|
AKA Pseudonym posted:The biggest consequence would be people not trusting the US to pay as much as they did and requiring a better payout before they start buying its debt again. Well OK, there would be some major economic efects as well, but it's not like the Chinese get to move into the Whitehouse or somethnig. So basically interest rates would go up on US Treasury bonds? I've always read that inflation would eventually kill the real value of the debt off, which doesn't seem like a great solution but the one that will probably eventually happen.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 12:43 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 19:37 |
|
Got this one on Facebook.quote:Pictured is a young physician by the name of Dr. Roger Starner Jones. His short two-paragraph letter to the White House accurately puts the blame on a "Culture Crisis" instead of a "Health Care Crisis".. To which I replied "This is obviously racist." And hooboy that brought 'em out of the woodwork. quote:I can absolutely guarantee that people of all races share the same characteristics of the patient he describes. In YOUR opinion it "seems to suggest". He's referring to the culture as a whole. Your comment made it about race.. not his letter. and quote:FACTUALLY, the whole story NEVER states what race the referred to person is so how can you take it as a "racist" or as they're talking about "black people?" All nationalities have tattoos, gold teeth and all of the described characteristics by the writer, as Missy has said. Nobody will ever know what race the person is so I don't think that comment is appropriate at the given time. and quote:I didn’t see where he said blacks were responsible for the national health care crises but kudos for immediately jumping to that conclusion. You don’t agree with him, so he must be a racist. That’s my favorite liberal debate technique.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 15:08 |
|
Yeah gosh, he didn't say the words black, African American or friend of the family, he just implied that this certain group listens to "ethnic" music and eats fried chicken and watermelon, how can you possibly take that to mean they are racist?! Also I love the typical "I don't personally think it's racist (as a probably white person) so therefore it obviously is not" defense.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 15:49 |
|
BonoMan posted:Got this one on Facebook.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 15:54 |
|
Doomclown posted:Oh hey. I just heard about this one second-hand from a friend saying he had to un-friend somebody for their racist Facebook update. Now I know what he's talking about. I argued with someone over whether that e-mail was racist or not as well. He kept telling me "white kids buy expensive sneakers too!" and after a while it was against my best interests to respond to him.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 15:59 |
|
I wonder how many 'expensive' things I could buy for the cost of one hospital visit to the ER.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 16:10 |
|
Oh, funny, an acquaintance on facebook posted that same Dr Roger Starner Jones letter and I jumped in unable to resist. After some back and forth I got her to tentatively agree that social safety nets are a good thing and therefore the dialog is better served by talking about how to make the system smarter and more efficient rather than just rail angrily against those that game it. But she still believes completely in the Welfare Queen and nothing I say will ever change that.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 16:18 |
|
Turns out that it was an actual letter written to the Clarion Ledger here in Mississippi.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 16:21 |
|
How are u posted:Oh, funny, an acquaintance on facebook posted that same Dr Roger Starner Jones letter and I jumped in unable to resist. After some back and forth I got her to tentatively agree that social safety nets are a good thing and therefore the dialog is better served by talking about how to make the system smarter and more efficient rather than just rail angrily against those that game it.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 16:42 |
|
Funny that. My father, a republican but also an oncologist, just started practicing in a rather poor section of Michigan after practicing in an affluent suburb of Chicago for 30 years. He said that he is shocked about how amazing the poor African-Americans handle their bouts with cancer. They are respectful, change their lifestyles, and "just want to go back to work" - they do their chemo and radiation without a complaint. Quite unlike the some of the suburbanites who are just aching for you to save their life so they can sue you. I sat next to a man on a 2 hour plane ride who talked the ENTIRE time. He literally said to me, "You don't know anything. I do... I get the e-mails." I immediately thought of this thread as he went on about Obama's communism, Obama's vacation days, Obama's Muslim religion, Ayers writing the books. He was so loving angry. He blamed all his problems on the democrats, his FIVE failed business on his partners, the lien his wife has on their home due to her credit card debts on the government (somehow), how he could have ran the Ford company but he doesn't "Play the game", how he knows hit men who would kill people for him for free, he could have been a major league ball player but he had a wife and knew his responsibility. The blacks are more racist than whites because they can say people are being racist. Sorry, I had to get that out, I have been tense for days from his anger.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 17:17 |
|
York_M_Chan posted:Funny that. My father, a republican but also an oncologist, just started practicing in a rather poor section of Michigan after practicing in an affluent suburb of Chicago for 30 years. He said that he is shocked about how amazing the poor African-Americans handle their bouts with cancer. They are respectful, change their lifestyles, and "just want to go back to work" - they do their chemo and radiation without a complaint. Quite unlike the some of the suburbanites who are just aching for you to save their life so they can sue you. I hardly have the patience to talk to normal people on a plane ride. Why wouldn't you just pop in head phones or tell him to shut up?
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 17:23 |
|
York_M_Chan posted:I sat next to a man on a 2 hour plane ride who talked the ENTIRE time. He literally said to me, "You don't know anything. I do... I get the e-mails." I immediately thought of this thread as he went on about Obama's communism, Obama's vacation days, Obama's Muslim religion, Ayers writing the books. He was so loving angry. He blamed all his problems on the democrats, his FIVE failed business on his partners, the lien his wife has on their home due to her credit card debts on the government (somehow), how he could have ran the Ford company but he doesn't "Play the game", how he knows hit men who would kill people for him for free, he could have been a major league ball player but he had a wife and knew his responsibility. The blacks are more racist than whites because they can say people are being racist. Sorry, I had to get that out, I have been tense for days from his anger. Jesus Christ. That's the terrifying face of middle America right now, rolled up into one guy. People like that scare the hell out of me - they're angry that things aren't going their way but they're not sure how they ended up there. They want to take it out on somebody but they're not really sure who or how.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 17:24 |
|
I was on the train the other day and one guy said that the "ground zero mosque" was being moved because of what that Gainsville pastor did. I correct him and said no such thing was ever said by any one that could affect the movement of the community center, and they shouldn't have to move it. I guess through my thick accent people heard "Hitler had the right idea" because that's basically how people looked at me. I live in Massachusetts we should be better than this .
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 17:27 |
|
Good Citizen posted:I hardly have the patience to talk to normal people on a plane ride. Why wouldn't you just pop in head phones or tell him to shut up? The weird part is that he didn't talk to me until I put my headphones on, then tapped me on the shoulder and asked me if it was a blackberry. I said, "No, It's just an iPod" to which he responded, "Oh, so you only get e-mails on it then?" Yes, I put headphones on to check me e-mail. But I am a masochist when it comes to conversations with lunatics. Edit: I think the anger the Rush and those like him instill in their listeners is insane. My father-in-law puts him on and it is like being scolded for three hours, he just yells into the mic. My father-in-law now has esophageal cancer from all of the acid issues he has, but doesn't see the correlation. No wonder esophageal cancer is the most common cancer among Upper-middle class white males. York_M_Chan fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Sep 17, 2010 |
# ? Sep 17, 2010 17:28 |
|
MrPhaethon posted:I actually think it's pretty okay to disagree with your professor if you think they're wrong and have a good case to prove your point. It's an important part of education, as long as it's done politely. It's pretty craven to sneer at someone for challenging "the man in charge of grading your tests." That's not really the point. The crux of his argument is essentially "everybody knows professors are Democrats", therefore political science is indoctrination class. Given how awfully it's written (and thought-out), there's no reason to believe the quotes he's given are real. Persecution complex leads people to make a lot of poo poo up about how hard they have it.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2010 19:13 |
|
Fwd: FW: Lol posted:
Hey guys, did you know black people are merely white people that are full of poo poo?
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 03:32 |
|
Lansdowne posted:Hey guys, did you know black people are merely white people that are full of poo poo? Mormons believe it.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 03:41 |
|
The fun thing to do is to actually try and engage people on their message. "So, you claim he's 'full of bull-crap.' What has he said that has given you this opinion?" "....."
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 04:05 |
|
the posted:The fun thing to do is to actually try and engage people on their message. That's easy to answer. "HEALTH CARE AND STIMULUS! SOCIALISM!"
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 04:19 |
|
BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 04:35 |
|
Great now all the doctors in my family are messaging me about my comments on that stupid doctor letter. "You just don't know. You're Ignoring the facts." Blah blah blah. Although the person that originally posted it said she does now see the racial tone of the message and disagrees with it.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 17:30 |
|
Doomclown posted:Oh hey. I just heard about this one second-hand from a friend saying he had to un-friend somebody for their racist Facebook update. Now I know what he's talking about.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 21:59 |
|
I don't know if there's still an anti-Fox News thread, but I just skipped by there today and saw the headline: "Is Islamophobia a Media Myth?" Goddamnit.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2010 22:38 |
|
BonoMan posted:I don't know if there's still an anti-Fox News thread, but I just skipped by there today and saw the headline: I felt like this today at the gym. I was rowing and Fox had a segment on "America's Textbooks." I thought to myself, "Good, the process of textbook selection is a problem given that Texas and California almost completely dominate the process and there are a numbe...oh wait he just said we should look out for socialist ideals in textbooks. Dammit."
|
# ? Sep 19, 2010 12:46 |
|
Ugh. My parents know these e-mails annoy the gently caress out of me.quote:
|
# ? Sep 19, 2010 18:27 |
|
The real crime is that loving pun.
