|
gurosnype
|
# ? Dec 15, 2010 19:01 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 13:58 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:gurosnype eeeeeewwwwww
|
# ? Dec 15, 2010 19:18 |
|
haveblue posted:In Japanese manga and anime, the topic is many times present in the Ero guro sub-genre. that sections is only for popular culture, bro also since when was the trojan war considered a pop culture reference?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2010 23:43 |
|
maniacdevnull posted:that sections is only for popular culture, bro Since they got that dreamy Brad Pitt to play Achilles!
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 01:08 |
|
Rapper DMX referred to being a necrophiliac in the song "Bring Your Whole Crew" on his 1998 album Flesh of My Flesh, Blood of My Blood when he rapped "...got blood on my dick 'cause I hosed a corpse".
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 01:11 |
|
in wikipedia's defense that was a pretty dope album
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 03:25 |
|
you see, that black man wrote of it in his rap "music" so it's ok if it's in my animés
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 03:44 |
|
Rare non-worthless wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_confidence_tricks
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 08:37 |
|
I hope that page lists every ludicrous offhand mention in heist shows like Leverage "Shall we try the Lisbon Shuffle?" "Too obvious, Ploughman's Handle?" "Nah, it's overplayed, do we have the men for Lost Uncle Bob?"
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 11:15 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thor_Aackerlundquote:1990 NWC (Nintendo World Championships)
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 13:19 |
|
You might say I'm kind of a big deal since I'm - - properly cited!
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 18:27 |
|
FMguru posted:Rare non-worthless wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_confidence_tricks quote:Football picks JawnV6 fucked around with this message at 19:11 on Dec 16, 2010 |
# ? Dec 16, 2010 18:55 |
|
JawnV6 posted:"an episode" did not link me to the encyclopedic definition of what an "episode" means, wtf is up with this "creative" linking??? In the example you cite that's actually not bad since in that context episode is specific (and it indeed links to that specific episode). Also kinda lol to see there is an explicit rule against linking to obvious common english words. quote:For example, in the article on supply and demand:
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 23:25 |
|
the worst thing is when there's links in the article that seem to go to another page but in fact redirect to the top of the page you're reading because some tard merged the articles and didn't remove the link
|
# ? Dec 16, 2010 23:59 |
|
madprocess posted:the worst thing is when there's links in the article that seem to go to another page but in fact redirect to the top of the page you're reading because some tard merged the articles and didn't remove the link cool
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 00:12 |
|
ShadowHawk posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Linking is actually pretty interesting because you see it broken all the time. from the craigslist article, guess what the link is to: quote:he site has been found to be particularly appealing to help connect lesbians and gay men with one another because of its free and open nature in addition to it being hard to find gay people in one's area for some.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 01:04 |
|
ShadowHawk posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Linking is actually pretty interesting because you see it broken all the time. *uses acronym 25% into 10,000 word article, links it* *uses acronym 3000 words later, doesn't link it* gently caress you, editor.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 01:57 |
|
ShadowHawk posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Linking is actually pretty interesting because you see it broken all the time. in the previous example the text in question is "the blind kids" and is therefore also specific (it uses the definite article)
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 02:12 |
|
i still have no idea who these blind kids are tbqh
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 02:33 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:i loving hate how they only link the first occurrence of a word see the style guide says they should link both so go fix it open source patches welcome
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 02:43 |
ShadowHawk posted:see the style guide says they should link both so go
|
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 03:04 |
JawnV6 posted:i still have no idea who these blind kids are tbqh but at least you now know what a whistle and the discovery channel are! Also "hacking." Why someone who had no clue what hacking was would read a page on Captain Crunch is beyond me
|
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 03:11 |
|
its this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:All_Day_%28album%29 glad to be of service, y'all
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 03:49 |
|
i think you found it. holy gently caress the going on there
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 15:03 |
|
TenementFunster posted:its this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:All_Day_%28album%29 quote:This might reflect some misunderstanding of the subtleties of the No Original Research policy, but I would argue that, except in those cases where a sample is hard to identify (and then references are certainly appropriate), the record itself is the source; the samples listed on the article at this point are almost all unambiguously identifiable this guy is the reason i stopped using punctuation
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 17:14 |
TenementFunster posted:its this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:All_Day_%28album%29 Holy gently caress they are hard on keeping it removed until someone at wikipedia specificly gets written approval from greg gills for he himself to release an original tracklist and time information in order to declare it as original information. so the burden is now on girl talk himself to release information to satisfy wikipedia. holy loving poo poo
|
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 17:17 |
|
why don't people circumvent the original research thing by setting up alldaytraacklist.blogspot.com and posting their original research there, then copying it to wikipedia with attribution
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 17:50 |
|
haveblue posted:why don't people circumvent the original research thing by setting up alldaytraacklist.blogspot.com and posting their original research there, then copying it to wikipedia with attribution Wish u would post your original research in GBS where it belongs.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 17:51 |
|
wow just wow
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 17:52 |
|
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 18:22 |
|
LinuxGirl87 posted:
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 18:27 |
|
MononcQc posted:
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 18:35 |
|
LinuxGirl87 posted:
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 19:06 |
|
MononcQc posted:
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 19:11 |
|
|
# ? Dec 17, 2010 19:14 |
|
Mimas looks like the death star
|
# ? Dec 18, 2010 04:41 |
|
Wikipedia has seriously raised almost 10.5 million and they still want like 5 million more? gently caress THEM.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2010 07:19 |
|
haveblue posted:why don't people circumvent the original research thing by setting up alldaytraacklist.blogspot.com and posting their original research there, then copying it to wikipedia with attribution circular reference and/or 'it needs to be by a reputable publication' so yeah, someone call up the new york times and get them to publish all that (without citing wikipedia as the source ofc)
|
# ? Dec 18, 2010 08:58 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowclone Pointless neologisms? beating off about how the Inuit don't actually have however-many-words for snow? (As if that were even the point of the loving anecdote.) That's SO Wikipedia! LinuxGirl87 fucked around with this message at 16:08 on Dec 19, 2010 |
# ? Dec 19, 2010 16:01 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 13:58 |
|
LinuxGirl87 posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowclone Resurrecting a page-2 thread? on a Sunday morning? Pointless use of the [spoiler] tag? That's SO LinuxGirl87!
|
# ? Dec 19, 2010 16:11 |