Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



Nothing can probably top McGriddle's apartment fire one (that got Christman so angry I think I heard his neighbors called the cops), but "won't someone think of the plucky bankers?" is up there.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eason the Fifth
Apr 9, 2020
Man gently caress that guy. "If we cap overdraft fees, how will banks make up the lost revenue?"

I watched overdraft fees absolutely wreck my parents' finances for years.

the milk machine
Jul 23, 2002

lick my keys
megan mcardle is uniquely stupid even for an nytimes columnist

Wraith of J.O.I.
Jan 25, 2012


if we give people mosquito nets, whose blood will they suck??

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。
wapo*

here’s the link if you need it: https://archive.is/ikpDi

gradenko_2000 posted:

people don't USE bank overdrafts, what the gently caress!!!

using a bank overdraft to go to the applebees’ salad bar

poisonpill
Nov 8, 2009

The only way to get huge fast is to insult a passing witch and hope she curses you with Beast-strength.


if you dip under by twenty bucks paying your electric for the month, how is the bank supposed to float it? it makes sense to charge an overdraft fee for deigning to make your bank “loan” you money

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,
as bad as payday loans are, i don't think there are any in america that charge 1,277,500% APR which is the actual literal APR of a bank "loan" of $1 if you pay it back the next day with a $35 overdraft fee

Best Friends
Nov 4, 2011

the milk machine posted:

megan mcardle is uniquely stupid even for an nytimes columnist

her opinions are singularly loathsome to everyone except, critically, the handful of people who own media properties. those dozen people all think she’s brilliant.

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler

Love Rat posted:

Bret Stephens says the tunnels mean Hamas is solely responsible for Gazan deaths lol.

The tunnel poo poo is seriously funny poo poo. It's like Geraldo's Al Capone vault stunt. These sure are some photos of empty tunnels. Very compelling evidence of nothing in particular.

gently caress, his article on Israel being taken to court was so loving stupid. "There's lots of genocides going on around the world, why pick on this one! Anyway, by my own personal legal definition of genocide, which I've just made up, the Israeli genocide ISN'T a genocide, so there! Frankly, the only reason anyone's complaining about this is because you're all antisemites!"

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

gradenko_2000 posted:

people don't USE bank overdrafts, what the gently caress!!!

Ermm, they're taking advantage of the bank generously providing the option of an unsecured loan (for a small fee)?

Eason the Fifth
Apr 9, 2020
usury is a sin but everybody decided to ignore that part

Clark Nova
Jul 18, 2004

usury is a sin but we couldn't have a world-spanning omnicidal empire without it so it gets a pass

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

the milk machine posted:

megan mcardle is uniquely stupid even for an nytimes columnist

Best Friends posted:

her opinions are singularly loathsome to everyone except, critically, the handful of people who own media properties. those dozen people all think she’s brilliant.

I just have a hard time with her because she's so loving stupid and never makes the case for why I should believe the things she treats as natural law or common sense.

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Frosted Flake posted:

I just have a hard time with her because she's so loving stupid and never makes the case for why I should believe the things she treats as natural law or common sense.

old flame?

HashtagGirlboss
Jan 4, 2005

A long time ago I got hit with something like $315 in various fees for a set of transactions that looked something like this (I don’t remember the exact numbers but it was six transactions total and only the last one went over)

$101 balance

$5 purchase
$10 purchase
$15 purchase
$30 purchase
$30 purchase
$30 purchase

The last one obviously took me over my balance, but I was expecting my paycheck to hit Monday morning so I wasn’t worried, so what my balance looked like at that point was $101 balance, -$19 available. Okay

Bank then on Monday morning processed from highest to lowest, and charged me $35 unavailable funds fee on the $15/$10/$5 purchase, which then my account was -$4 ($105 in fees). It then charged me $35 overdraft for all six transactions, double dipping on the 3 smaller transactions, for another $210 and a total of $315 in fees, for a $19 overdraft. Then they applied my direct deposit

This was back in 2008 or so and I think it’s been illegal for a while, but it still pisses me off

Best Friends
Nov 4, 2011

Frosted Flake posted:

I just have a hard time with her because she's so loving stupid and never makes the case for why I should believe the things she treats as natural law or common sense.

when I was a mega committed young liberal, before I was even on SA, I canceled my Atlantic subscription when they hired her as business editor. I sent a note with my cancellation asking if they realized she had zero qualifications besides flattery of the rich. I could barely even imagine. The Atlantic! hiring hacks! My goodness, how bizarre.

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:
i used to have a bank account so bad theyd charge me overdraft fees without actually overdrafting, so my debit card would get declined PLUS id have to pay a fee

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


HashtagGirlboss posted:

A long time ago I got hit with something like $315 in various fees for a set of transactions that looked something like this (I don’t remember the exact numbers but it was six transactions total and only the last one went over)

$101 balance

$5 purchase
$10 purchase
$15 purchase
$30 purchase
$30 purchase
$30 purchase

The last one obviously took me over my balance, but I was expecting my paycheck to hit Monday morning so I wasn’t worried, so what my balance looked like at that point was $101 balance, -$19 available. Okay

Bank then on Monday morning processed from highest to lowest, and charged me $35 unavailable funds fee on the $15/$10/$5 purchase, which then my account was -$4 ($105 in fees). It then charged me $35 overdraft for all six transactions, double dipping on the 3 smaller transactions, for another $210 and a total of $315 in fees, for a $19 overdraft. Then they applied my direct deposit

This was back in 2008 or so and I think it’s been illegal for a while, but it still pisses me off

Their argument was "well the higher amounts are likely higher priority, like rent or utilities, so we want to process those first! We're helping!" oops now they get tons and tons of extra fees. Not sure if it was ever made illegal or not

Clark Nova
Jul 18, 2004

one of the tepid post-2008 reforms is that you can opt out of overdrafts but you have to ask, but to ask you have to know that it is possible to ask and they're sure as poo poo not going to tell you

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005


I lost so much loving money to BofA overdraft fees back when I was paycheck-to-paycheck. I think it was comparable with what I spent on literal payday loan interest (if not higher than the interest for the "better" payday loan sources).

Edit: Stuff like HashtagGirlboss mentioned would also happen frequently. Automatic charges would go through and I'd get hit would like 3 separate $30-something overdraft fees.

They would also organize transactions such that my paycheck was after the billing. IIRC this was made illegal at some point?

Ytlaya has issued a correction as of 00:34 on Jan 25, 2024

Harik
Sep 9, 2001

From the hard streets of Moscow
First dog to touch the stars


Plaster Town Cop
I got a $35 charge for a 1 cent overdraft. Love banks, want to see more banks on fire.


https://twitter.com/equalityAlec/status/1750290485300633876

Sleekly
Aug 21, 2008



netanyahu hotdog guy

Dr. Jerrold Coe
Feb 6, 2021

Is it me?
megan mcardle might think she's smart but her employers dgaf that she's an obvious idiot, she just has to say the stupid poo poo

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:

HashtagGirlboss posted:

A long time ago I got hit with something like $315 in various fees for a set of transactions that looked something like this (I don’t remember the exact numbers but it was six transactions total and only the last one went over)

$101 balance

$5 purchase
$10 purchase
$15 purchase
$30 purchase
$30 purchase
$30 purchase

The last one obviously took me over my balance, but I was expecting my paycheck to hit Monday morning so I wasn’t worried, so what my balance looked like at that point was $101 balance, -$19 available. Okay

Bank then on Monday morning processed from highest to lowest, and charged me $35 unavailable funds fee on the $15/$10/$5 purchase, which then my account was -$4 ($105 in fees). It then charged me $35 overdraft for all six transactions, double dipping on the 3 smaller transactions, for another $210 and a total of $315 in fees, for a $19 overdraft. Then they applied my direct deposit

This was back in 2008 or so and I think it’s been illegal for a while, but it still pisses me off

that's called "financial services" and it gets added to gdp and creates a lot of value. win/win!

