|
I love Stroud but the receiving corps he’s had with Wilson, Olave, and Smith-Njigba rivals the Burrow LSU crew. Marvin Harrison Jr. too. Jesus. I’m sure better scouts than me can discern how much is them versus the talent around them.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2023 00:35 |
|
infraboy posted:Just off my intuition but i’m not super sold on Stroud and Bryce being that good in the NFL. Two typical college teams that are used to steamrolling most teams with their top 4 and 5 star recruits. The NFL is just a different game altogether. Buddy, the easiest way to look smart in a draft thread is to be ruthlessly cynical about every quarterback prospect. That said: - Stroud routinely hits windows where it wouldn’t matter if he’s throwing to Olave/Wilson/JSN or like Taylor Gabriel man. You can question if he’s going to make the pre-snap read, hold a ball too long, or if his tendency to run backwards will cause him to throw off his back foot, but the dude out throws on tape that only like Lawrence did as a prospect in terms of placement. His arm is very very good. If he had the raw power of like Lock or Levis we would be talking about him as the clearest #1 possible. - Young just feels like a “what it” guy the more I watch him. He’s going to create some ludicrous highlights, but I just cannot fathom having to spend 15 years worrying about a quarterback who is smaller than my slot corner. This is an admittedly dumb hill to die on, but I just cannot believe a guy who is Nick Saban’s height is making it 10 years, even if they’re probably going to be very fun. Ornery and Hornery posted:Earlier in this thread, I scouted Hyatt and noted he was smol and fast. Great class if you want a slot receiver! Putting QJ on the ravens in that mock is a war crime because I fundamentally don’t believe he’s workable as a first rounder right now without a guy scheming him open consistently. He’s good, but to steal a Doltos line from last thread, don’t overpay for Golden Tate.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2023 00:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 03:15 |
|
Yea but I was totally wrong about Olave the guy looks awesome in the league.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2023 00:55 |