Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: OwlFancier, crispix)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Christ this country is so depressing. There should be a special mental illness payment to everyone just for having to live here and put up with this never ending bullshit.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

History Comes Inside!
Nov 20, 2004




It would be means tested

mediaphage
Mar 22, 2007

Excuse me, pardon me, sheer perfection coming through

Tesseraction posted:


-JAMBLY CROMBYN

my favourite flavour of jaffa cake

Mebh
May 10, 2010


Reading the comments on JCs latest tweet about how he gave a speech for trans rights.

Dear God :dogstare: there's not enough napalm.
I'll save the thread from terf insanity as I'm sure it's just omnipresent horror, but still it really seems to have gotten so much worse if you gauge the world by Twitter ("there's your problem...")

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

David Davies was being a total oval office on BBCQT last night:
https://twitter.com/implausibleblog/status/1781080654886719735
https://twitter.com/stuzi_pants/status/1781206726995263560

fuctifino fucked around with this message at 23:23 on Apr 19, 2024

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
what a nasty oval office

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

crispix posted:

what a nasty oval office

Tory cunts are normally better at masking their hate, but he took his mask fully off last night. I had to watch the videos a few times for it all to sink in. I guess they don't have to pretend as much since they know they are hosed at the next GE

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
i actually had it on because i was working late and it was honestly like satire lol

he just kept ranting about Wales and calling the Labour woman names

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
when fiona bastard bruce has to step in on behalf of someone in the labour party you know you've hosed it badly

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

oh that's the other double d dickhead

I preferred the ex-SAS midnight legger guy he was comically incompetent rather than cunty incompetent

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

crispix posted:

i actually had it on because i was working late and it was honestly like satire lol

he just kept ranting about Wales and calling the Labour woman names

Deciding to stop watching all the bollocks like QT, Klientssberg on Sunday, pissy Peston and the rest was one of the best media decisions I ever made

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Mebh posted:

Reading the comments on JCs latest tweet about how he gave a speech for trans rights.

Dear God :dogstare: there's not enough napalm.
I'll save the thread from terf insanity as I'm sure it's just omnipresent horror, but still it really seems to have gotten so much worse if you gauge the world by Twitter ("there's your problem...")

There's a contingent of the Sensible Centrist Electables who associate trans rights with shouty student activists and jam grandpa, whereas TERFs are serious well-dressed people who get to write newspaper columns. Therefore they're TERF-allies by opportunism and to spite the fans of jam grandpa.

sinky
Feb 22, 2011



Slippery Tilde

sinky posted:

Brussels proposes free movement deal for UK’s 18- to 30-year-olds

Will starmer shoot himself directly in the dick and balls and come out against this for fear of offending people who will never vote labour?

:blastu:
"Labour has no plans for a youth mobility scheme"

guardian

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016



Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
Labour's youth mobility plans involve mobilisation of the youth to the front line

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

that's certainly one of the takes of all time

Jel Shaker
Apr 19, 2003

i’m not locked in here with you - you’re locked in here with me!

considering only >50 year olds vote tory you’d think they want to get rid of us to help bolster their voting pool

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!
clearly, to turn Britain into a nation of bootlickers capitalists we need 14 years of marxism-jezzaism

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

suck my woke dick posted:

that's certainly one of the takes of all time

And complimented perfectly by her “cat that’s just licked piss off a nettle” face

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
It's always funny to see these: "We, the Tories, haven't actually been in charge of the country for the last 14 years!" articles.

Grey Hunter
Oct 17, 2007

Hero of the soviet union.
Accidental destroyer of planets

suck my woke dick posted:

that's certainly one of the takes of all time


suck my woke dick posted:

clearly, to turn Britain into a nation of bootlickers capitalists we need 14 years of marxism-jezzaism

Without reading, I'm assuming the thought process is in fact that they have done such a right wing group of asshats that they have driven people to the left while making the country into a mess.

That has to be it, right?

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
Here is the screed in case anyone wants to ruin their Saturday.

I have bolded the worst bits for your pleasure.


quote:

At the Press Awards on Thursday night, where we were both losers, my cartoonist colleague Matt (Pritchett) provided a perfect summary of the current consensus among Conservative voters. Telegraph readers, he observed, seemed to agree on two things: “That the Tories deserve to be booted out, and that Labour will be even worse”.

Faced with the choice of half-baked Conservatism or air-fried socialism (perhaps served with a side order of haggis), it is little wonder that Right-leaning people are dry-retching just at the thought of the next general election – let alone which box to cross.

On Wednesday, a survey of more than 5,400 voters conducted by former Tory treasurer Lord Ashcroft found that, although Conservative support is at rock-bottom, 45 per cent of voters still don’t want a Labour government. A substantial number of people agree that Labour will be worse for Britain than the Tories, but voters are still set to reject the Conservatives by a massive margin. Why?

There are a number of explanations, including a general desire for change and the misapprehension that there is no risk attached to putting a net zero nut who cannot decide whether or not a woman has a penis into No 10. But arguably the most compelling reason is a sense of betrayal – the feeling behind the #zeroseats anti-Tory slogan that is gaining momentum on social media.

Those who normally vote Conservative understandably feel let down that the party has said one thing and done another, and left Britain a much less conservative place than it was 14 years ago.

Take the sick note culture that Rishi Sunak addressed at the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) think tank today. While it is encouraging that the Prime Minister is looking for ways to tackle worklessness, how did it come to pass that a Tory administration has presided over such a major shift away from personal responsibility in recent years, and a destruction in the old culture of work? The UK is now the only G7 nation where the share of working-age people outside the workforce is higher than pre-Covid.

Such is the level of naivety inside Downing Street that the Prime Minister still expects to be thanked for furlough. No one wanted anyone to lose their jobs and businesses in lockdown, that’s true. But Sunak must take responsibility for the fact that his £70 billion scheme has not only left us with an economic hangover of epic proportions but also fostered a culture in which some people still expect to receive something for nothing.

Lockdown, and the free taxpayers’ money that came with it – billions of which were abused by fraudsters – have resulted in more and more people thinking that the state will subsidise them. The welfare system, meanwhile, is failing to encourage people into work, even when it might be good for them.

The number who are now economically inactive due to long-term sickness has increased by 717,000 since the pandemic. Each year millions of “fit notes” are issued, over 90 per cent of which find someone not fit for work. As a consequence, the cost of disability benefits is set to surge over the next five years.

This is completely unaffordable – not just economically but socially. Andy Cook, CEO of the CSJ, has rightly pointed out that the focus must shift “on what people can do, rather than what they can’t.”

Of course there are some desperately unfortunate people who are so incapacitated that they cannot work at all. But others will be able to work but lack the support to do so. Some also face difficulties in getting back into gainful employment by never-ending NHS delays for treatment.

It is strange that the Government has allowed this situation not just to fester, but to prosper, since the last lockdown was lifted – especially given that Sunak has never been backwards in coming forwards when it comes to telling people how to live other aspects of their lives.

Instead of fighting creeping state control, the Conservatives are actually making it worse, through measures like the new smoking ban. Still drunk on the draconian, anti-libertarian fumes of lockdown, the Tories, of all people, are now intent on telling people what to do with their lives – and their children, with a Scottish-style smacking ban and even a smartphone ban for under 16s also said to be in the offing.

Meanwhile, little or no authority appears to be exerted over those who actively seek to undermine British values. People can see the country visibly changing around them, with next to nothing done to require new migrants to integrate into our culture.

Protesters are allowed to call for intifada on the streets of London – and the nanny state is nowhere to be seen. Where were the Tories when a Batley school teacher was forced into hiding over a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammed? They were equally conspicuous by their absence when the Tavistock clinic was handing out puberty blockers like smarties to children. While the Conservatives have been asleep at the wheel on these issues, it has been left to others to fight the battles in our schools, in the NHS, and on social media.

This week, Katharine Birbalsingh, “Britain’s strictest headmistress” and bete noir of the Left, won a significant victory in facing down a legal challenge to a prayer ban she has enforced at the secular Michaela Community School in Wembley, London.

But why was she left to fight this court case alone? It was only after the judgment had been delivered that Education Secretary Gillian Keegan really roused herself, remarking: “I hope this judgment gives all school leaders the confidence to make the right decisions for their pupils.” It shouldn’t be the business of a court to rule on whether headteachers are the decision-makers in their schools – rather than pupils (or their parents). Why wasn’t the Government bolder in riding to Birbalsingh’s defence?

Similarly, why was it left to Father Ted creator Graham Linehan, JK Rowling and a bunch of feminists – along with a smattering of academics, journalists and other whistleblowers – to fight for women and children’s rights in the face of trans extremism?
How did we ever get to the point, under a Conservative Government, of teachers gender-affirming confused pupils behind their parents’ backs? We could expect this sort of virtue-signalling nonsense from Labour (and can look forward to more of it if the polls are correct), but this is a nightmare of the Tories’ own making.

The benefits crackdown is a good start, but for Sunak to have a hope in hell of winning back voters, he’s got to stop babying the electorate with endless five-point plans and come up with a much more grown-up vision for this country. Voters deserve so much more than having to choose between bad or worse.

Mebh
May 10, 2010


Jesus Christ that's a series of loving takes isn't it.

I assume it's as much rage/engagement bait as it is incoherent screaming that "radical trans people" are the real problem.

It makes the often mocked "LGBT steamroller" crushing conservative rights seem downright lucid.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

It is the material conditions of the world that she is raging against, with the complaint essentially being "why can't anybody do anything about this? surely if we had a hard enough man in charge of the government he would be able to fix it" without examining the manifest evidence that the government is simply incapable of doing the things she wants.

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Yeah, it's of a piece with Truss's ramblings, the absolute failure of my ideas when put into practise can only mean that there is an as-yet unseen shadowy power working against me.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

It's very tempting to view it as rage bait but there are plenty of people dumb and hateful enough to believe that.

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!

A Fuckwit posted:

Faced with the choice of half-baked Conservatism or air-fried socialism (perhaps served with a side order of haggis), it is little wonder that Right-leaning people are dry-retching just at the thought of the next general election – let alone which box to cross.

lmao

Marmaduke!
May 19, 2009

Why would it do that!?
Literally from one paragraph to the next: Schools must be allowed to decide what's best for children. Also, schools should not be making decisions for parents.

That's on top of "This government is banning too much stuff, which is why I applaud the decision to ban Muslims from praying".

Wachter
Mar 23, 2007

You and whose knees?

The solution she seems to be proposing, through her lionizing of Britain's most demonic freaks, is "more absolute wrong'uns"

Angepain
Jul 13, 2012

what keeps happening to my clothes
haggis because scotland you see. this is the high standard of satirical barbs that one needs to be published in the telegraph

also imagine believing keir starmer is a dangerous socialist. mate i loving wish

Nuclear Spoon
Aug 18, 2010

I want to cry out
but I don’t scream and I don’t shout
And I feel so proud
to be alive
absolutely astonished that after years of being appeased by the opposition that the right wing are trying to shift the overton window further rightward

domhal
Dec 30, 2008


0.000% of Communism has been built. Evil child-murdering billionaires still rule the world with a shit-eating grin. All he has managed to do is make himself *sad*. It has, however, made him into a very, very smart boy with something like a university degree in Truth. Instead of building Communism, he now builds a precise model of this grotesque, duplicitous world.
Let's have a whip round and buy the telegraph. Based on its quality columns we should have the means.

grobbo
May 29, 2014
The midsentence treatment of LAZY BRITONS NOW EXPECT SOMETHING FOR NOTHING incidentally, vast sums of taxpayer money were embezzled and squandered during lockdown by politicians and business leaders is truly something to behold.

Also good to see the inevitable narrative aftermath of the We Must Welcome The Cass Review For Being Very Balanced and Fair To Both Sides media consensus is "as has now been proven by Cass, woke doctors were force-feminising thousands of toddlers until Glinner proved that trans is wrong"

Grey Hunter
Oct 17, 2007

Hero of the soviet union.
Accidental destroyer of planets

domhal posted:

Let's have a whip round and buy the telegraph. Based on its quality columns we should have the means.

I often wonder how hard it would be to take over the lib Dems, a couple of hundred new members could swing things.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Love that the draconian Tory bans are "they might ban smoking, they might ban smacking, and they might ban children having smartphones" even though they say they won't.

No mention at all of the nitrous ban, dog ban, psychoactive substances ban, MARS rifle ban, etc. that they actually did.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Oh I forgot the 'corrosive substances ban' that makes it ridiculously hard to buy anything from concentrated battery acid to metal plate cleaner and photographic chemicals.

Clearly all of those were just sensible pragmatic measures compared to the draconian restrictions on being able to beat a child and then buy them a pack of tabs and an iphone though.

mediaphage
Mar 22, 2007

Excuse me, pardon me, sheer perfection coming through

Guavanaut posted:

Oh I forgot the 'corrosive substances ban' that makes it ridiculously hard to buy anything from concentrated battery acid to metal plate cleaner and photographic chemicals.

Clearly all of those were just sensible pragmatic measures compared to the draconian restrictions on being able to beat a child and then buy them a pack of tabs and an iphone though.

hope you never have to worry about clogged drains!

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
It's fine, they said that there are alternatives to acid for that.

They never named them, but they said they exist.

(afaict the alternatives are rural hardware stores that don't care about the ban as long as you vaguely look like you know what you're doing)

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006
Conservatism can never fail, it can only be failed.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund
Where does that phrase come from originally. The "X cannot fail, it can only be failed" one.

Also I wish that time management bullshit would piss off at workplaces. Especially when you have to work weekends.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply