|
echi be honest u would gently caress a fractal
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2018 03:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 12:45 |
|
|
sex is about the other person and fractals.. aren't really people and honestly if they were they'd be gross people
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2018 08:03
|
|
|
eschaton posted:I ran some software what drew a fractal how old is this photo? it's yellowed pretty badly
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2018 18:44
|
|
|
ok ... imagine hentai, but with seahorse tails
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 09:12
|
|
|
love to gently caress and cum in fractals
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 21:36
|
|
|
Caganer posted:love to gently caress and cum in fractals don't post ur mom's vag
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 21:59
|
|
|
These are not fractals but dumbass woodworkers call them fractals endlessly. I'm setting up a less terrible rig this week to mark some bowls with. Bad tests with a microwave transformer on hard maple - switching to a 9000v, 30ma neon transformer so it won't instantly murder me when I actually have to position the points: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 22:04
|
|
|
why arent those fractals???
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 22:19
|
|
|
because nature is imperfect and lame and only the cold hard reality of maths can bear a true fractal
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 22:33
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:why arent those fractals??? they are, but horrible nerds who can't define the equation for the pattern get super pissed off
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 22:35
|
|
|
All you need to know about Lichtenberg figures: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFTjFD84Q1c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E12nnpWc5c
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2018 22:39
|
|
|
heh i made som,ethingh better than a fractal https://giant.gfycat.com/EverlastingEnlightenedCaecilian.webm
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2018 08:45
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:they are, but horrible nerds who can't define the equation for the pattern get super pissed off I mean they have fractal features, but they don't really fit all the characteristics of a fractal.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 19:47
|
|
|
like what? which characteristics dont they fit?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 19:57
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:like what? which characteristics dont they fit? not fuckable
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 20:00
|
|
|
did echi gently caress the fractal yet
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 20:25
|
|
|
Dongslayer. posted:gently caress the fractal this could make for a cool idiom
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
Dongslayer. posted:did echi gently caress the fractal yet Ive jerked off on mushrooms before and when I came I saw fractals in my brain does that count
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 22:18
|
|
|
moron izzard posted:These are not fractals but dumbass woodworkers call them fractals endlessly. I'm setting up a less terrible rig this week to mark some bowls with. These are fractals, of course they're fractals. They're not rendered down to an infinite number of iterations, but they don't have to be to display self-similarity independent of scale, which is obviously present just by looking at them. Lichtenstein figures similarly use electricity to burn fractals into polymers or glass. There are a ton of fractals in nature, again, not "rendered" down to an infinite number of iterations, but still self-similar, including...
They're literally everywhere, man.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 23:01
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:Ive jerked off on mushrooms before and when I came I saw fractals in my brain does that count it absolutely does. the blood vessels behind your eyes are fractals, you might have been seeing something inspired by that structure
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 23:01
|
|
|
Tom Collins posted:These are fractals, of course they're fractals. They're not rendered down to an infinite number of iterations, but they don't have to be to display self-similarity independent of scale, which is obviously present just by looking at them. Lichtenstein figures similarly use electricity to burn fractals into polymers or glass. I already answered this hours ago you dork. Its got fractal properties, but you can't just remove one of the major features of a proper fractal and still say they are one.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 23:14
|
|
|
moron izzard posted:I already answered this hours ago you dork. Its got fractal properties, but you can't just remove one of the major features of a proper fractal and still say they are one. Sure can, just did
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2018 23:27
|
|
|
A straight line is a fractal.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 00:49
|
|
|
Tom Collins posted:There are a ton of fractals in nature, again, not "rendered" down to an infinite number of iterations, but still self-similar, including...
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 03:09
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:A straight line is a fractal. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 03:37
|
|
|
if u really think about it, like existence is a fractal, what with all the quantum decisions, branching out forever  
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 03:48
|
|
|
this thread is a fractal and it can get hosed
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 03:53
|
|
|
moron izzard posted:I already answered this hours ago you dork. Its got fractal properties, but you can't just remove one of the major features of a proper fractal and still say they are one. facts about your posts in this thread: 1. strong opinions about what does and doesnt have fractal properties 2. complete unwillingness to post what properties fractals have
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 03:55
|
|
|
you can't "own" fractals man
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 07:01
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:facts about your posts in this thread: 3. Understands normal fuckers will just google it instead of putting that effort into writing bad posts.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 13:49
|
|
|
It’s like arguing that this 5x4 rectangle is definitely a square, even though it’s missing core features of a square like having equal sides. You can’t just foo foo away the infinite repeatability bit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 13:50
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:2. complete unwillingness to post what properties fractals have Fractals have the same level of complexity regardless of how far in you zoom. Fractals are "self-similar" in that a small portion of the fractal is very similar in structure or even identical to the whole, at arbitrary levels of magnification. This is basically the entire, fundamental definition of "fractal". Plants and many other natural structures do display self-similarity to some level of magnification, but you don't have to zoom in too far before you hit e.g. individual molecules and atoms, and what do you know, they no longer look like the whole fern frond/leaf back/whatever. So they aren't fractal, they just have a few levels of self-similarity/recursion going on. "A fractal which is not rendered down to an infinite level of magnification" is a roundabout way of saying "a non-fractal". There are no fractals in nature.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 14:23
|
|
|
a fractal is a nonempty compact subset of a metric space that exhibits a non-integer Hausdorff dimention & exact self-similarity is literally no part of it. those sparky things are not fractals, but one could easily mistake them for fractals based on an empirical estimate of their dimension. hthth the mathworld definition is really bad btw
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 18:20
|
|
|
it is as accurate to say "there are no fractals in nature" as it is to say "there are no cubes" or "there are no point-masses" or "there are no rigid objects"
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 18:34
|
|
|
moron izzard posted:3. Understands normal fuckers will just google it instead of putting that effort into writing bad posts. disagree. fractals are quite the abstract concept. you can’t explain away fractals in one explanation or equation and it’s very open ended
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 18:34
|
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:Fractals have the same level of complexity regardless of how far in you zoom. Fractals are "self-similar" in that a small portion of the fractal is very similar in structure or even identical to the whole, at arbitrary levels of magnification. This is basically the entire, fundamental definition of "fractal". Plants and many other natural structures do display self-similarity to some level of magnification, but you don't have to zoom in too far before you hit e.g. individual molecules and atoms, and what do you know, they no longer look like the whole fern frond/leaf back/whatever. So they aren't fractal, they just have a few levels of self-similarity/recursion going on. haha very wrong e: fractals are often used to describe naturally occurring phenomena hth LP0 ON FIRE fucked around with this message at 18:41 on Mar 1, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 18:36
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:it is as accurate to say "there are no fractals in nature" as it is to say "there are no cubes" or "there are no point-masses" or "there are no rigid objects" this guy gets it
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 18:40
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:rigid objects 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 12:45 |
|
|
you guys have ruined this great thread with your bullshit nerd jizz
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2018 19:11
|
|