|
I literally have not a clue about US soccer
|
#
?
May 28, 2009 19:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 16:09 |
|
|
Ka0 posted:Hibernian FC JESUSLOOKATTHE SIZE OF THAT COLLAR
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2009 20:06
|
|
|
Ka0 posted:I literally have not a clue about US soccer Player play in the US, Rangers buy them, play them, and then sell them on to small EPL clubs for some form of profit. See Reyna, Claudio. Hopefully not Edu or Beasley, 'cos those two are awesome. Unless they're keepers. Then they go to a mid-table Premiership team and become fan favourites.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2009 20:06
|
|
|
Semprini posted:Both kits useless for away games against Celtic. You'll have to use your International Away
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2009 20:08
|
|
|
ibroxmassive posted:Player play in the US, Rangers buy them, play them, and then sell them on to small EPL clubs for some form of profit. This is honestly not a bad description. But no, that Boston United is the Boston in Regular England, not the one in New England. There are a lot of towns here that share the same name as the towns over there, and I know more than one person who favors Portsmouth because they are from Portsmouth, New Hampshire. When I first started watching the EPL I always chuckled at the Sky Sports ticker showing scores from teams that, to me, look like they're all from the suburbs around here, like Braintree and Weymouth and Plymouth. (I'd see Southend vs Northampton and picture Gay Men and their Little Dogs vs Lesbian Hippies).
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2009 20:22
|
|
|
Some Clown posted:I'm getting one of these bad boys. 
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2009 22:56
|
|
|
Ka0 posted:Spurs teaser image for upcoming kit ooooooh! I'm excited! 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 06:17
|
|
|
Directorman posted:ooooooh! I'm excited! I don't think single colour full body stockings are the way to go.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 10:53
|
|
I am the law, but an easily bribed kind of law.
|
MattWPBS posted:I don't think single colour full body stockings are the way to go. Yeah how do they see through those things?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 15:12
|
|
|
Are spurs just bringing 3 new kits out every year now or what?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 16:52
|
|
|
Directorman posted:ooooooh! I'm excited! Glory comes in three colours apparently. Slogan means literally nothing.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 20:56
|
|
|
ICA posted:Glory comes in three colours apparently. Slogan means literally nothing. Better that than "To Wear Is To Do". That was just annoying as all hell.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 22:01
|
|
|
Terrible aye. I dunno where it's from though. That Reebok (I think) one is annoying. gently caress, what was it? God drat it, forgotten. Useless post is edit: oh aye, it was 'impossible is nothing', which, again, makes literally no sense and also is allusion towards another nonsensical phrase (nothing is impossible). gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 22:45
|
|
|
ICA posted:Terrible aye. I dunno where it's from though. That was Adidas and it's a pretty good slogan to be honest.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 22:52
|
|
|
What? Impossible is nothing? I hate it.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 23:00
|
|
|
Grez posted:Are spurs just bringing 3 new kits out every year now or what? Fine with me! 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 23:27
|
|
|
ICA posted:Terrible aye. I dunno where it's from though. Corruption of the club motto 'To Dare Is To Do'. Motto should still be the latin 'Audere Est Facere', very annoying they changed it.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2009 23:53
|
|
|
MattWPBS posted:Corruption of the club motto 'To Dare Is To Do'. Motto should still be the latin 'Audere Est Facere', very annoying they changed it. So it has history? That's cool, I like that then. It is kinda funny though in light of Spurs' recent 'success'.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2009 00:45
|
|
|
ICA posted:So it has history? That's cool, I like that then. It is kinda funny though in light of Spurs' recent 'success'. Is the Carling Cup in 2008 really that long ago? Sure it's a Mickey Mouse trophy but they've won a trophy more recently than Arsenal, Chelsea, or Liverpool.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2009 01:09
|
|
|
Dunno brah, only started watching The Football in 2009. edit, i mean, who cares about spurs. since klinsmann, honestly, no one. double edit. carling cup last season is NOT 'glory', no.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2009 04:50
|
|
|
If it doesn't matter, can we have it then? I'll not say no to a trophy.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2009 09:17
|
|
|
New Sunderland goalie shirt might have been classy were it not for the BOYLE: BOYLESPORTS LOOK ITS BOYLE, OF BOYLESPORTS thing.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2009 18:48
|
|
|
Ka0 posted:New Sunderland goalie shirt I think it's sexy as gently caress regardless of the BOYLESPORTS logo
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2009 19:01
|
|
|
Boyle Sports
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 06:06
|
|
|
Ka0 posted:New Sunderland goalie shirt Just out of curiosity, how many of you have a problem with sponsored kits? I don't mind them, it fills in the space and gives the clubs money, but I know others like to keep the integrity of the kits.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 11:59
|
|
|
Flapper posted:Just out of curiosity, how many of you have a problem with sponsored kits? I don't mind them, it fills in the space and gives the clubs money, but I know others like to keep the integrity of the kits. There's no integrity in football really. I could see myself being annoyed if they just brought it in, but I don't remember a time when they weren't there.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 12:02
|
|
|
Flapper posted:Just out of curiosity, how many of you have a problem with sponsored kits? I don't mind them, it fills in the space and gives the clubs money, but I know others like to keep the integrity of the kits. The only problem I have with the Sunderland one is the way they cut out the background on Boylesports. Either have a flat addition or do something other than randomly leave in whitespace on O's but cut it for L's.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 12:07
|
|
|
ibroxmassive posted:The only problem I have with the Sunderland one is the way they cut out the background on Boylesports. Either have a flat addition or do something other than randomly leave in whitespace on O's but cut it for L's. Looking at it now that is annoying, goddamn I didn't even notice until you pointed it out 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 12:14
|
|
|
Flapper posted:Looking at it now that is annoying, goddamn I didn't even notice until you pointed it out Yeah. Now it totally looks like BOY L ESP O RT S.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 12:38
|
|
|
The Sunderland one is aggravating because it overdoes the advertising. Boyle or Boylesports, PICK ONE!
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 16:26
|
|
|
Mickolution posted:There's no integrity in football really. Barcelona and Unicef, you could argue that there's some integrity there
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 20:49
|
|
|
Villa's sponsor, Acorn, is a charity too right? Though there's debate about whether that encourages people to give to the charity yada yada
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 21:18
|
|
|
Flapper posted:Just out of curiosity, how many of you have a problem with sponsored kits? I don't mind them, it fills in the space and gives the clubs money, but I know others like to keep the integrity of the kits.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 23:02
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind Carling if the logo was straight, and was more than a sticker that peeled off in the wash.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 23:41
|
|
|
ibroxmassive posted:I wouldn't mind Carling if the logo was straight, and was more than a sticker that peeled off in the wash. Surely the fact that it peels off in the wash means you get a nice sponsor free shirt?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 23:52
|
|
|
Transatlantic Gulp posted:Surely the fact that it peels off in the wash means you get a nice sponsor free shirt? It doesn't peel properly. Just folds along the lines in the shirt, and loses colour and stuff. If you want a proper sponser-free one then you can ask in the shop, as long as you've got a team sponsered by booze/gambling.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2009 23:57
|
|
|
Indeed, go back to the FA cup final and when the teams run out, look at the Everton mascots...
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2009 08:45
|
|
|
Ugh what the gently caress is this?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2009 14:09
|
|
|
All the umbro kits are gettin that three tone collar, which look pretty poo poo. The blue going down looks like a fatter version of the 05/06 Rangers away kit, but incorporating the 08/09 third kit break in the line for the sponsor. edit: Expect it to look poo poo on the kids tops as well, because they won't carry the line down and there'll just be a gap where SBOBET used to be.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2009 14:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 16:09 |
|
|
ibroxmassive posted:edit: Expect it to look poo poo on the kids tops as well, because they won't carry the line down and there'll just be a gap where SBOBET used to be.  not blank by any means, but yeah they didnt use the space fully.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2009 14:44
|
|