|
Ferrinus posted:Obrimos 1: I saw a vampire today. Vampire 1: I saw an ObriFWOOSH Obrimos 1: 
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 02:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 09:15 |
|
|
Dammit Who? posted:Mastigos: Seen any... changelings? Ahahahaha!
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 04:04
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:Obrimos 1: I saw a vampire today. 
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 06:51
|
|
|
a man of ill repute posted:
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 06:53
|
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:ferrinus can me and tombheart make a promethean out of the soul of socharis's dead girlfriend and a body stitched together out of fat gay dead dudes i have darker plans for her
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 11:15
|
|
|
Chernobyl Peace Prize posted:owod werewolf: choose one of 13 stereotypes and play it yeah but at least 10 of those owod stereotypes were 100% retarded
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 20:27
|
|
|
CBN is being unfair, Harmony is dumb but it's not really that invasive at levels 7->5/4ish, which is what most play will take place at, it pretty much forbids the usual stuff (except for the thing where if you reveal the truth of the werewolf condition to a human you actually lose spiritual power and go insane)
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2009 22:51
|
|
|
reading the grimoire book and supplements, in the mage world, orders vehemently protect their particular rotes, and i can't seem to wrap my head around that, i'm just like "what's the big deal, i buy them for 2 xp a dot, i don't even have to buy them dot by dot like everything else, what the gently caress is with you"
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 03:28
|
|
|
If you don't jealously hoard arcane secrets then Get The gently caress Out
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 03:29
|
|
|
Nicolae Carpathia posted:reading the grimoire book and supplements, in the mage world, orders vehemently protect their particular rotes, and i can't seem to wrap my head around that, i'm just like "what's the big deal, i buy them for 2 xp a dot, i don't even have to buy them dot by dot like everything else, what the gently caress is with you" clearly ferrinus should make buying rotes much more expensive/difficult
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 04:13
|
|
|
no i'm just saying that sometimes the Mystical Import of the world doesn't always come across in the game is all oh god don't make rotes expensive ferrinus
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 04:35
|
|
|
Nicolae Carpathia posted:no i'm just saying that sometimes the Mystical Import of the world doesn't always come across in the game is all so you're saying ferrinus is a bad ST mods. mods can we get a ban on htis chucklefuck
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 10:46
|
|
|
Dammit Who? posted:so you're saying ferrinus is a bad ST with my last breath i curse dammmitttwhhhoooooooo
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 18:50
|
|
|
with mind 4 i now have the ability to send my mind into twilight as a projection while my body remains comatose, what spells would i need to use so i can manipulate and sense material objects while i'm ghosting it up
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:29
|
|
|
Nicolae Carpathia posted:with mind 4 i now have the ability to send my mind into twilight as a projection while my body remains comatose, what spells would i need to use so i can manipulate and sense material objects while i'm ghosting it up you'd be able to use your senses normally but not manipulate anything i'm pretty sure you'd still be able to cast magic to some degree too but i may be wrong
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:30
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:you'd be able to use your senses normally but not manipulate anything what magic could i use to, say, grab stuff though, could i cast any death spells upon myself to alter my twilight form or would i basically have to learn forces to manipulate real world things
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:34
|
|
|
Nicolae Carpathia posted:what magic could i use to, say, grab stuff though, could i cast any death spells upon myself to alter my twilight form or would i basically have to learn forces to manipulate real world things i think it'd be forces. you don't actually have a twilight form when you use Mind to project yourself, you're just a mind. i think you're intangible even to other twilight poo poo like ghosts, although i'm not looking at thebook atm
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:40
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:i think it'd be forces. you don't actually have a twilight form when you use Mind to project yourself, you're just a mind. i think you're intangible even to other twilight poo poo like ghosts, although i'm not looking at thebook atm This mental form has no Corpus or ephemeral body, just an intangible, semi-transparent mage that can be affected only by mind-affecting powers. Likewise, the mentally projecting mage cannot affect creatures or things physically except through magic.
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:47
|
|
|
nuts to that i'll just buy some fuckin' Numina rotes
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:47
|
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:This mental form has no Corpus or ephemeral body, just an intangible, semi-transparent mage that can be affected only by mind-affecting powers. Likewise, the mentally projecting mage cannot affect creatures or things physically except through magic. i think i might require that sensory range be measured from your physical body because just being able to turn into a mind and then gently caress people up w/ magic while they can't do poo poo about it is kind of crazy (i.e. you'd need to do everything as a Sympathetic spell. the immediate presence of your mind means you've got an automatic Intimate connection though)
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2009 23:48
|
|
|
can we buy some skills
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2009 17:59
|
|
|
yeah go for it incidentally there's an excellent chance i won't be able to run this week i'm busy as heck 
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2009 18:50
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:yeah go for it thats cool m8
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2009 23:23
|
|
|
branigan is still alive apparently
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 00:39
|
|
|
ferrinus what is your opinion on the Disarm merit
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:09
|
|
|
whats that
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:12
|
|
|
a man of ill repute posted:whats that read the wod corebook \___ if you are using a weapon and your damage exceeds your opponent's dexterity you can choose to knock their weapon out of their hand and send it flying (no. successes) yards.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:27
|
|
|
that sounds silly
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:31
|
|
|
that merit blows because you can't take away his weapons. both of them.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:32
|
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:that merit blows because you can't take away his weapons. in your case i'd just have to kick one weapon out of each of your hands
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:33
|
|
|
I have to two-hand
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:36
|
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:I have to two-hand one hand to aim the other to hold the magnifying glass
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:39
|
|
|
disarm is something you deliberately attempt rather than a free bonus effect you get per hit, isn't it? i don't remember it looking bad..
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:46
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:disarm is something you deliberately attempt rather than a free bonus effect you get per hit, isn't it? i don't remember it looking bad.. Disarm (**) Prerequisite: Dexterity *** and Weaponry ** Effect: Your character has refined his Weaponry Skill to the extent that he can use a weapon to disarm opponents in close combat. When making a normal attack, compare your successes to the opponent's Dexterity. If you get a number of successes equal to or greater than the opponent's Dexterity, you can choose to have your character disarm him instead of doing damage. A weapon lands a number of yards away from the opponent equal to your successes rolled. Disarming is a different activity than specifically attacking or breaking weapons or items carried by opponents. See 'Equipment' (p. 139) for rules on doing that.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 21:53
|
|
|
looks okay to me obviously if it causes huge problems i might change it + offer a refund but i wouldn't expect it to. mind you that specifies Weaponry, not Brawl attacks
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 22:00
|
|
|
Ferrinus posted:looks okay to me to be fair it's not for mage, i was just curious about your opinion on it in general i was just wondering if it was one of those merits like fresh start that sounds okay in the book and is completely useless in practice
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 22:10
|
|
|
Nicolae Carpathia posted:to be fair it's not for mage, i was just curious about your opinion on it in general keep in mind: you attack them, and disarm, inflicting no damage on their action, they pick up their weapon, inflicting no damage one on one it's basically a delay tactic although of course if you have friends with you rock on
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 22:16
|
|
|
can you use that with a multiattacking merit
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 22:17
|
|
|
Attorney at Funk posted:can you use that with a multiattacking merit nothing stops you besides DMs who are smarter than gul banana yeah that's right
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2009 22:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 09:15 |
|
|
so you should be safe then
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2009 18:09
|
|
