Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

Grand Fromage posted:

Ah, here it is: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2010/07/21/whee-downloads-now-48-of-pc-game-sales/ The TL;DR version, the stats didn't count digital downloads as sales, and downloads now account for half of the PC market so, yeah. Big oversight there.

Yeah, no. The NPD can't count and sometimes outright lie to suit their agenda. Digital downloads do not account for half of PC sales. They account for less than a third by most estimates, and the NPD never bothers to do anything other than take wild guesses at sales numbers.

So yes, it's dumb that the NPD overlooked making up numbers for digital sales while making up numbers for retail sales, but digital distribution is not the almighty saviour that people think it is (which doesn't mean the PC is dying either, I'm just correcting you on that fact). Besides, digital distribution is actually worse for the consumer than something like Amazon in the UK.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leovinus
Apr 28, 2005

by Y Kant Ozma Post

Ansob. posted:

So yes, it's dumb that the NPD overlooked making up numbers for digital sales while making up numbers for retail sales, but digital distribution is not the almighty saviour that people think it is (which doesn't mean the PC is dying either, I'm just correcting you on that fact). Besides, digital distribution is actually worse for the consumer than something like Amazon in the UK.

What a shame.

Astroturf Man
Nov 2, 2006
Falsifying grassroots support since 2006!

3 posted:

Invisible War has a ton of flaws, but the one thing it cribbed from DX1 that was right was allowing the player to come up with solutions to the problems the game presents them with. Deus Ex is like coming across a hallway with dozens of doors, and each of them is open. Invisible War is basically the same hallway, but with half its doors locked. And your modern FPS has no doors other than the one entered through and the one you see at the end of the hall.

And in the modern FPS/RPG you'd press X to invoke the beautifully scripted "walking down the hall" cutscene.

This is pretty true. As poo poo as Invisible War was, the game component of it is still better than a lot of modern games. At least they're trying to simulate a bit of a world.

Ansob. posted:

So yes, it's dumb that the NPD overlooked making up numbers for digital sales while making up numbers for retail sales, but digital distribution is not the almighty saviour that people think it is (which doesn't mean the PC is dying either, I'm just correcting you on that fact). Besides, digital distribution is actually worse for the consumer than something like Amazon in the UK.

There's a good chance that this share will continue to increase. In the past I wouldn't have considered buying stuff from a digital distribution service but after several good experiences with Steam have come to quite like it.

Lowen SoDium
Jun 5, 2003

Highen Fiber
Clapping Larry

Grey Fox V2 posted:

Your assumption was that the game was bad because it was built for both Xbox 1 and the PC platforms when really was bad because of all the reasons Harvey Smith outlined in the video.

My assumption was that one of the reasons the game was bad because it was built for the Xbox 1 and then haphazardly ported to the PC and it shows.

And you assume that Harvey Smith is the only person who is allowed to say why DX:IW failed. I agree with every reason he said, but there more to it than that and the lovely port job was part of it.

Deus Ex: Invisible War was the Highlander 2 of video games.

Quetzal-Coital
Mar 7, 2003

Lowen SoDium posted:

Deus Ex: Invisible War was the Highlander 2 of video games.

Completely and totally accurate.

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Ansob. posted:

Besides, digital distribution is actually worse for the consumer than something like Amazon in the UK.

I'll grant that the NPD estimates might be very off, but you're going to have to explain to me why Amazon is bad and an assortment of digital stores is worse. There's a ton of players in Digital Distribution, all competing on features and service. And GoG and Impulse already compete by offering stuff DRM free.

And It's important that you do explain it to me, because digital purchases as a share of all purchases is only going to go up, so if there's something terribly wrong, we need to know now.

Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

Doc Hawkins posted:

I'll grant that the NPD estimates might be very off, but you're going to have to explain to me why Amazon is bad and an assortment of digital stores is worse.

Actually, no, I'm not, because that's not what I said. I said digital distribution is far worse than Amazon in the UK.

It's roughly 30% worse, actually, since the price of a new game on Steam is £35 and the price of a new game on amazon.co.uk is £25. The reason this is the case is because amazon has to compete with other retailers. It's the same reason Tesco and Asda scramble to offer new titles below the £30 mark when they're sufficiently big. The retailers set the prices.

However, if you'd like me to expand the point to digital distribution as a whole, contrast it with retail sales. On digital distribution services, the publisher sets the price. The "digital retailer" doesn't get a say about the price of anything being sold through its website beyond suggesting sales. This means that competition between DD services is irrelevant to publishers. Either way, they get to sell their games for as much as they want because there's no third-party deliberately reducing their profit margin per-item in order to make more money in the long run. The major reason why we're still getting new games at the £35-40 price range is because retail still exists, and if publishers started demanding £60 or £80 per new PC game on Steam everyone would just shrug and go buy from a physical store (look at what happens with Steam in Australia).

When a publisher sells a game via retail, GAME, Amazon, Zavvi et al. all need to independently control their prices in order to get as many people as possible to buy from them. When a publisher sell a game via digital distribution, the only person setting prices is the publisher. I'm pretty sure I don't have to explain why the balance of power being that way around in DD is a bad thing for customers.

Lemon-Lime fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Jul 25, 2010

KillHour
Oct 28, 2007


Ansob. posted:

Actually, no, I'm not, because that's not what I said. I said digital distribution is far worse than Amazon in the UK.

It's roughly 30% worse, actually, since the price of a new game on Steam is £35 and the price of a new game on amazon.co.uk is £25.

Uh... that doesn't mean digital distribution is bad, that means that developers are overcharging.

Cicadalek
May 8, 2006

Trite, contrived, mediocre, milquetoast, amateurish, infantile, cliche-and-gonorrhea-ridden paean to conformism, eye-fucked me, affront to humanity, war crime, should *literally* be tried for war crimes, talentless fuckfest, pedantic, listless, savagely boring, just one repulsive laugh after another
Valve dosen't actually set the price of games on steam (except for their own of course)

Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

Cicadalek posted:

Valve dosen't actually set the price of games on steam (except for their own of course)

That is exactly why there's a problem.

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Oh, so you feel that many publishers aren't taking enough advantage of the savings and higher margins that digital distribution brings by making the price of digital versions significantly lower. I agree! Can't wait to see them smarten up, as has already happened, say, in the Japanese PSN.

/Derails

The 4th ending to Invisible War is awesome, period. :colbert:

Lork
Oct 15, 2007
Sticks to clorf

Gynovore posted:

The knife doesn't give a bonus for sneaking up on a guy. The prod does.

(Insert obligatory 'stick with the prod'.)

Incidentally, that looks like a decent idea for a mod. Since the code for "Are you hitting from behind?" exists in the prod, it should be a simple cut and paste job.
Actually, the way it works is, any attack from behind at point blank range will do 10x damage. That goes for any weapon; a knife, a prod, even a sniper rifle will do it. Yeah, it's pretty silly.

Ainsley McTree posted:

But I like it that way! Plus I'm pretty sure that upgrading your pistol skill still affects how much damage it does and how much recoil you have after taking a shot so it's not totally pointless to put more skill points in it.
If you're that intent on breaking the game, why not just cheat yourself to max skill, or summon a bunch of accuracy mods?

Quetzal-Coital posted:

No.
And it isn't worth playing anyway.
Go read a wiki for the storyline then watch the video endings on youtube.

If I cannot convince you otherwise, you can make the game slightly more tolerable by installing the DX:IW texture pack from here:

http://download.cnet.com/Deus-Ex-Invisible-War-Texture-Pack/3000-7492_4-10259306.html
Sadly I'd have to recommend against using the texture pack. While the comedy value of making Alex D look exactly like Ben Stiller cannot be understated, it adds significantly to the loading times, which, as people have mentioned, are already the biggest problem with the game.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Lowen SoDium posted:

My assumption was that one of the reasons the game was bad because it was built for the Xbox 1 and then haphazardly ported to the PC and it shows.

And you assume that Harvey Smith is the only person who is allowed to say why DX:IW failed. I agree with every reason he said, but there more to it than that and the lovely port job was part of it.

Deus Ex: Invisible War was the Highlander 2 of video games.

What you're not getting is the port had nothing to do with it. The engine was hosed up because it was all written by one guy in his basement, who put in a ridiculous lighting system and other things that didn't work right, then left the company without leaving any documentation or clue of how to work with said lovely engine. They did not have the money or time needed to start over, so they were stuck with essentially making a mod of an engine that didn't work worth a drat and no one understood.

It had everything to do with lovely project management and nothing to do with the console.

Quetzal-Coital
Mar 7, 2003

Doc Hawkins posted:

The 4th ending to Invisible War is awesome, period. :colbert:

Which ending is the "4th"?

Lork posted:

Sadly I'd have to recommend against using the texture pack. While the comedy value of making Alex D look exactly like Ben Stiller cannot be understated, it adds significantly to the loading times, which, as people have mentioned, are already the biggest problem with the game.

Actually I wouldn't argue with this, it does increase your load times by about 30% or so.
VVV: it worked for me in Win 7, but not in Vista.

Quetzal-Coital fucked around with this message at 21:19 on Jul 25, 2010

Relin
Oct 6, 2002

You have been a most worthy adversary, but in every game, there are winners and there are losers. And as you know, in this game, losers get robotizicized!
Has anyone else had issues running DE2 from steam and if so how did you rectify it? I checked the tech support forum but it was useless aside from confirming that yes, many people had issues running this piece of poo poo

SolidSnakesBandana
Jul 1, 2007

Infinite ammo

Lork posted:

Actually, the way it works is, any attack from behind at point blank range will do 10x damage. That goes for any weapon; a knife, a prod, even a sniper rifle will do it. Yeah, it's pretty silly.

Silly? Or yet another reason why this game owns?

Grey Fox V2
Nov 14, 2008

Augmented Balls of Titanium!

Relin posted:

Has anyone else had issues running DE2 from steam and if so how did you rectify it? I checked the tech support forum but it was useless aside from confirming that yes, many people had issues running this piece of poo poo
Aside from an odd issue where the game minimizes then maximizes during load screens in Win7 64bit I haven't had any issues.

Doug Lombardi
Jan 18, 2005

Grey Fox V2 posted:

Aside from an odd issue where the game minimizes then maximizes during load screens in Win7 64bit I haven't had any issues.

That happens with every operating system because it's a piece of poo poo XBOX port.

Grey Fox V2
Nov 14, 2008

Augmented Balls of Titanium!
Actually it only started happening after I manually adjusted the FOV and resolution so it wouldn't look like dog poo poo in 1024x768.

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Quetzal-Coital posted:

Which ending is the "4th"?

Sorry, it was being referred to as such.

It's the one where you destroy the very possibility of a global society, the earth is devastated by centuries of war, but the very few survivors are so enhanced and self-sufficient that they escape to space and found a civilization that spreads across the galaxy and lasts until the stars grow cold. :black101:

Some people call it "lame," because you're kinda choosing one especially nihilistic "faction" over the main three, and they're all like "Huh, are you sure? Well, we'll give you a discount at the company store, I guess."

But I like them, and I like the ending, because to me, it underlines the single thing that Invisible War might have gotten a little bit more right than Deus Ex: all four endings are:
  • Very different from one another;
  • Arguably, good;
  • Arguably, terrible.
Recently, an article about Deus Ex (the endings, specifically) made the rounds in my Google Reader circle. I am the only person I know who's played the game. Before I really said anything on the everyone came to the basic agreement that, as one person put it, "fusing with Helios is so obviously the right choice, why would anyone do any differently?"

Did you find those choices pretty unchallenging and anticlimactic? So did people who didn't even play the game.

Shart Carbuncle
Aug 4, 2004

Star Trek:
The Motion Picture
Yeah, I can't imagine myself choosing anything but that ending for the first game (barring multiple playthroughs). It's way more appealing than the others based on the available information at the time.

SpazmasterX
Jul 13, 2006

Wrong about everything XIV related
~fartz~
I have discovered that Deus Ex is a lot more fun when you cheat a little bit.

Ainsley McTree
Feb 19, 2004


I've been dicking around lately with just all-out cheating (max skills, max ammo, maxed out augs, etc) and it's even pretty fun like that. Storming through liberty island with a master rank assault gun is pretty satisfying.

orange lime
Jul 24, 2008

by Fistgrrl

Ainsley McTree posted:

I've been dicking around lately with just all-out cheating (max skills, max ammo, maxed out augs, etc) and it's even pretty fun like that. Storming through liberty island with a master rank assault gun is pretty satisfying.

press T

> set deusex.jcdentonmale bcheatsenabled true
> allaugs
> summon weaponpeppergun
> set weaponpeppergun projectileclass rocketWP
> allammo
> spawnmass hooker1 30

pick up the pepper gun

press F7

thank me later

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

Grey Fox V2 posted:

Aside from an odd issue where the game minimizes then maximizes during load screens in Win7 64bit I haven't had any issues.

I thought that was the game actually closing then reopening; certainly that was the problem with Thief 3 that caused the difficulty to reset to Normal every time you loaded a level more than once.

Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

tentaclesex posted:

Yeah, I can't imagine myself choosing anything but that ending for the first game (barring multiple playthroughs). It's way more appealing than the others based on the available information at the time.

Actually, if you're less of a socialist and more of a liberal, theIlluminatiending is way more appealing. TheHeliosending involves all life beingregulated by an AI with no illusion of choice,whereas theIlluminatione actually trusts human beings to remain in control of their private lives and believes they can build an utopia on their ownwith a little guidance from JC and Everett, who are both humanists - Everett's one-man crusade against the Illuminati was started because he believes they'd lost their way and gone from guiding hand to tyrannical, parasitical overlords.

Retro-Future Rodent
Jul 30, 2008

Ranked 9327th out of 9328 players worldwide.
/\/\/\
That's all well and good, but the choice between peaceful Earthbound civilisation and near-eternal galaxy-spanning one is a no-brainer for me.

orange lime posted:

press T

> set deusex.jcdentonmale bcheatsenabled true
> allaugs
> summon weaponpeppergun
> set weaponpeppergun projectileclass rocketWP
> allammo
> spawnmass hooker1 30

pick up the pepper gun

press F7

thank me later

I prefer
Biomod
Unrealistic difficulty
>spawnmass rat 50
>spawnmass cat 40
>spawnmass doberman 10
>spawnmass weaponWPgrenade 40
But any grenade is fun

Cats and dogs going apeshit throwing phosphor grenades at each other, every time one goes off, clouds of flaming animals are flung 40 feet in every direction.

Saved me from getting funny looks from MY WIFE for mass murdering hookers, too.

Retro-Future Rodent fucked around with this message at 13:47 on Jul 26, 2010

In Training
Jun 28, 2008

Retro-Future Rodent posted:

/\/\/\
That's all well and good, but the choice between peaceful Earthbound civilisation and near-eternal galaxy-spanning one is a no-brainer for me.

Yeah but if we are talking first game only, you can even make a case for the Dark Age. On paper, it does make sense, as Tong is attempting to remove all global government control and returning actual power to the people on a local scale. It's the most idealistic, pure form of Democracy and if thats your thing than I can totally see someone picking it. I actually had to deliberate over which one to choose and it was overall an incredibly satisfying ending to a game that was already so amazing.

Also, everyone who hasn't played the game wants to pick the Helios ending because it sounds the most cool/badass.

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Dogs and cats can use grenades on the unrealistic difficulty?? :aaaaa:

Ansob. posted:

Actually, if you're less of a socialist and more of a liberal, one actually trusts human beings to remain in control of their private lives and believes they can build an utopia on their ownwith a little guidance from JC and Everett, who are both humanists - Everett's one-man crusade against the Illuminati was started because he believes they'd lost their way and gone from guiding hand to tyrannical, parasitical overlords.

Huh. Well, you may have just done a pretty impressive analysis of my circle of friends based on very little information. Speaking for myself, I find it pretty hard to trust Everett's plan when the Illuminati started off as humanists too, but being composed of humans, they were inevitably corrupted by their position, and he's trying to do the same thing and claim things will be different.

Hank Morgan
Jun 17, 2007

Light Along the Inverse Curve.
I think the main reason people pick the Helios ending is because it is the easiest one to get of the three.

Zeerust
May 1, 2008

They must have guessed, once or twice - guessed and refused to believe - that everything, always, collectively, had been moving toward that purified shape latent in the sky, that shape of no surprise, no second chance, no return.

Ansob. posted:

Actually, if you're less of a socialist and more of a liberal, theIlluminatiending is way more appealing. TheHeliosending involves all life beingregulated by an AI with no illusion of choice,whereas theIlluminatione actually trusts human beings to remain in control of their private lives and believes they can build an utopia on their ownwith a little guidance from JC and Everett, who are both humanists - Everett's one-man crusade against the Illuminati was started because he believes they'd lost their way and gone from guiding hand to tyrannical, parasitical overlords.

I'm pretty sure the Helios ending leaves people's private lives intact, it just overhauls the entire governmental system in favour of an omniscient, benevolent dictator, whereas the everett ending leaves the structure of society entirely intact, warts and all.

Not to say your essential point is incorrect. The latter would still be far preferable from the individualist standpoint.

Astroturf Man
Nov 2, 2006
Falsifying grassroots support since 2006!

Hank Morgan posted:

I think the main reason people pick the Helios ending is because it is the easiest one to get of the three.

Not true, I've gone through and cleaned out the entire level only to choose the Helios option.

3
Aug 26, 2006

The Magic Number


College Slice
It's rather smugly satisfying to leave Page helpless in his little bubble though.

Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

In Training posted:

Yeah but if we are talking first game only, you can even make a case for the Dark Age. On paper, it does make sense, as Tong is attempting to remove all global government control and returning actual power to the people on a local scale. It's the most idealistic, pure form of Democracy and if thats your thing than I can totally see someone picking it.

The thing I like best from Invisible War is that it's a massive gently caress you to the people naïve enough to think that ending would work out well for humanity. :3:

Frankosity posted:

I'm pretty sure the Helios ending leaves people's private lives intact, it just overhauls the entire governmental system in favour of an omniscient, benevolent dictator, whereas the everett ending leaves the structure of society entirely intact, warts and all.

Not to say your essential point is incorrect. The latter would still be far preferable from the individualist standpoint.

We have no proof either way, I think, so you're safe assuming both. That said, given that that ending involvesputting an all-powerful AI in charge of running the world, I'm pretty sure its mandate would eventually spread to regulating stuff like traffic, etc., then on to running people's daily lives - just some ways down the line.

Basically: is it better to do away with our humanity in an effort to make a better world, or is it better to try to make a better world despite our humanity? Pick one: Hobbes or Locke.

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.

Hank Morgan posted:

I think the main reason people pick the Helios ending is because it is the easiest one to get of the three.

Not quite you can hit the reactor destruct switch through the glass shield :v:

gary oldmans diary
Sep 26, 2005

Ansob. posted:

Actually, if you're less of a socialist and more of a liberal, theIlluminatiending is way more appealing.
Siding with Everett is unappealing to anyone that searched his home.

Ansob. posted:

I'm pretty sure its mandate would eventually spread to
That is an opinion based on other works of science fiction rather than one based on anything you learn about the character/circumstances in the game.

SpazmasterX
Jul 13, 2006

Wrong about everything XIV related
~fartz~

Ainsley McTree posted:

I've been dicking around lately with just all-out cheating (max skills, max ammo, maxed out augs, etc) and it's even pretty fun like that. Storming through liberty island with a master rank assault gun is pretty satisfying.

All I did was max out my skills and give myself lockpicks, mulitools, and ammo. I picked up all my augs legitimately and then spawned upgrade canisters to upgrade the ones I wanted.

Now I run around with Cloak, Run Silent, and Power Regulator on all the time while I keep refilling my energy. :v: That, and sometimes I ghost when I want to get somewhere faster, like exiting the VersaLife building your first time through.

Lowen SoDium
Jun 5, 2003

Highen Fiber
Clapping Larry

Hogburto posted:

Siding with Everett is unappealing to anyone that searched his home.


Did you find his child porn sex dungeon or something?

Lemon-Lime
Aug 6, 2009

Hogburto posted:

Siding with Everett is unappealing to anyone that searched his home.

Except he has JC with him.

Hogburto posted:

That is an opinion based on other works of science fiction rather than one based on anything you learn about the character/circumstances in the game.

Except we have nothing else to go on.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zeerust
May 1, 2008

They must have guessed, once or twice - guessed and refused to believe - that everything, always, collectively, had been moving toward that purified shape latent in the sky, that shape of no surprise, no second chance, no return.

Lowen SoDium posted:

Did you find his child porn sex dungeon or something?

They're probably referring to Lucius DeBeers, who serves as an example of how cynical and manipulative Everett is, providing a darker side to the Illuminati ending.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply