|
Just went through a whole bunch of photos from some horse show thing that happened right outside my window. Turns out every single one was out of focus, even the ones that were taken (relatively) close. Which is...annoying...to say the least. I'm fairly positive this is the handy work of my 18-55 kit lens, but goddamn it. I've got a photo-day planned soon, too. Maybe if my buddy decides he doesn't want to go I can borrow his lenses. Would adjusting the diopter on the viewfinder matter (I use glasses for reading, etc.)? I mean if I spend the rest of my evening tweaking the viewfinder, is that gonna change anything in the mechanics of how the camera auto focuses then goes "bleep" when everything is in focus? Or is that only there to help people with glasses not apply their diopter to their manual focusing? I'm guessing its the latter. Glad Christmas is coming up soon, get to wish for a new, less crappy lens. (Maybe buy one as a gift to me, from me or something ) Quasi-rant over.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 20:55 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 09:58 |
|
forkbucket posted:Just went through a whole bunch of photos from some horse show thing that happened right outside my window. Turns out every single one was out of focus, even the ones that were taken (relatively) close. Which is...annoying...to say the least. I'm fairly positive this is the handy work of my 18-55 kit lens, but goddamn it. I've got a photo-day planned soon, too. Maybe if my buddy decides he doesn't want to go I can borrow his lenses. Look thru viewfinder. Let camera autofocus. Does the subject appear in focus to you? If not, you can adjust the diopter so it does appear in focus to you. This permits accurate manual focus. It has no impact on how the camera autofocuses.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 20:59 |
|
Yea, that's pretty much what I thought. drat tiny LCD screen keeps lying to me ...or I'm just out of practice, need to get out & shoot more.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2009 21:03 |
|
I just came across a great website for picking up old film camera supplies and darkroom equipment. https://www.publicsurplus.com Most of the items are pickup only but you might just get lucky. For $5 I wish I was close enough to bid on this SX-70. Edit: Also Fire trucks if anyone is interested. Tigertron fucked around with this message at 23:57 on Oct 17, 2009 |
# ? Oct 17, 2009 23:55 |
|
Crosspost from GBS Tattoo thread, but I figured it'd also be appreciated here. My tattoo artist showed me a video of a guy getting a piece done that was shot in stop-motion to make it look like the tattoo was doing itself. He said he'd be down to make something similar so I came into the appointment with my boom stand, AB1600, and softbox. This is what was created. You guys should also get a kick out of the subject matter of the actual sleeve.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2009 14:29 |
|
thats dorkroom commitment 4 lyfe
|
# ? Oct 20, 2009 14:32 |
|
Knux posted:This is what was created. You guys should also get a kick out of the subject matter of the actual sleeve. No loving way, that is too awesome.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2009 14:40 |
|
Put this on your back.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2009 14:48 |
|
I am thinking about going to the local, and great, tattoo parlour to see if someone would let me do this. That's an awesome video. I dugg it, too.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2009 15:07 |
|
Interview with Arnold Newman
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 00:28 |
|
Knux posted:This is what was created. You guys should also get a kick out of the subject matter of the actual sleeve. That is loving awesome.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 00:42 |
|
Knux posted:This is what was created. You guys should also get a kick out of the subject matter of the actual sleeve.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 03:48 |
|
Interrupting Moss posted:Put this on your back. There's this older guy in NYC who goes around to all the parades and such with one of those. Shoots handheld. loving insane.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 05:39 |
|
Defecting to Nine posted:There's this older guy in NYC who goes around to all the parades and such with one of those. Shoots handheld. loving insane. Does he have a beard?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 10:51 |
|
Knux posted:
Heyooo, Gizmodo picked this up: http://gizmodo.com/5386603/camera-tattood-in-time-lapse-by-another-camera
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 16:32 |
|
Fists Up posted:Does he have a beard? Yeah..?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 19:34 |
|
Knux posted:You guys should also get a kick out of the subject matter of the actual sleeve. ONE OF US! ONE OF US! That is a really great tat, and I guess that's another thing film cameras are great for. Having a D3 and 1DmkIII on your arm with a CF card in between them just wouldn't have had the same impact.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 21:02 |
|
squidflakes posted:Having a D3 and 1DmkIII on your arm with a CF card in between them just wouldn't have had the same impact. Most likely gonna throw my 5dmkii on right at the top, and by that time the film strips will be turning pixelated. Still toying with the idea.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 21:58 |
|
IS THE ONION A GOON?? http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/17_year_old_thinks_shes quote:17-Year-Old Thinks She's Getting Into Photography
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 22:30 |
|
FACT: all girls go through a photography stage. It's usually right after horses.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 23:49 |
|
I think i clipped that out and stuck it on someones fridge when i saw it haha
|
# ? Oct 21, 2009 23:57 |
|
brad industry posted:FACT: all girls go through a photography stage. It's usually right after horses. And right before Boone's.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 00:07 |
|
I laughed at that article a little harder than I should have.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 00:22 |
|
brad industry posted:FACT: all girls go through a photography stage. It's usually right after horses. An alarming amount (of boys and girls) also go through a writer and artist phase. If you're lucky, it's not anime slash edit: I am so sick of seeing of "artistic" saturation blown-out etc etc pictures on my facebook feed. At least most of them are getting over this now, I don't see nearly as many "omg I just got an awesome new camera!!" (read as: 99% canon Xsi for some reason) nonanone fucked around with this message at 00:41 on Oct 22, 2009 |
# ? Oct 22, 2009 00:33 |
|
pwn posted:IS THE ONION A GOON?? That is far too funny
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 09:02 |
|
Knux posted:Most likely gonna throw my 5dmkii on right at the top, and by that time the film strips will be turning pixelated. Still toying with the idea. Oh well poo poo, that would be great. Maybe pixels fading to 1s and 0s? Are you going to do another stop motion for that one as well?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 15:45 |
|
Giant cardboard TLR build time-lapse video (from RFF)
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 18:16 |
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:Giant cardboard TLR build time-lapse video A big TLR cabinet would be a good [and nerdy] place to keep photography stuff.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 18:58 |
|
squidflakes posted:Are you going to do another stop motion for that one as well? Since the reaction has been so crazy I think i'm gonna do my whole arm this way
|
# ? Oct 22, 2009 21:44 |
|
Have you guys seen those Trauma ads? I saw all three next to each other for the first time today, Great concept and well done once you stop wondering if that's that guy from sliders
|
# ? Oct 23, 2009 17:58 |
|
A lot of NBC's bumpers are done in that style this season. I noticed as well, very well done. They don't seem to be reflected in their shows' ratings so far, though.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2009 18:01 |
|
Ive got fridge magnets from a Glee photoshoot that I found in a Superclips. I think they are pretty awesome http://www.flickr.com/photos/heatherannehogan/3932682780/ The behind the scenes video is up on hulu. Can anyone tell if he using a handheld hasselblad? http://www.hulu.com/watch/72049/glee-photo-shoot#s-p7-sr-i1
|
# ? Oct 23, 2009 22:20 |
|
He sure is.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2009 22:30 |
|
It's an H2 or H3.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2009 22:40 |
|
Extremely rare Nikon lens for sale up on eBay right now: Close-up photo . . . . According to douchebag Ken Rockwell, only 350 were made back in the 1970's and very rarely do they show up in the used market. Bids for this auction start $17,633. Ken Rockwell posted:The Nikon 13mm is the world's widest non-distorting professional SLR lens ever made, by anyone, in any format. http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/13mm.htm http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/technology/nikkor/n09_e.htm ...I'm not sure I would want it though. Seem almost like a liability because of its rarity and price tag.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2009 08:12 |
|
This is the only rectilinear lens capable of getting a full rainbow in frame, making it an essential part of any Nikon owners bag. It will work on any Nikon camera ever but it will not work on Canon cameras. Click here to buy a Nikon Camera such as the D40 (my favorite camera due to it's small size). Please. I have children to feed and I am completely unqualified to do anything but post to my horrible affiliate marketing website.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2009 08:27 |
|
Yeah, which is why you take what he says with a grain of salt. But it's still a rare and unique lens. If I only had 17,633 disposable dollars I would probably waste my money on it.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2009 08:30 |
|
Mannequin posted:
I gotta agree with you. It looks like the bubble sits further out than the sides of the lens hood. Can you imagine scratching that beast? "oops" Still though, 13mm at 35mm, that's amazing, you'd need something like an 8mm lens on a crop body to get the same FOV. Wow, I just looked at the ken rockwell photo, his photo shows the size of the thing better. It's HUGE. "Big, long, telephoto lenses are not great, even though they impress beginners. Every camera maker: Nikon, Canon, Minolta, Pentax, Zeiss, Leica, the Russians and more, all make big telephotos. So what? Photography is about getting close. Long lenses are for photographers who lack the skills to get close."
|
# ? Oct 24, 2009 09:02 |
|
snowman posted:"Big, long, telephoto lenses are not great, even though they impress beginners.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2009 16:42 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 09:58 |
|
Mannequin posted:Extremely rare Nikon lens for sale up on eBay right now: lmbo a Sigma 12-24 is more flexible, less cumbersome, faster, wider, cheaper by several orders of magnitude, has autofocus, and is still rectilinear. Ken
|
# ? Oct 25, 2009 02:59 |