Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Billy Gnosis
May 18, 2006

Now is the time for us to gather together and celebrate those things that we like and think are fun.

Pyrotoad posted:

Unfortunately it's one of those ones that gets effectively poisoned by his blog post where he very confidently asserts that the scammers he's personally friends with or that genuinely believe their own bullshit are good actually.

I can't get over that. He clearly made the connection or else why bring them up at all in his blog post specifically about scammers.

But I mean Mookie's philosophy and writing has always been good people's actions are always good, and bad people's actions are always bad.

Billy Gnosis fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Apr 17, 2024

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FlocksOfMice
Feb 3, 2009
I'll change my tune if the spirit healing rocks that are all also scams end up being what saves the day.

gently caress me it's going to be that isn't it.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

To be fair, it would be probably would be easier to scam people with magic crap in a world where magic exists, ironically. Since it's in the realm of possibility, more people would be receptive to it. And just look at all the people who get fooled by tech scams in the real world. You could write a whole story about scam wizards, it would be great.

super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

a cartoon duck posted:

as much as his greatest hit is "people like to write sexy thieves, so why not write a sexy rapist?"

They already existed, they're called vampires.

rudecyrus
Nov 6, 2009

fuck you trolls

Caphi posted:

Also what does her relationship status have to do with any of this? (at this point I assume it's just a detail that he threw in so that he can end the arc with her meeting a boy who also loves rocks or whatever to make it look like a happy ending regardless of how much he bungles the actual central relationship dynamic)

It seemed like Dad was pissed because she was pursuing her own interests instead of getting married and pumping out kids since he's the typical authoritarian patriarch, but he's actually angry she fell for multiple scams. Okay.

Medenmath posted:

Maybe she was buying healing rocks to try and cure whatever killed her dad

Thing is, she didn't mention her dad died young or of some sudden illness, but judging by what she says here it looks like that's what happened -- she was searching for healing stones or precious gems to sell for treatment. Would've been nice to establish that before.

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

Its still a generic thing though. Like the prediction posts from above demonstrated it's so easily predictable. A good story is a living thing. It breathes, it has a pulse. Mookie just makes an approximate shape of a comic. From a distance it might look like one but it's a dead mishappen thing with only the most superficial resemblances to a story.

I really dislike this shallow fetid pond of a man.

Mx.
Dec 16, 2006

I'm a great fan! When I watch TV I'm always saying "That's political correctness gone mad!"
Why thankyew!


There's a new page and it's dumb thanks for reading

rudecyrus
Nov 6, 2009

fuck you trolls


1. That was easy
2. Lol at the lovingly drawn rear end
3. Teleported outside

rudecyrus fucked around with this message at 06:31 on Apr 19, 2024

Invisible Clergy
Sep 25, 2015

"Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces"

Malachi 2:3
Magic is gentler. Except when it kills ghosts.

Spirit shepherds are self-abnegating monks who exist to serve ghosts even at the expense of their own bodily autonomy. Except when the ghost is rude.

10/10, conflict negated.

Hippocrass
Aug 18, 2015

That third panel of the first comic just makes it. It's still funny if you remove it, but that panel included just makes it top tier.
Man I was afraid there was going to be some conflict there for a minute.

Samovar
Jun 4, 2011

I'm 😤 not a 🦸🏻‍♂️hero...🧜🏻



Well, so much for this story exploring topics. Am I surprised? No. Disappointed? ...almost always.

FlocksOfMice
Feb 3, 2009
This would be fine as like a 4 page comic you see on tumblr scrolling by and you click the heart button to mark that you've seen it, and never think about it again, at least. This is like. Going bowling and you hit a pin at last. You hit one pin.

I can make fun of someone who rolls nothing but gutterballs constantly but someone who can hit at least one pin, it feels mean.

Mx.
Dec 16, 2006

I'm a great fan! When I watch TV I'm always saying "That's political correctness gone mad!"
Why thankyew!


the butt is terrible

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Oh so now you can just forcibly move them on without solving their underlying problem? And your moral is that's fine if you personally think they're an rear end in a top hat.

And you're leaving the family there with no catharsis? Shout at them with dad's voice and then just kill him forever. I dread to think what's going to happen next week when she follows up with the daughter/son who are now going to thank her for this bullshit non-ending.

Breadmaster
Jun 14, 2010

Breadmaster posted:

I'm just waiting for him to remove all tension/abruptly end this arc in the next page.

well, now what do i do with the gift of prophecy?

catlord
Mar 22, 2009

What's on your mind, Axa?

