|
I'm confused. Is Rich just making a joke about a slavedrivers union, or is this some kind of obtuse statement about the current political theater?
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2010 23:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:03 |
|
|
Hahahaha
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 00:08
|
|
|
Shame, a good set up for the end ruined by a rehashing of tiresome  UNIONS  sentiment.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 02:24
|
|
|
Yadoppsi posted:Shame, a good set up for the end ruined by a rehashing of tiresome Uh, I didn't get the :arrg: unions bit at all. Saying the situation is unfair and that it works out for them and that they feel sorry for them doesn't scream anti labor union to me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 02:32
|
|
|
Jesus Christ. Burlew added a throw-away one-liner as a caption to the strip in which he references the American Revolution which was started by the Boston Tea Party which must mean he's making a sly commentary on the current Tea Party activists AMIRITE GUYS????????? _____________________________________________________________________  No wait Burlew is making a joke about how silly it would be for such a useless and non-productive group such as slavedrivers to form a union and strike for better wages which must mean he thinks all people who have ever formed a union and strived for better conditions ARE NO BETTER THAN SLAVEDRIVERS AMIRITE GUYS???????? _____________________________________________________________________ Let's just get the discussion to where it's going to go eventually: what alignment do you think Sarah Palin is?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 03:36
|
|
|
Eschers Basement posted:Let's just get the discussion to where it's going to go eventually: what alignment do you think Sarah Palin is? Lawful good. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 03:38
|
|
|
Mystic Mongol posted:Lawful good. Is that a Lawful Stupid joke? I can't tell...
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 03:48
|
|
|
Mystic Mongol posted:Lawful good. Shooting dire wolves from holy helicopters
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 03:49
|
|
|
Eschers Basement posted:Let's just get the discussion to where it's going to go eventually: what alignment do you think Sarah Palin is? Neo-Conservative Christian.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 05:16
|
|
|
True Neutral, obviously. Isn't that the default for all beings with an intelligence score of 4?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 05:55
|
|
|
DrakePegasus posted:True Neutral, obviously. Isn't that the default for all beings with an intelligence score of 4?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 05:56
|
|
|
Eschers Basement posted:Let's just get the discussion to where it's going to go eventually: what alignment do you think Sarah Palin is?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 07:22
|
|
|
Seems Chaotic Neutral to me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 17:32
|
|
|
This is the worst discussion in the history of this thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 19:36
|
|
|
terminal mehmet posted:This is the worst discussion in the history of this thread. I believe that the discussion is Chaotic Evil because it is both bad and not within the bounds of the stated topic.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 19:40
|
|
|
Hang on, I gotta install my remove Cliff Racers patch on the internet.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2010 20:21
|
|
|
 what discussion?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2010 20:45
|
|
|
New comic: It's a better idea than Bill and Ted's, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2010 13:32
|
|
|
Gorbash posted:New comic: Who would judge a wet t-shirt contest between death and some lady?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2010 15:59
|
|
|
Probably a bunch of dead souls. Although Death probably gets to pick who, exactly. Dude always has stuff weighted in his favor.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2010 16:09
|
|
|
terminal mehmet posted:Probably a bunch of dead souls. Although Death probably gets to pick who, exactly. Dude always has stuff weighted in his favor. I love that last panel, just for the expression on the warrior's face. She's clearly been sitting on that one since the day she started adventuring.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2010 16:21
|
|
|
All he needs is a bunch of necro-fetishists. I'm sure he could find enough just in a 10 year span of people dying in Germany. This is a horrible conversation, though. Let's not go further down this trail.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2010 19:06
|
|
|
terminal mehmet posted:All he needs is a bunch of necro-fetishists. I'm sure he could find enough just in a 10 year span of people dying in Germany. I wonder if they covered this in the Book of Erotic Fantasy. I can't believe we live in a world where that is a question a human can ask.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2010 05:25
|
|
|
SlimGoodbody posted:I wonder if they covered this in the Book of Erotic Fantasy. I can't believe we live in a world where that is a question a human can ask. Of course, pages 37-38. It deals with the issues of sentient and nonsentient undead. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2010 07:08
|
|
|
Who are the graven images on the altar?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2010 13:01
|
|
|
Poil posted:Of course, pages 37-38. It deals with the issues of sentient and nonsentient undead. You're joking, right? Right?? Um... guys... I don't think I can like D&D anymore.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 06:04
|
|
|
Vorgen posted:You're joking, right? Try not to hold it against D&D; its the victim. Decades of being the victim.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 07:16
|
|
|
Plus the book of erotic fantasy wasn't official in any way and was just put up as a fan made ebook.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 09:57
|
|
|
The Book of Vile Darkness, on the other hand...
