|
fronz posted:My sources reveal that Advance Wars 3DS will be release in 2015. but what does he say about ridley in smash bros
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 19:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 17:36 |
|
|
Seshoho Cian posted:but what does he say about ridley in smash bros too big for the 3ds's screen only the wii u has the brains to handle the ridley
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 19:40
|
|
|
i'm really bad at these games because numbers don't go up
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 19:49
|
|
|
But Rocks Hurt Head posted:it's only been *checks* wow, 6 years. drat, yeah, it's been a long time since we had an advance wars game. it was called advance wars because it was the gameboy advance.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 19:51
|
|
|
lesbian baphomet posted:it was called advance wars because it was the gameboy advance. Then why were the DS games called Advance Wars, smart guy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 19:56
|
|
|
Zoq-Fot-Pik posted:Then why were the DS games called Advance Wars, smart guy. Dual Strike
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
days of ruin obviously fell flat because it had no naming schema
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 20:04
|
|
|
Minrad posted:too big for the 3ds's screen  bring back the nes design where he's the same height as samus
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 20:06
|
|
|
I liked that Days of Ruin introduced units other than the newest biggest gently caress off tank A 3DS advance wars is long overdue Oxyclean posted:Apparently it wasn't bad from a gameplay wise (and possibly storywise too) but I liked the HAPPY FUN WAR more then edgy/gritty post-apocalypse crap that's already super overdone. the story is kind of goofy in DoR, I like the whole post-apocalypse with everyone being dicks to the naive good guys and insane military dictators seizing power but the cartoonish mad scientist and his cloned anime girl family was a bit much Fellis fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Sep 12, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 20:52
|
|
|
So there's this Advance Wars thread going on in Games which desires more games of AWBW. I heard it's pretty darn good.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 21:22
|
|
|
Fellis posted:I liked that Days of Ruin introduced units other than the newest biggest gently caress off tank it also de-introduced the mega tank, which was the most retarded unit imaginable
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 21:23
|
|
|
fronz posted:it also de-introduced the mega tank, which was the most retarded unit imaginable The intro of the anti-tank owned. Also the Aircraft carrier jets were OP as gently caress in combat but well balanced due to fuel. The only reason DoR isn't my favourite is because there was no Olaf. Soviet Santa, best general.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
fronz posted:it also de-introduced the mega tank, which was the most retarded unit imaginable I like to imagine that someone on the design team didn't understand the concept of "medium" tanks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
The more you guys talk about it the more I remember how good Days of Ruin was. My opinion on Dual Strike must really have been coloured by the nostalgia of old characters returning. That and I was like, 14.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 00:14
|
|
|
fronz posted:it also de-introduced the mega tank, which was the most retarded unit imaginable agreed
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 00:20
|
|
|
Mach2 posted:The more you guys talk about it the more I remember how good Days of Ruin was. My opinion on Dual Strike must really have been coloured by the nostalgia of old characters returning. That and I was like, 14. dual strike is really stupid. the only positive change it made was a few of the new co's had cool gimmicks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 05:40
|
|
|
I used the Dual Strike that Eagle and Sami have when playing a game against my brother and he didn't want to play against me after that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 18:48
|
|
|
darealkooky posted:dual strike is really stupid. the only positive change it made was a few of the new co's had cool gimmicks. the new modes were cool, the awards thing was neat, some of the new co gimmicks were cool. the new units sucked but oh well, don't use them? the only really significant problem it had (and it was significant for sure) was the dual co power. if it had everything else but had been founded on AW2's game mode it would have been a way way better game
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 18:53
|
|
|
there are a lot of subtle mechanics changes in dual strike that make the game way dumber. although now that I think about it, cruisers being able to attack all boats instead of just subs makes naval combat aprox 100% less retarded, so that's cool.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 18:57
|
|
|
darealkooky posted:dual strike is really stupid. the only positive change it made was a few of the new co's had cool gimmicks. Black boats. Aircraft carriers. Piperunners.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 20:26
|
|
|
ok i'm being a little unfair to the new units, but it's a fact that they're either OP or useless with no inbetween
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
darealkooky posted:ok i'm being a little unfair to the new units, but it's a fact that they're either OP or useless with no inbetween I'm not sure. Aircraft carriers allowed for greater defenses against air strikes for naval units, while the black boats provided more overall defense for naval units, which they were in desperate need of due to their pricing. Piperunners, as situational as they were, did grant a level of mobility and defense along a particular area, allowing for defenses to be built upon a greater scale which didn't require chokepointing (I know that's not a word) the opponent.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 17:36 |
|
|
carriers are waaaaaaaay to expensive to be a worthwhile counter to bombers, black boats are op and make naval v naval combat an even bigger slog then it already was, and piperunners are either OP or worthless depending on if you're playing on a gimmicky map with pipes set up in the right way
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2014 20:55
|
|