|
MuscaDomestica posted:You realize that the Pentagon probably has defenses and they covered up the wreckage to stop people from finding out what they used… still took a lot of damage from the plane.
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 09:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 11:43 |
|
|
One of my friends wound up in a restricted area just touristing around on a school trip. Things might have changed, but my summary of the defenses back then was "what defenses?"
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 09:30
|
|
|
The Pentagon is right next to an airport. I would be willing to believe that shooting down a commercial flight was not a part of the pre-9/11 gameplan. You'd want to be really goddamn sure before shooting one down and you'd have very little room for error.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 09:31
|
|
|
Bula Vinaka posted:There are problems with the Pentagon. No person so far has been able to replicate what happened in a simulator. The lawn was completely untouched. For that to happen, along with the destruction that occurred to the building, the plane would have had to have been flown a few feet off the ground, right up to the point where it hit the building. In addition to that, despite there being a number of video cameras recording the area, only one video has ever been released, which only shows an explosion. No plane is visible. Apparently, government agents raided any gas station or other building in the area that had video cameras recording the area minutes after the crash. The plane was moving at 850kmh when it impacted the building, there's no way you're going to capture that on a lovely security camera that gets 24fps if you're lucky. It also did hit several lampposts and a generator before impacting the Pentagon. It took less than a second to travel more than 300 feet inside the building, the sheer forces involved literally disintegrated most of the fuselage. But there are photos of what is unmistakably airplane debris on the lawn, bearing the familiar white stroke/red fill text of American Airlines' livery. There are statements from eyewitnesses corroborating that it was an airplane. Also I'm curious about your first claim about nobody being able to recreate the crash in any flight sim, because it sounds like horseshit. How do you know? Mister Speaker fucked around with this message at 09:39 on Jan 2, 2023 |
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 09:37
|
|
|
Sincerely, I have questions about the Pentagon attack but I don't doubt that things happened about the way they've been reported. I also haven't cared since like...2008 or something. There was a brief window in my teenage years where conspiracy thought could have gotten its hooks into me, but I'm ultimately too lazy to get super deep into that nonsense. I wish it hadn't permanently ruined one of my uncle's brains, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 10:33
|
|
|
nobody ever talks about the fifth plane
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 10:56
|
|
|
I was crashing planes into the wtc before it was cool.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 13:14
|
|
|
It's only 6 days away from 3/11, at the very least it did come original
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 13:22
|
|
|
One of my coworkers mused aloud last night that the steel beams must have been sawn through with box cutters. Cutting through steel with a simple razor would require a sawing motion so intense that it would result in an explosion. And why else can't you take box cutters on planes anymore? Think about it!
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 15:34
|
|
|
XYZAB posted:Nope, three buildings fell down. the building that was damaged and on fire? weird that it would fall down
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 15:36
|
|
|
I'm just still mad about that period where you couldn't take nail clippers on planes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 15:55
|
|
|
why did wtc7 fall like a controlled demolition lmaooo
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 16:05
|
|
|
Hell Yeah posted:there's so many problems with every single thing in the world that i just sprint through life high on weed without really looking at anything in detail except women's asses. Thread should have just ended here, tbh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 16:09
|
|
|
Nah, that's missing an appreciation for half the world's asses
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 16:46
|
|
|
hulk hogan did it Ive seen the photots
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 16:53
|
|
|
Pimpcasso posted:hulk hogan did it Choad Bogan
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 16:56
|
|
|
I've never seen a "woman's rear end" and I don't know anyone who has either. If they are real, there seems to be very little evidence of them. Make of that what you will
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 17:12
|
|
|
GABA ghoul posted:I've never seen a "woman's rear end" and I don't know anyone who has either. If they are real, there seems to be very little evidence of them. Make of that what you will I saw a woman's anus once, it looked like poo poo!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 17:14
|
|
|
Lil Swamp Booger Baby posted:I saw a woman's anus once, it looked like poo poo!!! tuyrn on your monitor
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 17:16
|
|
|
Panic! At The Tesco posted:tuyrn on your monitor My monitor is your anus!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 17:17
|
|
|
where was Peter Daszak on 9/11?
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 17:27
|
|
|
Bula Vinaka posted:There are problems with the Pentagon. No person so far has been able to replicate what happened in a simulator. The lawn was completely untouched. For that to happen, along with the destruction that occurred to the building, the plane would have had to have been flown a few feet off the ground, right up to the point where it hit the building. In addition to that, despite there being a number of video cameras recording the area, only one video has ever been released, which only shows an explosion. No plane is visible. Apparently, government agents raided any gas station or other building in the area that had video cameras recording the area minutes after the crash. Ah, the bog standard loose change video questions. Love that a students fictional high school project that student author admits is nonsence and he only promoted because a rich nutter gave him a pile of cash is still “evidence”.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 20:21
|
|
|
Tom holland was a 9/11 baby
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 21:42
|
|
|
Not only because two planes and none of them hit building 7, but also because every official video about building 7 starts with “this was the first collapse ever of a large freestanding building from fire alone.” One coincidence I can handle (building on second-hand fire), but TWO coincidences (entire structural failure)? It just ticks a box in my head that suggests to me something was going on that day. But then again the whole day was absolutely without precedent, so logically if I can fully accept the more insane main event, which I find no reason not to, then I can accept smaller events of equal or lesser amounts of unprecedentedness like building 7 collapsing. And it’s by using critical thinking skills and formal logic like that that this doesn’t bother me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 22:13
|
|
|
Not unequivocally, but every alternative explanation I've heard is more implausible and I honestly believe that sometimes crazy poo poo just happens because, so I don't doubt it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 22:17
|
|
|
Edward from Twilight was in a twin tower, the movies told me this
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 22:17
|
|
|
Gosh, why might the New York's fire department have had trouble resourcing putting out building 7, on that day, September 11th 2001? I'm not a highschool student so I can't deduce this one from pure reason.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 22:18
|
|
|
pencilhands posted:believing in 9/11 being an inside job is like the bud light of conspiracy theories though, plenty of people do and it doesn't make you special at all Well at least you're comfortable being the basic bitch of the crazy person world.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 22:20
|
|
|
I went to school with a 9/11 truther. Talking with him genuinely blew my mind. Surreal poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 22:56
|
|
|
the lone gunmen writers did 9/11 to boost their ratings.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 23:01
|
|
|
Flowers for QAnon posted:Tom holland was a 9/11 baby conceived in the falling towers or on one of the planes?
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 23:12
|
|
|
XYZAB posted:Not only because two planes and none of them hit building 7, but also because every official video about building 7 starts with “this was the first collapse ever of a large freestanding building from fire alone.” One coincidence I can handle (building on second-hand fire), but TWO coincidences (entire structural failure)? It just ticks a box in my head that suggests to me something was going on that day. A skyscraper fell down next to it with jet fuel and fire exploding from the sides. Seems pretty logical to me unless building 7 was a mile away or something?
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 23:26
|
|
|
Buce posted:conceived in the falling towers or on one of the planes? Father was in the plane, mother was in the tower. An unholy union
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 23:30
|
|
|
XYZAB posted:Not only because two planes and none of them hit building 7, but also because every official video about building 7 starts with “this was the first collapse ever of a large freestanding building from fire alone.” One coincidence I can handle (building on second-hand fire), but TWO coincidences (entire structural failure)? It just ticks a box in my head that suggests to me something was going on that day. I’ll make you feel better right now. Some insurance company probably had a billion dollar policy on WTC7. That insurance company was probably examining every piece of dust from ground zero to find the slightest reason to not have to pay out. Obviously they found nothing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 23:43
|
|
|
Bloodfart McCoy posted:I’ll make you feel better right now. Some nerds already did the math and figured it all out. https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-7-investigation quote:Why did WTC 7 collapse, while no other known building in history has collapsed due to fires alone?
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2023 23:56
|
|
|
XYZAB posted:Not only because two planes and none of them hit building 7, but also because every official video about building 7 starts with “this was the first collapse ever of a large freestanding building from fire alone.” One coincidence I can handle (building on second-hand fire), but TWO coincidences (entire structural failure)? It just ticks a box in my head that suggests to me something was going on that day. Building with uncontrolled fire collapses. News at 11. So it was the first? Big deal, the WTC was the first to collapse from plane rammage. This is the goofy “just asking questions” thinking that conspiracy nutters use.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2023 00:17
|
|
|
Hell Yeah posted:there's so many problems with every single thing in the world that i just sprint through life high on weed without really looking at anything in detail except women's asses. I think this needs to be my new custom title.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2023 00:34
|
|
|
Lowtax orchestrated 9/11 in order to boost account sales
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2023 00:38
|
|
|
That he done
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2023 02:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 11:43 |
|
|
I have to admit I like the way crazies think: “Object in space? Not instantly identified? ALIENS!!!!!!!” “Something happens? No clear/incomplete answer? JEWISH SPACE LIZARDS!!!!” Event/object clearly defined with answer? - Drop discussion immediately with no self awareness when the next object/event appears.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2023 02:21
|
|