is this a load of bull or what?? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
yea it's pretty messed up, OP | 119 | 49.38% | |
actually.... - it's good | 75 | 31.12% | |
i'm an idiot let's talk about my dress | 47 | 19.50% | |
Total: | 241 votes |
|
Larry Parrish posted:But on the other hand if some dipshit trips in his store or whatever and sues I don't think he should lose his house etc from damages on top of the business Why would anybody lose their house? If it was in Denmark that somebody fell over in a store, the store's insurance would cover it. Store owner wouldn't even feel it, drunk idiots fall over literally 6 times a day. Idk where the lawsuit comes in, they're rarely necessary.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 09:26 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 13:10 |
|
they are necessary because america
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 09:34 |
|
yea that seems like a proper good system m8
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 09:36 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:Why would anybody lose their house? If it was in Denmark that somebody fell over in a store, the store's insurance would cover it. Store owner wouldn't even feel it, drunk idiots fall over literally 6 times a day. Idk where the lawsuit comes in, they're rarely necessary. Look if you aren't from a top 10 economy plz do not post in this forum... 4 (when converted to real currency) figgie fucktards are not welcome But anyway I have no idea how corporations in the EU work but in most US states, business owners who don't have their business in a limited liability corporation or some other legal arrangement have it in the same 'bucket' as their house and cars and stuff, so if they had to pay damages or fees or whatever they would potentially have to liquidate stuff outside of their business to pay it off, where as it would maybe still sink some guy's business but at least it's just the corporation that has this massive legal debt and not him personally Larry Parrish fucked around with this message at 09:49 on Feb 28, 2016 |
# ? Feb 28, 2016 09:46 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Look if you aren't from a top 10 economy plz do not post in this forum... 4 (when converted to real currency) figgie fucktards are not welcome ok sorry poor boi
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 09:48 |
|
you have to pay thousands of US dollars for basic medical care, lol
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 09:59 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:Why would anybody lose their house? If it was in Denmark that somebody fell over in a store, the store's insurance would cover it. Store owner wouldn't even feel it, drunk idiots fall over literally 6 times a day. Idk where the lawsuit comes in, they're rarely necessary. "lawsuits are rarely necessary" is a good way to say "i am not living in the united states of freemerica"
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 10:08 |
|
kwinkles posted:"lawsuits are rarely necessary" is a good way to say "i am not living in the united states of freemerica" yea that was kinda my point
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 10:39 |
|
(dont get me wrong, theres a lotta bullshit capitalism in europe, its no dream world, and its making its inroads in denmark too. yall dont have to worry, soon we will all live in a lovely lovely wonderland)
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 10:40 |
|
rear end (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 10:43 |
|
zen death robot posted:This thread seems bad close+gas please
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 10:57 |
|
zen death robot posted:This thread seems bad Gas
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 11:32 |
|
zen death robot posted:This thread seems bad
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 11:35 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:no its not. laws that limit liability don't do so in the case of demonstrable negligence or many other myriad of things that allow one to pierce the corporate veil. i own a small business, and one of the things i have to do to ensure that im shielded from personal liability if anything bad was to happen is to make sure im properly insured and that my corporation operates properly like a corporation. if i got someone sick and i didn't have the proper licenses/insurance a court could easily pierce the veil of my corp and go after me personally. limiting liability for owners of a business is a good thing and it only covers their rear end when they do things proper. now the major businesses like bp or whatever that get away with oil spills, well, that's not really an with shareholder limited liability.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 14:10 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:Why would anybody lose their house? If it was in Denmark that somebody fell over in a store, the store's insurance would cover it. Store owner wouldn't even feel it, drunk idiots fall over literally 6 times a day. Idk where the lawsuit comes in, they're rarely necessary. if they are like any number of small business owners in the us they don't actually have a separate corporate entity and are thus liable for any and all damages. say the max liability limit on the insurance isn't enough to pay for the damages, they'll come after the individual for the remaining balance. if they had a proper entity setup, the owners would be shielded instead and the business would just go under.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 14:12 |
|
oh yeah in socialist denmark you cant run a business without the proper insurance unless you wanna run some weird under the table poo poo but then its not so much a business as it is just criminals doing thangs
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 14:35 |
In any case I don't think you get to claim 5th amendment rights as a LLC SBO Or ... What ... That your company is a non slave natural born free person? Wtf? That poo poo is literally freeman level idiocy
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 15:27 |
|
its a muddy fuckin thing. ideally coorpoations &c should not be treated as people under any circumstance. put the blame on the real people, dont let them skirt he law. but then the alternative in this case is some kinda weird court order against the entirety of apple; owners, managers, employees... that doesnt make sense either. welp. the real solution is that whoever managed the phone for the municipality or whatever hosed up by resetting the icloud password. their problem now imo.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 15:55 |
|
limited liability for corporations is an absolutely necessary thing. corporate personhood in all aspects not so much, but it's right there in title 1 usc §1 and has been a cornerstone of American jurisprudence since the start.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 16:12 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 13:10 |
|
cuba si yankee no
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 16:15 |