|
crime fighting hog posted:Special "It came from FaceBook!" edition some retard on facebook posted:okay michelle obama, why don't you go run up the deficit some more so you can take your vacation and use a jet plane that costs $11000 per hour, and so you can have around the clock security that costs almost $100000 total.....courtesy of us taxpayers ....aren't you obamas rich enough to afford that on your own? Yeah? Where the gently caress were you when Bush vacationed all the loving time in Crawford? Also in regards to that weapons email, I like how they say the weapons were a mixed variety of Russian, Chinese and Afghan made weapons. When the gently caress did Afghanistan start importing weapons? Handsome Ralph fucked around with this message at 21:51 on Aug 7, 2010 |
# ? Aug 7, 2010 21:43 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 13:28 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:"It's a shame we no longer do that"? I really don't remember elementary or middle school, but in high school we only did the pledge once a week. It is also definitely non compulsory, although you couldn't tell a few of the teachers that. I was quite pleased when the Vice Principal told my art teacher she couldn't give me detention for not standing during the pledge.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2010 22:11 |
|
Boondock Saint posted:Came to post this one, so I'll post this one instead. Why can't Michelle Obama and her security detail vacation like normal people???? These guys really don't understand the security required for a head of state, since the closest anyone got to Bush ever was a flying shoe.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2010 22:28 |
|
Law in PA the P o A must be said but students do not have to say it. P o A is really freaky and weird especially the god part. When I taught I was always really conflicted.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2010 23:41 |
|
I actually did voluntarily refuse to say the pledge starting from Middle school due to my opposition to the war and because I didn't want to say "under God", and I got so much flak for it it's unbelievable. I was sent to the office countless times, accused (by my teachers!) of being a "Commie" and a "Russian", had various "long chats" where I had to defend the fact that I didn't hate America or anything like that, etc. Ultimately, it's your right to not say the pledge, but it was a hell of an effort and I was harassed every step of the way for it. Preposterous that people would actually feel defensive about wanting to say the pledge-- reminds me of that "well what about when women rape men?!" and "well what about reverse racism?!" mindset.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 01:35 |
|
Boondock Saint posted:Yeah? Where the gently caress were you when Bush vacationed all the loving time in Crawford? I love not only how deceptive these "WELL LOOK AT HOW MUCH OBAMA'S FAMILY SPENDS ON FRIVOLITY MY TAX DOLLARS" emails are, but that even if they were true they're a drop in the bucket compared to how much we're spending on the military. Actually a drop in the bucket is the understatement of the year. hitension posted:I actually did voluntarily refuse to say the pledge starting from Middle school due to my opposition to the war and because I didn't want to say "under God", and I got so much flak for it it's unbelievable. I was sent to the office countless times, accused (by my teachers!) of being a "Commie" and a "Russian", had various "long chats" where I had to defend the fact that I didn't hate America or anything like that, etc. Ultimately, it's your right to not say the pledge, but it was a hell of an effort and I was harassed every step of the way for it. Preposterous that people would actually feel defensive about wanting to say the pledge-- reminds me of that "well what about when women rape men?!" and "well what about reverse racism?!" mindset. Jesus. Can I ask where you grew up?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 02:44 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:Actually a drop in the bucket is the understatement of the year. In this context it would be an overstatement.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 04:05 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:"It's a shame we no longer do that"? For me, 80's to mid 90's in Oregon, we only did it for school assemblies after 5th grade. Mid way through 6th grade I learned that you could sit through it on "religious" grounds from a fellow student who's family was Jehovah Witness, and I stopped doing it altogether. Most of the other students where just mouthing the words or saying parodies any way. Thinking back, I'm not even sure we did it for assemblies in high school at all. Either that, or I just got so used to sitting through them I just forgot about it.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 05:18 |
|
Alastor_the_Stylish posted:In this context it would be an overstatement. Eh? A drop in the bucket means a very small amount of the whole. How much the Obama family spends on travel is microscopic compared to military spending.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 06:32 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:Eh? A drop in the bucket means a very small amount of the whole. How much the Obama family spends on travel is microscopic compared to military spending. I think he was trying to say that even "a drop in the bucket" was overstating how much the Obama travel fund costs.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 07:18 |
|
OrangeKing posted:I think he was trying to say that even "a drop in the bucket" was overstating how much the Obama travel fund costs. Oh. I suppose either works, depends on what direction you're taking the comment. We knew what we meant so disregard.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 08:05 |
|
Boondock Saint posted:Also in regards to that weapons email, I like how they say the weapons were a mixed variety of Russian, Chinese and Afghan made weapons. I think you mean exporting. And yeah, I noticed that too. Sure, Afghans have their own cottage industry for Kalashnikov copies et cetera, but they all go for fighting their own little wars. Afghanistan doesn't even have trade ports so they'd have to go through Pakistan. It would be incredibly daft to export handmade guns from there to North or Central America, might as well start smuggling drugs from USA to Mexico.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 15:45 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:Special "It came from FaceBook!" edition You know what other country has to pledge allegiance everyday? North Korea. Little strange that you want to limit my free speech, eh Comrade?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 17:00 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:My friend just responded with this: idk, but they dont cuz it reps the G-man... "I don't know, but they don't do [the pledge] because it represents God." Perhaps you could ask him what his opinion would be if the muslim students replaced the word "God" with "Allah?" Or if public schools began teaching Catholicism to students?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 18:20 |
|
I thought G-man meant big government?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 18:22 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:I thought G-man meant big government? 90% chance he means god there, but he's probably unwilling to type it out if it doesn't come copy-pasted from something. The actual definition of "G-man" doesn't make sense in context.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 18:26 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:I thought G-man meant big government? It's The Gambler, dude's just a huge Kenny Rodgers fan.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 18:28 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:I thought G-man meant big government? In my understanding, it comes from Government Man and more specifically was used as a referral to FBI agents in some old detective novels.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 19:27 |
|
Nenonen posted:In my understanding, it comes from Government Man and more specifically was used as a referral to FBI agents in some old detective novels. J Edgar Hoover made up the term and got it popularized by claiming a criminal ("Machine Gun" Kelly) called the agents that when he was caught.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 19:51 |
|
There isn't really anything new opinion-wise about this email, but I had to post it just for the gifs. Also, imagine the text is all comic sans.quote:Subject: TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE Hmm, need to make my opinions more palatable. Better add some gifs straight out of 1995.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2010 23:50 |
|
Somehow I feel like having to administer urine tests to everyone who needs government aid would actually not save any money at all! e: And I also feel like many conservatives, faced with this obvious refutation of the point, would respond with "well, then obviously we ought to just shut down welfare entirely" or even suggest that it's worth spending extra money just so no drug users can "cheat" the system.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 00:12 |
|
Put the loving gun down if you don't want to be labeled crazy, dude.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 02:46 |
|
shotgunbadger posted:
What's in his pocket? ANOTHER GUN?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 03:35 |
|
shotgunbadger posted:
His fingers on the trigger that's not very good safety protocol.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 03:48 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:His fingers on the trigger that's not very good safety protocol. trigger discipline goes out the window shortly after they took away...his freedom
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 03:50 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:trigger discipline goes out the window shortly after they took away...his freedom Gather you armies
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 05:06 |
|
Frankly it seems like a huge invasion of privacy to have to take a urine test at your place of work (unless you're a pro athlete or something). I'd see that as more of a problem than MAH TAXES going to the poor.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 20:19 |
|
quote:I guess we could call the program "URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 20:54 |
|
I think requiring random UAs for federal politicians would be the quickest method of ending the war on drugs.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 20:57 |
shotgunbadger posted:
He looks really sad that no one's around to shoot at.
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 23:08 |
|
Toad on a Hat posted:He looks really sad that no one's around to shoot at. Yea that's a terrible image to use really, ol Gus is just wigglin his gun all around and he's just so sad he can't shoot someone, and we're supposed to go 'that poor man being called crazy!'.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2010 23:54 |
|
I know right-wing types who actually feel that not being allowed to shoot people they personally disagree with is a horrible infringement on their rights. They view having their beliefs challenged as an attack that is no different from being shot at, and therefore, meriting armed response.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 02:21 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:Special "It came from FaceBook!" edition I have to cover a lot of government meetings for work and every single one starts with the pledge (and some with a prayer). I've literally just started saying "blah blah blah" sotto voce.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 04:23 |
|
quote:There's a man on YouTube who ran as an independent for some political office (I'm not sure which one) in Colorado, and he makes a ton of videos. Which of you goons is this in the video?
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 12:17 |
|
Dameius posted:Subject: Can you believe this? This one. I am in the Coast Guard and got this on the internal email. gently caress. I sent reply all the snopes link and a heated warning to check fact before you slander you commander-in-cheif. This was a year ago and sent to about 100 people. Contrary to most cases here, he got a very embarrased response about the mistake. The guy reply alled his response too, so you CAN change opinions guys. Or at least make people question crazy claims they read! Keep fighting the retardation. Bombadilillo fucked around with this message at 21:03 on Aug 10, 2010 |
# ? Aug 10, 2010 16:36 |
|
In this case the happy from the correction of something that really shouldn't even need a correction (seriously there's no one on this side of Sharron Angle who would even think that near a microphone) is completely cancelled out by the sadness of knowing that was going around in an internal coast gaurd email. I was born with a heart full of neutrality.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 17:43 |
|
Can someone help me with this "Three Things about Islam" video that's making the rounds on all of the crazy "Islam Watch" websites (and of course, my Holocaust-survivor grandparents' email chains)? I'm hesitant to link the video because I don't want to increase its hit count, but it basically says Islam is different from other religions because of these 3 things:
The first point seems easy enough to refute. The very existence of different sects of Islam would indicate to me that the Qu'ran is in fact open to interpretation. The other ones I'm not sure what to say, other than "nuh uh". Video if you really want to watch some racist propaganda: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 19:49 |
|
None of those things are inherent in or exclusive to Islam.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 19:57 |
|
I can't watch the video but I love the "creeping Islam in Europe!" themes. It's like unhistory.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 20:01 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 13:28 |
|
Papercut posted:The first point seems easy enough to refute. The very existence of different sects of Islam would indicate to me that the Qu'ran is in fact open to interpretation.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2010 20:55 |