|
I just got my pair yesterday and I went to SH/SC to see the Glass thread. It's closed with a modnote saying: Put it in IYG. So here we go! Unless you've been living under a rock, you already know what this is. It's 1500 dollar pair of glasses with no lenses that super impose a F-16 like HUD in your right eyeball. How do I get one Go here : http://www.google.com/glass/start/how-to-get-one/ Fill out the application. Wait for approval. Throw down *150. Yeah that's right. These things are 1500 dollars. How awesome is it! Is it like the video?! Meh. These are early prototypes and the video is a little overselling of the capabilities. It's not really like a total "immersion" as much as it is a tiny TV projected in your upper right field of vision. Text is kind of difficult to read, it doesn't "know" everything you want to do like the video, Has a slight learning curve, you can't enter webforms, etc. I'm on the fence, not a developer, and not wealthy...I'm not sure .. Don't get it DEVELOPMENT: There's two ways to develop glassware. 1)Mirror API OR 2)Glass Dev Kit. OR 3)Both AT THE SAME drat TIME I don't know poo poo about mirror API but I did make a sample application in a few hours after looking at the glass development page. I can say "OK glass, who is the fairest of them all" and a card shows up with my wife's photo and text explaining that she is always the fairest of them all. She smirked and said "that's neat". If you know a little about Android development than making GDK glassware isn't too hard. I'm going to experiment with it some more and see what I come up with. Post your experiences I guess.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 20:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:17 |
|
I don't have much to add (read: nothing to add), but wanted to chime in that you are not the only goon looking absolutely fab in these. Hopefully some more people have something else to add. I'm lazy and have done precisely nothing developer-wise with them. I want to, but... effort. edit: Experience is alright. Not $1500, but I knew that. I have a lot of issues with bluetooth data I think because I am always toggling airplane mode on my phone. However, when it works, I absolutely love googling and pictures with it. I think it would be great for people who have kids because documenting everything would be incredible. intervoid fucked around with this message at 02:31 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 02:27 |
|
I just put in my order earlier today for the new prescription frames. So, once those get here, I just need to get some lenses made for them and I'll actually be able to use mine outside! What a novelty!
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 03:38 |
|
Have either one of you guys received your invite to upgrade to version two? Or OP do you have version two since you just got yours not long ago? I'm still waiting.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 03:49 |
Sweet, I'm in on this goon party. Unfortunately I'm on a Galaxy Nexus that's barely hanging in as I wait for my equipment upgrade to finish. It kind of kills the user experience.
|
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 03:53 |
|
intervoid posted:Have either one of you guys received your invite to upgrade to version two? Or OP do you have version two since you just got yours not long ago? I'm still waiting. I got my Glass just after V2 came out.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 04:09 |
|
I literally got mine monday so I'm not sure what V2 is! Mine had frame colors options is that V2?. The software is XE12 I think? Edit: Google search [though not on glass] shows I have V2. TheReverend fucked around with this message at 07:51 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 07:47 |
TheReverend posted:I literally got mine monday so I'm not sure what V2 is! Most visibly, V2 has the earbud because the bone transducer doesn't work well on everyone's head when you have fixed frames.
|
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 22:23 |
|
Trip report: Since I live in the South and we don't respond well to snow, I've been snowed in for the past few days. And since it's cold, I haven't had a good reason to go outside. Today I got cabin fever and decided to grocery shopping. Things I learned: -It's actually kind of hard to see outside. -The navigation thing is pretty neat, but I prefer to use my phone and pump the audio through my car BT connection. -The lady at the checkout will think you're from the future and ask to try them. You will spend 15 minutes explaining them to the checkout lady. Also GiantMetalRobot , I too am on a Galaxy Nexus and yeah it's great it kills my battery it no time. I have a backup battery coming to last me till ~April when I will upgrade my phone.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 23:30 |
|
I'm curious to hear your guys opinions on the whole "antisocial" debate.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2014 09:02 |
|
Sir_Substance posted:I'm curious to hear your guys opinions on the whole "antisocial" debate. I rarely wear mine anymore, and tend to take them off around other people because they look at me like I have lobsters coming out of my ears. This will happen to everyone unless the wearer has no self-awareness or a sizeable portion of the population buys into the idea and they become a more common sight. Even when I wore them semi-regularly I would never have worn them to a restaurant, bar, or other social gathering. At best they're equivalent to your phone, and if you're on your phone at any of those places you're being rude. True, just because you're wearing them doesn't mean you're using them, but it's similar to having a phone out, ready to ring. There is nothing that could happen in that instance that you would need to have it out and ready. All that said, I still the idea of them, and I hope they catch on in some other form. (Earpiece + handheld combo from "Her"?)
|
# ? Jan 31, 2014 15:10 |
Sir_Substance posted:I'm curious to hear your guys opinions on the whole "antisocial" debate. I tend to put them on top of my head when I have to interact with someone I don't know and sometimes with friends. Which is exactly not the point. But when I'm in a non-social situation like riding a bike, they are fantastic.