Breadmaster posted:

well, now what do i do with the gift of prophecy?

Move to a backwater town full of jocks who'll never appreciate you and sell your services as a prophet, an oracle for hire, if you will?

Sybot
Nov 8, 2009
Ah, there's the other shoe dropping with the story. A conflict between what the ghost needs to move on and what the bereaved need to move on? What if the ghost is kind of an rear end in a top hat? No problem, it turns out spirit shepherds are ghostbusters as well!

Once again Mookie leaves interesting ideas on the table. What if the scammer guy went around banishing every ghost as fast as possible without any empathy, while the protagonist wanted to take the time and effort to understand them to give them peaceful closure, even if they were kind of rear end in a top hat like dad here. That'd be a much more interesting conflict than him just being a fraud.

super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

catlord posted:

Move to a backwater town full of jocks who'll never appreciate you and sell your services as a prophet, an oracle for hire, if you will?

And make bad puns and alliterative sentences.

GrossMurpel
Apr 8, 2011

super sweet best pal posted:

And make bad puns and alliterative sentences.

If someone tells you they go to Alcoholics Anonymous, look disapprovingly to the side as if a camera was there

Mordja
Apr 26, 2014

Hell Gem
So if the whole point of spirit shepherds is to guide ghosts into the generically spiritual "Great Cycle" is this one just straight up gone? Making her a murderer?

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer
Uhh so how much longer is this arc supposed to go?

super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

The next week is going to be three pages of her being satisfied with a job well done despite things not ending happily and any regret will be superficial. Mookie will consider this character growth. Optionally, she'll be sad that people are taking advantage of her profession but nothing will be done about this. Another shaggy dog story in the can.

amigolupus
Aug 25, 2017

The thing that gets me is that by trying to tackle both the idea of someone being haunted by an rear end in a top hat family member as well as the need for consent to have your body possessed, the story ends in this situation where Spookie ends up coming across as a selfish egotist who makes the situation all about herself. She's not mad at Ghost Dad because he is a controlling rear end in a top hat who thinks she needs to get married to solve her problem, or that him haunting the daughter from beyond the grave is causing her stress, or that he can't respect his grown-rear end daughter to make her own mistakes. No, Spookie banished Ghost Dad for the crime of being mean to her, personally.

Tesseraction posted:

Oh so now you can just forcibly move them on without solving their underlying problem? And your moral is that's fine if you personally think they're an rear end in a top hat.

And you're leaving the family there with no catharsis? Shout at them with dad's voice and then just kill him forever. I dread to think what's going to happen next week when she follows up with the daughter/son who are now going to thank her for this bullshit non-ending.

It's hilarious how Pares manages to provide way more catharsis to the daughter than Spookie did.

rudecyrus
Nov 6, 2009

fuck you trolls

Maxwell Lord posted:

Uhh so how much longer is this arc supposed to go?

about 5 or 6 more pages

Mx.
Dec 16, 2006

I'm a great fan! When I watch TV I'm always saying "That's political correctness gone mad!"
Why thankyew!


amigolupus posted:

The thing that gets me is that by trying to tackle both the idea of someone being haunted by an rear end in a top hat family member as well as the need for consent to have your body possessed, the story ends in this situation where Spookie ends up coming across as a selfish egotist who makes the situation all about herself. She's not mad at Ghost Dad because he is a controlling rear end in a top hat who thinks she needs to get married to solve her problem, or that him haunting the daughter from beyond the grave is causing her stress, or that he can't respect his grown-rear end daughter to make her own mistakes. No, Spookie banished Ghost Dad for the crime of being mean to her, personally.

It's hilarious how Pares manages to provide way more catharsis to the daughter than Spookie did.

Thanks for articulating this, it was a dynamic I super wasn't into and this really makes things clear why

super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

Mordja posted:

So if the whole point of spirit shepherds is to guide ghosts into the generically spiritual "Great Cycle" is this one just straight up gone? Making her a murderer?

It's a real Calm Hitler situation. The ghost is bad because he breached :decorum: and now the kind and patient Spirit Shepherd has to show what happens to people who go beyond the limits of her patience. Killing him is ok because it's a punitive measure.

a cartoon duck
Sep 5, 2011

i'd like him to stop talking about consent

Inexplicable Humblebrag
Sep 20, 2003

Cemetry Gator
Apr 3, 2007

Do you find something comical about my appearance when I'm driving my automobile?
So here are my notes -

Once again, it’s too wordy.

