|
jackpot posted:
Sigh, I know, I only cared about his upper body, but he wanted to have the pants like that 
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 02:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 01:20 |
|
|
Since you guys are liking these I'll post a few more.   
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 05:20
|
|
|
Please, please, please work on your temperature adjustment.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 13:36
|
|
|
Oprah Haza posted:Please, please, please work on your temperature adjustment. That's just me playing around in post. I've been sick and bored out of my mind.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 16:58
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about it. It's naturally warm ish looking, which gives a lot of life. What an animated kid, one of those rare cases you can actually say is a really cute baby.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 18:13
|
|
|
Whitezombi posted:Since you guys are liking these I'll post a few more. I can't stop imagining that the baby took this herself as a profile picture for Facebook or something, and it makes me laugh.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 18:57
|
|
|
I'll be damned if that didn't make me laugh. Now I can't unsee it, there's no way whitezombi took this picture
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2009 19:28
|
|
|
Here are a few I've taken recently; comments welcome.     
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2010 00:35
|
|
|
I love having my 2nd light to control density. I keep it almost perfectly at the camera axis, similarly to how Dan Winters uses his ringlight. I need to build some screen covers to control the ratio more, this is using 2:1 (my power pack is locked at a 2:1 assymetric) 
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2010 00:52
|
|
|
If I have the room to do it I tend to use a large softbox/umbrella behind the camera instead of an actual ringlight. Or bounce a bare head into a V-flat behind it. Same effect, more control.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2010 01:38
|
|
|
poopinmymouth posted:I love having my 2nd light to control density.  , it's nice to know your face doesn't shatter if you smile
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2010 03:09
|
|
|
notlodar posted:That entire set is really cute Yes, sad to say, my first thought wasn't about the merit of the photo, but, "Hey, pimm is smiling!!"
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2010 10:38
|
|
|
brad industry posted:If I have the room to do it I tend to use a large softbox/umbrella behind the camera instead of an actual ringlight. Or bounce a bare head into a V-flat behind it. Same effect, more control. Yeah this was a 60" umbrella almost directly behind the camera and up a bit. Learned about it this way from an old school portrait guy. Seems a lot of people don't use the fill on axis, which leads to shadow pockets. I do wish my power pack had more control over the asymmetric ratio.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2010 11:50
|
|
|
Clubs and event: This local photog has good stuff: http://anthonyverrilli.com/ Wish I could see more photogs shooting with such quality more often
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2010 05:18
|
|
|
dakana posted:I can't stop imagining that the baby took this herself as a profile picture for Facebook or something, and it makes me laugh. KingColliwog posted:I'll be damned if that didn't make me laugh. Now I can't unsee it, there's no way whitezombi took this picture That's the first thing I thought when I was processing it. I have strange friends.  
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2010 18:23
|
|
|
LuisX posted:Clubs and event: This guy has a really slick site, I like how he's added twitter urls to all the pictures - good way to try and stop people stealing his photos without credit. Also, ridiculously gorgeous women shot in an unabashed way.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2010 20:32
|
|
|
LuisX posted:Clubs and event: Great pics though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 09:13
|
|
|
Yeah the gallery interface is hosed up something fierce.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 11:13
|
|
|
jackpot posted:My loving God, what is up with the bouncy poo poo going on. I don't know if it's just Firefox, but it drat near made me seasick, what a terrible way to display photos. I agree with this, but I let it pass cause he could shoot 
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 18:43
|
|
|
How as this taken?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 20:39
|
|
|
Two softboxes at even 45 degree angles and then two black fill cards to subtract really close to his head on either side. Probably a black card under his chin too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 20:43
|
|
|
brad industry posted:Two softboxes at even 45 degree angles and then two black fill cards to subtract really close to his head on either side. Probably a black card under his chin too. I have no idea what those are.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 20:47
|
|
|
the posted:I have no idea what those are. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3032679
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 20:52
|
|
|
LuisX posted:Clubs and event: Good looking girls? Check Quality pictures? I don't know. The glaring highlights on the faces really really make me hate these pictures.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 21:53
|
|
|
squidflakes posted:Good looking girls? Check 2nding, basically the best stuff about the photos are the subjects, and since it's club photography, he didn't really have much to do with that. These look like pretty formulaic flash with some kind of diffuser on a bracket, go to popular clubs with hot chicks, get well known so you can get some friendly poses, and snap away. I don't see anything laud-worthy about them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 23:03
|
|
|
There's at least 2 or 3 Cobra Snake wannabes in every major city now, it's so annoying. edit: This pretty perfectly sums up how I feel about them: Travis Jeppesen posted:As a photographer, Nan Goldin has inspired a legion of imitators who tend to confuse certain lifestyle traits with artistic substance, a privileging of content over form with an excuse for taking sloppy photographs. I tend to think of them as the Vice generation, after the magazine that first published many a Goldin copyist under a hipster anti-ethos saturated with attention begging and unwarranted self-destruction. From a review of a Nan Goldin show http://www.artforum.com/archive/id=24055 brad industry fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Jan 4, 2010 |
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 23:04
|
|
|
That poo poo is awful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 23:28
|
|
|
dude knows his clientele though, as bad as the quality seems to us it's probably 90% better than what's on all these people's facebooks and myspaces - he seems to be able to market himself well and probably makes decent money doing it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 23:43
|
|
|
brad industry posted:There's at least 2 or 3 Cobra Snake wannabes in every major city now, it's so annoying. Would you mind just quoting the whole thing, I really don't want to register for another site to read it.-+
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2010 23:57
|
|
|
This hipster anti-ethos is just killing me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2010 00:18
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:This hipster anti-ethos is just killing me. Say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism...
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2010 00:48
|
|
|
JaundiceDave posted:Would you mind just quoting the whole thing, I really don't want to register for another site to read it.-+ artforum.com posted:Nan Goldin
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2010 00:49
|
|
|
the posted:How as this taken? From the style i'd say it's one of Martin Schoeller's too. Google the name and see if there are many 'behind the scenes' videos.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2010 07:39
|
|
|
the posted:How as this taken? with a Rebel 
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2010 12:56
|
|
|
Travis Jeppesen posted:Her subjects, whether laughing or crying, often seem as though their minds are somewhere else, and their eyes are lost in pensive reverie Or, you know, they are just high as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2010 16:22
|
|
|
 i found the lighting right here to be great, so I just exposed the shot for her at -1 and brightened her up in post to retain the background. woooo
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2010 01:44
|
|
|
I like the composition in that one ^, but it's pretty obvious that her face has been massively brightened.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2010 03:45
|
|
|
It works though. Maybe play with the white balance a bit, her skin does not look that well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2010 15:21
|
|
|
Yeah I noticed that when I viewed it large. I am going to burn her face and dodge the other half, because it kind of looks like she's got two face going on. Thanks guys
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2010 16:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 01:20 |
|
|
It looks like you've pushed the right side of her face too far (not much detail left, and the left side's bright enough, so I'd tune it down a notch). Also you've got pretty obvious exposure-adjustment halo's around the jacket. This is really the kind of picture where bringing to some light along makes post 200% easier.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2010 16:17
|
|