|
Demon_Corsair posted:Resubmitted for your approval. Much better now. It looks like the horizon is slightly crooked or distorted. Have you tried any other cropping options? It might add a little more drama to the shot as a more panoramic style image.
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2009 02:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 07:34 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2009 08:07
|
|
|
Reichstag posted:I like both of these. Nice shot!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2009 19:35
|
|
|
RangerScum posted:Nice shot! Thanks, not so sure about this one. I feel like this sort of thing is probably better achieved with a tripod and long exposure. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2009 22:56
|
|
|
Reichstag posted:Thanks, not so sure about this one. I feel like this sort of thing is probably better achieved with a tripod and long exposure. yeah, probably. at least that'll let you stop it down. i just got a roll of velvia 50 back and apparently 1/30 really isn't fast enough to shoot handheld wtf so i did a three shot pano with that velvia:  scanned, it's like 500+ MP, and i dont have enough scatch space on my windows partion to dodge and burn it to look good. i did the above by shrinking it down to something far more manageable. when i gave my windows partition 20 gigs i totally forgot about scratch space guidoanselmi fucked around with this message at 08:43 on Dec 4, 2009 |
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 07:57
|
|
|
A few more shots from Tibet. I've been procrastinating doing any post on these forever.  
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 08:51
|
|
|
drat that is some blue water. curiously what altitude were those at?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 08:56
|
|
|
guidoanselmi posted:drat that is some blue water. curiously what altitude were those at? First one was near the 5km mark if I'm not mistaken. The others were at about 4-4.3km.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 08:58
|
|
|
guidoanselmi posted:scanned, it's like 500+ MP, and i dont have enough scatch space on my windows partion to dodge and burn it to look good. i did the above by shrinking it down to something far more manageable. when i gave my windows partition 20 gigs i totally forgot about scratch space
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 09:22
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:Pretty sure you can move your scratch file? i just looked this up & fixed it. thanks!
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 09:25
|
|
|
man thats gross posted:A few more shots from Tibet. I've been procrastinating doing any post on these forever. You should post a trip report, I'm interested to hear about it. I've only been as close as Qinghai, my Chinese friends wanted to go to Tibet but thought they would die of altitude sickness or something, so we didn't go :-\
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 22:07
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:You should post a trip report, I'm interested to hear about it. I've only been as close as Qinghai, my Chinese friends wanted to go to Tibet but thought they would die of altitude sickness or something, so we didn't go :-\ They might. =/ Nah, if you just give it a few days at a moderate altitude (we stayed in Lhasa, 3.5km) you should be fine. I'll definitely be posting a report as soon as all the post is finished.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2009 22:47
|
|
|
Went to Multnomah Falls recently, the trek to the top ended up being more than I expected, pretty day though.  
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2009 04:29
|
|
|
omfg its jeff posted:Looks like a dangerous position to be taking a photo from 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2009 10:40
|
|
|
omfg its jeff posted:I really like this but I feel like there are too many (great) subjects. If you took two photos instead, one with the waterfall under you and the trees, and one with the trees and the road/ocean, each would be a great picture and they would be less cluttered. As it stands, there are two great subjects (waterfall and ocean/road) and a great background/filler (trees), but you don't really know what to focus on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2009 11:27
|
|
|
Buller River from my recent NZ road trip Click here for the full 1024x452 image.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2009 12:18
|
|
|
fenner posted:Looks like a dangerous position to be taking a photo from There's a pretty great platform at the top, but I was leaning pretty far over the rail to not catch it in the picture. Thanks FBI, I have a couple sans waterfall that turned out, but I didn't get any that I like of just the waterfall.   The road looks weird and disconnected in that last one, but it matches up with other pictures, so I'm not sure what's really going on there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2009 03:54
|
|
|
Got my rear end out of bed for sunrise this weekend. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2009 07:42
|
|
|
I was all excited to attempt to get some really cool landscape shots to actually contribute a bit to this thread while I was on my trip to Marco Island this weekend. Then it decided to pour rain and be insanely windy 90% of the time. I managed to get out and take photos for about an hour along the beach while there was a small break in the weather. Here's on of the ones I took away. I was trying to capture both how lovely the weather was and the tiny glimmer of sunny hope that was peaking through. I really wish I had something that was between my 20mm and my 8mm fisheye for this. Well, really I wish I had a full frame.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2009 18:24
|
|
|
rockcity posted:I could just be imagining things, but there is something really strange going on with the horizon line here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2009 23:48
|
|
|
Ishkibibble_Fish posted:I could just be imagining things, but there is something really strange going on with the horizon line here. Nah, I think you're right, I was shooting at a bit of an angle and wasn't focusing on getting things perfect on the camera. I'll fix that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2009 00:30
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2009 05:35
|
|
|
rockcity posted:Nah, I think you're right, I was shooting at a bit of an angle and wasn't focusing on getting things perfect on the camera. I'll fix that. Is the sky comp'd in? Whitezombi posted:I'm loving all of these canyon shots of yours, especially this one. Dread Head posted:Got my rear end out of bed for sunrise this weekend. I've been too busy to get out in ages, just starting to find some time now just in time for eternal northern darkness  Might try a sunrise or set this weekend I guess, but waking up in the dark and leaving work in the dark is killing me already and it's only December.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2009 18:43
|
|
|
whaam posted:Is the sky comp'd in? Nope, that's just the weather that day. There was a brief bit of blue sky for maybe 20 minutes and the rest of the day the sky was just a dark mass of ugly as you see on the right there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2009 19:14
|
|
|
 Taken about an hour before landing in Beijing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2009 04:53
|
|
|
whaam posted:I've been too busy to get out in ages, just starting to find some time now just in time for eternal northern darkness It sucks, we don't have it as bad here and it is still terrible. -- 
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2009 05:01
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2009 03:08
|
|
|
spf3million posted:
I really like this, there's a great sense of movement in the clouds. I took these up in Rocky Mountain National Park last weekend:   
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2009 22:59
|
|
|
not many cool landscapes near me, just generic medium-sized cities 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2009 02:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2009 18:51
|
|
|
I like that. It doesn't quite feel like a, to borrow a term, fine print, though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2009 20:43
|
|
|
Finally got a working tri-pod. Edit: I reedited the photo a bit, and removed most of the spots the best I could, but most of them were actually rain drops that got on the lens. Wubble fucked around with this message at 00:05 on Dec 29, 2009 |
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2009 21:50
|
|
|
Wubble posted:Finally got a working tri-pod. I like this. A lot. But, dude, clean your sensor. edit: Wubble posted:Finally got a working tri-pod. Ah, makes sense. In any event, beautiful photo. torgeaux fucked around with this message at 09:54 on Dec 29, 2009 |
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2009 22:01
|
|
|
was playing with some long exposures sans-tripod a few months back. This is on the Oregon coast at Cannon Beach. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2009 23:00
|
|
|
I'm going to Hawaii next month and I'm planning on doing some hiking and taking pictures along the way, so no tripod. I was thinking of renting a 70-200 while I was out there for my 7D, but I think that would be entirely too bulky/heavy to really hike with. I have a 17-50 Tamron f/2.8 (no VC) that I would use instead. I have a lowepro micro trekker 100 backpack that I'm pretty sure won't fit a 70-200 in it with the 7D either. Although I'm reading online it will... Any tips? I don't know quite what to expect and I definitely don't want to hike having a 7D with a 70-200 around my neck. edit: I am going to post this in the gear thread too. milquetoast child fucked around with this message at 01:15 on Dec 29, 2009 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2009 01:01
|
|
|
dunkman posted:I'm going to Hawaii next month and I'm planning on doing some hiking and taking pictures along the way, so no tripod. Take a tripod, even if it is a smaller one they are really useful and if you have a bag then you can probably strap it to it. as for a 70-200 you need to decide what you are wanting to take photos of I think it would be handy and you could keep it in your bag until you needed it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2009 01:31
|
|
|
fack. ingore this for now...
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2009 04:58
|
|
|
dunkman posted:I'm going to Hawaii next month and I'm planning on doing some hiking and taking pictures along the way, so no tripod. Monopod. Get an inexpensive one you won't mind hurting, and just keep it out and use it as a walking stick.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2009 09:55
|
|
|
If you are going to hike get a walking staff with a built in camera mount. I have this one and it's great - really light. http://www.rei.com/product/745686
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2009 17:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 07:34 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 00:03
|
|