Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Butter Activities
May 4, 2018

Why would any political system function perfectly when the richest 1% own half the global wealth and have free reign to manipulate outcomes with that wealth?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

OneEightHundred posted:

California's ballot propositions are a nice microcosm of the best and worst of direct democracy. On one hand, it broke up the state gerrymander. On the other, God help you if you suggest that people reaping massive home value windfalls should maybe pay some property tax.

Prop 22 is pretty much the same type of failure, obvious immediate direct benefit at the cost of screwing things up badly in a way that's way more visible to people whose job it is to make policy. And the 7/8 voting threshold is stupid, but you have to remember that voters see tying the legislature's hands as a feature, not a bug.

California just seems really dumb. Ballot propositions did great everywhere this election but there. Here in Oregon the propositions did more to enforce left wing politics than the do nothing Dems.

BougieBitch
Oct 2, 2013

Basic as hell

punk rebel ecks posted:

California just seems really dumb. Ballot propositions did great everywhere this election but there. Here in Oregon the propositions did more to enforce left wing politics than the do nothing Dems.

I'd say it's a pretty mixed bag everywhere, here in MA we had people vote against ranked-choice voting, so it seems to me that people are perfectly capable of hanging themselves with the lifeline you throw them any time you try something more complicated than "legalize weed" or "raise the minimum wage". Obviously those are worthwhile goals to pursue, but it's pretty clear that people aren't able to engage with stuff that can't be summarized in a sentence

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

BougieBitch posted:

I'd say it's a pretty mixed bag everywhere, here in MA we had people vote against ranked-choice voting, so it seems to me that people are perfectly capable of hanging themselves with the lifeline you throw them any time you try something more complicated than "legalize weed" or "raise the minimum wage". Obviously those are worthwhile goals to pursue, but it's pretty clear that people aren't able to engage with stuff that can't be summarized in a sentence

Like anything else in politics what has to be done is to get the message out. Ranked choice voting isn't likely to come via congress.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

BougieBitch posted:

I'd say it's a pretty mixed bag everywhere, here in MA we had people vote against ranked-choice voting, so it seems to me that people are perfectly capable of hanging themselves with the lifeline you throw them any time you try something more complicated than "legalize weed" or "raise the minimum wage". Obviously those are worthwhile goals to pursue, but it's pretty clear that people aren't able to engage with stuff that can't be summarized in a sentence

That was a problem with the Vote Yes on 2 people. Look at what towns voted for it and what towns didn't. The wealthier suburbs loved the idea, the Metro West voted for the idea but they couldn't get out of the wealthy suburbs, they didn't take any message or do any work outside of Greater Boston.

OneEightHundred
Feb 28, 2008

Soon, we will be unstoppable!

punk rebel ecks posted:

California just seems really dumb.
California gets a big rep as a liberal bastion but also has some of the most toxic NIMBY/old-money/general greed bullshit in the country.

To elaborate on the earlier point, the point of referendums is to tie the hands of the legislature. When that's to break up ossification and corruption in the actual political system, it works really well. When it's used to enact policies that normally require careful consideration of a lot of complex factors, a.k.a. the literal job of elected representatives, like screwing with the budget, it works horribly.

(That doesn't apply to establishing commissions/agencies, like the difference is, the government has to be able to functionally do its job. There's a difference between telling them what their objectives must be, and trying to do their job.)

OneEightHundred fucked around with this message at 16:14 on Nov 15, 2020

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BougieBitch
Oct 2, 2013

Basic as hell

Mooseontheloose posted:

That was a problem with the Vote Yes on 2 people. Look at what towns voted for it and what towns didn't. The wealthier suburbs loved the idea, the Metro West voted for the idea but they couldn't get out of the wealthy suburbs, they didn't take any message or do any work outside of Greater Boston.

If the problem was just people not voting yes then sure, but the thing is that people had to specifically vote no. It's not just that people aren't informed, there's some kind of kneejerk reaction that make people default to whatever position sucks more instead of just leaving it blank

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply