|
Paragon8 posted:Well clearly every photographer that would use a female model in public is going for upskirts. :s They cracked the code  Now what am I going to do for upskirts
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2010 18:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 20:21 |
|
|
The funniest part to me is his description: "some Goober on a bike comes riding up and pushing up on me...well he ran over my foot and then he promptly went flying back a good distance where he and his bike met the concrete." Is he delusional? He acts like he beat this dudes rear end or something. That's not what I am gathering after seeing that video.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2010 22:42
|
|
|
sooo I just bought a Mac Book, do you think if I call adobe they'll let me switch my license? or would the same key work with both versions??
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2010 04:27
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3343073&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=1 ahahahaha, oh god this is terrible. We really don't want people like this representing photographers.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2010 04:46
|
|
|
Martytoof posted:They cracked the code
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2010 05:44
|
|
|
What the gently caress is a goober The other one is pretty funny - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmIk89VCJzc From 1:20 onwards. Guess what lady. Thats just what the paparazzi do! And they dont get arrested. I bet she reads lots of trashy magazines as well.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2010 07:34
|
|
|
psylent posted:We've got you covered Wonder if I can mount a 17-50 2.8 on that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2010 16:11
|
|
|
Cross posting from the canon thread. Full-frame/35mm sensor on the right  http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Press-Release/Canon-Develops-Largest-CMOS-Sensor.aspx quote:TOKYO, August 31, 2010—Canon Inc. announced today that it has successfully developed the world's largest*1 CMOS image sensor, with a chip size measuring 202 x 205 mm. Because its expanded size enables greater light-gathering capability, the sensor is capable of capturing images in one one-hundredth the amount of light required by a professional-model digital SLR camera. http://web.canon.jp/pressrelease/2010/p2010aug31j.html Maybe we can finally go back to the 'shooting with a giant negative' days.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 10:41
|
|
|
Can't wait to see the glass they'll put in front of that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 10:46
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:
Would love to work in the cleanroom they made that sensor in. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 10:58
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:Cross posting from the canon thread. Is this Canon's much-awaited answer to the Sony NEX? Because I think they have made a mistake somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 11:06
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:Can't wait to see the glass they'll put in front of that. Something like this for a portrait lens?  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/find/newsLetter/Mother-of-All-L-Lenses.jsp
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 14:25
|
|
|
spog posted:Is this Canon's much-awaited answer to the Sony NEX? Prototype for an entry level digital large format camera.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 15:28
|
|
|
Didn't they just make a 120MP 35mm sensor too? Single-capture 5 gigapixel camera 
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 15:38
|
|
|
Diffraction limited at f/1 hurray 8)
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 16:40
|
|
|
I'm stocking up on flash bulbs in anticipation of the monster sensor.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 20:36
|
|
|
HPL posted:I'm stocking up on flash bulbs in anticipation of the monster sensor. I'm literally imagining a hideous creature made of photo sensors climbing the empire state building, that has to be defeated by an army of KRock clones that blast him with Saturation ray guns.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2010 20:48
|
|
|
It's about 8"x8", so there are plenty of existing lenses that would cover it. I'm curious what the application is, I'm guessing scientific or military. On the similar subject subject cool video about a guy in SF with a trailer-cam, also shows him developing it (you will lol if you know what a BTZS tube is).
