|
Vanagoon posted:Speaking of people getting fired: Is anyone here who saw them set a 727 down on it's rear end end some years ago? It's not terribly rare: http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?album=134 Edit: apparently the best solution is to have a bunch of guys climb in the back door, form a line, and slowly walk toward the flight deck, slowly shifting the CG back forward and gently tipping it back onto the nosegear.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 18:25 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 04:46 |
|
BIG HORNY COW posted:I don't remember hearing anything about this, but its really not surprising. For the first two, I was thinking, "Well, at least the kids in back will be safe with that nice crumple zone" But then the third one just pretty much disappears.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 18:28 |
|
teh jhey posted:For the first two, I was thinking, "Well, at least the kids in back will be safe with that nice crumple zone" I've seen that one before, as it says in the comments it wasn't a test of the car, but of the wall and facility. the car had lots of weight in the back.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 18:43 |
|
GWBBQ posted:I really want to hear an A-10 firing in person. It's like the tripods from the remake of War of the Worlds. They sound the same as what you hear in the videos, just louder and with more bass hitting your chest. I got to play with them at the National Training Center in the Mojave Desert. It feels cool enough calling in artillery fire and watching a patch of ground smolder because of you, but unleashing close air support from an A-10 on something makes you feel like god.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 19:24 |
|
ab0z posted:I've seen that one before, as it says in the comments it wasn't a test of the car, but of the wall and facility. the car had lots of weight in the back. Did you seriously just rely on Youtube comments for information?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 21:19 |
|
Adiabatic posted:Did you seriously just rely on Youtube comments for information? I seriously relied on the last time it was posted and the research that was done at that time that was repeated in a youtube comment that reminded me of it, yes.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 21:58 |
|
ab0z posted:I've seen that one before, as it says in the comments it wasn't a test of the car, but of the wall and facility. the car had lots of weight in the back. If the YouTube comment is right, that's a Holden Commodore and not a Chinese car, but I still don't think I'd want to take one on vacation.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 22:49 |
|
BIG HORNY COW posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOFIt9iw1Fs I am not surprised surprised it crushed like that, they were pieces of poo poo those old Commodores.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 22:57 |
|
Not mechanical failure, but rather crew failure: Again, not so much mechanical failure as "hit by air-to-air missile":
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 23:25 |
|
LOO posted:Again, not so much mechanical failure as "hit by air-to-air missile": Holy poo poo. Was this plane carrying Admiral Yamamoto, or what? Digging around yielded the following, which matches the damage: http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/0301-sam-threat01.htm posted:Although struck by an air-to-air missile, the Hawker 800 carrying Juvénal Habyarimana, the president of Rwanda, shows what a manpad can do. In the late 1980s, the business jet was flying over Angola when an Angolan MiG-23 pilot attacked it with two heat-seeking air-to-air missiles. The first warhead struck the right engine, tearing most of it from the mounts and puncturing the pressure vessel. The second missile locked onto the heat signature of the falling engine, which spared the airplane and the president. After an emergency landing, the Hawker was crated back to the UK and rebuilt to fly another day. I'd like to think that I live my life in a manner that doesn't piss off anyone else so much that they'd fire a missile at my goddamned airplane.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2009 23:54 |
|
Sexual Lorax posted:Holy poo poo. Was this plane carrying Admiral Yamamoto, or what? Digging around yielded the following, which matches the damage: Yeah, that's pretty much it. quote:On 6 August 1988, the Botswana Air Wing British Aerospace 125-800, flown by Col. Albert Scheffers (CO Botswana Air Wing) and British Aerospace transport pilot Arthur J. Ricketts, carrying the president of Botswana, J. K. Quett Masire and eight other passengers, was underway at 35.000ft over Angola. All of a sudden, those on board heard a loud bang and there was an explosive decompression of the cabin. The aircraft yawed, rolled and dived almost at once and then a shower of fan blades from the starboard Garrett TFF.731-5 engine was observed as it separated away from the aircraft and went in forward direction. The aircraft was hit by one of two R-60/AA-8 Aphid missiles fired at it from an Angolan MiG-23ML interceptor. The first missile hit the starboard engine and ripped it together with the entire pod off the aircraft. The second missile then hit the same engine after it was already off the aircraft. Col. Scheffers regained control of the aircraft at 28.500ft, completed an emergency shutdown and thus preserved the other aircraft systems. 2.000lb of fuel in the right wing and one engine were lost, and there was extensive damage to the right wing and flaps. The aircraft spiraled down and then landed at Cuito Bie, in Angola. Subsequent inspection reveald that the hydraulic pump, starter/generator and alternator were still attached by hoses and cable looms. Angola apologized to Botswana for the missile firing, especially as usual air traffic control clearances had been received before the presidential trip. Nobody on board the aircraft suffered serious injuries, and the aircraft was subsequently repaired.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2009 00:18 |
|
LOO posted:Yeah, that's pretty much it. haha do they have a carfax type service for aircraft? "HAWKER 800 LOW FLIGHT HOURS NO MISSILE DAMAGE L@@K!!!"
|
# ? Nov 14, 2009 00:55 |
|
I posted this either in AI or Cycle Asylum a while back: Was learning a bit about fixing my first motorbike, the mechanic suggested we change out the old chain for a new one. Chinese quality got me about 25kms, after I got it back to the shop we put the old chain back in and it kept chuggin' for the next 3-4 weeks of the trip. Never found the pieces of the transmission case, they flew off into the jungle never to be seen again
|
# ? Nov 14, 2009 04:33 |
|
grover posted:Sort of like if you were driving the car at 60mph on the highway with a trunk full of luggage? If you luggage consists of many hundreds of pounds of steel bolted to the floor, then yes. When they test these walls, the cars are over-max weight by a LOT. There is a video of a VW T3 disintegrating and we later find out it had some ungodly amount of steel welded into the bed.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2009 19:16 |
|
Disciple of Pain posted:If you luggage consists of many hundreds of pounds of steel bolted to the floor, then yes. When they test these walls, the cars are over-max weight by a LOT. There is a video of a VW T3 disintegrating and we later find out it had some ungodly amount of steel welded into the bed. The steel should simply be sitting in the trunk, not welded in. Or other ballast added up to the car's stated load capacity, like suitcases full of sand or something.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2009 21:39 |
|
That's not what they're testing? They're trying to test a massive car-wall impact; they don't give a poo poo about what happens to the car, as long as it stops.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2009 22:16 |
|
grover posted:Well that's stupid, how is that suppose to test for failure of the seatbacks to prevent luggage penetration into the passenger compartment? The rear seats in my 98 Ford Escort failed when my wife had an accident, even with virtually nothing in the trunk and a mere 20mph front-end impact. They are testing the wall, not the car.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 01:55 |
|
Kinda like this but in reverse: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh835unue5w
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 10:33 |
|
blew the spindle off with a little abuse hires http://tharf.com/albums/random/IMG_1350.jpg and just because i had this in the same folder now thats some shear failure thArf fucked around with this message at 10:43 on Nov 15, 2009 |
# ? Nov 15, 2009 10:36 |
|
thArf posted:now thats some shear failure If that was an accident, did the driver / passengers survive?
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 19:17 |
|
DefaultPeanut posted:If that was an accident, did the driver / passengers survive? That's just what happens to GM vehicles after 3 or 4 years of normal use. ALL GM vehicles.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 19:19 |
|
The PCV has to be changed you say? (250k MX6 V6)
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 21:21 |
|
Sockington posted:The PCV has to be changed you say? (250k MX6 V6) running a bit rich, are we
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 22:17 |
|
deviant. posted:running a bit rich, are we Just a slight bit.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 22:37 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyoDpMVwxFw This thread loving rocks!
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 23:29 |
|
Holy poo poo. I'd love to see photos of the mechanical carnage afterwards.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2009 23:34 |
|
thArf posted:blew the spindle off with a little abuse Given the uprated multi-shock system, it looks like someone got a bit too excited running through the dunes. What is this? GM? Toyota? It really makes me want to replace the bad drivers side front wheel bearing on my hilux all of a sudden.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2009 01:19 |
|
DefaultPeanut posted:Rads really get dangerous when the cap does not vent properly... im pretty sure the guy who owned the truck posted those pictures so at least he lived but ive been wrong before ACEofsnett posted:Given the uprated multi-shock system, it looks like someone got a bit too excited running through the dunes. What is this? GM? Toyota? It really makes me want to replace the bad drivers side front wheel bearing on my hilux all of a sudden. you can see the dents in the upper arm drop bracket that indicate he was super bottoming out on landings and probably cracked the spindle which then came flying off later bad bearings are scary but more so on the 2wd trucks because they will just fall out of the spindle - on the 4x4 they have those nice huge axles to hold them in let me find pics of a 2wd failure edit: still looking for the 2wd but found axle shaft and another broken spindle http://tharf.com/albums/random/2220_DSCF0118.jpg http://tharf.com/albums/random/2220_DSCF0122.jpg http://tharf.com/albums/random/2220_DSCF0124.jpg (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 03:46 |
|
BIG HORNY COW posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHZqcKj7jNM I'm digging the slow motion piece of glass that floats by the camera at :58. Also the driver using the dashboard as an airbag even with seat belts on and an actual airbag going off.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 06:48 |
|
speaking of horrible mechanical failures i promise not to do that again
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 07:40 |
|
Taaaaaaarb! posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyoDpMVwxFw That poor poor FB That said, I love how there's just the shower of sparks and the hood flies open and closed and it's like nothing changed.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 07:43 |
|
BIG HORNY COW posted:I don't remember hearing anything about this, but its really not surprising. The scariest part of that second video is that's only 64km/h(40mph).
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 08:15 |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw2r_lIRgpY
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 08:24 |
|
durty posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw2r_lIRgpY I would rather change the tags than open a new tab
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 08:55 |
|
durty posted:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw2r_lIRgpY That's pretty frightening. So, I guess this isn't exactly a car question but what's up with the camera in that? It looks like someone is recording a projection of another video on a waving screen.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 09:05 |
|
Splizwarf posted:That's pretty frightening. So, I guess this isn't exactly a car question but what's up with the camera in that? It looks like someone is recording a projection of another video on a waving screen. Rolling shutter effect It mostly plagues cellphone cameras, but some consumer camcorders are affected as well.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 09:51 |
durty posted:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw2r_lIRgpY [Edit] Video does say oil overfilling caused that, but how's that possible? [Edit2] Oh yeah, there's always the breather tube, but I think that would require massive overfilling.. JointHorse fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Nov 17, 2009 |
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 16:09 |
|
thArf posted:speaking of horrible mechanical failures Roads? Where were going, we don't need ... roads.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 16:46 |
|
Muffinpox posted:I'm digging the slow motion piece of glass that floats by the camera at :58.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 19:53 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 04:46 |
|
bladernr posted:Roads? Where were going, we don't need ... roads. Or the ability to open the rear doors on either side, it seems...
|
# ? Nov 17, 2009 21:26 |