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

Dr. Jerrold Coe posted:

megan mcardle might think she's smart but her employers dgaf that she's an obvious idiot, she just has to say the stupid poo poo

vocal morons are pretty much the standard hire at opinion shops and think tanks because they're reliable. you dont need a smart person to write op eds in favor of financial predation on the poor, in fact its better if theyre not smart because a smart person might try to construct an actual argument instead of regurgitating the sound byte your focus group market research team could come up with. you want someone who will hit that "market choice benefits the consumer! in! all! cases!" button like a trained seal every single time without fail.

atelier morgan
Mar 11, 2003

super-scientific, ultra-gay

Lipstick Apathy
i spent the 00s and 10s manually writing and mailing checks to pay all my bills like a caveman because that meant i never got hit with overdraft fees from banks playing bullshit games with processing transactions

(in the 20s im unemployed and unemployable and have neither money nor bills so i dont need to bother, lucky ducky)

Peggotty
May 9, 2014

Wait what the gently caress. I always thought "overdraft fee" just meant the interest you have to pay, I never knew you guys have to pay a literal fee on top of that Jesus Christ

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

The Oldest Man posted:

vocal morons are pretty much the standard hire at opinion shops and think tanks because they're reliable. you dont need a smart person to write op eds in favor of financial predation on the poor, in fact its better if theyre not smart because a smart person might try to construct an actual argument instead of regurgitating the sound byte your focus group market research team could come up with. you want someone who will hit that "market choice benefits the consumer! in! all! cases!" button like a trained seal every single time without fail.

But why?

I mean, why not at least pretend to have some rigour?

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Frosted Flake posted:

But why?

I mean, why not at least pretend to have some rigour?
Being able to treat someone who is obviously wrong as obviously correct is a power move. Only losers need rigor.

DickParasite
Dec 2, 2004


Slippery Tilde

Frosted Flake posted:

But why?

I mean, why not at least pretend to have some rigour?

The vast majority of the remaining paid subscribers of the NYT and WaPo want to hear the End of History story repeated to them.

In Training
Jun 28, 2008

Frosted Flake posted:

But why?

I mean, why not at least pretend to have some rigour?

Because nobody cares.

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Being able to treat someone who is obviously wrong as obviously correct is a power move. Only losers need rigor.

Yeah, you want reliable mouthpieces who'll repeat your talking points loudly and confidently. Being correct is irrelevant and being curious is actively discouraged.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Frosted Flake posted:

But why?

I mean, why not at least pretend to have some rigour?

because you touch yourself at night op

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



quote:

The accepted story of America’s intertwined ills has been challenged from a more fundamental front by new research suggesting inequality might not have evolved as most of us thought. The most prevalent story among economists, following the seminal work by Piketty and Saez, has argued that the rising concentration of income in the hands of the richest Americans has drastically shrunk everybody else’s share of the pie.

But a recently published alternative estimate, by economists Gerald Auten of the Treasury Department and David Splinter of Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation, suggests that the share of income going to the top has remained roughly flat since 1960.

Inequality has increased, for sure. Yet once they include the effect of redistribution, adding taxes and government programs such as food stamps, Medicaid, Social Security and the like, the academics find that the poorest one-fifth of Americans drew roughly the same share of income in 2019 that they did about 60 years ago.
...
Redistribution, then, must do most of the work. The U.S. government raises considerably less in taxes than do other Western democracies. But it does so more progressively, taxing people at the top most heavily. At the bottom, it largely provides help in cash. The earned income tax credit, for instance, is one of the most critical tools for lifting the income of low-wage workers. Poor families with children benefit from a child tax credit that puts money in their pockets.

:lol: Bullpoo poo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/01/25/economic-inequality-despair-redistribution/

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012


Not going to look, but is this doing something like "medicaid is worth 3k a month when buying on the health care exchanges"

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



genericnick posted:

Not going to look, but is this doing something like "medicaid is worth 3k a month when buying on the health care exchanges"

Probably. I think the basic idea is that the European safety net is much better but it's more regressive because it relies on consumption taxes that are regressive. The American system (supposedly) relies on more progressive taxation like the earned income tax credit that is better for poors somehow.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

Probably. I think the basic idea is that the European safety net is much better but it's more regressive because it relies on consumption taxes that are regressive. The American system (supposedly) relies on more progressive taxation like the earned income tax credit that is better for poors somehow.

I thought the US has VAT?

uber_stoat
Jan 21, 2001



Pillbug

genericnick posted:

I thought the US has VAT?

no. sometimes some fringe pol will bring up the idea but it never goes anywhere.

graventy
Jul 28, 2006

Fun Shoe
I feel like the word 'income' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there to obfuscate all other forms of wealth.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



genericnick posted:

I thought the US has VAT?

only at the state and local levels (it's called a sales tax and is slightly different)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply