Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
dot communist
Mar 28, 2005

The Bloop posted:

The reason for big business to be all in now is to become the standard before that happens

Exactly. Zuck just wants to secure a user base as early as possible.

I can't help but think though that the kind of general-purpose metaverse he's insinuating, one where you chat with gran about Buddy's trip to the vet before teleporting off to your shift as a Facebook mod or whatever, all while wearing a generic Mii style avatar, is maybe a bit far fetched.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

dot communist posted:

Exactly. Zuck just wants to secure a user base as early as possible.

I can't help but think though that the kind of general-purpose metaverse he's insinuating, one where you chat with gran about Buddy's trip to the vet before teleporting off to your shift as a Facebook mod or whatever, all while wearing a generic Mii style avatar, is maybe a bit far fetched.

Maybe

So was talking to grandma through the internet using a computer in your pocket not that long ago

chaosbreather
Dec 9, 2001

Wry and wise,
but also very sexual.

The Bloop posted:

I hear what you're saying but barring an apocalypse (which is a realistic but separate conversation) in another 20 years the components for good XR might be cheap enough that another dorky company can do it in a garage with kickstarter money

The reason for big business to be all in now is to become the standard before that happens

There's a reason why Oculus was a VR company and not an AR company, though. You can totally VR in a garage. But the problem is AR lenses are only good for AR - that's why Meta has to spend so much money on that compared to Quest, which is a cheap android phone strapped to your face, and the only way to make the display systems is through a herculean fusing together of like 8 incredibly desperate highly specialised disciplines using microscopic-scale engineering to create ex-nullo components that require engineering their mass production in. How cheap any component is depends on how much anyone needs it, that's why Meta has to spend the big bucks now. So the garage dream would require a diverse team of absolute top-of-their-game geniuses using 3d printing technology that is pretty much star trek level, on a project that has left a smoking crater on the tech landscape that would still be highly radioactive.

Facebook is Meta now because their growth and revenue is currently dependant on how much Apple and various world governments lets them get away with, which is rapidly decreasing. Apple and the other consumer electronic companies are getting serious about it because they don't have anywhere else to go, phones have been pretty great for a while now, and companies have to grow or die.

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Facebook is Meta now because "Facebook" is a toxic dinosaur brand

Stick Figure Mafia
Dec 11, 2004

They should give me free vr helmets and also maybe money then maybe I will use it. For RE4 VR.

chaosbreather
Dec 9, 2001

Wry and wise,
but also very sexual.

The Bloop posted:

Facebook is Meta now because "Facebook" is a toxic dinosaur brand

I'm not just talking about the name change, I'm talking about turning a social media / ad company abruptly and completely into a 'metaverse' company, changing direction at a company-wide level, and spending 100 billion, per year, on metaverse poo poo. Losing a toxic dinosaur brand is, I'm sure, a bonus, but if it wasn't a priority after Cambridge Analytica it probably isn't now.

satanic splash-back
Jan 28, 2009

It's actually Meta because it's an anagram for Meat.

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

chaosbreather posted:

I'm not just talking about the name change, I'm talking about turning a social media / ad company abruptly and completely into a 'metaverse' company, changing direction at a company-wide level, and spending 100 billion, per year, on metaverse poo poo. Losing a toxic dinosaur brand is, I'm sure, a bonus, but if it wasn't a priority after Cambridge Analytica it probably isn't now.

Regular people don't know what Cambridge Analytica is/was

The problem is that grandparents are mostly on Facebook and it's uncool as hell

The rebrand is a cynical marketing attempt to be hip and the investment in other tech is because the people still using Facebook don't care that it sucks so investment there is pointless.

They are taking a shot at what the next thing might be but I think Zuck is also a weird true believer in robot world because he's personally a techy nerd who would rather interact with others remotely using an avatar because he's also a huge goon

kntfkr
Feb 11, 2019

GOOSE FUCKER
there's no i in meat

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA
This discussion really hits at just how hard Zuckerberg has hosed this all up, because go back 20 years and tell me a company will be spending hundreds of billions trying to get everyone to use virtual environments and I would have thought there was NO WAY I would absolutely hate it

flubber nuts
Oct 5, 2005



i wont forget this.

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Dr. Quarex posted:

This discussion really hits at just how hard Zuckerberg has hosed this all up, because go back 20 years and tell me a company will be spending hundreds of billions trying to get everyone to use virtual environments and I would have thought there was NO WAY I would absolutely hate it

Right lol

But I'm not even sure what company I would want to do it now, they all suck poo poo and just want a way to mine data from you

ProfessorMarvel
Jan 6, 2021

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Dr. Quarex posted:

This discussion really hits at just how hard Zuckerberg has hosed this all up, because go back 20 years and tell me a company will be spending hundreds of billions trying to get everyone to use virtual environments and I would have thought there was NO WAY I would absolutely hate it

Leave it to affluent white men to snatch defeat from the jaws of certain victory by way of consequences of their own actions.

vaginite
Feb 8, 2006

I'm comin' for you, colonel.



Is there a device that can suck my dick but I do n't know it's a device

Brother Tadger
Feb 15, 2012

I'm accidentally a suicide bomber!

vaginite posted:

Is there a device that can suck my dick but I do n't know it's a device

OP’s mom

Cassette Moodcore
May 4, 2022

As others have pointed out the end game has to be augmented reality, we’ve had google glass, Microsoft HoloLens, take a walk you can bring granny along she’ll wear her streamlined VR setup in the home you got your glasses on Facebook will record your convo and literally know everything about your life and sell that to the advertisers while the government gets their share too. Will work great for work as well to steal information, I think VR is an important part of it though

Cassette Moodcore fucked around with this message at 05:57 on Aug 23, 2022

ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD
Jan 21, 2007

the other day i had an office presentation where a dude was shilling for his company that made robots controlled by vr.

i work for a bank.

the first question he asked us is can you think of any ways you can benefit from the technology and my coworker suggested we rob our bank

ProfessorMarvel
Jan 6, 2021

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD posted:

the other day i had an office presentation where a dude was shilling for his company that made robots controlled by vr.

i work for a bank.

the first question he asked us is can you think of any ways you can benefit from the technology and my coworker suggested we rob our bank

Please for the love of God tell me you don't work for their IT department, because I can't imagine how many messes they have to mop up from vendors dazzling the bank management with the latest shiny toy/massive risk exposure 🤦‍♂️

ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD
Jan 21, 2007

ProfessorMarvel posted:

Please for the love of God tell me you don't work for their IT department, because I can't imagine how many messes they have to mop up from vendors dazzling the bank management with the latest shiny toy/massive risk exposure 🤦‍♂️

sorry homey

our goal for 2022 was getting "into crypto" so i hope you have a hole in your mattress

Pac and Cheese
Oct 29, 2010

gotta walk fast
metaverse looks so lovely because it needs to run on self-contained oculus hardware okay, once john carmack gets the tech down you will all eat your words in my metafecture as my metaserfs

ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD
Jan 21, 2007

Pac and Cheese posted:

metaverse looks so lovely because it needs to run on self-contained oculus hardware okay, once john carmack gets the tech down you will all eat your words in my metafecture as my metaserfs

im gonna join john romeros vr raiders led by a virtual black guy named superfly johnson so i'll see you when youre up against the wall sucking it down

Pac and Cheese
Oct 29, 2010

gotta walk fast

idiot thought code is law when nfts just proved that law is code, i'm sure you'll "make me your bitch" with your inferior tech daddy

e: editors note: turns out john romero actually said design is law and this post sucks

Pac and Cheese fucked around with this message at 07:07 on Aug 23, 2022

ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD
Jan 21, 2007

Pac and Cheese posted:

e: editors note: turns out john romero actually said design is law and this post sucks



ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD posted:

suck... it down

dk2m
May 6, 2009

Dr. Quarex posted:

This discussion really hits at just how hard Zuckerberg has hosed this all up, because go back 20 years and tell me a company will be spending hundreds of billions trying to get everyone to use virtual environments and I would have thought there was NO WAY I would absolutely hate it

Seriously, this is the most hosed up part about all of this - I’m a giant nerd and grew up loving nerd poo poo but absolutely nothing about this is exciting or interesting even from just a nerd standpoint. I don’t give a gently caress about VR even though it is right up my alley

can’t tell if I’m just getting old or technology has already reached the dystopian tipping point where everything feels like a cynical attempt to find new ways to advertise to you

Barudak
May 7, 2007

Hololens still exists, you just don't hear about it because they aimed it only at commercial people and the US military. Also because I think it has been wildly financially unsuccessful.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

The Bloop posted:

W🎩

Is this doomer poo poo or what?

VR has come and gone a bunch of times since I played Dactyl Nightmare in like 1995

Why would this be the last time? If it's not ready yet it will just go dormant for ten years until the tech advances and we try again

Like with 3D movies

3d movies are a good example

I think the problem is that fundamentally the vast majority of people categorically don't want to be immersed in media to the point of building obstacles between themselves and the real world and / or tethering themselves to the media in a way that limits them irl. So just like with 3d movies, VR will never become more than a fad / niche product no matter how mature because the nature of the technology goes against the needs of the majority of the public, regardless of how sophisticated it can get. Maybe there's a case for AR as a useful application of the concept in some limited cases, we'll see.

The Moon Monster
Dec 30, 2005

Buce posted:

is it possible mark zuckeberg is a scanner from the Cordwainer Smith Extended Universe?

Has he ever told us what he lives for?

Hammerite
Mar 9, 2007

And you don't remember what I said here, either, but it was pompous and stupid.
Jade Ear Joe
Relaxing in the bath, I hear what sounds like distorted, far-off mumbling. Looking around in idle confusion I see nothing. The mumbling gets louder. I reach for the side of hte bath to pull myself upwards. Something strange about the back of my hand? I turn my left hand toward my face and retch. The tip of every finger is Mark Zuckerberg's face, looking and judging. "More data" says my Zuckerthumb and I pass out

The Moon Monster
Dec 30, 2005

chaosbreather posted:

Exactly, so making them not dork goggles is the goal that will cost Facebook everything to maybe enable another company to achieve.

Don’t forget, the idea that you’d have a computer in your house like some kind of gross ham radio nerd was pretty much exactly the same sentiment you’re expressing here and was super common in the 70s and 80s, even the 90s. It can be difficult to see how much culture has shifted but it’s dramatic and hasn’t stopped.

In the 90s, people would laugh and say “nobody wants to type to people on a computer instead of just using a phone”, and they were talking about rotary dial.

If you told them then that in the future absolutely everyone would carry at least one, usually two or three computers on them at all times, all of them connected via deadly microwave radio waves, they’d lose it.

I think you provided the better analogy here, which is ham radio. It'll be useful to some professions and some weird hobbyists, but most people won't bother because they can already do everything they actually want on a telephone::computer.

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

steinrokkan posted:

3d movies are a good example

I think the problem is that fundamentally the vast majority of people categorically don't want to be immersed in media to the point of building obstacles between themselves and the real world and / or tethering themselves to the media in a way that limits them irl. So just like with 3d movies, VR will never become more than a fad / niche product no matter how mature because the nature of the technology goes against the needs of the majority of the public, regardless of how sophisticated it can get. Maybe there's a case for AR as a useful application of the concept in some limited cases, we'll see.

I agree that that is 100% a possibility and I stand by the comparison.

But I'm enough of a sci-fi tech nerd to be able to image multiple tech fixes for both that could overcome that reluctance.

It's funny but 3d movies may actually need MORE help because they're so.... one dimensional. They don't really do anything for you. But if future heads up display AR glasses/ eyeball projectors/ brain holograms/ whatever are giving other people information and access to things you don't have, you may be willing to suffer a little inconvenience for it.

A bit like carrying a phone everywhere and making sure it's charged, wearing a smart watch/Fitbit, or even just wearing regular glasses.

The Saddest Rhino
Apr 29, 2009

Put it all together.
Solve the world.
One conversation at a time.



How do I commit a genocide in the metaverse

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

The Saddest Rhino posted:

How do I commit a genocide in the metaverse

Pull the plug

kntfkr
Feb 11, 2019

GOOSE FUCKER
the metaverse could be useful for simulating the crucifixion of mark zuckerberg

Buce
Dec 23, 2005

The Moon Monster posted:

Has he ever told us what he lives for?

oysters, in vain the cranch

BAGS FLY AT NOON
Apr 6, 2011

A Soft Nylon Bag

The Saddest Rhino posted:

How do I commit a genocide in the metaverse

1,000,000 MetaBux for the nuke launcher.

Bula Vinaka
Oct 21, 2020

beach side
Everyone knows that in the future, the VR goggles will go away and we'll just have holograms.

So there will be meetings at tables where everyone is in a different place but it looks like everyone is sitting at the same table for a meeting. Each person sees a hologram of everyone else.

So since that will surely happen in the future, smart companies are going to start preparing for that right now, so they'll have the upper hand and be on top, in the future.

That best explains The Metaverse.

Investors should be happy.

Outrail
Jan 4, 2009

www.sapphicrobotica.com
:roboluv: :love: :roboluv:
I'll have a lot of respect Zuck if he ships out 7.5 billion headsets at once and detonates the hidden bombs in them all at the same time.

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost
Ladies and gentlemen of the board, good morning! Glad to see nobody was shot on their way in, ha ha.

The last corporate war was great for our sales of prosthetics for the survivors who could afford it through the government LIMBS program.

The plan to implement the subscription model on our prosthetics is nearly ready for full scale launch.

Our legal team has been treading the line very carefully on this, and legally, we cannot simply disable the bionic limbs when subscriptions expire.

BUT what we can do is reduce functionality if the subscription lapses. Our guys are 100% sure that's legal.

Want to use your sword arm implant? It now comes out at a snails pace. Good luck with that.

Veteran wants to pick up his coffee cup? A "glitch" increases grip strength to maximum.

Best part is, even if the device is put into unpaid mode, the full data collection suite on it will continue to function and transmit.

Lastly, and this is always a game of cat and mouse, our next pushed update should be able to defeat the aftermarket ad blockers on our RealEyes.

olives black
Nov 24, 2017


LENIN.
STILL.
WON'T.
FUCK.
ME.
VR is not going to become mainstream until porn is feelable, smellable and lickable. End of loving story.

Mommy and Daddy will always be sure to make a big deal out of how much their little Timmy enjoys Beatsaber, but until both of them can get hosed by a sweaty werewolf that smells and tastes like it has just pissed on itself the tech will be doomed to nichedom.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

kntfkr
Feb 11, 2019

GOOSE FUCKER
vr will never replace meat

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply