|
Who's idea was it to fly the Enterprise under water? drat it, Troi, get out of the bridge! 
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2012 17:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 17:54 |
|
|
Karpaw posted:Cumberbatch did an interview with Swedish movie site Moviezine, in which he identifies his character as John Harrison. He also says that there was no need to do research on previous incarnations of him. Benedict Cumberbatch via Google Translate posted:I did not do any research on my character based on previous incarnations. Benedict Cumberbatch in Swedish posted:Jag behövde inte göra någon research kring min karaktär baserad på tidigare inkarnationer. Trying to think of different villains that he could be playing is fun, but honestly, I'd be happy if he was playing someone we've never seen before too. Yeah, it's s Star Trek movie, but that doesn't mean it has to be something we've already watched.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2012 16:58
|
|
|
ufarn posted:"behövde" means, basically, "needed", which is an important distinction. Similar to "besoin" in French. In other words it's probably a character with no backlog of information. That's exactly what I figured. Thanks for clearing it up thogh!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2012 19:28
|
|
|
My God, Bones, what have I done? Exactly what you needed to. You took an ugly ship and gave it a chance for a redesign. Mogomra fucked around with this message at 02:48 on Feb 4, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2013 02:45
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:I still find it amazing how talented Robert Wise is as a director. The guy could direct any genre.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2013 16:47
|
|
|
Pops Mgee posted:I'd argue that this monstrosity is pretty pointy too. I wonder why anyone would ever make a spaceship that looks like that. Every other mining vessel in all of Star Trek looks decidedly less sinister.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2013 23:20
|
|
|
No one ever said being a Starfleet captain would be glamorous.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2013 18:36
|
|
|
AlternateAccount posted:What the gently caress? Nothing in that list of spoilers sounds very good except for the bit quoted above. :\
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2013 18:55
|
|
|
I guess you have a point.me posted:Not my Trek!  I look forward to seeing how that particular scenario unfolds!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2013 19:14
|
|
|
MadScientistWorking posted:That isn't a contrivance. Blowing up 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2013 21:27
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:The tie-in game even looks like Mass Effect. If it is a Mass Effect clone, that's a good thing, right?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2013 14:10
|
|
|
Screen cap of the new ship from the 1080p trailer: I could see this being Starfleet's new big bad war ship after getting all but destroyed in the last movie. The saucer almost looks like Excelsior's, but who knows. Mirror Universe would be neat too, but how many alternate universe/timelines/realities do we need? While we're wildly speculating, maybe it's something Section 31 has been working on in the background?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2013 19:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 17:54 |
|
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:For fucks' sake, apparently the non-Imax 3D version isn't even scheduled to play in my city yet. I hate 3D films. I don't know if this is a problem everywhere, but around here, all the IMAX theaters only have like 2 good seats. Otherwise you're stuck with a kink in your neck, or you can't see the whole screen at once. I'd much rather see it on a regular sized screen.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2013 17:25
|
|
