|
|
# ? Jul 8, 2010 13:23 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 20:03 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:!: apparently to put a colon into wikipedia you have to use {{!:}} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H264#Profiles how it looks: High 4:2:2 Profile (Hi422P) how you type it: High 4{{!:}}2{{!:}}2 Profile (Hi422P) and now somebody wants to delete that so there are ‹See Tfd› everywhere
|
# ? Jul 8, 2010 22:36 |
|
just added the pic to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Brule completely ignored the no fair use rule
|
# ? Jul 8, 2010 22:38 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:and now somebody wants to delete that so there are ‹See Tfd› everywhere im pretty sure half the editors are really just trolls like how can you tell the difference between a real sperg and someone who wants to make wikipedia lovely with really odd reasoning
|
# ? Jul 8, 2010 22:38 |
|
why did wikipedia decide this bullshit is a good idea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial_%28Formatting%29 hmm yes instead of using <b>for bold</b> or something like that, let's use '''three apostrophes''' surely using common punctuation marks for important formatting won't ever cause problems
|
# ? Jul 8, 2010 22:42 |
|
RZApublican posted:love-shyness: related articles: Attachment theory (psychology) Asperger syndrome Asexuality Avoidant personality disorder Body dysmorphic disorder Castration anxiety Codependency Emotional abuse Erotophobia Gynophobia Involuntary celibacy Limerence Low self esteem Nice guy Obsessive love Psychological trauma PTSD or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Relationship breakup Sexual frustration Shyness Single (relationship) Social anxiety Social phobia Vagina Dentata Unrequited love
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 03:23 |
|
^ next stop unrequited love Talk:Cheek Untitled Isn't the picture on this page possibly cruel? A teenager with "prominent cheeks"? I don't think so. She is my girlfriend and she is OK with it. Yupanqui 00:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC) I took the liberty to add (puffy) to the description of her cheeks. "Puffy cheeks" is IMHO a good way to describe massive cheekage of the cute, rodent-like kind. 84.209.4.79 21:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) She's really hot. Can I have her when you're done with her? 79.71.235.129 (talk) 12:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC) zetamind2000 fucked around with this message at 04:39 on Jul 9, 2010 |
# ? Jul 9, 2010 04:36 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bladez636 jesus loving christ: The Working Man's Barnstar I award you this barnstar for your effort in adding all the cameo information to List of characters in Invader Zim. I see that you spent several hours on it and it is very useful having all that information in one place. Thank you! ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 12:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC) information about a cartoon show is very useful indeed
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 05:14 |
|
RZApublican posted:She's really hot. Can I have her when you're done with her? 79.71.235.129 (talk) 12:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Perhaps he has nuts he would like to store for the winter.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 05:16 |
|
"Most often, "nice guys" spend a lot of time in the friend zone." - wikipedia
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 06:39 |
|
JawnV6 posted:i can't talk to women because of crippling personal issues but OMG THEY SUCK seriously tho, and who has time to cater to the problem of "total number of remote controls under female control?"
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 06:40 |
|
acker posted:"Most often, "nice guys" spend a lot of time in the friend zone." if you've ever used the "i ended up in the friend zone bc i'm a nice guy" rationalization, grow some balls.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 06:45 |
|
you only end up in the friend zone if the girl basically sees you as another woman
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 23:30 |
|
Sometimes I want to troll the talk pages for stuff like Involuntary Celibacy but then I realize that it would be totally lost on anyone who reads them.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 23:32 |
|
Europe already has a handle on the involuntary celibacy problem, some countries literally supply hookers to people unable to normally procure sex Some guy in D&D said his down syndrome brother gets one in his country
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 23:35 |
|
Unrequited love well, the article is just a list of examples in fiction, let's have a look at the talk page quote:Cardcaptor Sakura
|
# ? Jul 9, 2010 23:36 |
|
ahaha wikipedia e/nquote:Y DOESNT SHE LOVE ME?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 00:05 |
|
i'll never play footy again
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 00:08 |
|
RZApublican posted:ahaha wikipedia e/n i just jumped off a bridge because i lost the will to live Tis sucks.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 01:24 |
|
RZApublican posted:Unrequited love jesus this block looks so good quote:Cardcaptor Sakura quote:because the case of Sakura and Tomoyo is a platonic love, as Sakura never realized that her friend was in love with her. The unrequited love refers to a refused love. Yes, this is cruel, but say good-bye to your text. Happy day. 200.71.186.110 23:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 01:34 |
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 01:34 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Meat_stubs i don't really think this is worthless, i just laughed at the name of the category
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 07:00 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World's_second_oldest_profession
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 07:59 |
|
cool, an article with almost as many references as words
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 09:22 |
|
acker posted:Barin_in_a_vat_(en)_v2.png
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 12:13 |
|
acker posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Meat_stubs lol
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 12:16 |
|
what's a low-importance article under the aegis of WikiProject Christianity and the Christmas task force? the home alone nes game
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 20:57 |
|
what does home alone the nes game have to do with christianity, other than being set during the holiday season
|
# ? Jul 10, 2010 21:36 |
|
The Harvard Comma posted:
there was a great helldump thread about some goon who constantly said they had this.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2010 09:20 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:IPod_Touch/Archive_5#Product_is_not_colloquially_called_iTouch The iPod touch page is a constant edit war of people trying to add something saying that bloggers colloquially call it an "itouch" and their changes getting reverted
|
|
# ? Jul 11, 2010 11:02 |
|
ugh i just read the entirety of this poo poo, gently caress assburgers
|
# ? Jul 11, 2010 13:38 |
|
This man is my new favourite wikisperg. He put this up on the talk page for the article about dirty words in Latin which is probably one of the best pages on wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Latin_profanity#profanity.3F quote:This is correct. Profane language strictly speaking is not the same as obscene language. Taboo references to body parts and functions are obscene. Profanity is something else, it does not respect religion. We all have the same body parts and functions, but we do not all have the same religion. I'd be hard pressed to think of a people that did not find constant reference to bodily functions annoying and improper in polite conversation, or did not refer to them when they wished to be shocking. I think that is something we have in common. Profanity, on the other hand, is a totally different matter. It depends on who is defining it. If you are not acquainted with someone else's religion you might find that you are being totally profane and horrifying without even knowing it. Such statements, inadvertent or not, have cost people their lives. This article is really quite unacceptable. Its author(s) betray not only a preoccupation with the confrontations of youth over matters we consider vulgar but also a disrespect for religion in general and Christianity specifically. Do you really want us to think the Christian religion is responsible for western in general and French in particular profane language? Give us a break. Go have another argument with your parents, leave us out of it. The article is certainly completely wrong. Obscene language was certainly much less shocking to the Romans than it is to us, as their taboos were far fewer. There was not too much privacy in ancient Rome about either the clothing, the toilet or the sex. Many of the female slaves were put to prostitution quite openly. Most of the considerable upper classes had one or more servants perpetually present. Discussion of intimate medical conditions and problems was quite frank. This was a village type environment - everyone knew everything about everyone. You might sit next to your neighbor on the public toilet; men and women bathed nude together in the baths. As in societies that customarity go nude or nearly so, these customs did not affect the rules of sex and marriage. What you young people are experiencing here is culture shock. Can't you manage to keep this out of our encyclopedia? You need to grow up a bit more. Get yourselves blackboards and when you feel the urge go scrawl shocking words on them. Leave us alone. If absolution for your young sexual practices and desires is what you are looking for, we can't do that. Sorry. Now, for the profanity. Latin literature certainly offers reams and reams of profanity. In Shakespeare's time they used such language as "Odd's Bodykins", by God's little body. Is Christianity responsible for that? In Plautus just about every third line has a profane epithet, such as Hercle, "by Hercules." As the latter was considered divine, the term was a shocking profane epithet. And it goes on and on. The plain and simple truth is, you don't know a thing about your topic, editors, you've done no research, you take the words of the one source you do use out of context, and you are very fond of repeating vulgar words for the female genitals. How old are you, 15? 16? Believe me, son, matters appear quite differently when you have to assume the roles of a responsible adult. I don't know what to do about this article. Rather than delete it and start completely over I second the motion of the editor who started this topic, let's change the name and content. I suggest "Latin taboo language" to include both obscenity and profanity. I could put 4 or 5 serious tags on this from non-NPOV to unsourced and could also recommend it for immediate deletion. Instead I am going to give you a chance to bring it up to acceptable quality. Get with it or get off it. I'm working on Latin articles from time to time. When I get around to this one again if nothing has been done I will be making radical changes or else putting in all the warning flags it deserves.Dave (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
|
# ? Jul 11, 2010 14:03 |
|
found the most worthwhile thing on wikipedia Get Out (board game) quote:Get Out is one of the earliest board games published by Cheapass Games. Players are trying to move out of their parents' basements. They roll dice and move around the board, trying to collect jobs and apartments. unsurprisingly there is nothing on the talk page
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 17:30 |
|
this is in the "did you know" section as im posting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_paper_orientation literally an article that has no other purpose than to be poo poo on
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 19:39 |
RZApublican posted:found the most worthwhile thing on wikipedia cheapass games are awesome
|
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 19:44 |
|
Seamonster posted:this is in the "did you know" section as im posting: That article was way longer than I thought it would be.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 21:53 |
|
Seamonster posted:this is in the "did you know" section as im posting: that horrible article posted:A toilet seat left up: not ready to be sat upon
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 22:38 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotel_toilet-paper_folding
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 23:34 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotel_toilet-paper_folding poopercraft
|
# ? Jul 12, 2010 23:58 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 20:03 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mnemonics_for_the_cranial_nervesquote:32. One Of Our Team Tickled And Fingered Very Greasy Vaginas And Holes
|
# ? Jul 13, 2010 03:08 |