|
Objective Action posted:No no no, see those are all actually kind of cute and/or funny. That is not how rule 34 works at all. I would have thought rule 34 wouldn't require me to think about the picture for a few minutes, before I realized who was in it.
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 00:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
Ferrinus posted:It took me a while to start reading Goblins because I just can't stand how that guy draws goblins - they're these weird blobby alien things whereas everything else is more or less normal. But hey, if you don't like your goblins all big-eyed and floppy, you can always go to the other extreme like pathfinder has. Efreet saiid fucked around with this message at 01:19 on Jun 23, 2007 |
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 01:17
|
|
|
Efreet saiid posted:But hey, if you don't like your goblins all big-eyed and floppy, you can always go to the other extreme like pathfinder has. Those goblins are badass 
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 01:31
|
|
|
Objective Action posted:No no no, see those are all actually kind of cute and/or funny. That is not how rule 34 works at all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 01:31
|
|
|
Efreet saiid posted:I like his goblins, after all they're supposed to be alien and wierd by human standards. The goblins in that link rule! What I mean by "everything else is more or less normal", though, is that literally everything else is more or less normal. That lizard dude looks like a lizard. Orcs look like orcs, ogres look like ogres. But goblins are apparently from Mars.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 01:34
|
|
|
Robot Bastard posted:Okay, I can kind of understand someone making that particular piece of art, but drat--is that comic even a week old yet? That's some fast work! There was an Order of the Stick thread in /34 on 7Chan. Don't ask me how I know that. It's gone now and there's a crappy one there now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 05:11
|
|
|
Vicissitude posted:There was an Order of the Stick thread in /34 on 7Chan. Don't ask me how I know that. That was me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 05:13
|
|
|
bgaesop posted:That was me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 05:45
|
|
|
Davethulhu posted:You're a monster.  here's a link
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 06:03
|
|
|
I can't beleive that people were bitching about us quibbling over D&D rules, and then once we stopped everyone sighed with relief and started talking about erfworld and miko porn.sakesniper posted:Those goblins are badass Ferrinus posted:The goblins in that link rule!
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 07:25
|
|
|
Efreet saiid posted:I can't beleive that people were bitching about us quibbling over D&D rules, and then once we stopped everyone sighed with relief and started talking about erfworld and miko porn. The thing is, when talk of Erfworld and porn comes up, it's not two people bickering back and forth with page-sized replies that make us want to gouge loving own eyes out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 07:50
|
|
|
bgaesop posted:That was me. Godspeed, you maverick renegade. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 08:02
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:The thing is, when talk of Erfworld and porn comes up, it's not two people bickering back and forth with page-sized replies that make us want to gouge loving own eyes out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 08:50
|
|
|
Efreet saiid posted:Yeah man it's totally way better when somebody sphams the thread with a shitload of stick figure porn. Honestly? Yes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 08:56
|
|
|
If anyone has the chutzpa to do so, I'd like to see a pic of Elan in the style of AxeManiac's current avatar. I'm invisible, indeed.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 13:09
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:Honestly? Yes. So which one of us did you agree with? It was me, right?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 15:06
|
|
|
I think he was just positing a pro-stick-figure porn stance.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 15:29
|
|
|
More like an anti-long-boring-discussion-nobody-cares-about stance.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 16:11
|
|
|
You just can't let me live the dream, can you Fuego?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 16:53
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:More like an anti-long-boring-discussion-nobody-cares-about stance. Both are pretty terrible, actually.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 19:55
|
|
|
And now we're arguing about which crappy discussion is crappiest; talk about progress!
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 19:57
|
|
|
Oh God this thread is cursed.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 20:16
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:Oh God this thread is cursed. Bestow Curse Necromancy Level: Clr 3, Sor/Wiz 4 Components: V, S Casting Time: 1 standard action Range: Touch Target: Creature touched Duration: Permanent Saving Throw: Will negates Spell Resistance: Yes You place a curse on the subject. Choose one of the following three effects. * -6 decrease to an ability score (minimum 1). * -4 penalty on attack rolls, saves, ability checks, and skill checks. * Each turn, the target has a 50% chance to act normally; otherwise, it takes no action. You may also invent your own curse, but it should be no more powerful than those described above. The curse bestowed by this spell cannot be dispelled, but it can be removed with a break enchantment, limited wish, miracle, remove curse, or wish spell. Bestow curse counters remove curse.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 20:19
|
|
|
I think you mean Bestow Curse Thread Necromancy Level: Clr 3, Sor/Wiz 4 Components: V, S Casting Time: 1 standard post Range: Touch Target: Thread touched Duration: Permanent Saving Throw: Will negates Spell Resistance: Yes You place a curse on the thread. Choose one of the following three effects. * -6 decrease in regular posters (minimum 1). * -4 penalty on thread rating. * Each post, the poster has a 50% chance to act normally; otherwise, they keep on posting crap. You may also invent your own curse, but it should be no more powerful than those described above. The curse bestowed by this spell cannot be dispelled, but it can be removed with a break circlejerk, topic switch, mod appearance, probation, or ban. Bestow curse counters remove curse.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 20:37
|
|
|
Can we all just agree that this is Burlew's fault for not giving us our Friday update? Rabble rabble rabble.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 21:14
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:I think you mean Fuckin' awesome
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2007 21:52
|
|
|
Choke Babies Now posted:Can we all just agree that this is Burlew's fault for not giving us our Friday update? Rabble rabble rabble indeed. I dunno if this makes me a bad person, but I liked today's erfworld. Even if they're all round and cutesified, dragons lunging from treetops and eating people is fine and dandy in my book.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 05:01
|
|
|
I just hope Vinnie Doombats doesn't bite it. He's the most likable character on the "good guys" side. Edit: No pun intended.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 05:08
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:I just hope Vinnie Doombats doesn't bite it. He's the most likable character on the "good guys" side. And of course knowing the writer's track record with Nice Things, we'll find out five issues in that Vinnie is a homopedonecrophiliac.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 05:31
|
|
|
Looks like the woodsy elves rolled a 1.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 05:39
|
|
|
Tupperwarez posted:And of course knowing the writer's track record with Nice Things, we'll find out five issues in that Vinnie is a homopedonecrophiliac.  
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 05:43
|
|
|
Is Ansom dressed like Super Dave? I'm enjoying the more actiony strips of Erfworld than the talking heads one. I really think the klog pages were a terrible idea on the creators part to try and stuff in too much information that they thought we needed to know.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 06:20
|
|
|
I think they'd have been fine if they stuck to the update schedule. Since they don't, getting one of those feels like getting cheated out of a regular comic. Honestly, most of Erfworld's problems would be fixed by a consistent schedule.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 06:54
|
|
|
Detetsu posted:Is Ansom dressed like Super Dave? The "klog" pages were, basically, filler for the days when the artist wasn't able to maintain the schedule (apparently he got married. The nerve!) Comments: I couldn't figure out what was going on in that second-to-last line, until I realized that it was the two Woodsy Elves looking through the hole that got poked through their buddy's middle. Daaaamn... (Also, note that one guy buried under Dragon shite in the last panel...) edit: Do the bats spot everything in the hex, or just the things that attack them? Because that could be the idea--the "slow" dragons just move up into the ring of hexes and wait; the "fast" dragons attack the column and then retreat to the ring. That way, the fast dragons don't have to fight when Ansom's troops move into the hex; the slow dragons can take over the job. Robot Bastard fucked around with this message at 07:09 on Jun 24, 2007 |
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 07:02
|
|
|
Robot Bastard posted:Ansom is dressed as Evel Kenevel. Thank you for explaning this strip because I did not know what the gently caress,
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 09:35
|
|
|
Robot Bastard posted:edit: Do the bats spot everything in the hex, or just the things that attack them? Because that could be the idea--the "slow" dragons just move up into the ring of hexes and wait; the "fast" dragons attack the column and then retreat to the ring. That way, the fast dragons don't have to fight when Ansom's troops move into the hex; the slow dragons can take over the job. From what I've been getting out of it, they spot everything in *that hex* (and presumably a visibility radius around them which doesn't help in forest). Combat seems to happen on a level of hex-vs-hex, or at least invading units vs. all defenders in that hex, which is why putting all the units in a single giant stack would be a terrible idea (if, indeed, it's even possible, many game systems have limits on how big stacks can be, which often translates into a limit on how many units can fit in a hex.) Judging from the map, it looks like units can only see one space into thick forest, and I suspect either enemy units in thick forest can't be seen unless you move into the hex (and get ganked) or unless you move next to the hex (and get attack-of-opportunity ganked). If it didn't necessitate potential ganking, there would have been no reason to lose the bats. Summary: Ansom isn't going to know what's in the center hex until he beats down one of the surrounding groups and, even worse for him, moves into the center hex. It is entirely possible that this turn will end with his reserve forces in the worst position imaginable, namely, surrounded entirely by dragons (dwagons lol). Side note: I am amused by The Arkenhammer's occupation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 13:18
|
|
|
ZorbaTHut posted:Side note: I am amused by The Arkenhammer's occupation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2007 16:34
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:Which is oddly incorrect; if it does something, it's not a MacGuffin. So far, all it's done is crack walnuts and spawn a few pigeons, which isn't really plot-critical. I mean, in theory it's useful - but we really haven't seen anything along those lines.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2007 02:55
|
|
|
It does provide the explaination for Stanley having all the dragons, which is kinda a big deal...
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2007 03:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
Yeah, I'm sure Stanley's ability to make dragons swarm around and threaten to toast Parson was due to the Arkenhammer. In fact, for all we know, Gobwin Knob may not even produce dragons; he may only have them because of the Arkhenhammer. (Or, if the "game" is anything like many other games of its type, like Heroes of Might and Magic, his town would only be producing one colour of dragon if it produced them at all. I'll bet him having several colours of dragon is due to the Arkenhammer.)
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2007 03:41
|
|