|
# ? Sep 19, 2010 19:29 |
|
RagnarokAngel posted:The real crime is that loving pun. Also, I'm pretty sure they're being racist somehow.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 00:38 |
|
I would have went with Balack Obearma, what with it being a black bear and all.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 02:36 |
|
Mordiceius posted:Ugh. My parents know these e-mails annoy the gently caress out of me. So black people are animals? Got'cha
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 05:17 |
RagnarokAngel posted:The real crime is that loving pun. It's still better than Baquack Obamailure
|
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 06:01 |
|
That Obama-bear e-mail seems to be just another 'lazy blacks on welfare' thing. Nothing too complex.BonoMan posted:"Is Islamophobia a Media Myth?" the yellow dart posted:I felt like this today at the gym. I was rowing and Fox had a segment on "America's Textbooks." I thought to myself, "Good, the process of textbook selection is a problem given that Texas and California almost completely dominate the process and there are a numbe...oh wait he just said we should look out for socialist ideals in textbooks. Dammit." I wonder if flat contradiction is, psychologically-speaking, more effective than actually engaging with the specifics of some assertion or debate. That 'left wing media' thing seems to be a part of it: If people examine media and come to the conclusion it presents a right-wing narrative, it's better to flatly contradict that and say it's left-wing rather than seemingly-legitimising the debate by asking whether it is actually true that it's right-wing.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 07:18 |
|
That pun is hilarious, what are you guys talking about
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 17:48 |
|
The person who sent this is not Jewish, nor has he ever been to Israel in his life, but he sure wishes that it were more like ancient Romequote:When did it happen?
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 21:46 |
|
Man I hope whoever wrote that gets his home bulldozed
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 22:33 |
|
Huge Liability posted:The person who sent this is not Jewish, nor has he ever been to Israel in his life, but he sure wishes that it were more like ancient Rome Should I feel bad about not knowing much of what he's referencing, or is it because I'm 23?
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 23:23 |
|
Huge Liability posted:The person who sent this is not Jewish, nor has he ever been to Israel in his life, but he sure wishes that it were more like ancient Rome Israel shmisrael, that letter is one long piece of stupidity for what it says about Rome almost more than anything it says about Israel or us Jews.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 23:24 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:Mormons believe it. Incorrect, bigot. I got this as a response to sending out Robert Reich's NYT Piece on why we need a second New Deal to some Glenn Beck worshiping family and friends of family. This response came from an old friend of the family who was an elementary teacher and self-professed intellectual. All his emails are signed "Calling an illegal alien and undocumented worker is equivalent to calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist." Old Man posted:I hope you will understand that my comments are in no way meant to be negative criticism... that said I have to say what I've been saying to friends and associates for lo these many years: it never ceases to amaze me that those who have never even taken elementary economics courses (macro or and/or micro) or read a basic text are wont to pontificate about what is wrong with the economy, why it isn't providing the same standard of living as it once did, or any other of a myriad of topics about which they have no understanding whatever (I don't know if this applies to you, but more about that later in terms of the Reich article). So much of what they construe to be sound economic analysis proves in the end to be nothing more than emotionally tinged reflections on their perceptions of the morality and justice of particular economic issues. Just as I tweak my computer-illiterate friends with the rejoinder 'did you read the manual?' when they contact me in a panic, when I find myself in conversation with such 'experts' on economic issues, the first thing I ask is 'have you read...' followed by a list that would go on for some time if they didn't stop me. In addition to the aforementioned basic texts (the finest I've found happened to be the best selling university textbook in the field up to the untimely death of its author, Paul Heyne: The Economic Way of Thinking), I naturally begin with The Wealth of Nations, The Fable of the Bees, An Essay on the Principle of Population, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo... well, you get the picture. I thought about drafting a major response, but my spirit was weakened by the stupidity. His whole argument lends itself to "these economics books from 2.5 centuries ago say he is wrong, ergo, he is wrong! If you have not read the requisite literature then you are incapable of arguing the point!"
|
# ? Sep 20, 2010 23:39 |
|
I seriously doubt he's read Adam Smith, considering he was a precursor to Marx and was certainly in favor of wealth redistribution.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2010 00:32 |
|
Chunk posted:I seriously doubt he's read Adam Smith, considering he was a precursor to Marx and was certainly in favor of wealth redistribution. Not to mention that there isn't any actual economic analysis there. All he says is quote:He still advocates a stagnant view of social and economic classes in America (the need to fix blame -- and fix that blame elsewhere -- is not exclusively confined to any particular party or class) and blithely proposes additional credits that we have no real way of funding (I would have supported many of them when there was a way to pay for them). Where is the mention of the crushing debt that will soon rob you, my children, and my grandchildren and bring down our 'economy' in ways that will make 1929 look like a boom? The first two and a half paragraphs are masturbatory bullshit, then there's three lines of DEBT!, then more bullshit.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2010 03:07 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 19:37 |
|
This is just a reminder that anybody who says "simple economics" with a straight face has absolutely no loving clue what they're talking about; even within the vastly simplified and reality-detached realm of modern economics literature, nonlinear effects should obliterate any sense of "simplicity" a researcher may have had. If somebody is berating you for a lack of "fundamental economics," chances are they took an Econ 101 class in college without paying attention or are just plain stupid as gently caress. Brownie points to the first person who guesses which paper this is from or which method is used to compute the social optimum. HELLO THERE fucked around with this message at 05:01 on Sep 21, 2010 |
# ? Sep 21, 2010 04:53 |