|
Chilly McFreeze posted:I said no rollups!! Technically not a roll up. Just a reversal of the triangle choke.
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 05:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 10:01 |
|
|
KungFu Grip posted:Technically not a roll up. Just a reversal of the triangle choke. It's a fruity roll up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 05:54
|
|
|
Chilly McFreeze posted:It's a fruity roll up. You set up your own joke. No putting in your own rebounds.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 05:55
|
|
|
Tato posted:I think it's so weird that the monday night wars were raging so hot that both promotions opened loving restaurants. Did anyone on this board ever get the chance to eat at WWF New York or the WCW Nitro Grill? I'm interested to hear about it, because most of the reviews I've found were really funny in how bad the service was at both joints. I went to WWF New York a bunch when I was a kid. I'd probably consider the food to be subpar now, but I liked it a lot, particularly The People's Sundae, which was a sundae on top of a giant, warm chocolate chip cookie. They really didn't have that much memorabilia. The restaurant was downstairs and the upper level was a huge store. There was an arcade thing with the Royal Rumble game that was out on Dreamcast around then, and lots of chain link fence. Oh actually now I remember they had handprints of Andre the Giant. That was pretty cool. Also I don't remember any bad service but I always went on weekends and never on, say, a Tuesday night. Nut Bunnies fucked around with this message at 06:00 on Nov 7, 2009 |
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 05:55
|
|
|
Chilly McFreeze posted:Question: How many times has the Undertaker been defeated cleanly, not counting rollups? Khali, whenever the gently caress he made his debut.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 05:58
|
|
|
Didnt Mark Henry get a clean win on understand and banish his soul from the wwe? Which means mark henry is strong enough to slam out an exorcism
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 08:33
|
|
|
Oasx posted:What i was thinking was that the nosebleeding would probably have something to do with the wrestlers, and if you were close enough to see the wrestler nosebleed you were probably as close to the ring as you could be. To be honest, I'm aware of both interpretations - for sporting events it's the really high seats, but at musical events it's down the front because that's where the mosh and the fistfights are: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5onwtF4mZs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 09:22
|
|
|
Captain Charisma posted:I went to WWF New York a bunch when I was a kid. I'd probably consider the food to be subpar now, but I liked it a lot, particularly The People's Sundae, which was a sundae on top of a giant, warm chocolate chip cookie. They really didn't have that much memorabilia. The restaurant was downstairs and the upper level was a huge store. There was an arcade thing with the Royal Rumble game that was out on Dreamcast around then, and lots of chain link fence. Were you there for any ppvs? I always went for the ppvs It was amazing on ppv night.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2009 10:53
|
|
|
Did anyone inside WWE ever have anything to say about the Cena/RVD match at ONS? Seems like there were some fed lines to Taz/Styles sticking up for Cena, and the obviously very rabid, and vulgar, crowd.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2009 07:29
|
|
|
spongeh posted:Did anyone inside WWE ever have anything to say about the Cena/RVD match at ONS? Seems like there were some fed lines to Taz/Styles sticking up for Cena, and the obviously very rabid, and vulgar, crowd. No official statements or anything, but the fact that they never really went back to the Hammerstein says it all. I think they still call it a "unique" match or a match with a "unique atmosphere," which is WWE-speak for "the crowd didn't react the way we wanted them to and we couldn't drown it out." I do think they issued some half-hearted apology for the language of the crowd on WWE.com, but that was for an early ECW episode, not the PPV, if it happened at all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 00:01
|
|
|
I think they left after they tore Big Show & Batista a new one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 00:06
|
|
|
HulkaMatt posted:They went back. That was only like a few weeks later, though, wasn't it?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 00:07
|
|
|
I think it was a month but I'm probably wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 00:09
|
|
|
HulkaMatt posted:I think it was a month but I'm probably wrong. ONS was 6/11/06, Batista/Big Show was 8/1/06 so a little under two months.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 00:18
|
|
|
Karmine posted:ONS was 6/11/06, Batista/Big Show was 8/1/06 so a little under two months. That night was better for CM Punk.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 00:19
|
|
|
spongeh posted:Did anyone inside WWE ever have anything to say about the Cena/RVD match at ONS? Seems like there were some fed lines to Taz/Styles sticking up for Cena, and the obviously very rabid, and vulgar, crowd. They were very happy with it. Everyone knew going in that RVD would be mega-over and Cena would be a giant heel and poo poo on by the crowd. Hell, Cena himself says he was going into it as a heel. They figured the fan reactions at ONS were evidence bringing back the ECW name would be a huge success. Free Market Gravy posted:No official statements or anything, but the fact that they never really went back to the Hammerstein says it all. It says nothing. As previously stated they went back again. The reason they stopped running Hammerstein for ECW was because they rolled the ECW tour into Smackdown because of poor ticket sales.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 01:11
|
|
|
ECW was never going to succeed but it's amazing how they pretty much set it up to fail immediately. Although really after the Invasion you can never say that about any WWE venture.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 02:09
|
|
|
Captain Charisma posted:ECW was never going to succeed but it's amazing how they pretty much set it up to fail immediately. You don't say https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkEwz4DCnLM
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 11:27
|
|
|
Captain Charisma posted:ECW was never going to succeed but it's amazing how they pretty much set it up to fail immediately. I don't know if you're being facetious or not, but in all seriousness, I did read rumors on the internet that the WWE was purposely booking crappy ECW shows in the beginning to justify switching it to the more traditional WWE style it uses now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 17:24
|
|
|
I maintain that some of the best sellers of the RKO are the divas. Though Randy Orton: Diva Killer probably wouldn't fit with the PG rating.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 18:22
|
|
|
Writer Cath posted:I maintain that some of the best sellers of the RKO are the divas. Well yeah but neither does Triple H's Weekly Gay Joke.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 18:27
|
|
|
Karmine posted:Well yeah but neither does Triple H's Weekly Gay Joke. Oh come on, that's not fair. Sometimes it's a racist joke.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 19:30
|
|
|
BizarroAzrael posted:Oh come on, that's not fair. Sometimes it's a racist joke. Did Orton's promo during the VIP Lounge remind anyone of Triple H's promos during his WrestleMania feud with Booker T?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 19:41
|
|
|
TL posted:Did Orton's promo during the VIP Lounge remind anyone of Triple H's promos during his WrestleMania feud with Booker T? Yep. I just hope that if they're going with the same build, they tweak the payoff a bit this time around.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 19:53
|
|
|
TL posted:Did Orton's promo during the VIP Lounge remind anyone of Triple H's promos during his WrestleMania feud with Booker T? Orton's promo was far more blatant than Triple H ever got with Booker T.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 21:42
|
|
|
No, Orton said "Hood". Whereas Triple H said "What people like you are for are making me laugh. Come on, do a jig! Do your little spin-a-roonie!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 23:03
|
|
|
Orton walked into the VIP lounge and told three black guys that they were nothing more than criminals, and that him and his two white privileged "from blood" buddies were the ones who really "belonged", then told the three black guys to "go back to your "hoods"". Triple H told a black character noted for his comedic touches that his job on the show was to make people laugh and "do spinaroonies" to make people happy. They both had racial undertones but Orton's was far more blatant in my opinion, and intended to be more malicious than Triple H's mocking "not taking my opponent seriously" tone during his feud with Booker.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2009 23:09
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:Orton walked into the VIP lounge and told three black guys that they were nothing more than criminals, and that him and his two white privileged "from blood" buddies were the ones who really "belonged", then told the three black guys to "go back to your "hoods"". you're forgetting that mvp did time and thats what the criminal remark was in reference to, right? and the "privileged by blood" might have something to do with all of their fathers being big wrestling superstars in the past and them getting shortcuts through the business that way. I feel the Triple H one was far worse in how demeaning it was.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:23
|
|
|
dusty udder smoker posted:you're forgetting that mvp did time and thats what the criminal remark was in reference to, right? and the "privileged by blood" might have something to do with all of their fathers being big wrestling superstars in the past and them getting shortcuts through the business that way. I feel the Triple H one was far worse in how demeaning it was.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:38
|
|
|
Dragging Iron Feet posted:I haven't seen the Orton promo yet (Raw airs here in a few hours) but it would have to be pretty bad to top the Triple H promos leading up to WM19. Fucker said "people like you" so many times I was shocked WWE got away with it. and then he won.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:41
|
|
|
dusty udder smoker posted:you're forgetting that mvp did time and thats what the criminal remark was in reference to, right? and the "privileged by blood" might have something to do with all of their fathers being big wrestling superstars in the past and them getting shortcuts through the business that way. I feel the Triple H one was far worse in how demeaning it was. Didn't swagger use the same criminal thing in his fued with MVP?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:45
|
|
|
Don't worry, Orton's going to win this feud with Kofi too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:46
|
|
|
Beef Jerky Robot posted:Didn't swagger use the same criminal thing in his fued with MVP? yeah but like i said earlier, mvp actually was a criminal who served time so it played into his character
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:50
|
|
|
Has Triple H ever had short hair? Or has he always gone with it shoulder length?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 00:54
|
|
|
AlbertFlasher posted:Has Triple H ever had short hair? Or has he always gone with it shoulder length? He's had it a little shorter than that, but it makes his nose look enormous.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 01:01
|
|
|
dusty udder smoker posted:yeah but like i said earlier, mvp actually was a criminal who served time so it played into his character He referred to the other two as criminals as well (well, Kofi at least, I'd have to check again on Mark) and really the whole vibe came across as maliciously entitled to me (even beyond the normal Legacy sense of entitlement), as opposed to the almost casual "lol racism" feel I got from Triple H/Booker T.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 01:05
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:He referred to the other two as criminals as well (well, Kofi at least, I'd have to check again on Mark) and really the whole vibe came across as maliciously entitled to me (even beyond the normal Legacy sense of entitlement), as opposed to the almost casual "lol racism" feel I got from Triple H/Booker T. Well technically Kofi vandalized his car. He is a criminal now in real life rules.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 01:07
|
|
|
and mark henry is so strong it should be illegal
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 01:27
|
|
|
Mark Henry is a sexual deviant. e: And deadbeat dad. He didn't bring that hand to work with him once!
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 02:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 10:01 |
|
|
Meat Recital posted:Mark Henry is a sexual deviant. That hand was too busy hanging out at the top of the stage on Smackdown.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2009 02:31
|
|
