|
https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1781010866709676215
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 20:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 03:06 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 17:51
|
|
|
those are not actually the cutet grandikids ever imo
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 19:35
|
|
|
What are you talking about? What could be more cutet than a grandikid with a melting face and a stump arm?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 19:57
|
|
|
drat i knew some of those photos looked hosed up as hell. some of them didnt even look like her lol.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:29
|
|
|
flubber nuts posted:drat i knew some of those photos looked hosed up as hell. some of them didnt even look like her lol. Did they mention in the documentary that they were "recreations" or whatever? Or did they legit pass AI images off as part of a documentary?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:10
|
|
|
Chewbecca posted:Did they mention in the documentary that they were "recreations" or whatever? Or did they legit pass AI images off as part of a documentary? i didnt watch the credits but absolutely zero mention of recreation during the ai photo scenes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:12
|
|
|
flubber nuts posted:i didnt watch the credits but absolutely zero mention of recreation during the ai photo scenes. That's an obscenity and documentary makers should know better. At minimum there should be a caption on the screen saying "AI recreation of [person] doing [thing]" but I don't see a reason to include AI images at all Is it a documentary or a dramatic recreation?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:19
|
|
|
ive been using topaz gigapixel for photo restoration the last ~5 years & im certain those are artifacts of AI upscaling from too small/poor quality source images
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 23:05
|
|
|
VERY COOL MAN posted:ive been using topaz gigapixel for photo restoration the last ~5 years & im certain those are artifacts of AI upscaling from too small/poor quality source images Fucks sake. That explains it better than just whole-cloth fakes being put in by the director/editor and okayed by bosses, by lawyers checking image rights, etc. Still bullshit and unnecessary. Audiences who watch historical docs accept blurry old photos if that's all there is. For fucks sake. I edit documentaries and this puts what we do to shame. We really work hard not to get one over for story's sake and some huge loving streaming platform throws this up and makes us all look like chancers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 00:30
|
|
|
Show a blurry photo then run a cool enhance effect across it to show the ai upscale, bam you added more content and are disclosing it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 00:34
|
|
|
Deep Glove Bruno posted:Fucks sake. That explains it better than just whole-cloth fakes being put in by the director/editor and okayed by bosses, by lawyers checking image rights, etc. Still bullshit and unnecessary. Audiences who watch historical docs accept blurry old photos if that's all there is. For fucks sake. I edit documentaries and this puts what we do to shame. We really work hard not to get one over for story's sake and some huge loving streaming platform throws this up and makes us all look like chancers. i agree with you, fwiw. i am mostly removing moire patterns or jpeg artifacting from rough scans of 90s rap CD booklets. those photos from the netflix doc are atrocious
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 01:09
|
|
|
Deep Glove Bruno posted:Fucks sake. That explains it better than just whole-cloth fakes being put in by the director/editor and okayed by bosses, by lawyers checking image rights, etc. Still bullshit and unnecessary. Audiences who watch historical docs accept blurry old photos if that's all there is. For fucks sake. I edit documentaries and this puts what we do to shame. We really work hard not to get one over for story's sake and some huge loving streaming platform throws this up and makes us all look like chancers. If you watch Man on the Run on netflix it's a documentary on the malaysian prime minister stealing billions from the public, Ai art is used predominantly for caricatures in the worst way possible but not widely condemned because barely anyone watched it        
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 01:37
|
|
|
Tunicate posted:Show a blurry photo then run a cool enhance effect across it to show the ai upscale, bam you added more content and are disclosing it. You didn't add content relevant to the documentary, you added four seconds of runtime in the form of irrelevant "AI" masturbation and diluted your actual content. Netflix, of course, did it because if it doesn't get found out it looks okay, and if it does get found out hey, that's free advertising, baby! E: holy poo poo those Man On The Run ones are terrible.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 01:40
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCZoHUL7qU
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 01:42
|
|
|
I get the AI is cheap/free or whatever to use - but do the producers not see that the output looks like poo poo? Do they see the mangled hands and bizarrely proportioned whatever's and just say that's it folks, we got 'em
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 08:01
|
|
|
You'd think the nazi mom would be less happy
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 09:01
|
|
|
Chewbecca posted:I get the AI is cheap/free or whatever to use - but do the producers not see that the output looks like poo poo? Do they see the mangled hands and bizarrely proportioned whatever's and just say that's it folks, we got 'em The art department (probably one person) sure as poo poo knows, but the producers are the dad from Elf. Once, I had a producer yell to the crew, "let's go, we're not winning any Emmys here". theflyingexecutive has a new favorite as of 09:25 on Apr 20, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 09:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 13:31
|
|
|
I wanma read huckleberry finn but he gets a mega beam rifle from gundam
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 13:38
|
|
|
Tom Swift with AI charactetistics
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2024 10:49
|
|
|
Huckleberry Finn keeps that Huckleberry Thang on him
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2024 11:04
|
|
|
The one entertaining use of the-stuff-currently-being-referred-to-as-AI is mashing together concepts no human ever would in evocative manners. That's why ChatGPT was better when it was worse; it was funny to read Aliens scripts where the dropship had like forty people on it and new ones just kept spawning into existence, now it's just good enough to be boring. Anyway what I'm saying is I would read this book. Splicer has a new favorite as of 12:24 on Apr 21, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2024 11:05
|
|
|
I keep getting this poo poo recommended on youtube,i block one and another channel pops up. It all looks like absolute poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2024 13:16
|
|
|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:I keep getting this poo poo recommended on youtube,i block one and another channel pops up. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2024 22:42
|
|
|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:I keep getting this poo poo recommended on youtube,i block one and another channel pops up. There's about 5-6 of these.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 00:12
|
|
|
 Open your eyes 70% and see what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 16:43
|
|
|
egg_dog posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 18:25
|
|
|
Splicer posted:Ave Lamia Singing it this way from now on
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 18:54
|
|
|
we have stock photos at home stock photos at home: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 20:52
|
|
|
One Iowa is arguably too much
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 20:55
|
|
|
eggs cost $Iowa a dozen, thanks brandon
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 00:05
|
|
|
The Wicked ZOGA posted:One Iowa is arguably too much One Iowa Too Many
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 02:17
|
|
|
A day late, an Iowa short
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 06:05
|
|
|
My boss makes an Iowa, I make a dime, so I look at AI crap on company time
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 08:08
|
|
|
Please doctor, how much for my childs heart medication
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 09:08
|
|
|
A Fistful of Iowas
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 10:12
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 12:15
|
|
|
Filthy buggers
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 12:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 03:06 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/kidkerrigan/status/1782888749333897319?t=jqJ5F8tZhWM2Iy22KSPDeg&s=19
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 13:15
|
|