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2014 15:47 |
|
They're really good when cooking, too.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2014 17:13 |
|
intervoid posted:Have either one of you guys received your invite to upgrade to version two? Or OP do you have version two since you just got yours not long ago? I'm still waiting. I got my Glass in early May, so I had a v1; received my swap invite in early December. Took a week and a half from when I sent it back for them to send the return box. It had prepaid overnight shipping to return it, and they overnighted me the replacement.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2014 23:58 |
|
I got to tell a Google employee to take them off. He was surprised.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2014 03:05 |
|
Anyone know if the new invites still last 7 days? I just got a second one this morning and I gave away my first.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2014 22:56 |
|
Sir_Substance posted:I'm curious to hear your guys opinions on the whole "antisocial" debate. Actually using Glass in a social setting is worse. If you're looking at someone, then look at the Glass display, the other person sees you kind of looking at them but not really. The other thing about Glass is that the difficulty in acquiring them (had to write an essay and pay $1500, although now it's effectively just paying $1500) meant that the folks who actually had them were really keen on the idea of wearing them all the time. If the devices were more accesible, and actually had utility, you might find more folks purcashing and using them for specific uses, but not going out in public with them.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 02:13 |
|
I wear em on head on the way to work. Normally this isn't a big deal but I forget sometimes and get a drink at a gas station or grocery or something I spend an hour explaining it to people. If anything it makes me MORE social because people say "what the hell is that?".
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 03:25 |
|
One thing that has kind of confused me is I find it hard to believe that the manufacturing cost is anywhere near $1500, it's probably closer to a few hundred at most, I mean this isn't cutting edge hardware, application yes but it's pretty much a low end phone hardware wise. Of course there is the R&D budget but that seems more like a sunk cost that they really can't recoup nor should really expect to on this limited rollout... So what's the point? To keep them from being adopted? Do they expect to swap out several different versions at no cost? Do they not really plan on releasing this for such a long time that a wider user base would not expand development in a realistic manner?
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 04:01 |
|
Three Olives posted:Do they expect to swap out several different versions at no cost? Three Olives posted:Do they not really plan on releasing this for such a long time that a wider user base would not expand development in a realistic manner? Those things are entirely on Google to fix. The platform can't move forward until that's done, it doesn't really matter how many folks adopt it.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 04:31 |
|
Three Olives posted:One thing that has kind of confused me is I find it hard to believe that the manufacturing cost is anywhere near $1500, it's probably closer to a few hundred at most, I mean this isn't cutting edge hardware, application yes but it's pretty much a low end phone hardware wise. Of course there is the R&D budget but that seems more like a sunk cost that they really can't recoup nor should really expect to on this limited rollout... Well you have to understand that there aren't that many of these and it's not like HTC or Samsung is rolling these out of an Asian factory 24/7. So because they aren't buying "in bulk" they probably cost a whole lot more than they could should they be massed produced. On a more speculative note: -They probably want to keep these relatively rare for a while. Complete strangers come up to me to ask about them. And since I was one of those people who really wanted one and -They also probably want to keep these in the hands of people who are going to take the time to really use these things. A few friends/family of mine couldn't deal with the learning curve and thought it was stupid. If it was easily affordable you'd get a lot of tech support problems, etc. ExcessBLarg! posted:Folks with v1 units did get a free upgrade to v2. TheReverend fucked around with this message at 06:04 on Feb 5, 2014 |
# ? Feb 5, 2014 05:57 |
|
ExcessBLarg! posted:
I saw a piece on... I think it was The Verge? When Glass first came out. The guy was trying it out around the city, and the impression I got of him was a slightly awkward person who didn't want to meet people's eyes, and who looked embarrassed to be having his photo taken in every picture. Then I watched the video and realised he's actually a confident presenter, it's just that in every picture he was looking at the glass display and that gives a really strange impression
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 08:26 |
|
Sorry I haven't really been following Google Glass. What does it do? Does it display navigation info, maps and websites? I assume you need to be looking at a phone or something to get an image on there but you specifically mentioned cooking and driving applications. Can you, for example, scroll a page with it somehow?