But more importantly - the conflict needs to have stakes. We need to be invested in the situation. Daughter is being haunted. Cool. Why do I care?

Another major problem is that as soon as a conflict or complicating factor is introduced, you clear it up immediately. Ghost dad is angry. If she gets him out on the first try, there’s no challenge. There’s no tension. If he possessed his daughter or something like that, now we’re cooking.

And what of Pares? Why is he here? You set up this really interesting show down, but instead, he brags, he gets humbled, he either runs away with his tail between his legs or he apologizes and gives up scamming people?

This is why you need to write an outline! This is why you plan! You can see the threads that are just hanging out and doing nothing and either develop them or cut them.

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

You cant ask mookie to have stakes! He's vegetarian!

HazCat
May 4, 2009

a cartoon duck posted:

i'd like him to stop talking about consent

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

catlord posted:

Move to a backwater town full of jocks who'll never appreciate you and sell your services as a prophet, an oracle for hire, if you will?

I just realized how hosed up it is that Mookie didn't name his comic Prophet for Profit.

Codependent Poster
Oct 20, 2003


A shameful butt

I also wear pants that are skin tight and show my rear end and all its contours

Roleplaying Larry
Dec 5, 2008
He keeps emphasizing the importance of consent, why do you think he has something to prove about this subject as it is portrayed in his work?

FlocksOfMice
Feb 3, 2009

Roleplaying Larry posted:

He keeps emphasizing the importance of consent, why do you think he has something to prove about this subject as it is portrayed in his work?

I think he's just emulating the language that he sees getting used in queer spaces/vulnerable peoples spaces. There's a lot of traumatized people there and so you see a lot of caution around the idea of consent even in fiction? And I think he's just emptily aping that because he's naturally "drawn to queer spaces."

rudecyrus
Nov 6, 2009

fuck you trolls

a cartoon duck posted:

i'd like him to stop talking about consent

Happy Landfill
Feb 26, 2011

I don't understand but I've also heard much worse

Hippocrass posted:

Man I was afraid there was going to be some conflict there for a minute.

MiracleFlare
Mar 27, 2012
It's not even technically an incorrect way to describe it, but it still carries some specific connotations I don't think he meant to invoke. Or if he did mean it then he fumbled the landing. "I didn't consent to you using my voice to abuse your daughter (understandable, I've seen possession as an allegory for intimacy and abuse before), so I'm gonna ignore your consent by forcibly banishing you (why would you frame it as both a consent violation and karmic revenge?)"

On paper it's a good outline: Dead shithead continues to haunt his daughter both figuratively and literally, he throws her attempt to make peace with him in her face, third party has to exorcise him for good so his family can move on with their lives. But,

amigolupus posted:

The thing that gets me is that by trying to tackle both the idea of someone being haunted by an rear end in a top hat family member as well as the need for consent to have your body possessed, the story ends in this situation where Spookie ends up coming across as a selfish egotist who makes the situation all about herself. She's not mad at Ghost Dad because he is a controlling rear end in a top hat who thinks she needs to get married to solve her problem, or that him haunting the daughter from beyond the grave is causing her stress, or that he can't respect his grown-rear end daughter to make her own mistakes. No, Spookie banished Ghost Dad for the crime of being mean to her, personally.

it goes down this way, with the medium being angry first about the possession and then about the abuse. Plus his children lack any sort of agency in the whole matter, not even getting to say a quick "gently caress off, dad". Yes, in the real world most people don't get that cathartic moment of telling off the abusive relative, many times they just never speak again and it's this open wound that doesn't heal cleanly. But I feel like once your story has brought the dead parent back as a tangible ghost that's throwing furniture around, you've set up the expectation of the children being the ones to lead the callout instead of a stranger they've known for five minutes.

Overall though I still like this story better than the previous ones in Legacy, I guess? Maybe that can turn around after however many more weeks are left

SubG
Aug 19, 2004

It's a hard world for little things.
You're not stranded, you're stubborn. Wanting to protect your family? Pfft. Now, if you wanted to play a flute solo for random pedestrians, now that's a legitimate need binding you in perpetuity to the material plane.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Invisible Clergy
Sep 25, 2015

"Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces"

Malachi 2:3
Or wanting to go on a walk.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply