|
Dradien posted:#4 – Hitler is an avowed Marxist. Several of his cabinet members and appointed “czars” are Marxists. Marxism is a philosophy of centralized control VERY similar to communism. The government is in complete control. Here’s an example – While Hitler had his “ministers”, Mr. Obama has his “czars”. The government body has recently been described as “overinflated” as a result of all these unconstitutional additions to the government. Another example, Mr. Obama promises more jobs….but there have been none. As a result, people are on unemployment. Mr. Obama continues to allow unemployment extensions – as long as he does so, people will continue to support him. The threat of having NO income is a great manipulation tool. This one is probably my favorite. You should ask the person who sent this to you what it meant to have a red triangle in a concentration camp.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 17:44 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 01:26 |
|
And since I replied with a rebuttal, I am now a Liberal Lemming and close minded...awesome....
|
# ? May 27, 2010 18:06 |
|
Yeah Hitler was a big fan of that socialist Jew's work. Ok.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 18:08 |
|
Dradien posted:I have a rebuttal written up if anyone wants to read it, I'll post it.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 19:42 |
|
Turing sex machine posted:Of course. I tried to be as accurate as possible, but there may be some errors here, I didn't go and look anything up to confirm it when I was writing it... "When Hilter was younger, he was considered a brilliant, charismatic rising star with innovative ideas to improve Germany's strength as a nation. Correlation #1 - Mr Obama is younger, attractive and very charismatic and his speeches have made him become the "One" - his promises of hope and change inspired those that had lost hope. (Just like Hitler)" Yea, there are tons of people that are young and charismatic that gives great speeches, point? Take Scott brown, nice and young rising Republican star that even had a centerfold...Does that make him Hitler? "#2 - Hitler targeted the youth as his primary audience - if he could "educate" them, he could control them under the guise of teaching them to be stronger for the future; however, the education, was indoctrination instead of true education. Mr. Obama has done the same, doing video conferences to the public schools all over the US; children being taught to sing his praises in their music classes; children being told that a picture of Obama is patriotic, but one of the American flag is offensive; targeting the impressionable youth of our country and telling them to good patriots. He has also put people in charge of education that wish to control/limit what is being taught (revisionist history)." I have seen the video of the children in that classroom singing a song about him. However, I need proof of your other claims, about the video conferencing and whatnot. I also HIGHLY doubt he said the American flag is offensive, again, I need proof of that. Don't look at Obama for wanting to rewrite history, look at Texas, they are the ones changing all their history books and whatnot, Obama has no control over what textbooks say. You're not very well versed in this process, are you? "#3 – Hitler seized control of all the civilian arms corporations and put them under the control of his “Armament Minister’s”. Mr. Obama seized control of General Motors and fired their executives. Which is not allowed under the constitution." Mr. Obama did not seize control of GM. I don't know about you, but I did watch and read about the bailouts, and GM went to D.C. asking for money to ail their failing company. That is no way seizing it, and was totally voluntary. They could have not taken the money, but they would have failed. Also, the bailout worked, they posted a profit and paid back their loans, and are no longer under the government "control", if you can even call it that. Ohh, hey, also, Bush started that GM bailout, not Obama. Is Bush Hitler? "#4 – Hitler is an avowed Marxist. Several of his cabinet members and appointed “czars” are Marxists. Marxism is a philosophy of centralized control VERY similar to communism. The government is in complete control. Here’s an example – While Hitler had his “ministers”, Mr. Obama has his “czars”. The government body has recently been described as “overinflated” as a result of all these unconstitutional additions to the government. Another example, Mr. Obama promises more jobs….but there have been none. As a result, people are on unemployment. Mr. Obama continues to allow unemployment extensions – as long as he does so, people will continue to support him. The threat of having NO income is a great manipulation tool." Ok, I'm going to have to call you on your bullshit right here. First of all, there have been czars in the government for a long time, and titled as such. They are just shortened names for otherwise long titles/position names. Obama has them, Bush had them, Clinton had them, Bush Sr. had then, and Reagan had them. It's isn't a new thing, and it sure in hell isn't Marxist, unless, again, you're calling Reagen, Bush Sr and Jr, and Clinton all Hitler... Second, Obama has created, or will create, close to two million jobs. In two years, which is more then Bush did in 8 years. I can cite this if you want to. Also, you might want to ask my wife how her job is doing, the one created by ARRA (American Reinvestment and Recovery Act *A.K.A the Stimulus) funding. Also, jobs created by that funding can be tracked at "http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx". In addition, Obama had no direct control over Unemployment Benefits. A month or two ago, they were delayed for a month or two by a single republican filibustering it. So, no, Obama doesn't control that. "#5 – This is where the health care comes into play a small amount. If you had the opportunity to read the health care bill, there was, in fact, a section dedicated to the determination of a person’s need for health care. There is no easy way to explain it here, but what it comes down to is that the bill would allow a panel of people to decide a person’s need for medical care and the cost effectiveness of maintaining their health. Based on the wording, it would seem that those that are less productive in our society will be the ones to suffer (ie:Autistic children, those with mental retardation, those with physical limits, etc). Hitler’s wish to exterminate those that were “imperfect” coincides." No...no there wasn't. If there actually were, it wouldn't had gone ANYWHERE, and the SCOTUS would have shot it down, since it has been until very recently, a majority republican court. Do me a favor....here is the bill in it's entirety. "http://docs.house.gov/rules/health/111_ahcaa.pdf" Find me the section about the death panels please... ...you won't, because they are not in there. "These are just a few of the examples….each in it’s own right is a long story and can be backed by documentation." Show me the documentation proving any of your above theory's please. Please feel free to correct me on anything I hosed up here, I wouldn't mind being educated a bit if I need it.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 20:17 |
|
The Hitler = Marxist thing should be addressed if only because there are too many stupid people out there who equate Nazis to socialists.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 21:10 |
|
Also Marxists killed the czar. So why would a Marxist appoint one?
|
# ? May 27, 2010 21:12 |
|
I'll take them into consideration, thanks. I'm more or less new with this whole debating politics, and I wish I would have gotten into them sooner. It was a product of my upbringing, where no one gave a poo poo about politics.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 21:19 |
|
This guy thinks that Hitler was gay. Hitler = Obama ispo facto OBAMA IS GAY.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 21:28 |
|
Naet posted:The Hitler = Marxist thing should be addressed if only because there are too many stupid people out there who equate Nazis to socialists. This is usually because the full name of the Nazi party was 'Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei' or 'National Socialist German Workers Party'. I think the main problem stems from the seemingly widespread, erroneous belief that liberal, socialist and communist are all synonymous and are typified by the McCarthyist view of the USSR.
|
# ? May 27, 2010 22:05 |
|
euphronius posted:Also Marxists killed the czar. So why would a Marxist appoint one? Back in August I had a Facebook discussion with a friend of a friend about Obama's czars. It ended with me pointing out that the czar was overthrown by the Bolsheviks and her telling me that I didn't know my history
|
# ? May 27, 2010 22:40 |
|
Bobby Digital posted:Back in August I had a Facebook discussion with a friend of a friend about Obama's czars. Was that the Nazi Bolsheviks or the Fascist Bolsheviks. Or the Gay Black Bolsheviks?
