|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 03:45 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 09:11 |
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 03:59 |
|
https://twitter.com/garflyf/status/636503655051464704
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:09 |
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:11 |
|
He really wants to get another Herald Sun front page with rat features, hey?
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:13 |
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:14 |
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:19 |
|
Wait, is the IPA shutting down next year? That's great news
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:31 |
|
I look forward to the IPA campaigning to overturn the following barriers to free speech in Australia: - ASIC secrecy provisions relating to investigations - inadequate whistleblower protections - censorship by the OFLC of just about everything - court imposed censorship of certain DNS lookups - libel laws - restrictions on plaintiff lawyer advertising Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 04:42 on Mar 31, 2017 |
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:40 |
|
What's the name of the rhetorical trick/logical fallacy where you present your opponent's argument as, for example, "pro-18C senators want to restrict your free speech" instead of "pro-18C senators believe 18C protects people from racial hatred"? I mean beyond "a lie". snoremac fucked around with this message at 04:52 on Mar 31, 2017 |
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:49 |
|
Jacqui Lambie??? :confutoot:
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:56 |
|
I can only assume the shitshow that was the 3 day "debate" on the subject of 18C was ironically enough to convince her that "Hrm yeah gently caress we need this." See also: https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/18-c-town?bffbozpol&utm_term=.eeaxQ6g7o#.es6802XzW
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:00 |
|
snoremac posted:What's the name of the rhetorical trick/logical fallacy where you present your opponent's argument as, for example, "pro-18C senators want to restrict your free speech" instead of "pro-18C senators believe 18C protects people from racial hatred"? A strawman?
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:00 |
|
Don Dongington posted:I can only assume the shitshow that was the 3 day "debate" on the subject of 18C was ironically enough to convince her that "Hrm yeah gently caress we need this." See also: God they really can't tell the difference between judging someone for the color of their skin and judging them based on their actions or character can they. Like that's the fundamental thing they can't get their head around.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:08 |
|
Don Dongington posted:I can only assume the shitshow that was the 3 day "debate" on the subject of 18C was ironically enough to convince her that "Hrm yeah gently caress we need this." See also: this whole thing is amazing 19. Fellow Queensland senator Barry O'Sullivan wanted to talk about "Negro citizens" in the United States.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:09 |
|
snoremac posted:What's the name of the rhetorical trick/logical fallacy where you present your opponent's argument as, for example, "pro-18C senators want to restrict your free speech" instead of "pro-18C senators believe 18C protects people from racial hatred"? Framing? I don't know if it's a logical fallacy, it's just how you win arguments.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:17 |
|
snoremac posted:What's the name of the rhetorical trick/logical fallacy where you present your opponent's argument as, for example, "pro-18C senators want to restrict your free speech" instead of "pro-18C senators believe 18C protects people from racial hatred"? Haven't had one of these for a while: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_GfFq1N-04
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:33 |
https://twitter.com/rpy/status/844338998923354113
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 06:24 |
|
Aesculus posted:Jacqui Lambie??? :confutoot: Don Dongington posted:I can only assume the shitshow that was the 3 day "debate" on the subject of 18C was ironically enough to convince her that "Hrm yeah gently caress we need this." Unlike some of the other crossbench senators, Lambie actually has compassion for other people and usually seems open to changing her stance on policy. She's been slowly sliding leftwards since PUP - recent sharia law business notwithstanding. Reading the policies on her website is frustrating, though - so close Jacqui, but not... quite... there! (maybe a slight bias here - she's one of my senators and her office is down my street a bit)
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 06:47 |
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:18 |
|
Elissimpark posted:Unlike some of the other crossbench senators, Lambie actually has compassion for other people and usually seems open to changing her stance on policy. She's been slowly sliding leftwards since PUP - recent sharia law business notwithstanding. No I think that's generally it. She's concerned about Sharia law because to the simple and uneducated and with the way that opponents of Islamic immigration frame it, it's concerning. Those of us with a basic understanding of How Australia's Legal System Works and who bother to look a little deeper at an issue than the front page of whatever rag Murdoch vomits onto the Tasmanian landscape once a week know better, but that's clearly not how she rolls. Beyond that, she's mostly working on a platform that shows concern for issues that affect normal people - much like left wing representatives try to do. Lo and behold, most of those issues affect the "latte sipping" segments of the population the same way they affect suburban mums and dads (Who knew!), so despite her cognitive biases she's going to find she has far more in common with the Greens than One Nation. She can't SAY that though, because aforementioned news outlets would tear her apart and call her a fascist.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:19 |
|
She reminds me a lot of Bendigo people. In that, she doesn't have any exposure to most minorities but does get the value of "helping the little guy" over "fygm".
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:29 |
|
https://twitter.com/davidlipson/status/847688092626468864
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:30 |
|
Why is this necessary when power bills are at record lows due to Axing the Tax
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:32 |
|
Try again malcolm
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:32 |
|
What a great win for all those businesses struggling by on a $50m turnover
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:42 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Why is this necessary when power bills are at record lows due to Axing the Tax Not to mention all the benefits privatisation has created!
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:44 |
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:45 |
|
God Xenophon is an easy lay.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:45 |
|
After the power bills have doubled I'm sure a one off $75 payment will go a long way. This is like still thinking a loaf of bread costs a dollar because they have hired help take care of those things for them.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:47 |
|
So is this related to the energy supplement (carbon tax compensation to low income earners) they keep trying to get rid of?
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:48 |
|
But boy just you wait to see those returns!
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:57 |
|
How do we know these old people won't just spend the money on dry sherry? Probably better to link the payment to an 'energy' card.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:58 |
|
https://twitter.com/murpharoo/status/847699723083370496 Ahahahah gently caress Cormann and gently caress Xenophon
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 08:02 |
|
DancingShade posted:After the power bills have doubled I'm sure a one off $75 payment will go a long way. You can get a loaf of bread for $0.85 at Coles
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 08:11 |
|
Renew Economy posted:The federal Coalition government has announced that it will provide $110 million in concessional loans to a solar tower and molten salt storage project in Port Augusta, as part of last minute negotiations with the Nick Xenophon Party to pass major tax cuts. So it seems like at least we get some renewable out of all this but only because it's in SA.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 08:15 |
|
Where's the debt and deficit disaster? Where's the budget repair? gently caress me, cutting taxes on our tax minimising lovely companies who increased profits by 20% this year and increased wages by 0%. Better increase those profits some more because then wages and jobs are sure to follow right?
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 08:16 |
|
I love compromising my position on long term issues for short term gains. Government run like big business.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 08:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 09:11 |
|
Getting the government to fund renewables in SA is a pretty funny bit of trolling.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 08:29 |