|
idk. my gf has a 144hz monitor and it always looks amazingly buttery smooth
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 14:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 10:00 |
|
|
I didn’t read any of this and i don’t know anything about monitors but I’d say that 144 is better because greater than.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 14:43
|
|
|
it’s pretty gross
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 14:56
|
|
|
a massive 1024x768, incredible 16 bit color, and x11 with only the finest toolkits like Xaw
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 15:23
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:up to say 100hz i could see for reducing eyestrain, but 120 or 144hz is the monitor equivalent of audiophiles claiming they can hear ultrasonics Everyone thinks this until they try it. You can absolutely tell the difference between 60, 100, 120, 144hz and I bet it keeps going past that but that's where my monitor stops. I tested it out with unreal tournament 99 with various frame limiters and 120-144 is obviously more subtle than 60-120 but there's a difference. Even just dragging windows around on a 60hz screen feels sluggish and jittery once you get used to the high frame rate. E: you also need a mouse with a high report rate to really take advantage of it. Mine can be toggled between 125hz and 500hz and yep, you notice the difference there too Sagebrush fucked around with this message at 16:40 on Jan 2, 2021 |
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 16:35
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:"i need 144hz for eye strain reasons", say people who never ran x windows at 1024x768 interlaced on a 14" crt
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 21:25
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:Everyone thinks this until they try it. you can save yourself all this strife by refusing to expose yourself to anything above 60
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 21:56
|
|
|
yeah i went through that argument when i was looking to get a new monitor. oh if i get something that's high frame rate what if it ruins 60hz for me forever? well it did. my laptop screen now feels chunky and slow. oh well. i don't regret it, hfr is way way better
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 22:02
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:well it did. my laptop screen now feels chunky and slow. turn ur laptop screen on
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 22:03
|
|
|
i remember some dude arguing that movies in 60fps were objectively better but low frame rates and motion blur are actually the best
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:i remember some dude arguing that movies in 60fps were objectively better as an artistic choice in cinema yes. in user interaction no. your eyes and nerves 'refresh' way faster than the monitor. anything that gets you closer to an instant response is an improvement
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:it’s pretty gross
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 05:14
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:you can save yourself all this strife by refusing to expose yourself to anything above 60 A couple years back I bought a new TV, Sony x900e, 4k hdr 120hz. Sweet. Later I bought a Acer monitor, 1440p, hdr, 144hz. Also sweet. Sometime later I hook my computer up to the TV. Something is wrong. Horribly wrong. Did a bunch of reading and it turns out that my TV is HDMI 2.0b which tops out at 60fps input. The panel is capable of 120 but only with trash motion interpolation. Still pissed about that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 05:38
|
|
|
Last Day of 2020 posted:A couple years back I bought a new TV, Sony x900e, 4k hdr 120hz. Sweet. I bought a 1080i CRT TV like 15 years ago and I still have it. We almost always just watch stuff on iPads/desktop at this point though
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 05:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 10:00 |
|
|
Last Day of 2020 posted:A couple years back I bought a new TV, Sony x900e, 4k hdr 120hz. Sweet. i had a tv like that and, even with decent motion interpolation, its just useless because nothing is intended for it aside from making sports look more natural some turn-based but frame locked games looked a bit better but uh
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2021 06:08
|
|
