|
Mr. Epic posted:Beautiful shots Dread Head. I apologize if this isn't the place to ask (I'm a newbie in the DSLR realm - just got my first Canon a week ago), but what equipment do you use to shoot? if you click and go to the flickr page, down on the right it will tell you what kind of camera they used, and there's a link that will show the full data embedded in the image that will tell you everything (unless it's been removed)
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2009 23:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 10:48 |
|
|
evensevenone posted:if you click and go to the flickr page, down on the right it will tell you what kind of camera they used, and there's a link that will show the full data embedded in the image that will tell you everything (unless it's been removed) Thank you kind sir.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2009 03:13
|
|
|
To elaborate I am using a Nikon D300, 90% of my landscapes are with the sigma 10-20mm and some of my latest stuff was with the nikon 80-200.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2009 04:12
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:You've really been killing this thread lately. These two are especially nice.  
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2009 05:41
|
|
|
Another one from Iceland, just outside of Skaftafell National park near/virtually on a glacier.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2009 14:22
|
|
|
I need to go to Iceland.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2009 16:45
|
|
|
In the summer, it's pretty much a bunch of fantastic landscape shots stitched together over an entire country/sub-continent - at least along the coast as we travelled.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2009 17:32
|
|
|
Yeah, Iceland is a loving beautiful place to visit. Pretty expensive, though. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2009 21:39
|
|
|
I haven't played with my camera for a little bit, and I'm starting to get back into it. Found this in my archives. 1/400s, f6.3, ISO 200, 200mm Click here for the full 1200x800 image. I've got another one with a small fishing boat in it, but I don't like it as much.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2009 18:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2009 20:49
|
|
|
Curufin posted:Yeah, Iceland is a loving beautiful place to visit. Pretty expensive, though. Most good things are it seems.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2009 23:01
|
|
|
Been messing with shooting panoramas on my 50mm, to make up for it not being wide. Oh its so nice compared to kit lens, no distortion etc. this one was actually done with the kit lens, still really nice, im loving the detail you can capture by merging images as a panorama 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2009 00:23
|
|
|
evensevenone posted:if you click and go to the flickr page, down on the right it will tell you what kind of camera they used, and there's a link that will show the full data embedded in the image that will tell you everything (unless it's been removed) or if they shot film  Curufin posted:Yeah, Iceland is a loving beautiful place to visit. Pretty expensive, though. I was so close to going last year when their bank failed, there was a simultaneous deal on airfare/hotel but I passed on it. I really shouldn't have, I've wanted to go for ages and it likely won't be that cheap again
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2009 03:58
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I was so close to going last year when their bank failed, there was a simultaneous deal on airfare/hotel but I passed on it. I really shouldn't have, I've wanted to go for ages and it likely won't be that cheap again its still pretty cheap relative to history due to the crisis. i spent a month there in may which i think is a good time to go, the weather isn't too bad and its before the main tourist season
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2009 04:08
|
|
|
Curufin posted:Yeah, Iceland is a loving beautiful place to visit. Pretty expensive, though. No, not anymore. Due to their catastrophic financial meltdown prices have plummeted in Iceland. As an example; About a year ago I had to pay € 599,- for a ticket from the Netherlands to Iceland. They now offer tickets ranging from € 299,- to € 349,-(including 3 nights in a hotel!). Hotels are approximately 20% cheaper and car rental seems to be cheaper too. Edit: info from http://www.icelandair.co.uk From £239 With the favourable exchange rate, Iceland is becoming one of the hottest destinations in the world. It also allows us to offer this fantastic city break deal which not only consits of flights and a 4 star hotel, it also includes a FREE Golden Circle tour. The Golden circle tour is Iceland's most popular tour and takes you to the magnificent waterfall, Gullfoss, the world famous geothermal area of Geysir and Thingvellir National Park where Europe meets America at the Continental Divide. The full day tour is booked two days after arrival so it allows you plenty of free time in Iceland to explore Reykjavik and its surroundings. Go visit Iceland on a 3-6 night break this winter. Available from London Heathrow, Manchester and Glasgow. General Gravedancer fucked around with this message at 04:15 on Oct 26, 2009 |
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2009 04:04
|
|
|
 (not HDR) (I promise)
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2009 08:01
|
|
|
A couple from a tip Saturday. Not really sure if I actually like the effect on the 3rd, but it's certainly very close to the grungy mossy feeling I was going for.  
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2009 08:18
|
|
|
Here's the re-edit:  Can't decide if I like the almost over-processed look of the first one or the more natural, flatter look of the second. Any ideas? ConspicuousEvil fucked around with this message at 00:42 on Oct 28, 2009 |
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2009 08:23
|
|
|
ConspicuousEvil posted:Here's the re-edit: Something does not look right, the sky around the clouds is slightly darker, did you run this through HDR software? The whole image kind of looks "blotchy, not sure what it is. ----  
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 08:00
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:Digging the first one, the contrast of the water against the dark beach with a nice sky. You must be done editing your trip photos if we are seeing rocks again 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 17:32
|
|
|
whaam posted:Digging the first one, the contrast of the water against the dark beach with a nice sky. You must be done editing your trip photos if we are seeing rocks again Haha, yeah for the most part I will probably go over the whole lot again to see if there is anything I changed my mind about.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 17:43
|
|
|
Meant to ask you, what do you pack your gear in when backpacking? Do you just take the body and wide angle and pack it in your backpack or something else? I just picked up a medium sized pelican case that should fit body+grip+lens and an extra tele, but drat is it heavy, probably too much so for my pack. The smaller peli's that would hold just the body+lens all seem too shallow to allow for the grip it seems.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 20:00
|
|
|
Depends what I am taking with me, and by that I mean it depends if I am taking my super tele. If I am not taking it then I will take my camera bag backpack with my short lenses in it. If I am taking my super tele then I will put it in a real backpack and I will take my wide and maybe my 80-200. When using my real backpack I have all my lenses in lens cases. Example: 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 21:11
|
|
|
Some pretty impressive mountain photography
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 21:38
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:Something does not look right, the sky around the clouds is slightly darker, did you run this through HDR software? The whole image kind of looks "blotchy, not sure what it is. I just ran it through LR and PS. Does it look blotchy in the second one also? Or does that one look ok? Thanks for the help, btw.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 23:47
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:Some pretty impressive mountain photography I have never seen anything like this mountain. Where is this?  edit time! sooooo that mountain isn't real. If you go to the photographer's website ( http://www.michaelnajjar.com/ , warning, it resizes your browser and is kind of a pain to navigate) you can read about the project, "High Altitude". It visualizes stock market trends in mountain vistas. Hence, some of the images you see are in edited to match the period indicated in the description of each image. Now the photos are suddenly worth looking at. JAY ZERO SUM GAME fucked around with this message at 00:09 on Oct 29, 2009 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2009 23:59
|
|
|
ConspicuousEvil posted:I just ran it through LR and PS. Does it look blotchy in the second one also? Or does that one look ok? Thanks for the help, btw. I'm assuming clarity was jacked up to 100 or near it, because there's a lot of haloing around the edge of the trees/clouds.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2009 00:06
|
|
|
Interrupting Moss posted:sooooo that mountain isn't real.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2009 00:52
|
|
|
Here are some landscapes I did from the last month or two.   
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2009 04:09
|
|
|
Ok, third time's a charm?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2009 04:43
|
|
|
Here are two from Seroak Mountain in Korea.  
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2009 01:45
|
|
|
Wubble posted:Really liking the sky in this one, nice editing... the contrast suits the image well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2009 14:29
|
|
|
Momonari kun posted:Here are two from Seroak Mountain in Korea. this is underexposed, unless that's the look you were going for.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2009 16:20
|
|
|
Fbi2thegrave posted:this is underexposed, unless that's the look you were going for. I was going for that a bit, but I need to play with it a bit more in post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2009 02:48
|
|
|
Went to Big Sur last weekend  
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2009 05:45
|
|
|
[quote="MMD3"] I love the grandeur of this one, but you should really crop out that bit of lake and people at the bottom. Suck it Iceland, here are some 'scapes of Greenland!   
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2009 05:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2009 18:03
|
|
|
yessssssssssssss A touch underexposed. But awesome.
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2009 18:09
|
|
|
Whitezombi posted:Where was this taken? I'll second the underexposed sentiment, but it's so dramatic it doesn't matter.   
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2009 10:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 10:48 |
|
|
Thanks. I took this on the East side of the Sandia Mountains facing East. I took this in September and I have a bunch to process still.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2009 19:07
|
|