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 13:12
|
|
|
Donraj posted:The Book of Vile Darkness, on the other hand... The BoVD isn't particularly grognardy, though. There's really nothing worse in it than what we've already seen Xykon, Sabine, and V do (or talk about.) Actually now that I think about it, the same is true of the BoEF. I mean, this is a comic with interspecies sex, as well as a recurring character who has sex with the undead, and that doesn't seem to bother anyone. Ashenai fucked around with this message at 13:20 on Apr 30, 2010 |
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 13:15
|
|
|
Amused Frog posted:Plus the book of erotic fantasy wasn't official in any way and was just put up as a fan made ebook. I can't believe I know this... but you're wrong. Yes, there was a net.book D&D guide to sex, which (hopefully) most people just giggled at and went away. But that's not what they're talking about. I know this. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 13:36
|
|
|
Ashenai posted:The BoVD isn't particularly grognardy, though. There's really nothing worse in it than what we've already seen Xykon, Sabine, and V do (or talk about.) It hasn't given pages upon pages of rules detailing the acts, what rolls you have to make and what possible effects there are either. It's like the difference between a player saying "oh yeah my guy takes a dead body into his tent and screws it because he's a sick bastard" and "I gently run my fingers along the decaying cheek of my undead lover. I'm going to roll a sensual touch check to see if I bring life to his flacid member." Edit: sfwarlock posted:I can't believe I know this... but you're wrong. Well, poo poo. Why couldn't you have left me blissfully ignorant?
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 13:40
|
|
|
The BoEF was still not an official book from Wizards of the Coast. It just used the OGL.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 13:48
|
|
|
sfwarlock posted:I can't believe I know this... but you're wrong. Sadly about 90% of the BoEF was lifted whole cloth from the netbooka nd updated for 3rd.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 13:51
|
|
|
Ashenai posted:The BoVD isn't particularly grognardy, though. There's really nothing worse in it than what we've already seen Xykon, Sabine, and V do (or talk about.) The BoVD had a feat, Lichloved, that gave you protection from undead sustained by regularly having sex with them. Just saying.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 16:11
|
|
|
Lord Commissar posted:The BoEF was still not an official book from Wizards of the Coast. It just used the OGL. The BoEF is also the sole reason the new 4th edition license is so bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 16:45
|
|
|
HKR posted:The BoEF is also the sole reason the new 4th edition license is so bad. Is that true? I guess it makes some sense.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 17:11
|
|
|
In the way that a man who was once bit by a house spider now wages a one-man war against all arachnid kind by unleashing a deadly neuro-toxin into the air 'makes sense', sure. There is a definite, observable sequence of events.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 17:33
|
|
|
HKR posted:The BoEF is also the sole reason the new 4th edition license is so bad. If by "bad" you mean "not giving away the license to anyone so they can compete against WotC with their own brand" then yeah, bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 18:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:03 |
|
|
Then there's that whole thing about "If you use the 4E License, you must convert all your products to 4E and no longer sell 3.5E-based products" thing. Did that ever get axed?
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2010 19:02
|
|