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 17:26 |
|
baka kaba posted:I saw a piece on... I think it was The Verge? When Glass first came out. The guy was trying it out around the city, and the impression I got of him was a slightly awkward person who didn't want to meet people's eyes, and who looked embarrassed to be having his photo taken in every picture. Get ready for ... glass and sex. Where everyone is awkwardly looking at themselves looking awkward.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2014 18:34 |
|
TheReverend posted:At the cost of sounding like a Google apologist, it's clearly labeled GDK preview. They most likely aren't done working with it yet. TheReverend posted:I got into the game late (for glass developers) and never had to deal with the MIRROR API so thank goodness for that but the GDK isn't so bad. I think it doesn't have a lot of documentation because a lot of it is just the normal Android stuff. The GDK isn't terrible, but if you really try to exploit its features in depth, you'll find the sample code only scratches at some of its features and that the GDK-specific API documentation doesn't document quite a number of methods, leading to trial and error to make stuff work, with no assurance it won't break in the next platform update. Perhaps that's all part of the experience given that the GDK is a "sneak preview". But as an engineer, when there's a number of other projects on your plate, you're probably going to invest time in something that doesn't result in a lot of process inefficiency and won't have to be redone next month. That's what's holding the platform back right now. Edit: At least with Android, if there's an ambiguity in the (otherwise generally quite good) documentation, you can actually check the framework source code to see how things are implemented. The Glass layer on-top of Android is proprietary so you can't really do the same there without a reverse engineering effort. That makes getting the documentation right even more important. ExcessBLarg! fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Feb 5, 2014 |
# ? Feb 5, 2014 18:57 |
|
I have two invites if anyone wants them. PM me your name and email address.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2014 21:21 |
|
I got mine today and it won't detect any of my voice commands except for "OK glass." I have no accent or anything so I'm not sure why I can't get this to work.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2014 19:08 |
|
UncleGuito posted:I got mine today and it won't detect any of my voice commands except for "OK glass." I have no accent or anything so I'm not sure why I can't get this to work. all commands start with "ok glass". "ok glass, take a picture" "ok glass, google, show me pictures of catfish" "ok glass, call grandma"
|
# ? Feb 28, 2014 19:56 |
|
Got an invite today. I'm considering it. Like, I wouldn't mind playing around with it or trying my hand at developing for it, but $1500 feels like a lot. Are the invites time-limited?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2014 07:41 |
|
ReidRansom posted:Got an invite today. I'm considering it. Like, I wouldn't mind playing around with it or trying my hand at developing for it, but $1500 feels like a lot. Are the invites time-limited? Yep. They expire in either one week or two (depending on what they're doing these days).
|
# ? Mar 1, 2014 08:53 |
|
ReidRansom posted:Got an invite today. I'm considering it. Like, I wouldn't mind playing around with it or trying my hand at developing for it, but $1500 feels like a lot. Are the invites time-limited?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2014 09:17 |
|
Seriously though....i think those Google Glasses look cool and they kinda make you look nerdy too from my perspective but....those things have to have so many more specs then they have now in order for me to go buy one for $1500 and wear it...i mean it has less capabilities then an iphone but you can look through it with glasses....so meh. I hope that they are gonna develop like solar energy for it too and everythin...that'll be cool (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Mar 1, 2014 10:20 |
|
Whirlwind Jones posted:If $1500 feels like a lot to you (it is) then don't do it. You'll regret it almost immediately. Going to try and get my employer to pay for it. Probably a 50/50 chance. Otherwise, yeah, I won't bother. I do alright, but not so good that parting with $1500 for something like this wouldn't feel a little like a bad decision. Guess I've got a week to convince them.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2014 20:34 |
|
Yeah don't pay for this. Work should pay for it otherwise you ain't missin' much
|
# ? Mar 2, 2014 00:17 |
|
You can always return it if you feel like it wasn't worth it.
|
# ? Mar 2, 2014 00:21 |
|
UncleGuito posted:I got mine today and it won't detect any of my voice commands except for "OK glass." I have no accent or anything so I'm not sure why I can't get this to work. If you say Ok Glass, you should notice a change in the screen and it will list the rest of the voice commands. The list grows as you add glassware. With glass, if you've having any issues, do a factory reset. I've had a few pair that have random problems. Factory resetting ends up fixing them. Recently, I had a pair come in that out of the box everything worked just fine, other than the head angle wake up. With it turned on, it would never activate no matter what angle you put it at. I performed a factory reset and once it was back, it worked fine, except for now the voice commands wouldn't work from the main launcher. "OK Glass," what was funny is if I took a picture with the button, or a blink, I could then use the voice command. More factory resets, and it didn't change it, so I just started dicking around and installed the strava app, I think the cycling one, and sure enough, voice response is working everywhere. There is a lot of potential in the glaas for a lot of applications, the rumor is that Google would like to get a public release by the end of the year, but I'm not sure it will happen.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2014 04:56 |
|
teejayh posted:If you say Ok Glass, you should notice a change in the screen and it will list the rest of the voice commands. The list grows as you add glassware. It ended up being an issue with the Twitter app. Once I disabled it, voice commands worked perfectly.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 13:20 |
|
I want a cut-down version of Google Glass. Get rid of the touch pad, the microphone, anything superfluous to a simple augmented reality display. It needs processor, screen, camera, and a wireless Internet connection. I don't want to give voice commands or fumble through apps in public anyway. I don't want to share on Facebook. Sync it with a computer to set everything up how you want it: Have it display more information about businesses you're looking at, have it pull up review scores for products you're looking at, have it pull up information about people you're looking at so you can become a Charles Magnussen-style supervillian, whatever. Everything else just seems to beg the question, "can't I already do that more easily on my phone?".
|
# ? Mar 27, 2014 02:01 |
|
So basically Google Glass except it also reads your mind?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2014 04:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:17 |
|
Well no, just keep the same settings once you've set them, and use the on-board camera to see stuff.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2014 21:55 |