|
Fillerbunny posted:Am I the only one who reads Todd's voice as a stuttering Err from Aqua Teen Hunger Force? I read Todd as a stuttering, high pitched Joe Pesci.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2009 22:31 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 10:56 |
|
Phenylketonuric posted:I read Todd as a stuttering, high pitched Joe Pesci. A coked-out Martin Scorsese in a room full of helium.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2009 23:36 |
|
Phenylketonuric posted:I read Todd as a stuttering, high pitched Joe Pesci. YES. I have been struggling to characterize the voice that I hear him speaking with, but this is it perfectly. With a little Jawa voice tossed in, maybe. Muffin Loaf fucked around with this message at 01:11 on Oct 15, 2009 |
# ? Oct 15, 2009 00:03 |
|
New strip is up and man I don't know what the hell
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 01:10 |
|
Holy poo poo, you can't accuse the strip of getting predictable!
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 01:12 |
|
What'n'the FRICK, indeed.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 01:23 |
|
Does North Korea even export any consumer products to the US?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 01:35 |
|
Anxiety Man why do I gotta love the text adventure references so much, I barely even played any
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 01:37 |
|
I admit it. Did not see that coming.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 01:38 |
|
I have no idea what's going on anymore.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 02:42 |
|
withak posted:Does North Korea even export any consumer products to the US?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 03:12 |
|
Looks like a dash of self-parody to me.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 03:27 |
|
Flying-PCP posted:Looks like a dash of self-parody to me. Totally.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 04:02 |
|
LAAAAA LA LAAAAAAAAA! Also on the topic of voices I hear Cornelius as David Attenborough. Swaying towards John Cleese when he's pissed because I'm incapable of imagining Attenborough ever being more than slightly miffed.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 06:56 |
|
Is that how a squirrel pisses?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 07:15 |
|
That's how any real man pisses.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 07:20 |
|
I occasionally pee Ray-style. This is because I invariably crack up thinking of how happy he looked yelling "We doin' this!" in Li'l Nephew's spy photo.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 07:28 |
magical realism again oh boy well you can tell onstad isn't a farmer because he's not giving the soil a break that's for sure
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 09:32 |
|
Integral Catculus posted:I occasionally pee Ray-style. This is because I invariably crack up thinking of how happy he looked yelling "We doin' this!" in Li'l Nephew's spy photo. Which strip was this?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 12:46 |
|
withak posted:Does North Korea even export any consumer products to the US?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 12:57 |
|
Capsaicin posted:Which strip was this? This strip from the somewhat piecemeal "Japan Man" arc.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 14:31 |
|
Integral Catculus posted:I occasionally pee Ray-style this is not something you share in public
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 16:25 |
|
Integral Catculus posted:This strip from the somewhat piecemeal "Japan Man" arc. My favorite part about that strip is that Ray's speech bubble is caught on camera.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 16:53 |
|
Spillane posted:magical realism again oh boy well you can tell onstad isn't a farmer because he's not giving the soil a break that's for sure shut your stupid face, I would read an achewood spinoff of magical realism until he got bored of making it. seriously i love them so loving much.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 16:54 |
|
Sigma-X posted:this is not something you share in public Edit: Shamelessness is the key to being as bitchin' as a cartoon cat. Also, I'm right there with you, Fillerbunny: The speech-bubble-in-a-photo makes that strip. Integral Catculus fucked around with this message at 18:34 on Oct 15, 2009 |
# ? Oct 15, 2009 18:30 |
|
Does ABLOO BLOO BLOO predate Achewood? I've honestly never encountered it before becoming a fan of Onstad's work. Now I see it everywhere.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 02:12 |
vonnegutt posted:shut your stupid face, I would read an achewood spinoff of magical realism until he got bored of making it. yeah i'm really looking forward to the same routine for about two months or three if the dude feels like updating just like that cartilage head snorefest a couple weeks ago, except with about 3/4 panels full of needless explanation about how teodor's cranky or some chris ware stylized flowchart that's just absolutely redundant considering it's the same drat thing he published for the last three years.
|
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:14 |
hey onstad why don't you have the teddybears thrown hopelessly into tarkovsky movies and only through the power of todd doing a wheely through 35mm can they make it back to being incredible assholes in the present also throw molly in there being an incredible bitch seeing as that's one of two female characters you can manage to write (the other being a feudal era doting mother who, unthinkably, is also an incredible bitch)
|
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:19 |
|
complaining about achewood: a funeral of the english language
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:22 |
moan all you want you should thank christ this dude is self published
|
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:23 |
|
Don't get me wrong. I'm just as sick of "How could that happen?? What's going on!? Oh no it's... *MAGICAL REALISM* (drum crash, studio audience cheers)." Achewood has been on a steady decline for at least a year or two, and it bothers me a lot because I love how the strip used to be. I think it has a lot to do with taking magical realism and turning it from a once-or-twice out of the blue artsy interlude to a recurring yuk-yuk gag, and analogous changes to other formerly strong elements. You've just got a confusing way of trolling about it. Why should I be thankful he's self-published? What would be worse if he weren't?
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:30 |
|
You guys are out of your minds. edit; :gb2lf: Spillane Happy Hippo fucked around with this message at 03:42 on Oct 16, 2009 |
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:38 |
|
Muffin Loaf posted:...Achewood has been on a steady decline for at least a year or two... Achewood has been amazing to me for the last year or two.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:54 |
|
I feel so sad for people who can't feel joy.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 03:56 |
Muffin Loaf posted:Don't get me wrong. I'm just as sick of "How could that happen?? What's going on!? Oh no it's... *MAGICAL REALISM* (drum crash, studio audience cheers)." Achewood has been on a steady decline for at least a year or two, and it bothers me a lot because I love how the strip used to be. I think it has a lot to do with taking magical realism and turning it from a once-or-twice out of the blue artsy interlude to a recurring yuk-yuk gag, and analogous changes to other formerly strong elements. no, for real, this aint a troll. i'm saying that his sporadic updates, his repetitive themes, his tendency to experiment and for the most part overindulge with dialogue would be disastrous from any publishers perspective if he didn't have such an established fanbase and critical acclaim from the first couple of years. I can't see why anyone who just discovered achewood over the last two years would stick around based on the merit of the last two years of strips. it's a godsend that the entire archive is free, so new fans can easily access the entire material without spending a lot of dough which wouldn't exist if he was published from a major distributor from the start, hence why this dude should looooooove self-publishing and you all should too.
|
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 04:06 |
|
Muffin Loaf posted:Don't get me wrong. I'm just as sick of "How could that happen?? What's going on!? Oh no it's... *MAGICAL REALISM* (drum crash, studio audience cheers)." Achewood has been on a steady decline for at least a year or two, and it bothers me a lot because I love how the strip used to be. I think it has a lot to do with taking magical realism and turning it from a once-or-twice out of the blue artsy interlude to a recurring yuk-yuk gag, and analogous changes to other formerly strong elements. This is what happens when someone who mostly posts in LF reads Achewood, I guess?
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 04:07 |
hahaha boy i sure do post in lf respond to my legitimate criticism or stfu
|
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 04:11 |
|
Your arguement is "I don't like Achewood" so I guess I should retort with "I like Achewood". Suck on that.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 04:23 |
|
Time magazine also likes Achewood, or did in 2007, oh god what if they don't anymore WHAT IF THEY DON'T
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 04:24 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 10:56 |
Happy Hippo posted:Your arguement is "I don't like Achewood" so I guess I should retort with "I like Achewood". Suck on that. if you read a word of what i posted instead of skimming through it's kind of obvious i read achewood pretty regularly. speaking of skimming i'm guessing you read achewood much like most people read dostoyevsky in freshmen year on the subway
|
|
# ? Oct 16, 2009 04:27 |