|
Go on to Wikipedia and see what happened. IS THIS WHERE ALL MY DOLLARS WENT, JIMBO?!?!?
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:31 |
|
If you and everybody else donated three dollars(or the equivalent in bitcoin) this wouldn't have happened so technically it is your fault
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:26 |
|
At least they kept the article about farts. Farticle if you will https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatulence
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:40 |
|
I don’t see any difference op, have you tried turning your monitor on?
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:42 |
|
Lol if you actually read entire wikipedia articles in 2023 instead of googling "wiki [topic]" and reading google's terrible 2-sentence summary of the wikipedia page
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:44 |
|
oh good another website that can't loving figure out how to optimize for a 2560x1140 resolution
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:52 |
|
Every site and application redesign has been bad for years now, and it shows no sign of letting up.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 21:58 |
|
Emrikol posted:Every site and application redesign has been bad for years now, and it shows no sign of letting up. Hey I personally enjoy every website using only 25% of the available space on my monitor because this is 1994, correct?
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 22:00 |
|
Just look at it on your phone like everybody else does
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 22:02 |
|
as long as the stats, history and current employment of all types of athletes and musicians nobody cares about, or ever cared about, are meticulously updated
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 22:19 |
|
This is why our teachers in high-school told us not to rely on Wikipedia. You just didn't listen.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 23:31 |
|
Why isn't Wikipedia in 4K for fucks sakes
|
# ? Jan 18, 2023 23:39 |
|
How many dollars do I have to
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:01 |
|
This site is designed for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 at 640x480. please adjust resolution accordingly.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:03 |
|
Wikpedia manager: What if the site looked like it was on a smartphone screen, but worse?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:25 |
|
Emrikol posted:Every site and application redesign has been bad for years now, and it shows no sign of letting up. 500 years from now wars will be fought over dark v. Lite theme reddit
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:43 |
|
It really is dogshit. I can't access any of the useful poo poo on the lefthand side of the screen now
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:44 |
|
Change it back.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:50 |
|
Wikipedia dilated my urethra one size too big now im pissing out of a flat tire.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:50 |
|
wick
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 00:59 |
|
PoopyPeedia
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:01 |
|
Thank gently caress.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:06 |
|
I shouldn't have to play their game
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:08 |
|
It looks normal to me. Is this because I didn’t give them money?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:12 |
|
Trixie Hardcore posted:It looks normal to me. Is this because I didn’t give them money? The mobile version is unchanged. The desktop version has some formatting changes.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:19 |
|
they did change it and it sucks gently caress you jimbo
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:20 |
Feeling pretty good about never donating to them right now
|
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:21 |
|
Looks exactly the same on my phone
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:23 |
|
I like it OP.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:23 |
|
haljordan posted:Hey I personally enjoy every website using only 25% of the available space on my monitor because this is 1994, correct? It does look like it was designed for the local Lions Club. Or fark.com
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:46 |
|
Maybe you guys should have donated a little bit more huh? No problem paying to post about farts here but Jimmy asks for a measly two bucks and you’re all with moths flying out your wallets
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:50 |
|
BAGS FLY AT NOON posted:Maybe you guys should have donated a little bit more huh? No problem paying to post about farts here but Jimmy asks for a measly two bucks and you’re all with moths flying out your wallets Those are my nighttime butterflies jerk
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 01:54 |
|
glad they've caught up to web 2.0 by adding a giant amount of useless white space to every page if you're not on a phone. the table of contents idea is fine. maybe they'll let you put images and databoxes on the void to the right? why do these websites make their ux designers make things worse all the time? is it like, we have to make them do SOMETHING
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:14 |
|
I'm on a desktop and I don't see any difference.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:17 |
|
SidneyIsTheKiller posted:I'm on a desktop and I don't see any difference. Ok it is cool that wikipedia supports braille
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:18 |
|
some articles that i've visited before seem the same even through ctrl f5, but the front page and newer articles are changed for me. 1920x1080 old vs new
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:20 |
|
All that stuff on the left was super useful too, especially the foreign language articles
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:22 |
|
love to have more whitespace on my screen need that eye-searing void want to put my butt in it
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:26 |
|
you can get to the old left side with the burger menu and the languages are on the top right, opposite side of the article title
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:31 |
|
Quotey posted:some articles that i've visited before seem the same even through ctrl f5, but the front page and newer articles are changed for me. 1920x1080 old vs new Optimized for 4:3 CRT screens from 1997. What dipshit thought this was a good idea?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2023 02:29 |