|
# ? May 27, 2010 23:32 |
|
dja98 posted:This is usually because the full name of the Nazi party was 'Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei' or 'National Socialist German Workers Party'. And that the Nazi Socialist Party came from the Christian Socialist Party which was from where a lot of the anti-Jewish schemes such as ghettos, not allowing them to do certain things such as buy weapons, wear yellow stars etc came from which came from past Christian history such as orders from the Vatican. So we can all blame the Christians for the Nazis. We can also blame the Christians for the Communists since Marx's philosphy was inspired by Jesus and Stalin got into communism while training to be a priest. Hitler also was inspired by his monastery school which had a certain symbol in it's coat of arms.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 00:52 |
|
notcreativeenough posted:And that the Nazi Socialist Party came from the Christian Socialist Party which was from where a lot of the anti-Jewish schemes such as ghettos, not allowing them to do certain things such as buy weapons, wear yellow stars etc came from which came from past Christian history such as orders from the Vatican. More history I wasn't taught in High School. World War 2: America won. The end.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 01:22 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:More history I wasn't taught in High School. Well it's pretty much only in the US you get this Hitler wasn't a Christian crap.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 06:06 |
|
dja98 posted:This is usually because the full name of the Nazi party was 'Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei' or 'National Socialist German Workers Party'. What they were and what they called themselves are two entirely different beasts. I understand that socialism is -- and has been in the past -- the buzz word for evil, but not being able to differentiate between the evils done in the name of socialism and the evils done in the name of fascism leads to the stupidity found in the many many emails we have here.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 14:03 |
|
quote:Also Marxists killed the czar. So why would a Marxist appoint one? Yeah, the Marxists + czars part of the initial email is hilariously poorly reasoned and you really need to bludgeon him with that if he keeps the exchange going.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 15:39 |
|
Bobby Digital posted:Back in August I had a Facebook discussion with a friend of a friend about Obama's czars. He probably doesn't know it but he is correct. The Tsar wasn't overthrown by the Bolsheviks, but by the alliance of liberals and socialists in the March (February) Revolution.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 18:46 |
|
oldman posted:He probably doesn't know it but he is correct. The Tsar wasn't overthrown by the Bolsheviks, but by the alliance of liberals and socialists in the March (February) Revolution. I didn't even know there were two Russian Revolutions in 1917 thanks, high school! That said, I'm roughly 100% certain that's not what he meant.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 20:07 |
|
Bobby Digital posted:I didn't even know there were two Russian Revolutions in 1917 thanks, high school! Likely the guy and you don't realize that life wasn't really different under the Tsars then under the Communists. Both groups didn't allow the common people to own property it was the property of the state. Same leadership different name. The Tsars were just becoming unpopular and the communists stepped into fill the leader position. Pogroms, religious oppression and religion being oppressed if it got out of line were all common occurances in Russian history. Lines for common necessities and store shelves nearly empty quite common in russian history as were death squads.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 20:19 |
|
oldman posted:He probably doesn't know it but he is correct. The Tsar wasn't overthrown by the Bolsheviks, but by the alliance of liberals and socialists in the March (February) Revolution. This is certainly the case, but didn't the Bolsheviks actually murder the Czar and his family?
|
# ? May 28, 2010 20:59 |
|
This one has probably been posted before but not recently and I wanted help for a response. I know there's a goon with a website about Arpaio but I can't remember what it is. I did find the website arpaio.com but hardly anything is sourced. quote:Subject: What a great guy!----If you've read it before it's worth reading again
|
# ? May 28, 2010 22:12 |
|
Email posted:'It feels like we are in a furnace,' Said James Zanzot, an inmate who has lived in the TENTS for 1 year. 'It's inhumane' Assuming this line wasn't put in as a balancing viewpoint (yeah right), this is easily the most outrageous part of the email. People are supposed to like Arpaio more because his prisoners think their treatment is inhumane? I can only imagine the Constitution thumpers who don't think this is "cruel and unusual" punishment.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 22:50 |
|
I almost skimmed over the part where he apparently makes inmates pay for their own meals. What the gently caress man.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 22:57 |
|
I don't want to get into the debate of how you're supposed to treat jail inmates but I'd love to hear someone defend this sort of treatment and attitude being dropped on someone who got caught with a non-dealing amount of drugs or skipped out on their speeding tickets or something. I'd also like to ask these same people why there are homeless people and shelters if all jails are apperantly three star resorts.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 22:59 |
|
Mo_Steel posted:I almost skimmed over the part where he apparently makes inmates pay for their own meals. What the gently caress man. The meals he makes them pay for are also substandard. That email really shows how just horrible some people are that by describing those conditions that would take most normal people aback as pluses.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 23:10 |
|
Pfirti86 posted:This is certainly the case, but didn't the Bolsheviks actually murder the Czar and his family? Just to continue this derail for a touch further: yes, but after anyone had stopped caring about them.
|
# ? May 28, 2010 23:11 |
|
oldman posted:He probably doesn't know it but he is correct. The Tsar wasn't overthrown by the Bolsheviks, but by the alliance of liberals and socialists in the March (February) Revolution. As I said the marxists KILLED the czar!
|
# ? May 28, 2010 23:26 |
|
euphronius posted:As I said the marxists KILLED the czar! You don't understand, the Czars, Nazis, communists, and gays are in reality all part of one giant evil behind the scenes organization that had Hitler, Stalin, and Elton John as instruments of their terror. This organization was led by one Onyango Obama and now our Obama stands to inherit the role! Wake up sheeple!
|
# ? May 29, 2010 02:44 |
|
I wrote out a response to the Arpaio email posted earlier today. Added some bible verses since that's the crowd I was emailing.quote:
Tesla Insanely Coil fucked around with this message at 22:37 on Jun 2, 2010 |
# ? May 29, 2010 05:57 |
|
Intel&Sebastian posted:I don't want to get into the debate of how you're supposed to treat jail inmates but I'd love to hear someone defend this sort of treatment and attitude being dropped on someone who got caught with a non-dealing amount of drugs or skipped out on their speeding tickets or something. Easy. People lived, worked, and survived in Phoenix before air conditioning was ever invented. Not having air conditioning is not cruel and unusual, it's just uncomfortable. And if you know something is illegal (like having a non-dealing amount of drugs) it doesn't really matter if you believe it's wrong or not does it? You broke the law and you knew there would be a consequence. Alot of homeless people prefer jails to the streets. In a homeless shelter you're free to go wherever you want to go during the day or the following night, which is a huge difference from jail. I think. Maybe it's not so obvious, I'm not sure.
|
# ? May 29, 2010 06:04 |
|
Tesla Insanely Coil posted:I wrote out a response to the Arpaio email posted earlier today. Added some bible verses since that's the crowd I was emailing. Well done. Another good quote is from the Sermon on the Mount, Luke 6:27-36 quote:27"But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. 30Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you.
|
# ? May 29, 2010 06:04 |
|
Randandal posted:Easy. People lived, worked, and survived in Phoenix before air conditioning was ever invented. Not having air conditioning is not cruel and unusual, it's just uncomfortable. And if you know something is illegal (like having a non-dealing amount of drugs) it doesn't really matter if you believe it's wrong or not does it? You broke the law and you knew there would be a consequence. However you can die in a jail cell if you don't have air conditining since it gets over a 100 degrees inside. No easy access to water in a small space can equal a death sentence.
|
# ? May 29, 2010 06:14 |
|
quote:I contacted my Congressman about House bill HR 3590, the health care bill. I asked for a summary of changes. Haha yeah gotta get conservatives in now you guys they'll fix it.
|
# ? May 29, 2010 13:20 |
|
quote:your gross WILL go up by the amount of insurance you get. quote:TITLE IX REVENUE PROVISIONS- SUBTITLE A: REVENUE OFFSET PROVISIONS - (sec. 9001, as modified by sec. 10901) That's not what it says at all...
|
# ? May 30, 2010 03:50 |
|
Tesla Insanely Coil posted:I did have links but I didn't want to paste them in the above quote but I can add them if anyone is interested. I would like to have the links, if it isn't too much trouble. Nice e-mail.
|
# ? May 30, 2010 07:11 |
|
xarph posted:That's not what it says at all... Yes, the bill also doesn't say "free health care for illegal immigrants" but there's emails going around about that one.
|
# ? May 30, 2010 16:53 |
|
notcreativeenough posted:However you can die in a jail cell if you don't have air conditining since it gets over a 100 degrees inside. No easy access to water in a small space can equal a death sentence. If you're lucky enough to be inside. "Tent City" is outdoors with temperature in the triple-digits during the summer. Google Marcia Powell and see how long a person lasts in an outdoor cell without water in that heat.
|
# ? May 31, 2010 00:50 |
|
Tesla Insanely Coil posted:I wrote out a response to the Arpaio email posted earlier today. Added some bible verses since that's the crowd I was emailing. tsk tsk, didn't you read it properly? quote:If you agree, pass this on. If not, just delete it. Really, that's no way to treat the poor sender of that email But more seriously, nice work on that. If you get any funny responses to your response, please put them here as well
|
# ? May 31, 2010 20:04 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 01:26 |
|
quote:I wonder why, no, I know why you never saw this on the mainstream media! This one isn't inherently bad, not even close to some of them in here. But it does have a few tropes that fit this thread. Namely "The mainstream liberal media doesnt report this!". Naturally it's fictious and while it's a nice story the worst part is the absolutely creepy marine worship in here. Read that last paragraph seriously. RagnarokAngel fucked around with this message at 06:42 on Jun 1, 2010 |
# ? Jun 1, 2010 06:40 |