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 01:37
|
|
|
That's so cool. My favorite part is him getting birthed out of the escape tube.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 02:51
|
|
|
CS5 is kick-rear end. Up to, and including, the new HDR feature. Kick-rear end.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 08:43
|
|
|
Helmacron posted:CS5 is kick-rear end. Up to, and including, the new HDR feature. Kick-rear end.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 08:59
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:Keep your voice down or you gonna get *shot. Fix'd for you there  I will agree that CS5 is kickass, I have not touched the HDR stuff so no clue if its anygood but I pass the time by content aware removing family memebers from shots and then sending them to the person... I get bored ok?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 11:53
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:It's about 8"x8", so there are plenty of existing lenses that would cover it. I'm curious what the application is, I'm guessing scientific or military. The end result photographs look really beautiful. Sadly it doesn't look like he's planning any exhibitions abroad let alone London.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 12:15
|
|
|
Zaran posted:Fix'd for you there 
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 12:52
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:It's about 8"x8", so there are plenty of existing lenses that would cover it. I'm curious what the application is, I'm guessing scientific or military. Ahh cool, it's like a slightly higher tech version of the Camera Truck guy I visited! Nice video, thanks for sharing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 14:03
|
|
|
Great, I'm listening to Steve Jobs teach me about HDR now. It's definitely not going away now. At least it looks pretty decent.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 18:10
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:Great, I'm listening to Steve Jobs teach me about HDR now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 18:13
|
|
|
I don't feel like buying a point and shoot anymore, just get an iTouch.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 19:31
|
|
|
AIIAZNSK8ER posted:I don't feel like buying a point and shoot anymore, just get an iTouch. You joke, but I can see people doing this. It's actually a pretty decent camera, but the flash is even more of a joke than point & shoot flashes usually are For $200-300 you get: camera, camcorder, music player, video player, pocket web browser/facebook and whatever else they want, etc. The only thing that a normal point and shoot has over it is optical zoom, but everybody I know with a p&s zooms to full optical, and then digital anyway, so 
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 19:43
|
|
|
especially now when the target resolution for most pictures wouldn't exceed whatever limits are on facebook or myspace. You don't even really need more than 5 mpix for that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 19:52
|
|
|
Shmoogy posted:You joke, but I can see people doing this. It's actually a pretty decent camera, but the flash is even more of a joke than point & shoot flashes usually are I mean right now, I carry a bag with my D90, 35 f/2 and an ipad around with me everywhere. I don't have an iPhone because I've got an awesome legacy Verizon minute plan. I can pick up an iTouch and be OK for taking snapshots at the amusement park, or at a strange party where I don't bring my full kit. Big loving Edit: http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/yikes-ipod-touchs-rear-camera-capped-at-960x720-stills/ Those jerk bags at Apple didn't put the new fancy back lit sensor into the itouch. Guess I'll still be waiting a bit longer. AIIAZNSK8ER fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Sep 1, 2010 |
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 19:59
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:Great, I'm listening to Steve Jobs teach me about HDR now. In a perfect world, iOS would have an achievement system, where after a certain number of achievements were unlocked, in-camera HDR could be enabled. Achievement unlocked - "Understanding Exposure" read. Achievement unlocked - rule of thirds used.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2010 23:31
|
|
|
Beer Coaster posted:In a perfect world, iOS would have an achievement system, where after a certain number of achievements were unlocked, in-camera HDR could be enabled. Real life needs more trophies in general.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 01:42
|
|
|
Why the gently caress does everyone add an extra e to the end of lens? I can let a few typos pass without comment but jesus, it's spelled "lense" so often that I'm questioning whether it's actually spelled "lens" at all. Am I actually the idiot who's misspelling it all the time?
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 04:44
|
|
|
I always read that misspelling as someone leaving the s off of lenses, which usually throws me off even more.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 04:48
|
|
|
AIIAZNSK8ER's Link posted:Yup, it’s official: the new iPod touch got a rear camera, but it’s not an iPhone 4-quality 5-megapixel shooter, an iPhone 3GS-quality 3-megapixel version, or even an iPhone-quality 2-megapixel version. Instead, it’s just shy of 0.7 megapixels, with 960x720 still resolution, outputting 720p videos at 1280x720. So don’t expect to toss out your point-and-shoot pocket camera—or an iPhone 4—for the iPod touch. This camera’s just for the kiddies.  The video resolution is higher than the still resolution?
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 04:48
|
|
|
BeastOfExmoor posted:
You got me, I was ready to plunk down some cash at Christmas time, until I realized the iTouch is far from an iPhone without the phone part. I mean, theres no gps or compass either. WTF.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 05:47
|
|
|
I imagine a future in which the ipod can be slotted into the back of a apple-manufactured camera and used as a wireless screen for live view, image storage and remote control.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 06:04
|
|
|
I was on the train home tonight and some guy sitting across from me was telling his friend that he was turning his old Rebel XT into a bong. It took all my effort to not admit I was eavesdropping over my headphones and ask them how he planned to make that work.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 06:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 20:21 |
|
|
Hollowed out lens as chamber, seal around the sensor area/rest of body, empty out the viewfinder housing and attach a bowl to it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2010 06:19
|
|
