Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

A human heart posted:

.
He was opposed to actually existing socialism and wrote a bunch of stuff beloved by anticommunists.

In conclusion, George Orwell is a land of contrasts.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cloudchamber
Aug 6, 2010

You know what the Ukraine is? It's a sitting duck. A road apple, Newman. The Ukraine is weak. It's feeble. I think it's time to put the hurt on the Ukraine

A human heart posted:

.
He was opposed to actually existing socialism

Only actually existing socialism as practised in Stalin's empire east of the Elbe; he supported the establishment of one of Europe's most far reaching welfare states in his own country.

The Belgian
Oct 28, 2008

A human heart posted:

.
He was opposed to actually existing socialism and wrote a bunch of stuff beloved by anticommunists.

Not that I hold Orwell to be some saint or great revolutionary leader, but calling someome who fought in the trenches for six months to defend actually existing socialism and got shot in the neck by a fascist for it opposed to existing socialism seems a bit off.

learnincurve posted:

No that was more of a comment about Reddit. Young people haven’t read that many books and most of them are on school book lists, if there is a book that they enjoy then everyone MUST know about it even though that book is 60 chuffing years old. Every generation of teenagers acts like they are the first to have ever read Orwell/Bradbury/and so on and so forth and it just gets boring seeing the same six book recommendations all the time.

A more recent and hilarious example were all those teenagers on Reddit/tumblr/goodreads who suddenly started (out of nowhere) banging on about The Picture of Dorian Gray and how they loved Wilde and how he spoke to their soul, boy did those kid’s get a shock when they all sat down to read the importance of being Ernest.

Fair enough, don't have any problems with that. A shame that only Orwell's late work is (mis)read by that group when his early work's quite lovely too and has more shades of grey by virtue of being based on Orwell's real life.

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

The Belgian posted:

Not that I hold Orwell to be some saint or great revolutionary leader, but calling someome who fought in the trenches for six months to defend actually existing socialism and got shot in the neck by a fascist for it opposed to existing socialism seems a bit off.


Fair enough, don't have any problems with that. A shame that only Orwell's late work is (mis)read by that group when his early work's quite lovely too and has more shades of grey by virtue of being based on Orwell's real life.

He was fighting alongside anarchists and seems to have had a fairly confused understanding of the political situation over there generally, but I don't really care about his personal beliefs so much as the ends his work has been used for.

cloudchamber posted:

he supported the establishment of one of Europe's most far reaching welfare states in his own country.
Having a welfare state doesn't make a country socialist.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Socialist supporters of the welfare state such as George Orwell, Winston Churchill,

The Belgian
Oct 28, 2008

A human heart posted:

He was fighting alongside anarchists and seems to have had a fairly confused understanding of the political situation over there generally, but I don't really care about his personal beliefs so much as the ends his work has been used for.

Having a welfare state doesn't make a country socialist.

The presence of, and desire to expand a welfare state are certainly socialist under whatever common definitions I'm aware of. Of course, they're not communist, but those are not the same things. For instance in the Communist Manifesto it might fall under this category

quote:



2. Conservative or Bourgeois Socialism.

A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances, in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society.

To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the work class, organizers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole and corner reformers of every imaginable kind. This form of Socialism has, moreover, been worked out into complete systems.

We may cite Proudhon's "Philosophic de la Misere" as an example of this form.

The socialistic bourgeois want all the advantages of modern social conditions without the struggles and dangers necessarily resulting therefrom. They desire the existing state of society minus its revolutionary and disintegrating elements. They wish for a bourgeoisie without a proletariat. The bourgeoisie naturally conceives the world in which it is supreme to be the best; and bourgeois socialism develops this comfortable conception into various more or less complete systems. In requiring the proletariat to carry out such a system, and thereby to march straightway into the social New Jerusalem, it but requires in reality, that the proletariat should remain within the bounds of existing society, but should cast away all its hateful ideas concerning the bourgeoisie.

A second and more practical, but less systematic, form of this socialism sought to depreciate every revolutionary movement in the eyes of the working class, by showing that no mere political reform, but only a change in the material conditions of existence, in economical relations, could be of any advantage to them. By changes in the material conditions of existence, this form of Socialism, however, by no means understands abolition of the bourgeois relations of production, an abolition that can be effected only by a revolution, but administrative reforms, based on the continued existence of these relations; reforms, therefore, that in no respect affect the relations between capital and labor, but, at the best, lessen the cost, and simplify the administrative work, of bourgeois government.

Bourgeois Socialism attains adequate expression, when, and only when, it becomes a mere figure of speech.

Free trade: for the benefit of the working class. Protective duties: for the benefit of the working class. Prison Reform: for the benefit of the working class. This is the last word and the only seriously meant word of bourgeois Socialism.

It is summed up in the phrase: the bourgeois is a bourgeois—for the benefit of the working class.

Orwell, at least around the time he wrote Homage to Catalonia was certainly no communist by the soviet viewpoint but he was a socialist.

cloudchamber
Aug 6, 2010

You know what the Ukraine is? It's a sitting duck. A road apple, Newman. The Ukraine is weak. It's feeble. I think it's time to put the hurt on the Ukraine

CestMoi posted:

Socialist supporters of the welfare state such as George Orwell, Winston Churchill,

In the build up to the 1945 election Churchill came out with a load of Road to Serfdom style stuff about how the Labour party's plans for implementing socialism in the UK would require them to eventually introduce an English version of the Gestapo.

gaydad
Mar 23, 2015
I gave up reading any Stephen King book. Misery was the first book I read by him and i thought it was amazing. So, I gave his other books a chance and I was disappointed. Not to mention IT is like 1000 pages.

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

Lightning Lord posted:

Orwell is so revered because he's thoroughly misinterpreted. Never seen Steinbeck get much praise from this group.

My point here btw, Orwell's views aside, is that his work has been used to say anything even remotely leaning left will inevitably become Animal Farm or 1984, and that I've never heard of a 14-19 year old redditer who gives a poo poo about Steinbeck.

504
Feb 2, 2016

by R. Guyovich

gaydad posted:

I gave up reading any Stephen King book. Misery was the first book I read by him and i thought it was amazing. So, I gave his other books a chance and I was disappointed. Not to mention IT is like 1000 pages.

Not picking on your opinions, but why does it matter how big it is?

mitochondritom
Oct 3, 2010

I abandoned Ready Player One about 3 chapters in. I was sick of 80's memes by then and knew it wasn't going to get any easier. It felt like Dan Brown decided to "do" Snow Crash or something.

The Rat
Aug 29, 2004

You will find no one to help you here. Beth DuClare has been dissected and placed in cryonic storage.

504 posted:

Not picking on your opinions, but why does it matter how big it is?

It's not the size that counts, it's how you use it!

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

504 posted:

Not picking on your opinions, but why does it matter how big it is?

if you must read a stephen king book then surely you'd want it to be done with as quickly as possible

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.
Plus it only has about 300 pages worth reading in the first place

King seems to think you can take a cliche and give them 100 pages of backstory and that suddenly makes them deep.

504
Feb 2, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Well No, otherwise he woundnt be popular.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

King does best with shorter novels, novellas, and short stories.

I could have sworn he's even said that himself, but I can't think of where.

ulvir
Jan 2, 2005

504 posted:

Well No, otherwise he woundnt be popular.

popularity itself isn’t a sufficient indicator of quality. something can be simultaneously popular and trash, such as marvel movies and stephen king

Sham bam bamina!
Nov 6, 2012

ƨtupid cat
Different Seasons is a very good book.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

All of his short story collections are solid, especially the Bachman collection

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

504 posted:

Well No, otherwise he woundnt be popular.

ok

Modulo16
Feb 12, 2014

"Authorities say the phony Pope can be recognized by his high-top sneakers and incredibly foul mouth."

mitochondritom posted:

I abandoned Ready Player One about 3 chapters in. I was sick of 80's memes by then and knew it wasn't going to get any easier. It felt like Dan Brown decided to "do" Snow Crash or something.

I abandoned Armada by Ernest Cline for that same reason. I also abandoned The Phoenix Project by Gene Kim.

13Pandora13
Nov 5, 2008

I've got tiiits that swingle dangle dingle




mitochondritom posted:

I abandoned Ready Player One about 3 chapters in. I was sick of 80's memes by then and knew it wasn't going to get any easier. It felt like Dan Brown decided to "do" Snow Crash or something.

The writing is just as lovely as Twilight but it get a social pass because it's aimed at men instead of teen girls and young women.

I gave up on the Dresden Files series. My SO really loves them and I just...can't make myself give a poo poo. I just find the titular character too convenient and unlikable and Butcher is seemingly allergic to writing an interesting female character. SO swears they get better but I'm not up to putting in the time to find out when there's millions of other books out there.

coolusername
Aug 23, 2011

cooltitletext

13Pandora13 posted:

The writing is just as lovely as Twilight but it get a social pass because it's aimed at men instead of teen girls and young women.

I gave up on the Dresden Files series. My SO really loves them and I just...can't make myself give a poo poo. I just find the titular character too convenient and unlikable and Butcher is seemingly allergic to writing an interesting female character. SO swears they get better but I'm not up to putting in the time to find out when there's millions of other books out there.

I got turned off by all the contrived mindcontrol/date rape scenes plots over the course of the series in Jim Butcher's books, on top of the cardboard female characters. Of which there are about way too many. Dresden Files, off memory, had poo poo like his backstory centers around his abusive mentor doing it to a girl, repeated supernatural kidnapping-rape plots in his side stories, his brother raping a villain to death while she screams in pleasure, entire villain group whose thing is doing it to people, siblings mind controlled into having sex, causing them to commit suicide, love interest for a novel+ was actually mind controlled the whole time..

Then his other series had even more over the scene in codex alera with a villain who breaks women into slaves via gang rape while forcing them to like it with magic and I realised it was just going to be him wanking off for a chapter every now and then.

No Wave
Sep 18, 2005

HA! HA! NICE! WHAT A TOOL!

Frank Viola posted:

I abandoned Armada by Ernest Cline for that same reason. I also abandoned The Phoenix Project by Gene Kim.
TPP summary: what saves the project is adopting continuous integration but it's written to sound as if "agile development" as a whole is responsible.

Modulo16
Feb 12, 2014

"Authorities say the phony Pope can be recognized by his high-top sneakers and incredibly foul mouth."

No Wave posted:

TPP summary: what saves the project is adopting continuous integration but it's written to sound as if "agile development" as a whole is responsible.

So basically: "Save us DevOps!".

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

No Wave posted:

TPP summary: what saves the project is adopting continuous integration but it's written to sound as if "agile development" as a whole is responsible.

People who work in IT shouldn't be allowed to write books

Ninurta
Sep 19, 2007
What the HELL? That's my cutting board.

A human heart posted:

People who work in IT shouldn't be allowed to write books

People who have Lum avatars shouldn't be allowed to comment on books.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

I wish I gave up on Ready Player One. I read it on a dare and it’s the worst loving thing. Is there an active thread where I can complain about it?

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

Jew it to it! posted:

People who have Lum avatars shouldn't be allowed to comment on books.

Why not?

TresTristesTigres
Feb 14, 2013

Posts from UnDeR9R0Und

Professor Shark posted:

King does best with shorter novels, novellas, and short stories.

I could have sworn he's even said that himself, but I can't think of where.

I just re-read his 1993 story collection Nightmares and Dreamscapes and he wrote this in the introduction

http://bestettler.com/EBooks/eBooks/King,%20Stephen/Nightmares%20and%20Dreamscapes/Stephen%20King%20-%20Introduction.htm posted:

The leap of faith necessary to make the short stories happen has gotten particularly tough in the last few years; these days it seems that everything wants to be a novel, and every novel wants to be approximately four thousand pages long. A fair number of critics have mentioned this, and usually not favorably. In reviews of every long novel I have written, from The Stand to Needful Things, I have been accused of overwriting. In some cases the criticisms have merit; in others they are just the ill-tempered yappings of men and women who have accepted the literary anorexia of the last thirty years with a puzzling (to me, at least) lack of discussion and dissent. These selfappointed deacons in the Church of Latter-Day American Literature seem to regard generosity with suspicion, texture with dislike, and any broad literary stroke with outright hate. The result is a strange and arid literary climate where a meaningless little fingernail-paring like Nicholson Baker's Vox becomes an object of fascinated debate and dissection, and a truly ambitious American novel like Greg Matthews's Heart of the Country is all but ignored.

I never bailed on any King stuff that was written before 1990 or so. His really recent novels, I bail on more of them than I finish. The Kennedy one was good though.

God Hole posted:

So I picked up Anna Karenina and it was just a dull slog all the way through. It was about an extramarital affair and somehow managed to be as boring and passionless as possible. I got as far as the horse race and knew exactly what it was foreshadowing and where the book was going to go and just put it down and never picked it up again.

I quit reading it twice at that exact same spot! It took me three tries to finish it. But dude, you should give it another try, it turns out to be way better than War and Peace. I agree the Anna/Vronsky parts are big bummers, and you know how it's going to end, but you need them to contrast with the Kitty/Levin parts. The scene where they write on the tablecloth is like the most :3: thing ever written.

But if you're dead-set on shorter works with doomed, passionate lovers then you might like Turgenev a lot

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Jew it to it! posted:

People who have Lum avatars shouldn't be allowed to comment on books.

If had a nickel for every dude who thought "you have an anime avatar" is a comeback to a human heart

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

Weren't the Lum avatars bought en masse by a mysterious benefactor anyway?

DeadFatDuckFat
Oct 29, 2012

This avatar brought to you by the 'save our dead gay forums' foundation.


Mel Mudkiper posted:

If had a nickel for every dude who thought "you have an anime avatar" is a comeback to a human heart

Yeah, he (or she) is just a whiny bitch that refused to do a mod challenge.

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

DeadFatDuckFat posted:

Yeah, he (or she) is just a whiny bitch that refused to do a mod challenge.

ah poo poo, i didn't do a Mod Challenge!! that's bad for some reason

Wapole Languray
Jul 4, 2012

I gave up in Ancillary Justice barely 50 pages in because I can't see why it got a Hugo. The main character basically had no personality, the imagery was vague, the pronoun thing just confused and annoyed me because it hosed with my ability to visualize anybody, and I couldn't find a plot or theme that entire time except maybe some weaksauce anti colonialism things. Also I don't need to read three shopping trip reports in a row when nothing happens except overcharging for bread.

Modulo16
Feb 12, 2014

"Authorities say the phony Pope can be recognized by his high-top sneakers and incredibly foul mouth."

business hammocks posted:

I wish I gave up on Ready Player One. I read it on a dare and it’s the worst loving thing. Is there an active thread where I can complain about it?

I wish there was I would be in there with you. Armada is worse.

TrixRabbi
Aug 20, 2010

Time for a little robot chauvinism!

I like Stephen King, but I gave up on Bag of Bones. I regret not finishing it cause it was a favorite of an ex of mine and she gave it to me when we were dating, but I wanted more ghosts and less 100-page monologues about writer's block and trying to help a trailer park woman pay her legal fees.

Ugly In The Morning
Jul 1, 2010
Pillbug
Anything by Neal Stephenson that isn’t Snow Crash or Reamde. And I only finished Reamde out of spite. That man needs an editor. How do you write a book that has MMO drama and globetrotting soy poo poo where the MMO drama is more interesting? I mean that in a relative since, because it wasn’t really interesting, but whenever it got back to the spy/terrorist stuff I would be dissapointed.

Illuminti
Dec 3, 2005

Praise be to China's Covid-Zero Policy
Redshirts by John Scalzi. Poorly written fan fiction. At points I literally couldn't tell who was talking because they all sound the same on the page. It also wasn't remotely funny or clever as the inexplicable 5* reviews had lead me to believe. I wasn't expecting a masterpiece but I was expecting something better crafted than a "hilarious" post on a tech support forum.

The Camel Club by David Baldacci - No one talks like that!!! It's worse than Dan Brown. People introduce themselves like they are living CVs.
"Hello, I'm Juliette Beautysmart from the CIA's special super division. I've been working on exposing a secret underground group but I also spend a lot of time studying Cryptography and shooting at the range."

"Err hi, I'm Dave."


Arrrrgh!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Ugly In The Morning posted:

Anything by Neal Stephenson that isn’t Snow Crash or Reamde. And I only finished Reamde out of spite. That man needs an editor. How do you write a book that has MMO drama and globetrotting soy poo poo where the MMO drama is more interesting? I mean that in a relative since, because it wasn’t really interesting, but whenever it got back to the spy/terrorist stuff I would be dissapointed.

Have you read Cryptonomicon? It and Snow Crash are his only books I think are worth reading--the prequel trilogy had some good parts too, but was way too bloated with filler to be worth it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply