|
Is there a reason drowning isn't an option? e: My company uses Orkin and Orkin refuses to use any traps that aren't sticky traps in our houses. I usually sabotage the traps with oil, but occasionally I'll get a call from staff freaking out about a screaming mouse stuck to one and I just tell them to drown'em in a bucket of water. Evil Sprite Can fucked around with this message at 18:32 on Jun 26, 2016 |
#
¿
Jun 26, 2016 18:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 20, 2024 09:31 |
|
|
Sock Weasel posted:...Because drowning is also a horrifically inhumane way to kill something? Don't get me wrong, I agree that bag and whack is the way to go and thankfully I've only had to do it once. However I don't see how drowning, as a second option, is less humane than not doing anything when you don't have someone willing to whack, chop or smash. I didn't mean the oh-my-god-that's-so-sad freaking out, I mean the oh-my-god-that's-so-gross freaking out. I've told them they need to kill it one way or the other and drowning is apparently less gross so that's what they pick. With gloves, a round bucket and a dinner plate it's low effort and over fairly quick. It's better than being thrown in the trash half alive.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2016 05:29
|
|
(Also generally speaking if someone can't handle dealing with a screaming animal in a sticky trap they're probably not going to be able to drown it.)